Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PL-INT-2023-005627 06.30.23 BOWERS + KUBOTA CAT PL.3, PL.4, PL.5, PL.7, PL.8
DeVera, Ashley From: Allan Basco <abasco@bowersandkubota.com> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2023 2:59 PM To: Planning Internet Mail Cc: Kathleen Chu; Kim Castillo; Lisa Minato; Ermina Pasierb Subject: County of Hawaii, Planning Department Professional Services Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Attachments: PL.3_Comm Planning (Com Plan Asst, PM Sup)_Bowers+Kubota.pdf; PL.4_Community Planning (Comm Reg Plans)Bowers+Kubota.pdf; PL.5 Community Planning (EA, EIS)_Bowers+Kubota.pdf; PL.7 Community Planning (Public Access Planning)_Bowers+Kubota.pdf; PL.8 Community Planning (Writer, Grant Writer)_Bowers+Kubota.pdf Categories: Yellow Category Dear Mr. Kern: Thank you for this opportunity to respectfully submit our attached qualifications for the County of Hawaii, Planning Department Professional Services During the 2024 Fiscal Year for the following categories: PL.3) Community Planning (Community Planning Assistant: project management support, community organizing, public participation, meeting facilitation) PL.4) Community Planning (Community/Regional Plans, General Plan, Climate Adaptation) PL.5) Community Planning (Environmental Planning, Environmental Assessments, Environmental Impact Statements) PL.7) Community Planning (Public Access Planning) PL.8) Community Planning (Writer, Grant Writer) Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Kathleen Chu by telephone at(808) 836-7787 or email at kchu@bowersandkubota.com. Thank you. Allan Basco Bowers + Kubota HawaiiBusiness' 2023 Best Places to Work Main Office: (808) 836-7787/(808) 833-1841 Fax: (808) 834-4833 www.bowersandkubota.com Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:This e-mail message,including any attachments,is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain confidential and/or privileged information.Any unauthorized review, use,copying,disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy the original message and all copies. 1 '''''('I'(:,, .; kyr. ok��, ' COUNTY OF HAWAII ' - ` "''' : '`> PLANNING DEPARTMENT OF }►P. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FISCAL YEAR 2023 - 2024 PL.3) COMMUNITY PLANNING Community Planning Assistant: Project Management Support Community Organizing, Public Participation, Meeting Facilitation yxy f�. f �<a yn�a J June 30, 2023 IIIPIIAIF aim BOWERS + KUBOTA Aff BOWERS + KUBOTA Construction Management•A/E Design•Planning•Project Management B+K No. 23.524 June 30, 2023 Mr. Zendo Kern, Planning Director Planning Department County of Hawaii 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3, Hilo, Hawai'i 96720 Subject: Professional Services During Fiscal Year 2023-2024 PL.3) Community Planning (Community Planning Assistant: Project Management Support, Community Organizing, Public Participation, Meeting Facilitation) Dear Mr. Kern: Bowers+Kubota Consulting(B+K)is pleased to submit our letter of interest and qualifications to provide professional services during the fiscal Year 2023-2024 for the above referenced category. We believe our staff with its extensive experience can provide the professional services required for your upcoming projects. Over the past 43 years, B+K has provided outstanding architectural/engineering design, program and project management, construction management, and planning services across the State of Hawaii while living our mission statement of Fulfilling Visions.Building Trust.Our extensive experience has resulted in successfully completing numerous projects for a variety of public agencies and private industry clients. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me by telephone at (808) 836-7787 or by email at kchu@bowersandkubota.com. Respectfully, BOWERS +KUBOTA CONSULTING, INC. Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge 94-408 Akoki Street,Ste.201-A,Waipahu,HI 96797 h (808)8367787 www.bowersandkubata.com i STANDARD FORM 330 ARCHITECT- ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS PART I-CONTRACT SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS A. CONTRACT INFORMATION 1.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) Professional Services in Fiscal Year 2023 - 2024 2.PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 3.SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER PL.3) Community Planning (Community Planning June 1,2023 Assistant: Project Management Support, Community Organizing,Public Participation,Meeting Facilitation) B.ARCHITECT - ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT 4.NAME AND TITLE Kathleen Chu,PE,Principal-in-Charge 5.NAME OF FIRM :,:t Bowers+Kubota Consulting 6.TELEPHONE NUMBER 7.FAX NUMBER 8.E-MAIL ADDRESS (808) 836-7787 (808) 834-4833 kchu@bowersandkubota.com C. PROPOSED TEAM (COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR THE PRIME CONTRACTOR AND ALL KEY SUBCONTRACTORS.) (Check) 0 9. FIRM NAME 10.ADDRESS 11.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT w < 2 a m z E ? O a v U PL.3) Community Planning Bowers+Kubota Consulting 94-408 Akoki Street, Suite 201- (Community Planning Assistant: a. X A Project Management Support, Waipahu,HI 96797 Community Organizing, ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE Public Participation,Meeting Facilitation) b. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE c. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE d. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE e. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE f. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE 9. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 1 D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM a7-'-9! • ► '�'. . I. OF COUNTY OF HAWAII Planning Department PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE Kathleen Chu,PE PLANNING SENIOR MANAGER Jared Chang,AICP PLANNERS Ronald Sato,AICP Matthew Kodama,MBA Carah Kadota,AICP Matthew Fernandez AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 2 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM 31 1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) af=Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Waipahu,HI 16.EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (State and Discipline) Bachelor of Science,Civil Engineering HI,Professional Engineer/Civil [#12808 (exp. 4/30/2024)] CA,Professional Engineer/Civil [#54022 (exp.12/31/2023)] 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Hawaii Council of Engineering Societies, Current Treasurer American Council of Engineering Companies of Hawaii American Society of Civil Engineers,Transportation Chair Engineering Sector Partnership, Chamber of Commerce,Women in STEM Lead 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED County of Maui,Department of Public Works PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Waiale Road Extension Project Ongoing N/A Waikapu,Maui,Hawaii (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑x CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE: Project Manager a. SCOPE: Project manager providing the County of Maui cradle to grave services,from planning through construction,on the Waiale Road Extension project.The roadway improvements will include a single span bridge over Waikapu Stream, roundabout intersections,two through lanes,shoulder bikeways,pedestrian sidewalks,a shared-use path,and two parallel grassy swales,which will serve as a permanent stormwater best management practice (BMP).The project team conduct agency and public coordination,both to seek input and provide information relating to the environmental and design related tasks. The environmental documentation for the improvement project will be prepared as a joint NEPA/HRS 343 environmental assessment.The construction bid documents will include construction plans,specifications,engineer's estimate,and permits PROJECT COST: $3,800,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Highways Route 50 (Kaumualii Highway) Feasibility Study-Hanapepe to Kekaha Ongoing N/A Kekaha,Kauai,HI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM b ROLE:Project Manager SCOPE: Conduct a Feasibility Study to explore conceptual details,constraints,and prospective timelines for different resiliency improvement alternatives based on probable future scenarios of concern for Route 50, Kaumualii Highway,from Hanapepe to Kekaha.The objectives of the Feasibility Study are to explore resiliency realities,criticalities,and challenges for the Route 50 study area. The scope of work will include coastal modeling of tidal flood frequency analysis and high-resolution sea level rise and wave inundation modeling.The modeling will be conducted for a variety of future sea level rise scenarios combined with different wave events to help estimate the frequency of occurrence of flooding at selected intervals in the future. PROJECT COST: $675,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Highways PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Vulnerable Road User Safety Assessment (VRUSA) Statewide,HI Ongoing Ongoing (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑x CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE:Project Manager c. SCOPE:Working with the HDOT to develop the State's first Vulnerable Road User Safety Assessment(VRUSA).A VRUSA is an assessment of the safety performance of a State with respect to vulnerable road users and the plan for the State to improve the safety of vulnerable road users.Addressing the safety of vulnerable road users through a collaborative and comprehensive approach allows people that walk,bike,and roll full and safe access to our transportation system.The assessment will include the Safe System Approach,which aims to improve safety culture,increase collaboration across all stakeholders,and refocus transportation system design and operation on anticipating human mistakes and lessening impact forces to reduce crash severity and save lives. PROJECT COST: $575,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Hawaii Community Foundation PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Affordable and Workforce Housing Regional Plans 2023 N/A Island of Maui, Hawaii (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE: Project Manager d SCOPE: B+K is creating three regional plans for the Central, South and West Maui regions.These plans highlight the need for affordable housing and infrastructure that would support those projects as part of the House Maui Initiative.The House Maui Initiative supports the planning and delivery of much needed affordable and workforce housing while building on the County of Maui's community-based planning process. As part of the effort,the B+K team explored where regional infrastructure can support and serve as a catalyst for affordable and workforce housing projects.Last year,the B+K team helped the County get additional funding for the Waiale Road Extension project,as a recipient of$25 M through the RAISE grant.Through a public private partnership with the neighboring developer,200 additional affordable homes will be built. PROJECT COST: $52,453 STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 3 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Jared Chang,AICP Planning Manager/Senior Project A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM Planner 17 <1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) an(Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Waipahu, HI 16.EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Bachelor of Arts,Public Administration 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) American Institute of Certified Planners(Certificate No. 028907) American Council of Engineering Companies, Senior Executive Institute, Class 26 Graduate (2002) American Planning Association,Hawaii Chapter Secretary (2017-present) 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City&County of Honolulu,Department