Laserfiche WebLink
assigned to the South Hilo District. So in the way this was counted, it meant that there are more <br />officers in South, it looks like there are more officers in South Hilo or in North Kona. So, again, <br />the County was short. And there’s also the statement of one manned police station per 12,500 <br />residents, it’s actually one manned station per district. So every district that has more than <br />12,500 residents is short. That would include South Hilo. <br />And then, finally, a minimum of five firefighters per shift and 15 firefighters per fire station per <br />district; and, again, the same analysis. Most of the fire stations had 15 personnel per district, <br />except Laupahoehoe station. So that means when you add all these things up it means that all <br />districts don’t match the standard. And so you would end up barring rezoning in all districts of <br />the island. <br />The recommendation is negative. If it’s meant to get the County to have more police and <br />firefighters we can’t see how stopping rezoning leads to that result. If the County sets a goal of <br />having a certain number of police officers per district it should fund having that number of police <br />officers and go out and hire them, same thing with firefighters, and having certain number of <br />police stations. That’s really up to the County to go and do. So the result of this is negative. <br />In looking at the park situation, we could improve how we handle parks in rezonings and in <br />subdivisions. We tend to, for the major projects we have had typically park requirements put <br />into the rezoning. I can’t say that there has been any standard method for doing that; and we <br />probably should have a more standardized expectation of what our park requirements should be <br />in a particular residential rezoning. But the idea that rezonings should be stopped in an area <br />because there aren’t enough parks again does not in itself lead to more parks. In fact, many of <br />the rezonings which have been granted, particularly in the past 15 years, do require, typically the <br />larger residential rezonings, do require park space to be dedicated. And the areas that are short <br />on parks tend to be that way because like in Puna or in Ocean View they’re being developed on <br />subdivisions that were granted in the fifties or sixties, or in North Kona they’re being granted on <br />zoning that was, they’re being developed on zoning that was granted in the sixties or seventies, <br />typically without park requirements. Waikoloa Village is the same situation. <br />So in the end we are recommending negatively on this amendment. This is the first time you’ve <br />looked at it and we’ll have it heard in Kona again before asking the Commission to take a vote <br />on it. <br />WATANABE: Thank you. Do we have any questions for Mr. Yuen? Yes, <br />Mr. Woodward. <br />WOODWARD: I don’t have any questions. But are we going to have discussion on this <br />or -? <br />WATANABE: Oh, yeah, we could discuss this also -. <br />WOODWARD: Okay. <br />WATANABE: Although we’re not going to take any action. <br /> EXHIBIT E 3 <br /> <br /> <br />