Laserfiche WebLink
you look at that Plan compared to whatÓs being proposed, itÓs totally consistent with the Puak <br />conceptual land use plan for that area. So aside from <br /> that, if there are any questions the <br />Commissioners have, IÓll be happy to answer. <br /> <br />WATANABE: Fellow Commissioners, any questions of Mr. Fuke? I have one. I noted <br />that, okay, we gave you apparently in the original SMA one year, and I believe Bobby Jean, or <br />the Director, gave you an administrative extension. Is Î I donÓt want to muddy the water but Î is <br />one year sufficient? <br /> <br />FUKE: Like any development we would like to have like infinity in terms of <br />planning; but I think itÓs realistic and I think that the standard practice on the part of the <br />Commission in matters like this has always been like one year, so -. <br /> <br />WATANABE: Typically, traditionally itÓs been one year, so you are okay? <br /> <br />FUKE: Correct, yes. <br />WATANABE: Okay, then I wonÓt, yeah, I wonÓt pursue that. Yes, Mr. Hayashi. <br /> <br />HAYASHI: That is what I wanted to clarify, because the applicant actually requested a <br />two-year extension to that particular condition. <br />FUKE: We said like up to two years, so if the Commission is willing to extend up <br />to two years, then you know, that would, as I said, itÓs better than, I mean itÓs short of infinity but <br />way better than one year. But IÓll leave that to the Commission. I really donÓt know what the <br />Commission or the DepartmentÓs policy has been in terms of time <br />would have been equivalent to like the original request, which was one year plus a one-year <br />administrative time extension, so -. <br /> <br />WATANABE: Mr. Hayashi? <br /> <br />HAYASHI: Yes, as far as the time extension, in the initial administrative time <br />extension the Director is allowed to do that; but the maximum would be whatever is was -. <br /> <br />WATANABE: Originally, and originally it was one year, right? <br /> <br />HAYASHI: Yeah, so if it was one year, then it would have to be for one year. There is <br />no policy set as to if the Commission were to grant a time extension request. <br /> <br />WATANABE: Yeah, okay, then I guess my next question would be directed to the <br />Director, and IÓd rather have your input than just the Commission voting. <br /> <br />LEITHEAD TODD: I think the two-year is a reasonable request, especially considering both <br />the applicants and my experience in the Department in terms of how long it takes to work out <br />these agreements, especially when you are dealing with multiple <br /> <br />EXHIBIT A <br />3 <br /> <br />