of Planning and Permitting PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) North Shore Sustainable Communities Plan Update 2022 N/A Various Locations,HI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM a. ROLE: Senior Planner/Meeting Facilitator SCOPE: The plan will establish the vision,policies,and land use patterns for the North Shore Planning District through 2040 and beyond.It will be developed using an inclusive process that combines research and data collection with community input. The plan will analyze and address new and emerging policy issues including climate change and sea level rise,as well as economic and tourism implications from COVID-19.Estimated construction cost is not applicable.PROJECT COST:N/A (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED County of Maui,Department of Public Works PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Waiale Road Extension Waikapu,HI Ongoing N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑x CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE: Project Planner b. SCOPE: Providing cradle to grave services,from planning through construction,on the Waiale Road Extension project.The roadway improvements will include a single span bridge over Waikapu Stream,roundabout intersections,two through lanes, shoulder bikeways,pedestrian sidewalks,a shared-use path,and two parallel grassy swales,which will serve as a permanent stormwater best management practice (BMP).The project team will conduct agency and public coordination,both to seek input and provide information relating to the environmental and design related tasks.The environmental documentation for the improvement project will be prepared as a joint NEPA/HRS 343 environmental assessment.The construction bid documents will include construction plans, specifications,engineer's estimate,and permits.PROJECT COST: $3,800,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED The Wilhelm Group for State of Hawaii, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Department of Transportation,Harbors Division Ongoing N/A Hilo and Kahului Harbor Land Acquisition (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE: Project Planner c. SCOPE: Assisting with the acquisition of privately held lands surrounding Hilo and Kahului Harbors and production of a Harbors Facilities Plan that will summarize the potential options that DOT-H may have in utilizing the acquired lands, assisting with the infrastructure due diligence,and preparing an Environmental Assessment for the harbors.Design vehicle maneuverability,harbor access points and major harbor use operations,forecasted harbor buildout and activities,and planned use and improvements to adjacent thoroughfares and streets were evaluated and agencies consulted with to formulate optimal use and development of the private lots to complement harbor improvements.PROJECT COST: N/A (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Hawaii Community Foundation PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Affordable and Workforce Housing Regional Plans 2023 N/A Various Locations,HI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM d. ROLE: Senior Planning Manager SCOPE: B+K was tasked with creating three regional plans for the Central, South and West Maui regions.These plans highlighted the need for affordable housing and highlighted housing projects and infrastructure that would support those projects as part of the House Maui Initiative.The House Maui Initiative supports the planning and delivery of much needed affordable and workforce housing while building on the County of Maui's community-based planning process.PROJECT COST:N/A (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Hawaiian Home Lands PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) North Kona Water Development Ongoing N/A Kona,HI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM e. ROLE: Project Manager SCOPE: Preparing Environmental Assessments (EAs) and a preliminary engineering report for potable water source development on two parcels in the Keauhou 2 Ahupuaa.The wells being developed are intended to support development of DHHL projects at Lai Opua Village and Kalaoa. PROJECT COST: N/A STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 4 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Ronald Sato,AICP Senior Project Manager/Senior A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM Planner 33 <1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) =Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Waipahu,HI 16.EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Master of Arts,Urban and Regional Planning Bachelor of Science,Political Science 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) American Institute of Certified Planners(Certificate No. 014538) Historic Hawaii Foundation, Board of Trustees (2010-2016) American Planning Association,National and Hawaii Chapters 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1, LE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Harbors Division PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Pier 40 Improvements Honolulu Harbor Ongoing N/A Honolulu,HI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑x CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM a ROLE: Senior Project Manager SCOPE: The State Department of Transportation,Harbors Division is proposing improvements to Piers 39 and 40 that's used by Young Brothers as an interisland terminal.The project would fill the harbor area between Piers 39 and 40 and demolish certain areas of these piers to offset fill and loss of U.S.waters.Inland areas would be raised 3 feet to address sea level rise and redevelopment of Young Brothers facilities.An EIS would be prepared along with addressing several federal requirements to support a U.S.COE Individual Permit for pier work. PROJECT COST: N/A (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Highways Division PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Transportation Corridor Assessment Route 11 Queen Kaahumanu/Kuakini Ongoing 2018 Highway, Kailua-Kona,HI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE: Planner bSCOPE:B+K is performing a Corridor Assessment to find plausible solutions and options that will reduce congestion and enhance safety along Queen Kaahumanu Extension and Kuakini Highway.With the growth in population and increase in traffic,congestion on Route 11 between Henry Street and Kamehameha III Road has continued to grow and worsen over time. The approach to develop the concepts will be modeled after the Planning and Environmental Linkages (PEL) approach to help facilitate future NEPA or HEPA processes in the future.Future traffic operations will be evaluated and near-term and mid-term improvements that can be readily implemented to reduce congestion will be identified and evaluated against a pre-determined set of criteria. PROJECT COST: $301,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State DLNR,Division of Forestry&Wildlife PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Kawainui-Hamakua Marsh Master Plan; Final Environmental Impact 2020 N/A Statement, Kailua,HI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE: Senior Project Manager c. SCOPE: The State DLNR,DOFAW updated their master plan for the 986-acre Kawainui-Hamakua Marsh Complex in partnership with DSP.The master plan supported wetland restoration,upland reforestation,created areas for native Hawaiian cultural practices,and supported public access and educational programs. Completed an EIS approved by the State Land Board and withstood a legal challenge. Work included extensive community outreach to address concerns and effective community- based planning. PROJECT COST: $53,300,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Hawaii Community Foundation PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Affordable and Workforce Housing Regional Plans 2023 N/A Various Locations,HI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM d. ROLE: Senior Project Manager SCOPE: B+K was tasked with creating three regional plans for the Central, South and West Maui regions.These plans highlighted the need for affordable housing and highlighted housing projects and infrastructure that would support those projects as part of the House Maui Initiative.The House Maui Initiative supports the planning and delivery of much needed affordable and workforce housing while building on the County of Maui's community-based planning process. PROJECT COST: N/A STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 5 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM Matthew Kodama,MBA Planning Project Manager 13 3 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) af= E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM Carah Kadota,AICP Assistant Planning Project Manager 7 <1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) v= E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Matthew P.Fernandez Assistant Planner A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM 3 <1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) af= F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 1 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City and County of Honolulu,Department of Design and Construction PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION ofappllcable) Honolulu Zoo Hawaiian Wetland Aviary Ongoing N/A Honolulu, HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City and County of Honolulu,Department John Condrey (808) 768-8468 of Design and Construction 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE: Bowers+Kubota Consulting is providing entitlement planning, landscape architecture,civil engineering services for the initial phase of a new Hawaii exhibit,which will feature a wetland aviary.The new exhibit starts at the main entrance arrival area and extends eastward to the Nene Goose Sanctuary. Once completed,the aviary will showcase animals in their habitat ranging from coastal wetlands to mountainous rain forests and further into dry forests and grasslands. The design intent is to expose guests to the wide range of native wetland (streams and ponds) and dryland habitats found in Hawaii.The scope of work for this project covers conceptual design and permitting,with follow-on design development and construction documents. PROJECT COST:F. $5,000,000 ,ham .,!" ,,0 jo ���..� N. '4 41I TRAtI$ 0,yn" $I 't SLoxR cxRieH r PHASE 3(Future Concept) % 1 Dry Forest&Grassland Aviary A Mu �y % a.,i % ,,- i I y PHASE 7(Proposed Concept) '��^ Coastal Wetlands Aviary y F I -Y. _ - , PHASE 2(Future Concept} pg ,,,,I. ,r- :;',i'- 'S� d " "" Mountain Rain-Forest Aviary '� , rTM " I 1:41, ,:I ?W TROPP,.AL �� rV FOREST ', fL,6MING4 PPRP 16- AVI - ARY 9 .,, rx,srnrlr,u,n, . _rte, , j ,11°P. , r ,.. \J, l qiq ,/ N , , /I .� nl 51ib+dv \\`�y .—....10m.ue 0 !C�@�f Q1 �A Fe. "vi / R$ ! n i � i , In V + p` 1I , _.. I 4 , Al 41--- '' ,''''' I T.T.P. f '73# 1-- -1-1 -1-- • • - ,P-01.1b."), i- 1 { may 1: p..T, „IE ,- ., �..,.f., 1Yr ���� f' i ,,,iixe" i� °.id's � � Q114-,..: :.i ,Z� y �I I, ('i 1. i; ad '"ha I a G iii!_ ''• ' ,%i "f . �. - - ,i �' r_ E1.�, til)3741'4' yV_ K fi' II,.r..Iw,ii L"H.•� eeJnt u�,J ., .. 1 J{l.V . j=i^'`]_ nwne tt'ia ^ea.4.rSf u 1 z 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE ��` Planner, Civil Engineer,Landscape a. Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Architect STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 9 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 2 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City and County of Honolulu,Department of Design and Construction PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Kahawainui Stream Dredging Ongoing N/A Laie,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City and County of Honolulu,Department Kristie Ching (808) 768-8800 of Design and Construction 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting is preparing construction plans and specifications for the maintenance dredging of the City- owned portion of Kahawainui Stream between the intersection with Laie Wai Stream to the mouth of the stream excluding the sand berm at the stream mouth.An environmental review consisting of a Draft and Final Environmental Assessment,with an anticipated Finding of No Significant Impact(FONSI),will be prepared in accordance to the Hawaii Revised Statutes Chapter 343. The review will include a biological survey,archaeological and cultural study,and other environmental reports to determine impacts of the project and mitigation measures.Preparation of permit applications for the dredging and obtaining permit approvals is included in the project scope along with engineering assistance during the bidding and construction. PROJECT COST: $2,000,000 ti '4 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner, Civil Engineer STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 10 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 3 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City and County of Honolulu,Department of Transportation Services PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Complete Streets Planning and Preliminary Design,Kaneohe, Kailua,and Pearl 2021 N/A City,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City and County of Honolulu,Department Daniel Alexander of Transportation Services (808) 768 6652 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE: Bowers+Kubota Consulting assessed implementation of complete streets concept designs in Kaneohe, Kailua,and Pearl City area as part of planned road rehabilitation projects in each area.The inter-disciplinary team was comprised of civil/ transportation engineers,physical/site planners,urban designers,arborists,and landscape architects. Initial tasks included evaluation of existing conditions through driving,walking and bicycling audits of each community; identifying the complete streets network based on land use and roadway configuration;and developing preliminary street cross-sections showing options for pedestrian walkways,bicycle lanes,shared pathways,and vehicular travel lanes.The project applied a context-sensitive solutions process,engaging stakeholders via outreach efforts,including community leader contact, social media outreach,bike tours,pop-up and sit-down sessions,distribution of project-specific collateral materials,and broadcast media coverage. Input from the community was combined with a multi-modal assessment of all transportation methods in each area and observations from the project team to prepare the complete streets proposals.Within each area unique conditions and parameters existed that called for specific solutions. Viable tools to develop complete streets were combined with sound urban design,physical planning and landscape architecture to arrive at best options.The results of the combined input were revealed at community meetings where concept plans were shown and additional feedback was provided. B+K worked with the team to bring its collective experience together and bring a sensible approach to addressing the evolution of the project areas'transportation networks,which was used to refine the street cross-sections and prepared concept plans for the proposed roadway improvements along with associated opinions of probable construction costs. B+K also assisted with the preparation of Exemption Declarations for the project pursuant to HRS Ch. 343. PROJECT COST: $4,000,000 _ �y. v s Afrifdakt/ KANEOHE �� / KAILUA / PEARL CITY COMP LETESTREETS COMPLETESTREETS COMPLETESTREETS Lwow A, Shawn mem _ _ i - , a NrlYifr J+�M�kw b M. 0 I i .. 4 ,„. 7,,. \ ,. .. , '; ...... . ,,,„,,.. .‘„,.„. rfS\ [, For more IMorroston etre the webslle.ht1p://www.ranolulu.govicampletastreets For more inlornatron mst the website:nttp.//www.rwnolulu.govicomplelestreeta Email vs with your thoughts-campletasireelsOhonalulu.gov ErnaI us with your lMPgh[5_comple[NReelsehonolulu goy Photo courtesy of Blue Zones 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. =Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner, Civil Engineer,Landscape Architect STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 11 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 4 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Kamehameha Schools PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(ifapplicable) Due Diligence Assessment and Test Fit Study for West Hawaii Land Acquisition (84-5236 Hawaii Belt Road) 2022 N/A Captain Cook,Hawaii 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Kamehameha Schools Laura Takahashi (808)534-8108 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting provided planning and consulting services for a due diligence assessment and test fit study of the property(for an early learning center)located at 84-5236 Mamalahoa Highway in Captain Cook,Hawaii. The scope of the due diligence assessment and test fit study included research and entitlements in phase 1;property condition assessment in phase 2;and a test fit study of the building and site in phase 3.The scope of work included an assessment of interior and exterior improvements as well as regulatory requirements, including pavement and parking areas; planting and irrigation systems; the general condition of the building architectural elements;plumbing fixtures;electrical fixtures and outlets;fire alarm system;general structural conditions; and the general condition of the air conditioning system; and the property's entitlements and zoning requirements.A due diligence assessment of the Early Learning Center Building at the Saint and Church and Model Schools(Kikiwelawela)in Kaneohe,Hawaii was also provided under this project. PROJECT COST: N/A % _w x .K it1A Hexa i`i Island .t { s , - il' , a - - ,t .. ..-- - -s , ti 7 -anorraa aa-- 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. �QBowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner, Civil Engineer,Landscape Architect STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 12 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 5 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City and County of Honolulu PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Department of Design and Construction 2022 Ala Moana Regional Park Master Plan and Environmental Impact Statement 2019 (EIS) Ongoing Honolulu, HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City and County of Honolulu,Department of Design and Construction Elaine Morisato (DDC) (808) 768-8406 Biederman Redevelopment Ventures Benjamin Donsky (212)390-1122 (Prime consultant) 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting supported the City in developing portions of the Preferred Concept Master Plan for Ala Moana Regional Park(Ala Moana)and preparing its corresponding Environmental Impact Statement(EIS).The goal of the master plan was to provide a planning framework allowing Ala Moana to become a multi-faceted beach park and even greater asset to the community. The master plan evaluated the park's existing conditions and identified areas of improvement including landscape features,infrastructure,parking and pathways,and the park's iconic beach front.The 17 proposed improvement projects focused on addressing deferred maintenance to elevate the park's existing facilities and address coastal erosion issues while respecting and celebrating the established character.As part of the master planning process,the B+K Planning Group prepared and published a final EIS analyzing the proposed improvements established in the master plan. As part of the environmental review process,the B+K Planning group investigated the project's potential effects on the built and natural environments and provided mitigation measures to help minimize impacts pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statues,Chapter 343.This analysis included analyzing the need for beach nourishment and drainage canal improvements to address impacts from natural and climate change hazards like sea level rise.The EIS also analyzed the project's compliance with relevant federal,state,and county land uses regulations and policies. To develop the alternatives in the master plan and EIS,a strong community engagement and outreach program was conducted to better understand the multi-generational impact of Ala Moana on the community.Multiple public,in-person informational meetings were held between 2015 and 2018 and a project website titled"Our Ala Moana Park"was launched to garner community feedback.Incorporating input from over 30,000 visitor interactions at the website,feedback from the in-person community meetings and consultation responses from the EIS resulted in the design alternatives presented in the master plan and EIS. Additionally,during the community engagement process the master planning team was informed of more urgent actions needed at Ala Moana. This prompted the City to enact a 9-point plan to address these issues in parallel with the long-term master plan creating a holistic approach to improving the park long-term. PROJECT COST: $14,600,000 -i- A-2 Medium-density hl Ala nnna Ciivd. Apartment ��_�......'•—+ + District �� Kewalo i E3asin ~ P-2 General Preservation District f.rr 4. Ap.ut rten _ Ala Moana Regional Park 1f.1. ?, • gip*cin.i1 i I ty Res rt `I PROJECT t ;� YAldwal� mixed 4 l' Use ,, .,Boat HAAT 1' ,,, '� BOUNDARY I a v, a f• � lir ar v ., i Magic I ':'.5',N.::` Y 'r.1w I Island I ",,, a 'uy r �` r PnciJic Ocean 1 Awa ) °v -,r I Public Precinct;: N.• I (Waikl I Di.t ti 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Mt‘/ +Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner, Civil Engineer,Landscape Architect STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 13 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 6 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED County of Maui,Planning Department PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) South Maui Community Plan Update 2022 N/A Kihei-Makena,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER County of Maui,Planning Department Jennifer Maydan (808) 270-8290 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting is updating the South Maui Community Plan that includes the regions from Maalaea,Kihei, Wailea,Makena,to Ahihi-Kinau/Kanaio. The updated plan will provide a vision,a community plan map,goals,policies and actions to guide County officials and staff,property owners,developers,and residents on the appropriate growth and redevelopment patterns for South Maui for the next 20 years. As a precursor to the community plan update,B+K has put together three resource papers that cover the topics of Sea-Level Rise and Climate Change,Housing,Population Growth,and Mobility.Each resource paper examines the current conditions in the area,key challenges for the future of the area and strategies to minimize adverse impacts. PROJECT COST: N/A • ..q. � P y.. ... -rte'•• �rr _. - x y A ,;per.