My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-10-03 TRUTTER
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-10-03 TRUTTER
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:52:32 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:52:25 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
` <br />Constitution, also further reinforced by the Hawaii State Supreme Court decision in the Ka <br />` <br />Paakai vs. the Land Use Commission decision. <br />I would urge that a 10-meter buffer on each -, neighboral buffer, landscaping or whatever is <br />appropriate as determined by DLNR and the developer be put on either side of the Mmalahoa <br />Trail so there is no encroachment to that trail, as has been done in the Waikoloa area. <br />The -, it was not mentioned today but it has been mentioned in the working group meetings as <br />well as during the State Department of Transportation Highways STIP meetings recently by <br />` <br />some of us, that it is absolutely essential that access to the Queen Kaahumanu Highway be <br />coordinated with other concurrent developments in the area. Yesterday and previously you've <br />heard Clifto's and you've heard me testify on that a previous meeting. <br />I believe and I note for the record that you have not yet received, at least I don't have it, that <br />you have not received comments from the Department of Transportation Highways, it's <br />coming under separate cover. Please don't make any decisions until you hear from them. And <br />even if you do, you might have to, you know, it might be different from their <br />recommendation. The issue is the proximity of major four-way traffic movements, or <br />unlimited traffic movements, on a high speed arterial road, and there is one right now at <br />Kohanaiki Business Park. There's another one proposed within a short distance by the subject <br />applicant, and another by Clifto's, and I would urge you please to try to do the best you can to <br />coordinate these altogether as best you can, or separate them by some distance. <br />The restoration and perpetual management and care of the anchialine ponds, which has been <br />represented to be done by the developer, is extremely important, and a good example would be <br />some of the ponds to the north. If you haven't seen them, you should go look at them. <br />There was discussion about setting up independent water baseline studies for -, to ensure that <br />water -, perpetual water quality, and I would concur to that. <br />I would urge you -, it hasn't been mentioned today, but I would urge you to put a condition on <br />the SMA that would minimize the impact of lighting on the area, both to the residents mauka <br />as well as to those who are utilizing the resources makai, that is in the ocean for fishing. And <br />I would commend to you the examples of Huallai Resort Four Seasons at Ka`plehu and <br />` <br />Mklei Estates in the Lands of Kau as being examples of how to have low impact lighting. <br />Anything other than that, I think there's going to be a big problem. <br />Previously mentioned on-site effluent use for the golf course watering, I hope that will be a <br />condition. <br />With respect to further, minimizing further visual impacts, underground utilities, I believe <br />that's going to happen, but should be a condition. <br />33 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.