My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-10-03 TRUTTER
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-10-03 TRUTTER
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:52:32 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:52:25 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
other sea life from degradation of water quality. This seemed to be a concern shared by the <br />` <br />gatherers of salt, gatherers of limu and opihi, fishermen, and surfers, as well as dive boat <br />operators in a multi-million dollar industry. <br />There are three questions that I want to consider today, and for each of them I have conditions <br />associated with them that I'd like to propose. <br />The first question is what specific water monitoring needs to be planned and budgeted by the <br />developer? <br />The second question is should the developer be required to employ non-toxic methods of <br />protecting against subterranean termites? <br />The third question is will the planned integrated golf course management process suffice to <br />keep our waters from being degraded? <br />In terms of the water monitoring needs, I'd like to address water monitoring needs first. <br />Yesterday, in Judge Ibarra's court, that's why it was 2:00 in the morning to finish this, I <br />listened to discussions of the August 13 th report of Karen Klein and Dr. David Ziemann, water <br />quality monitors for Hklia. I suggest that this monitoring procedure be adopted for <br />Kohanaiki. It is as follows, and there are four parts to it. <br />The court required Hklia to do a pre-construction baseline study of four quarterly samplings <br />to consist of three days within 14 days. These must be "dry-season" samplings so that the rain <br />can be less likely to confuse the result. <br />The second thing is that once construction begins, the same quarterly samples as pre- <br />construction. Again, dry-season samplings. <br />The third thing is groundwater sampling makai of the golf course and mauka of the shoreline, <br />that is to say within the public park, and also near the highway. So, as Dr. Brock said, you <br />can figure out what's going in, what's coming out and isolate them. <br />And correlation studies need to be done for each report between sampling events and <br />fertilization and/or irrigation. <br />This is a fairly extensive set of monitoring requirements. It's not cheap, and it goes on for <br />some time, and so I think the developer needs to plan and budget these tests up front and make <br />the results available to the Department of Health, other agencies, and perhaps some individual <br />or group nominated by the kpuna of the working committee. <br />The second thing I'd like to address, I respectfully request that the monitoring procedures be <br />adopted as a condition of the SMA permit. <br />35 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.