^ aw ` a;ate ° i� - �$ 7..w ' 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Lit. Bowers+Kubota Consulting, Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner, Civil Engineer STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 14 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 7 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Land and Natural Resources PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION Ofappllcable) Kealakekua Bay Master Plan&Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) Ongoing (estimated N/A South Kona, HI completion 2023) 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER State of Hawaii, Department of Department of Land and Natural Martha Yent (808) 587-0287 Resources 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE: Bowers+Kubota Consulting provided master plan,EIS,and management plan services for Kealakekua Bay State Historical Park. The state considers the park as one of the most historically significant places in Hawaii.The park spans 216 acres on land in three adjacent areas(Napoopoo,Pali Kapu 0 Keoua,and Kaawaloa),315 acres of waters of the adjacent Kealakekua Bay Marine Life Conservation District,and the Napoopoo pier.The primary project goal is to plan for a public park that preserves the area's cultural landscape and historic resources,preserves and protects the marine resources of Kealakekua Bay,promotes the scenic values and natural park setting,and accommodates outdoor recreation in a manner that does not impact or degrade natural and cultural resources.A draft master plan was developed before the ocean resources became the responsibility of the State Parks Division.The draft master plan is being updated to include analysis of marine issues and ocean recreational activities.The revised master plan will promote preservation and stewardship,offer guidance in the development of park interpretive concepts and programs,identify park facility needs,and recommend park management measures for the land and the sea.Community input and collaboration have been integral to the planning process and will continue to be considered in developing management measures. PROJECT COST: N/A (study) A 4•I A I N COOK w r d`K " ^y „„..44,4„ ,t....� .•, r 4. �c ::c - - •.. Nai�c'apo'o Ro�ci �"` �> -111tvi •Odd a, , N"�i •` ,o+ LOC Perky �p'rc�?F7Q' Beach to aCe aw � �Q Landing x '•. • ntiRd ! KaHauioa Bay Manini �p oPdo�oaa O e[ :yam Point nmen CU• [aptainc:aok pfd 7 Monument «✓ F Kealakekua Bay KA'AWALOA ,rte' • s • 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a Bowers+Kubota Consulting, Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 15 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 8 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Airports Division PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Ahukini Landfill Restoration,Phase II Ongoing N/A Lihue,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER State of Transportation,Airports Division Daryl Yokomizo (808)838-8825 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE: Bowers+Kubota Consulting is currently working with various agencies to develop a plan to deal with shearwater bird habitats in the project area;creating construction plans and specifications to stabilize a coastal slope containing landfill debris; and obtaining all necessary approvals and permits to allow such work.Project scope includes planning,environmental services, surveying,permitting,design and construction and post-construction support services.The scope also includes coordination with the State Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response(HEER)Office to address the mitigation and removal of debris that has fallen into the ocean. PROJECT COST: $8,600,000 ., • - f • K • 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE �� Planner,Environmental Engineer, a. r`Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Landscape Architect STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 16 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 9 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Hawaiian Home Lands PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) North Kona Water Development,Environmental Assessments and Preliminary Engineering Report Ongoing N/A North Kona,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER State of Hawaii, Department of Hawaiian Andrew Choy (808) 620-9559 Home Lands 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE: Bowers+Kubota Consulting is preparing Environmental Assessments (EAs) and a preliminary engineering report for potable water source development on two parcels in the Keauhou 2 Ahupuaa.The wells being developed are intended to support development of DHHL projects at Lai Opua Village and Kalaoa. A Hawaii Environmental Policy Act EA in accordance with Hawaii Revised Statutes(HRS)Chapter 343 and Title 11, Chapter 200 of the Department of Health Administrative Rules will be prepared for the one parcel with the U.S.Department of Agriculture(USDA)as the accepting agency. The other parcel will have an EA prepared pursuant to HRS Ch. 343 with DHHL accepting. A Preliminary Engineering Report(PER)meeting the requirements of the USDA Rural Utilities Service will also be prepared. A topographic survey for the PER will be coordinated and preliminary site layout and grading plans to confirm the area required for the site improvements will be prepared for the PER. The PER will also be processed for acceptance by the USDA Rural Utilities Service. A hydraulic study of the North Kona Water System and assistance in drafting the terms of the Water Development Agreement between DHHL,the landowners and the County Department of Water Supply will also be provided. PROJECT COST: N/A (Study) Illo girl/ � \���� 1\)y1�1�1��)1�1)l�l�)���11»lllly� rl ,"),w>»� }}}}?}}}}?}}}fY1)} MIIIU�RVIE;� � ,. T a r. E F .v - s .' t#i1 . I i 1 ' '7.' :i, ri, —7 ir , , oil -mom. r _ w s ' 9 , �I 41". .. I , n• " " 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3)ROLE Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner, Civil Engineer STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 17 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 10 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Greystar Development Services,LLC for University of Hawaii at Manoa PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) University of Hawaii at Manoa Multi-Family Housing,Environmental Assessment 2021 N/A Honolulu,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Greystar Development Services,LLC for Ethen Thacher (Greystar) (949)892-4973 University of Hawaii at Manoa 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting completed an Environmental Assessment for a Public Private Partnership(P3)project where the developer will design,build,and operate for profit the student housing multi-family building,day care center for UH students, and commercial operations such as a convenience store and/or eatery. PROJECT COST: $1,500,000 lir • . ih drr 111111111111111 • yl. l • tii• IM J • • _ V 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Bowers+Kubota Consulting, Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner, Civil Engineer STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 18 G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS 28.EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F 26.NAMES OF KEY PERSONNEL 27.ROLE IN EXAMPLE PROJECT (Fill in"Example Projects Key"section below before completing table.Place'X" (From Section E,Block 12) (From Section E,Block 13) under project key number for participation in same or similar role). 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge Jared Chang,AICP Planning Manager/Senior X Project Planner Ronald Sato,AICP Senior Project Manager/ Senior Planner Matthew Kodama,MBA Planning Project Manager X X X Carah Kadota,AICP Assistant Planning Project Manager Matthew Fernandez Assistant Planner X X 29.EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) City and County of Honolulu County of Maui 1 Department of Design and Construction 6 Planning Department Honolulu Zoo Hawaiian Wetland Aviary South Maui Community Plan Update City and County of Honolulu State of Hawaii 2 Department of Design and Construction Department of Land and Natural Resources Kahawainui Stream Dredging Kealakekua Bay Master Plan&Environmental Impact Statement City and County of Honolulu Department of Transportation Services State of Hawaii s Complete Streets Planning and Preliminary Design, 8 Department of Transportation,Airports Division, Kaneohe, Kailua,and Pearl Ahukini Landfill Restoration,Phase II Kamehameha Schools State of Hawaii 4 Due Diligence Assessment and Test Fit Study for West 9 Department of Hawaiian Home Lands Hawaii Land Acquisition (84-5236 Hawaii Belt Road) North Kona Water Development, City and County of Honolulu Department of Design and Construction (Biederman Greystar Development Services,LLC 5 Redevelopment Ventures-Prime Consultant 10 for University of Hawaii at Manoa Ala Moana Regional Park Master Plan and Environmental University of Hawaii at Manoa Multi-Family Housing Impact Statement STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 19 H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30.PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. COMPANY NAME: SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS BOWERS+KUBOTA CONSULTING,INC. 1. THE NAME OF THE FIRM OR PERSON, CONTACT 94-408 Akoki Street,Suite 201-A INFORMATION INCLUDING EMAIL ADDRESS, THE Waipahu,Hawaii 96797 PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS AND LOCATION Ph.(808) 836-7787 OF ALL ITS OFFICES Fax. (808) 834-4833 www.bowersandkubota.com Name of Firm Bowers+ Kubota Consulting, Inc. YEAR INCORPORATED: September 1980 Point of Contact Kathleen Chu, PE Principal PRINCIPALS• kchu@bowersandkubota.com (808) 836-7787 Brian Bowers,PE, CCM,President Principal Place of 94-408 Akoki Street, Suite 201-A, bbowers@bowersandkubota.com Business Waipahu, HI 96797 Dexter Kubota,PE,Vice President Location of all Offices Main Office (Waipahu) - Oahu dkubota@bowersandkubota.com Satellite Office (Kalihi) - Oahu Eric Iwamoto,PE, CCM,LEED AP,Principal Satellite Offices -Maui and Kauia eiwamoto@bowersandkubota.com Field Offices -Hawaii and Molokai Myong Choi,PE,LEED AP,Principal mchoi@bowersandkubota.com 2. THE AGE OF THE FIRM AND THE AVERAGE Mike Kamaka,PE, CCM,Principal NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES OVER THE PAST FIVE mkamaka@bowersandkubota.com YEARS. Hae-Dong Lee,AIA,NCIDQ,LEED AP,MBA Principal B+K has provided professional design services for the hlee@bowersandkubota.com last 43 years with the resources of the 8 principals and 260 professionals and administrative staff available to be Amy Matsushima, SHRM-SCP,Principal assigned to each project. Over the past 5 years, the average amatsushima@bowersandkubota.com number of employees has been 230 professionals. Kathleen Chu,PE,Principal 3. THE EDUCATION, TRAINING, AND kchu@bowersandkubota.com QUALIFICATIONS OF THE INDIVIDUAL, OR IF THE A FIRM, ITS KEY EMPLOYEES IN ACCORDANCE WITH HRS 103D-304 AND/OR THE PROFESSIONAL AND SCIENTIFIC OCCUPATION SERIES CONTAINED IN THE UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT'S QUALIFICATIONS STANDARDS HANDBOOK (HTTPS:WWW.OPM.GOV/ POLICY-DATA-OVERSIGHT/CLASSIFICATION- QUALIFICATIONS/GENERAL-SCHEDULE- QUALIFICATION STANDARDS/#URL=GS-PROF) Dependent upon the magnitude, complexity and needs of the County of Hawaii, Planning Department, Planning Services may include the following: • Master Planning • Regional & Community Plans • Site Planning • Federal, State, and County Permit Processing • Land Use Studies • Community Outreach • Environmental Impact Statements &Assessments • Entitlement Processing • Facilities Planning • Public Meetings • Physical Planning STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 20 H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30.PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. The team presented exhibits a broad spectrum of professional experience for providing Planning Services.We also employ expertise in architectural, landscape architectural, and civil and electrical engineering, and provide a wealth of diverse technical experience to projects as required. B+K is committed to dedicating the required expertise and personnel until successful project completion. Ms. Kathleen Chu will serve as Principal-in-Charge of all general planning projects with the County of Hawaii, Planning Department. KEY PERSONNEL PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS ACTIVE PROFESSIONAL NO.OF YEARS OTHER CERTIFICATIONS/ KEY PERSONNEL PROJECT ROLE REGISTRATION EDUCATION EXPERIENCE TRAINING STATE DISCIPLINE Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge HI Civil 30 BS COMMUNITY PLANNING Planning Manager Jared Chang,AICP /Senior Project N/A 17 BA American Institute of Planner Certified Planners Senior Project Ronald Sato,AICP Manager/Senior N/A 33 MA,BS American Institute of Planner Certified Planners Matthew Kodama,MBA Assistant Planning N/A 13 MBA,BBA Project Manager Carah Kadota,AICP Assistant Planning N/A 7 BEnvD American Institute of Project Manager Certified Planners Matthew Fernandez Assistant Planner N/A 3 BS/MS 1. A LIST OF RECENT PROJECT AND THE NAMES OF UP TO FIVE CLIENTS WHO MAY BE CONTACTED, INCLUDING AT LEAST TWO FOR WHOM SERVICES WERE RENDERED DURING THE PRECEDING YEAR: REFERENCES RECENT PROJECTS Jennifer Maydan, Planner Supervisor South Maui Community Plan Update. Maui County of Maui, Planning Department Telephone No. (808) 270-8290 (Ongoing) Andrew Choy, Planner DHHL North Kona Water Development, Kona, HI State of Hawaii, Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (Ongoing) Telephone No. (808) 620-9559 Lori Walker, Integrated Assets Manager Kukaniloko Green House and Nursery (Phase 1), Office of Hawaiian Affairs Telephone No. (808) 594-1835 Wahiawa, HI (Ongoing) Daniel Alexander, Project Manager City and County of Honolulu, Department of Transportation Complete Streets Planning and Preliminary Design, Services Pearl City, Kaneohe, Kailua, HI (2021) Telephone No. (808) 768-6652 Martha Yent, Interpretive Program Manager State of Hawaii Dept. of Land and Natural Resources, State Kealakekua Bay Master Plan & Environmental Parks Division Impact Assessment (EIS), South Kona, HI (Ongoing) Telephone No. (808) 587-0287 STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 21 H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30.PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. 