My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-10-02 TBOSCHETTI
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2009
>
2009-10-02 TBOSCHETTI
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:51:23 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:51:19 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
which essentially would make this roadway lot a buildable lot would sort of complicate things <br />until or, you know, could possibly complicate things. And I really don’t want to add a <br />complication to resolving -. You know, I’m not, I’m giving full credit to the, you know, the <br />applicant in terms of having an easement done. But, you know, that’s going to require a survey <br />and, you know, I would imagine incorporating this easement into the development plans. And so <br />I’m not sure how to address it. But I don’t want to, I don’t think we should take action, and then <br />that would add a complicating factor in resolving the access issue. <br />LIM:I guess it would be our position that the Planning Commission and the <br />County Council has never taken into account private property interests. They look at the land <br />use, you know, the land use issues and make a decision based on that. <br />IWASHITA:Okay. I agree. And so my, the way I would frame my concern is that this <br />is a roadway lot, part of the application is a roadway lot, and so, which there appears to be some <br />title question involved. And so it’s an incomplete application because this title question is not <br />resolved. And so it needs to be addressed before we move forward, is how I would look at it. <br />LIM:Well, as far as we’re concerned we don’t have any title problem. It’s <br />Mr. Paiva who has the title problem. So, you know, we’re willing to work him. And so I’d ask <br />that you give us a favorable consideration so we can move forward on this application. We’re <br />going to try to work it out with him if at all possible. I just cannot commit to you that my client <br />is willing to grant him the easement cause I don’t have the authority today. <br />ISHIBASHI:Well, just based on your design there’s no access for him. So if there’s <br />discussion, how long is that process going on and why is there no access? Cause he would <br />access through Kukuau Street. And the boundary of your plan is right on this boundary, right? <br />LIM:Right. The intention was always to give him access through the, what we <br />call the Parcel 80. <br />ISHIBASHI:Kukuau Street? <br />LIM:It’s just, yes. He has, there’s a drainage easement that comes down <br />through the middle of his property as well as ours. And I’m not sure if your house is located on <br />the -. <br />PAIVA:The Puna side of the easement. <br />LIM:Puna side of the easement, so he’d have to come across whatever bridge or <br />culvert we put in our driveway and into his parcel. So we still haven’t, like I said, worked out <br />the details of that; but that’s our intention. <br />ISHIBASHI:So you would allow him on the other side of the bridge -? <br />LIM:Yes. <br />11 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.