My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-10-01 TKONA HALE
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-10-01 TKONA HALE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:48:24 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:48:20 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
places -. I dont know if theres anybody who would like to comment onthat. Ill accept <br />a comment on that question from anyone who wants. <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Gimpel? <br />GIMPEL:My question to you, Ms. Siracusa, would be, this is too high for a <br />tsunami-caused evacuation, so -. <br />SIRACUSA:Fires, for example, fire. <br />GIMPEL:Thered have to be one heck of a fire. But the driveway could be <br />wide enough to permit both right and left turns out. I think that should be a principle <br />problem. <br />SIRACUSA:Okay. <br />SPRINGER:Thankyou,Commissioners.Anyotherquestionsorcommentsof <br />the testifier? <br />SIRACUSA:Id like to know how the developer would feel about that option? <br />SPRINGER:Theyll be returning to the table after we excuse the members of <br />the public. Thank you for contributing to the record today. If the Applicants <br />representatives could come forward at this time. Welcome back to the table. Youve <br />heard the testimony and the comments made by the Commissioners and the staff, and I <br />believe Commissioner Siracusa has a specific question for you. <br />SIRACUSA:Yes, it was suggested by Mr. Gimpel that it would be a lot safer <br />traffic-wise to have the entrance and exit from the parcel as being a single one right in the <br />center instead of on either end, so that there would be more line of sight for safety, more <br />safety in the traffic pattern. And then he further suggested, when I was concerned that <br />things would get jammed up if there was a fire, that it could be wider than, you know, <br />more than just a single lane, possibly two lanes out, something like that. So Id like you <br />to comment on that if, what you think about that suggestion, and if it seems to you that it <br />would be feasible, or if it would interfere with your other plans in some way. <br />FUKE:Id like to take an initial stab at it and maybe Mr. Saunders later <br />on. I think that we had originally conceded to the fact that, you know, we would have <br />like only one primary access and, if anything, that the second access would be reserved <br />only for emergency purpose; and this would be exactly like what the Department of <br />Public Works had recommended. <br />You will note earlier that when Mr. Saunders testified, you know, he was assuming that <br />the primary access would be on the mauka portion and Mr. Ki comes up and said like, <br />Well, theyre thinking a little bit more on the makai side, and then Mr. Gimpel is <br />saying, Maybe it should be right in the middle. And, so, I think that the way that the <br />16 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.