2. ANY PROMOTIONAL OR DESCRIPTIVE LITERATURE WHICH THE INDIVIDUAL OR FIRM DESIRES TO SUBMIT. B+K is very familiar with the County of Hawaii's requirements based on past and current project experience. Select previous and ongoing projects on the island of Hawaii include: • DOT- Facility Planning and Land Acquisition, Hilo and Kahului Harbors, HI • Legacy Hilo Due Diligence, Hilo, HI • DHHL - North Kona Water Development, North Kona, HI • Hilton Waikoloa Village -various projects, Waikoloa, HI • Waikoloa Kings' Lands Docmentation Support, Waikoloa, HI • Auwaikeakau and Popoo Stream Jurisdictional Determination, Waikoloa, HI • DLNR- Kealakekua Bay Master Plan and Environmental Impact Statement, Kealakekua, HI • Kamehameha Schools- Due Diligence Assessment and Test Fit Study for West Hawaii Land Acquisition, Captain Cook, HI I.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. 31.SIGNATURE 1 �T2 _ 32.DATE June 30, 2023 33.NAME AND TITLE Kathleen Chu, PE Principal-in-Charge STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 22 1.SOLICITATION NUMBER(If any) PL.3) Community Planning(Community Planning ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS Assistant:Project Management Support,Community Organizing,Public Participation,Meeting Facilitation) PART II-GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS (If a firm has branch offices,complete for each specific branch office seeking work.) 2a.FIRM(OR BRANCH OFFICE)NAME 3.YEAR ESTABLISHED 4.DUNS NUMBER Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. 2008 03-929-9763 2b.STREET 5.OWNERSHIP a. 94-408 Akoki Street, Suite 201-A . TYPE Corporation 2c.CITY 2d.STATE 2e.ZIP CODE b.SMALL BUSINESS STATUS Waipahu HI 96797 6a.POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE 7.NAME OF FIRM(IF BLOCK 2A ISA BRANCH OFFICE) Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge 6b.TELEPHONE NUMBER 6c.E-MAIL ADDRESS 808 836-7787 kchu@bowersandkubota.com 8a.FORMER FIRM NAME(S)(IF ANY) 8b.YR.ESTABLISHED 8c.DUNS NUMBER 9. EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE 10.PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE AND ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS c.No.of Employees c.Revenue a.Function b.Discipline a.Profile b.Experience Index Code (1) Firm (2) Branch Code Number(see below) 02 Administrative 41 A05 Airports;Navaids;Airport Lighting;Aircraft Fueling 5 06 Architects 20 A06 Airports;Terminals&Hangars;Freight 6 Handling 08 CADD Technician 7 C10 Commercial Building(low rise);Shopping Centers 4 12 Civil Engineers 26 C15 Construction Management 8 15 Construction Inspector 38 E02 Educational Facilities;Classrooms 4 16 Construction Managers 27 E03 Electrical Studies and Design 4 18 Cost Engineer/Estimator 2 E09 Environmental Impact Studies;... 5 21 Electrical Engineers 4 Ell Environmental Planning 4 23 Environmental Engineer 5 H07 Highways;Streets;Airfield Paving;Parking Lots 6 37 Interior Designer 1 H09 Hospitals&Medical Facilities 6 39 Landscape Architect 6 Hll Housing(Residential,Multi-Family;Apartments; 1 Condominiums) 47 Planner 6 L03 Landscape Architecture 4 48 Project Managers 66 P05 Planning(Community;Regional;...) 5 50 Risk Assessor 4 P06 Planning(Site,Installation and Project) 1 51 Safety/Occupational Health Engineer 1 R06 Rehabilitation (Buildings;Structures;Facilities) 3 52 Sanitary Engineer 1 SO4 Sewage Collection,Treatment&Disposal 4 53 Schedulers 2 S07 Solid Wastes;Incineration;Landfill 4 58 Technician/Analyst 3 S13 Storm Water Handling&Facilities 4 T02 Testing&Inspection Services 4 W02 Water Resources;Hydrology;Ground Water 4 Total 260 W03 Water Supply;Treatment and Distribution 4 11.ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM FOR LAST 3 YEARS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER (Insert revenue index number shown at right) a.Federal Work 7 1.Less than$100,000 6.$2 million to less than$5 million 2.$100,000 to less that$250,000 7.$5 million to less than$10 million b.Non-Federal Work 9 3.$250,000 to less than$500,000 8.$10 million to less than$25 million 4.$500,000 to less than$1 million 9.$25 million to less than$50 million c.Total Work 9 5.$1 million to less than$2 million 10.$50 million or greater 12.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. a.SIGNATURE (fac#A-Cd-3.,--- b.DATE June 30,2023 c.NAME AND TITLE Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021) i APPENDIX A: AWARDS AND CLIENT EVALUATIONS Bowers + Kubota's Unique Qualifications and Commitment to Excellence are demonstrated by some of the numerous awards and recognition we have received. Zweig Group's , ai i Business Ma ' National Best Firms to Work For gazine s tt„ 2022:4th Place Multidiscipline 2009,2011-2 3rd Place Firm Size 200+ Employees 2008 2023 Recipient 3rd Place Internal Marketing Award013,2015,2022-21 3. 1st Place Trifecta Award for Winning all 3 Categories 2021: 1st Place Multidiscipline 2nd Place Firm Size 200+ Employees 3rd Place Internal Marketing Award i' iAllio Trifecta Award for Winning all 3 Categories 2020: 1st Place Firm Size 200+ Employees 1st Place Multidiscipline 2019: 1st Place 100-199 Employeesr....;.. 2nd Place Multidiscipline n , Pirr . .; 2018: 1st Place Architecture r, I Ifr 1st Place Civil Engineering 2nd Place Multidisciplinary 2017:2nd Place Civil Engineering ,• 4E11 3rd Place Multidisciplinary ,' ,� :•*» ,, "4 2016:2nd Place Civil Engineering Best *; 3rd Place Multidisciplinary i ,4,, Fit-alsoi 2015:2nd Place Civil Engineering + -, .�,..e. a. <; 1st Place Multidisciplinary t4.. .• , 2014: 1st Place Civil Engineering .: 1st Place Multidisciplinary ,s zT ENR „„ ENR Magazine's Top 100 TOP 1 00 Construction mmliilli Management-for-Fee Firms 2022:#30 National ` \4BoWE\OWER + J 2021:#48 National 2020:#44 National -'-- 2019:#39 National In 5 Inc.5000 Idi Fastest Growing. 44.1„ ,, Private Companies 2021:#4761 National ,. , 2018:#4805 National __. „ �� 1111111 AHA Fit-Friendly Worksite i' 2012: Platinum Achievement Recipient 2011,2013:Gold Achievement Award 2018,2021:Silver Achievement Award 2014:Worksite Innovation Award A iCEë h WkUM'4M Lfil:%CH Lir I`.i:IJXN,YIti4.Lgi 1.4 WYi. - 1141 7-7- _ Excellence Award •Wanaao Road/Keolu Drive IVII-11k-V Reconstructed Sewer •Bowers+Kubota Warehouse/ Office Space A •Keauhou Beach Hotel and Site Demolition(Honor Award-National) Honor Award 7 2019 Construction •Kaumualii Highway Lihue Mill Management Project Bridge Rice street Achievement Award ASCE •UH Information Technology Center Water/Wastewater/Utility: •Ewa Makai Middle School Construction value greater •Honouliuli WWTP-New Solids than$50M Handling Facility •Honoapiilani Highway Lahainaluna Road Outstanding Widening, Kaneohe-Kailua Wastewater Conveyance&Treatment • to Aholo Road y New Interisland Terminal Civil Engineering Facilities Project KK Tunnel Complex,HNL 7 Achievement Award •In-Vessel Bioconversion •Emergency Repairs of'lhi'ihilauakea Bridge Facility , •New Interisland Terminal Complex,HNL •South Ramp Microtunneling •Replacement of Kea'iwa Stream Bridge Project •Hawaiki Submarine Cable and Kapolei •Kaneohe-Kailua Watewater Landing Station(Grand Award and Best Conveyance&Treatment Large Project) Facilities Project K-K Tunnel •Keauhou Beach Hotel and Site Demolition (Grand Award and Best Large Project [Hawaii],Best Large Project[Region],Honor Award[National]) ARUM — i aye.€r n +e ufos..r , i Public Works Project of the Year ri 1E331 HAWAII SOCIETY OF h Range Improvements PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS •Ala Wai Golf Course Driving 1 CM Project of the Year i •Emergency Repairs oYlhi'ihi- , lauakea Bridge •Haleakala Highway Widening, Phase II J'}"►'4 A Hawaii Society of7 •Honouliuli WWTP,New Solids Professional Engineers Handling Facility y� � AWA� 2011 Project of the Year Award •Ewa Makai Middle School 1 •Manele Small Boat Harbor :, Kamehameha Avenue Roadway Ferry&ADA Improvements Improvements •In-Vessel Bioconversion Facility •Pa'au'au Stream Building Project General Design Project Management Merit Award Project of the Year University of Hawai'i-West •Manana Properties Develop- 11 O'ahu,New Administration& ment Allied Health Building •National Cemetery Stabili- zation CM National Project of the Year •Replacement of Kea'iwa Stream Bridge Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 Kahuku Ranch Cesspool Assessment and Remediation $220,610 Name of Project Contract Amount Scope of work: Civil Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5)Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team 1. Keeps you informed Lucas Aribon, Albert Rivera Comments:The B+K team has been able to meet or exceed 5 my needs over the last year and a half and continues to I Comments:Answered previously. perform at an outstanding level. 2. Quality of Project Manager 2. Addresses problems and offers workable Eric Tamashiro solutions Comments: Eric has provided excellent service and has consistently provided project deliverables on time,within 5 5 budget, and according to scope. In addition Eric and his Comments:Answered previously. team has responded to the many requests, ranging from assistance with contract scoping to post project support, so we are very happy with the services provided. 3. Treats you as an important team member 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions Comments: Eric is extremely conscientious and understands that the acquisitions we have been working on come from the 5 Comments: Eric listens to my opinions and more global 5 top levels of leadership at KS. He response time is excellent, concerns and incorporates them into his proposed solutions. even calling/emailing time sensitive information on Friday afternoon and even the weekend. 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs 5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments:As stated earlier,we have been operating on 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion time, on budget, and according to scope. 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality* Integrity * Teamwork Comments:Answered previously. 5 Comments: Eric is outcome focused and provides various 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule options on how to achieve the outcomes I am seeking. 5 Section 2—Technical Ability Comments:Answered previously. 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 3. Processes documents in a timely manner Comments:Again, Eric provides solutions that meet our 5 5 needs but are within the established regulations and Comments:Answered previously. boundaries. 2. General technical knowledge Section 5—Value Comments: I don't think I have presented an issue that we 5 have not been able to resolve,that's gotta count for a lot! 1. Adheres to project budget 5 3. Knowledge of the contract Comments:Answered previously. Comments: I work closely with Eric on crafting the contract 5 and SOW,which has been very successful to date. 2. Provides added value 5 4.Quality of response to documents Comments:Answered previously. Comments: Our turn around times on comments and 5 revisions has really impressed my bosses. Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 1. Please rate the overall performance Comments: I don't know enough about your margins to be Comments: Over the last 18 months, Eric has worked on commenting beyond,we have been satisfied with the 5 some of the most high profile acquisitions for KS and has 5 compensation relative to the deliverables and timeframes delivered consistently so it not hard to praise his work and they are provided. give him the ratings I have. 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 2. Would be your choice for future service Comments: I am a stickler for maintaining timelines and Eric 5 Comments: Eric(and B+K by extension)is growing a 5 have met all of my expectations as well as those of the reputation for delivering high quality products in short internal clients at KS. timeframes with the leadership at KS'FDSD. 7. Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: Comments: Eric has been keen to share insights on 5 regulatory requirements to avoid missteps as the project progresses. Mr.Allen Salavea Kamehameha Schools 11/22/2022 Name Agency/Department/Division Date Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 RH-03: Eng. Design Support for FY23 IWRR $414,740 Name of Project Contract Amount Scope of work: Civil Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5)Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team Anthony Domingo, Jamie, Tang, James DeGuzman, Maria Bawag, Edgar Quinabo, 5 1. Keeps you informed 5 Joshua Gusman Comments: Comments: 2. Quality of Project Manager 2. Addresses problems and offers workable Mike Nishimura 5 solutions 5 Comments: Comments: 3. Treats you as an important team member 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions 5 Comments: Comments: 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs 5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments: 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality* Integrity* Teamwork 5 Comments: Comments: 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule 5 Section 2—Technical Ability Comments: 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 5 3. Processes documents in a timely manner 5 Comments: Comments: 2. General technical knowledge5 Section 5—Value Comments: 1. Adheres to project budget 5 3. Knowledge of the contract5 Comments: Comments: 2. Provides added value 5 4.Quality of response to documents Comments: 5 Comments: Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 1. Please rate the overall performance 5 Comments: Comments: 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 2. Would be your choice for future service 5 Comments: Comments: 7.Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: I realize all 5s does not offer constructive criticism, but I personally have N/A been extremely satisfied with the service we are receiving. Thorough, timely,yet not excessive communication is what I appreciate the most. Comments: Some scores regarding accuracy could have been docked, but all matters to date have been nondetrimental,which I believe is due to timely communication. Thank you and I look forward to our continued work together. Mr.Todd Ozaki County of Kauai, Department of Public Works 11/23/2022 Name Agency/Department/Division Date Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 PVT Landfill Owner Advisory Services $587,600 Name of Project Contract Amount Scope of work: Civil Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5)Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team r— 1. Keeps you informed Albert Rivera, Matt Takane 5 Comments:Quick to respond and detailed to enable Comments: appropriate answers/topos requested. 2. Quality of Project Manager 2.Addresses problems and offers workable Mike Nishimura solutions Comments: Mike is very responsive to any request 5 5 submitted. His directives are clear to subordinates that Comments: enable quality outcome. 3. Treats you as an important team member 5 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions 5 Comments: BK team has very inclusive of our needs. Comments: Listens attentively to needs and requests. 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs 5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments: No comment 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality* Integrity* Teamwork 5 Comments: Comments: Core values are met 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule 5 Section 2—Technical Ability Comments: 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 3. Processes documents in a timely manner Comments: Skill sets are very evident and reflected in the 5 5 end product Comments:Getting tired of commenting. 2. General technical knowledge Section 5—Value Comments:That is why we hired the company,formerly Belt- 5 Collins Hawaii. 1. Adheres to project budget 5 3. Knowledge of the contract Comments: 5 Comments: 2. Provides added value 5 4.Quality of response to documents Comments: 5 Comments: Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 5 1. Please rate the overall performance 5 Comments: Comments: 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 5 2. Would be your choice for future service 5 Comments: Meets or exceeds scheduled requirements. Comments: 7.Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: 5 Comments: Evaluation is too long. .................................................................... Mr.Albert Shigemura PVT Land Company, Ltd. 11/29/2022 Name Agency/Department/Division Date Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 Building 9 Well#2 Repair, Kunia Tunnel $325,988 Name of Project Contract Amount Scope of work: Civil Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5)Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team 1. Keeps you informed Tracey-Anne Panlasigui, Brian Kawamoto 5 Comments: Comments: 2. Quality of Project Manager 2. Addresses problems and offers workable Cary Kondo 5 solutions 5 Comments: Comments: 3. Treats you as an important team member 5 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions 5 Comments: Comments: 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs 5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments: 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality* Integrity * Teamwork Comments: 5 Comments: 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule 5 Section 2—Technical Ability Comments: 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 5 3. Processes documents in a timely manner 5 Comments: Comments: 2. General technical knowledge 5 Section 5—Value Comments: 1. Adheres to project budget 5 3. Knowledge of the contract 5 Comments: Comments: 2. Provides added value 5 4.Quality of response to documents Comments: 5 Comments: Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 5 1. Please rate the overall performance 5 Comments: Comments: 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 5 2. Would be your choice for future service 5 Comments: Comments: 7. Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: 5 Comments: Ms. Su Yi Jacobs Government Services Company 11/29/2022 Name Agency/Department/Division Date Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 Moloaa Irrigation Cooperative Water Sys. Improvem. $100,000 Name of Project Contract Amount Scope of work: Civil Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5)Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team Kristen Yoshida 1. Keeps you informed Comments: Kristen was responsive, efficient and clearly 5 Comments:Always there when we needed them, prompt went over and above to satisfy our needs. It was a responses and good proactive communications where pleasure working with her. necessary. 2. Quality of Project Manager 2.Addresses problems and offers workable Jay Stone solutions Comments: I have known Jay for many years, and he has 5 5 always exemplified professionalism,technical competence, Comments:Always worked towards a better solution for attention to detail, and has grown into a real leader and their client(us)and the affected water system. manager that any company would be proud to have. 3. Treats you as an important team member 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions Comments: 5 Comments: Maintained a good rapport with us during back 5 and forth comments. 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs 5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments: 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality* Integrity * Teamwork Comments: 5 Comments: Kristen and jay excelled in all of these 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule categories. GREA core values by the way. 5 Comments: Did their best to do this in spite of project delays Section 2—Technical Ability outside of their control. 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 3. Processes documents in a timely manner Comments: Kristen and Jay both maintained exemplary 5 5 professionalism during the ups and downs of this project, Comments: and never wavered from it. 2. General technical knowledge Section 5—Value Comments:They knew their stuff,came in with a good 5 approach and worked well with us on our technical 1. Adheres to project budget comments and suggestions. 5 3. Knowledge of the contract Comments: Comments: Kristen and Jay clearly read the contract and 5 understood its requirements and limitations. That was not 2. Provides added value always the case with about half of our other contracted consultants. 5 Comments: I saw effort in this as the project progressed 4.Quality of response to documents through its different stages. Kristen and Jay were always 5 I looking at things to add value to the project. Comments:always prompt and thorough Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 1. Please rate the overall performance Comments: N/A Comments:A"10"for sure, hope we can do business again 5 with them. 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 2. Would be your choice for future service Comments: Did their best to stay on schedule to finish the 5 5 contract in spite of other factors beyond their control. Comments:Absolutely 7.Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: N/A Comments: Mr. Michael Miyahira State of Hawaii, Department of Health, Environmental 12/5/2022 Management Division,Safe Drinking Water Branch Name Agency/Department/Division Date Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 Keauhou Beach Hotel Demolition Project Name of Project Contract Amount Civil Engineering, Landscape Archtiecture, Planning, Scope of work: Electrical Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5)Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team Calvin Ing, Albert Rivera, Edgar Quinabo, Brian Kawamoto, Bradley Tanimura, Lance Keliiaa, 1. Keeps you informed Christopher Billete, Kelsey Wai, Brian Itozaki, Nick Enomoto Comments:The entire team was very responsive. The project was very complicated,and the team was able to 5 5 flex when needed. I was also very satisfied with their ability and knowledge of the permitting and agency process. The team was able to address high-and low-level concerns Comments: Eric,Calvin and I talk often raised by the agencies. An example of this was a cover sheet included an"index/cheat sheet"for the plan reviewer so she could more efficiently navigate the large set of drawings. I believe this was much appreciated by the overwhelmed planning department. 2. Quality of Project Manager 2. Addresses problems and offers workable Eric Tamashiro solutions Comments: I have worked continuously with Eric for 10 Comments: None of the team shrunk from any problem. years!He is a measured and contemplative engineer. He reasonable solutions were brought up from multiple different is a good listener and clearly breakdowns issues so the 5 team members. Sometime the contractor,sometimes the 5 owner and the design team can discuss decisions with user,and design team. The important take away is that all focus and appropriate solutions. Eric communicates well were heard and felt comfortable sharing their ideas.At no with his team agencies that keep the conversations on time,was someone's reasonable contributions was point. He keeps the project moving and RFI/responses/ dismissed off hand. The team,as a whole,was open to revisions occurred timely. I also felt that our conversations critically thinking problems. concerning budget or overruns were transparent and fair. 3. Treats you as an important team member 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions Comments: I think it's fair to say that Eric and I have equal respect for each other. We both pretty much stay in our 5 Comments: Eric had very little choice in that matter. He 5 lanes and do our best to recognize each other's pain points managed well. as 'art of the .rocess to make the project successful. 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments: I never noticed a point where this project had a 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion staff issue. 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality* Integrity * Teamwork Comments: no issues Comments: I typically don't give 5's or the highest marks 5 on these types of surveys, but I'm not sure we could have 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule completed this project without this team. They all provided their best,advocated for the project and worked together. Comments: Our goals on schedule for this project was not in 5 the hands of the design team for the most part. EXCEPT for meeting our demo completion schedule. This again was the Section 2—Technical Ability joint effort by the entire team. 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 3. Processes documents in a timely manner Comments: Our conversations or actions never veered to unethical practices. I believe that all who contributed on 5 Comments: I don't believe that we could have moved faster 5 this project, inclusive of subcontractors and KS cultural, for submitting drawings or responding. contractors etc... behaved professionally and ethically. 2. General technical knowledge Section 5—Value Comments:As I read or participated in meeting with 5 agencies, I was impressed that the team was 1. Adheres to project budget 5 ready/knowledgeable/prepared to respond to all the comments. B+K was able to provide options or pivot or respond appropriately. 3. Knowledge of the contract Comments:All amendments to the contract were owner driven. For this particular project, Comments:The contract scoped was amended multiple times. It was a good think that the proposal was well 5 defined. We did need to refer back to the amendments to 2. Provides added value double check line-item cost. Although,the project took us on many twists and turns,we were able to keep track of what was included, not included and track costs. Comments: The added value was the depth of experience 5 we could pull from.Cheryl Palesh and other leaders within the BCH and B+K team provided a concise view of a very 4.Quality of response to documents complicated project.The project never struggled for 5 competent expert review on a high level. I never encountered a situation where we didn't have a decisive path. Comments: No issues. reasonable turn around time i Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 1. Please rate the overall performance Comments: Estimating some of these projects are hard as Comments: For complicated projects,this team was the the scope may shift. Having said that,the estimate or best. Considering the duration of the project and the proposal are very complete. Sometimes,the proposals are multiple changes in scope, I appreciated how and when more conservative than needed for every project. amendments were handled. As the owner PM, I However,one way we have navigating the unknown is to 4 appreciated not being inundated with multiple minor amend 5 phase the design contract. This way we can start ments. We were able to bundle the changes and forecast eliminating unknowns and not contracting for work where work so that invoicing/scope was clear and comprehensive. the scope is unclear and that significantly impacts design Also,during the covid lock down,the team also raised to the budget. Concurrently, B+K has assisted in wholistic occasion switching to MS TEAMs meeting was seamless. baseline cost on the conservative end to help with It's worthy to note that we had 100 OAC's and most of these budgeting. this way we can managed from both ends and were done virtually. hopefully exceed expectations. 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 2. Would be your choice for future service Comments:all documents are submitted on time. 5 Comments: B+K would be my preference especially for 5 large and/or complicated projects. 7.Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: N/A Comments: Mahalo nui for B+K's! Ms. Laura Takahashi Kamehameha Schools 11/23/2022 Name Agency/Department/Division Date i APPENDIX B: PROFESSIONAL LICENSES PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NOTICE THIS POCKET ID CARD IDENTIFIES YOU TO THE PUBLIC AS BEING CURRENTLY LICENSED AND SHOULD BE KEPT IN YOUR POSSESSION AT ALL TIMES. I License Number Expiration date Eli.' ''❑� CLASSES(ACTIVE): I I PE-12808 4130(2024 h• STATE OF-(OEM.CEPPFTTENT OF CO A(ERCE AND COM.SUAER AFFN RS _ 1,1111W1 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IOh El I I CLASS(ES):CE CIVIL lI KATHLEEN S B CHL 7140 MAKAA ST HONOLULU,HI 96825 !Ii / i SI,'. TURE OF LICENSEE _W W_—I J �• BOWERS + KUBOTA vI\ Construction Management•A/E Design•Planning•Project Management 94-408 Akoki Street,Suite 201-A Waipahu,Hawaii 96797 1 ' , COUNTY OF HAWAII - ` "'' : '`> PLANNING DEPARTMENT OF o STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FISCAL YEAR 2023 - 2024 PL.4) COMMUNITY PLANNING Community/Regional Plans, General Plan, Climate Adaptation yxy f�. skM`.P?, WAIN` June 30, 2023 BOWERS + KUBOTA Aff BOWERS + KUBOTA Cranstrucfron Managerncc,t•.n!£design•Planning Project Manage neaar B+K No. 23.524 June 30, 2023 Mr. Zendo Kern, Planning Director Planning Department County of Hawaii 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3, Hilo, Hawai'i 96720 Subject: Professional Services During Fiscal Year 2023-2024 PL.4) Community Planning (Community/Regional Plans, General Plan, Climate Adaptation) Dear Mr. Kern: Bowers+Kubota Consulting(B+K)is pleased to submit our letter of interest and qualifications to provide professional services during the fiscal Year 2023-2024 for the above referenced category. We believe our staff with its extensive experience can provide the professional services required for your upcoming projects. Over the past 43 years, B+K has provided outstanding architectural/engineering design, program and project management, construction management, and planning services across the State of Hawaii while living our mission statement of Fulfilling Visions.Building Trust.Our extensive experience has resulted in successfully completing numerous projects for a variety of public agencies and private industry clients. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me by telephone at (808) 836-7787 or by email at kchu@bowersandkubota.com. Respectfully, BOWERS +KUBOTA CONSULTING, INC. j7 Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge 94-408 Akoki Street,Ste.201-A,Waipahu,HI 96797 . r 1808)835.7787 www.bowersandkubota.com 4... i STANDARD FORM 330 ARCHITECT- ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS PART I-CONTRACT SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS A. CONTRACT INFORMATION 1.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) Professional Services in Fiscal Year 2023 - 2024 2.PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 3.SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER June 1,2023 PL.4) Community Planning (Community/Regional Plans, General Plan, Climate Adaptation) B.ARCHITECT - ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT 4.NAME AND TITLE Kathleen Chu,PE,Principal-in-Charge 5.NAME OF FIRM :,:t Bowers+Kubota Consulting 6.TELEPHONE NUMBER 7.FAX NUMBER 8.E-MAIL ADDRESS (808) 836-7787 (808) 834-4833 kchu@bowersandkubota.com C. PROPOSED TEAM (COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR THE PRIME CONTRACTOR AND ALL KEY SUBCONTRACTORS.) (Check) 0 9. FIRM NAME 10.ADDRESS 11.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT w < 2 a m z E ? O a (!)U 94-408 Akoki Street, Suite 201- PL.4) Community Planning a. X Bowers+Kubota Consulting A (Community/Regional Waipahu,HI 96797 Plans, General Plan, Climate Adaptation) ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE b. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE c. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE d. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE e. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE f. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE 9. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM ❑D (ATTACHED) AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 1 D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM a?.'(-? �.- ;\ . * _.) OF COUNTY OF HAWAII Planning Department PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE Kathleen Chu,PE PLANNING SENIOR MANAGER Jared Chang,AICP Ronald Sato,AICP Matthew Kodama,MBA Carah Kadota,AICP Matthew Fernandez AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 2 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge 31 1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) af= E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Jared Chang,AICP Planning Manager/Senior Project A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM Planner 17 <1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) rs= E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Ronald Sato,AICP Senior Project Manager/Senior A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM Planner 33 <1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) =Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Waipahu,HI 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Master of Arts,Urban and Regional Planning Bachelor of Science,Political Science 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) American Institute of Certified Planners(Certificate No. 014538) American Planning Association,National and Hawaii Chapters Historic Hawaii Foundation,Board of Trustees(2010-2016) 11 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Harbors Division PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Pier 40 Improvements Honolulu Harbor Ongoing N/A Honolulu,HI (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑x CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM a ROLE: Senior Project Manager SCOPE: The State Department of Transportation,Harbors Division is proposing improvements to Piers 39 and 40 that's used by Young Brothers as an interisland terminal.The project would fill the harbor area between Piers 39 and 40 and demolish certain areas of these piers to offset fill and loss of U.S.waters.Inland areas would be raised 3 feet to address sea level rise and redevelopment of Young Brothers facilities.An EIS would be prepared along with addressing several federal requirements to support a U.S.COE Individual Permit for pier work. PROJECT COST:N/A (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Highways Division PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Transportation Corridor Assessment Route 11 Queen Kaahumanu/Kuakini Ongoing 2018 Highway,Kailua-Kona,HI (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE:Planner bSCOPE:B+K is performing a Corridor Assessment to find plausible solutions and options that will reduce congestion and enhance safety along Queen Kaahumanu Extension and Kuakini Highway.With the growth in population and increase in traffic,congestion on Route 11 between Henry Street and Kamehameha III Road has continued to grow and worsen over time. The approach to develop the concepts will be modeled after the Planning and Environmental Linkages(PEL)approach to help facilitate future NEPA or HEPA processes in the future.Future traffic operations will be evaluated and near-term and mid-term improvements that can be readily implemented to reduce congestion will be identified and evaluated against a pre-determined set of criteria. PROJECT COST: $301,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State DLNR,Division of Forestry&Wildlife PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Kawainui-Hamakua Marsh Master Plan;Final Environmental Impact 2020 N/A Statement,Kailua,HI (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE: Senior Project Manager c. SCOPE: The State DLNR,DOFAW updated their master plan for the 986-acre Kawainui-Hamakua Marsh Complex in partnership with DSP.The master plan supported wetland restoration,upland reforestation,created areas for native Hawaiian cultural practices,and supported public access and educational programs.Completed an EIS approved by the State Land Board and withstood a legal challenge. Work included extensive community outreach to address concerns and effective community- based planning. PROJECT COST: $53,300,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Hawaii Community Foundation PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Affordable and Workforce Housing Regional Plans 2023 N/A Various Locations,HI (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM d. ROLE: Senior Project Manager SCOPE:B+K was tasked with creating three regional plans for the Central,South and West Maui regions.These plans highlighted the need for affordable housing and highlighted housing projects and infrastructure that would support those projects as part of the House Maui Initiative.The House Maui Initiative supports the planning and delivery of much needed affordable and workforce housing while building on the County of Maui's community-based planning process. PROJECT COST:N/A STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 4 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM Matthew Kodama,MBA Planning Project Manager 13 3 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) =Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Waipahu,HI 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Master of Business Administration,Business Bachelor of Business Administration,Finance 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) American Planning Association Hawaii State Public Charter School Commission,Commissioner °1I 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED County of Maui,Planning Department PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) South Maui Community Plan Update 2022 N/A Various Locations,HI (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑x CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM a. ROLE:Assistant Planning Project Manager SCOPE:Updated the South Maui Community Plan that included the regions from Maalaea,Kihei,Wailea,Makena,to Ahihi- Kinau/Kanaio. The updated plan provides a vision,a community plan map,goals,policies and actions to guide County officials and staff,property owners,developers,and residents on the appropriate growth and redevelopment patterns for South Maui for the next 20 years. PROJECT COST: $7,000,000(estimated) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Land and Natural Resources PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Kealakekua Bay State Historical Park Master Plan and Environmental Impact Statement Ongoing N/A South Kona,HI (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑x CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM b ' ROLE:Assistant Planning Project Manager SCOPE:Providing support services for the EIS.The primary goal of the project is to plan for a public park that preserves the area's cultural landscape and historic resources,preserves and protects the marine resources of the Bay,promotes the scenic values and natural park setting,and accommodates outdoor recreation in a manner that doesn't impact or degrade the natural and cultural resources.Draft master plan was completed in 2013. PROJECT COST:N/A (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City and County of Honolulu,Department of Facility Management PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Temporary Pearl City Police Station Ongoing N/A Pearl City,HI (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑x CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM `' ROLE:Planning Senior Manager SCOPE:Providing planning,design and permitting for the Temporary Pearl City Police Station located next to the Police Academy. Project include preparation of EA,Major Special Use Permit,Major SMA Permit,and zoning variance permits.Design includes temporary trailors with 150 parking stalls and utility connections to the existing police academy utility systems. PROJECT COST:N/A (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Hawaiian Home Lands PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) North Kona Water Development Ongoing N/A Kona,HI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM d ' ROLE:Assistant Planning Project Manager SCOPE:Preparing Environmental Assessments(EAs)and a preliminary engineering report for potable water source development on two parcels in the Keauhou 2 Ahupuaa.The wells being developed are intended to support development of DHHL projects at Lai Opua Village and Kalaoa. PROJECT COST:N/A (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Health PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Moloaa Irrigation Cooperative Water System Improvements 2020 N/A Kilauea,HI (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑x CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE:Assistant Planning Project Manager e' SCOPE:Prepared the plans, specifications and opinions of probable costs for a drinking water system improvements for an agricultural cooperative. Conducted a physical assessment of the water system's source, storage,treatment,and distribution facilities and recommended multiple improvements.Addressed the cross-cutting federal authorities then prepared the plans, specifications,and opinion of probable costs for the selected recommendation and submitted permit applications and obtained regulatory approvals for the construction of the proposed improvements. PROJECT COST: $1,000,000 STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 5 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM Carah Kadota,AICP Assistant Planning Project Manager 7 <1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) "=Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Waipahu,HI 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Bachelor of Environmental Design 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) American Institute of Certified Planners(Certificate No. 34599) American Planning Association,Hawaii Chapter 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City and County of Honolulu,Department of Design and Construction PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Kahawainui Stream Dredging Ongoing N/A Laie,HI a. (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑x CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE:Planner SCOPE:Processing permit applications with approvals including DA permit,401WQC,NPDES permit for construction stormwater discharges,stream channel alteration,HRS Ch. 6E with SHPD. PROJECT COST: $2,000,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Highways PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Vulnerable Road User Safety Assessment(VRUSA) Statewide HI Ongoing N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE:Planner b. SCOPE: Working with the HDOT to develop the State's first Vulnerable Road User Safety Assessment(VRUSA). A VRUSA is an assessment of the safety performance of a State with respect to vulnerable road users and the plan for the State to improve the safety of vulnerable road users.Addressing the safety of vulnerable road users through a collaborative and comprehensive approach allows people that walk,bike,and roll full and safe access to our transportation system.The assessment will include the Safe System Approach,which aims to improve safety culture,increase collaboration across all stakeholders,and refocus transportation system design and operation on anticipating human mistakes and lessening impact forces to reduce crash severity and save lives. PROJECT COST: 575,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Highways Route 50(Kaumualii Highway)Feasibility Study,Hanapepe to Ongoing N/A Kekaha,Kekaha,Kauai,HI (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE:Planner c. SCOPE: Conduct a Feasibility Study to explore conceptual details,constraints,and prospective timelines for different resiliency improvement alternatives based on probable future scenarios of concern for Route 50,Kaumualii Highway,from Hanapepe to Kekaha.The objectives of the Feasibility Study are to explore resiliency realities,criticalities,and challenges for the Route 50 study area. The scope of work will include coastal modeling of tidal flood frequency analysis and high-resolution sea level rise and wave inundation modeling.The modeling will be conducted for a variety of future sea level rise scenarios combined with different wave events to help estimate the frequency of occurrence of flooding at selected intervals in the future. PROJECT COST: $675,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Harbors Division PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Consulting Engineer's Report for FY2017-2019 Statewide,HI 2021 N/A d. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE:Planner SCOPE:Preparation of a Consulting Engineer's Report that examined the operations of all commercial harbors and associated improvements within fiscal year 2017-2019. PROJECT COST: $50,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Harbors Division PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Department of Transportation,Harbors Division Pier 40 Improvements Honolulu Harbor Honolulu,HI Ongoing N/A e. (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE:Planner SCOPE:Planning work involves site planning and coordination with DOT,HAR and Young Brothers on improvements and relocation of their operations during construction.An Environmental Impact Statement is also being prepared along with obtaining an Individual Permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers that will involve compliance with several federal regulations(Section 7,Section 106,etc.).PROJECT COST:N/A STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 6 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM Matthew P.Fernandez Assistant Planner 3 <1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) "=Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Waipahu,HI 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Master of Science,Urban and Regional Planning Bachelor of Science,Natural Resource and Environmental Management 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Office of Hawaiian Affairs PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Kukaniloko Green House&Nursery Phase 1 Ongoing N/A Honolulu,HI (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑x CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM a. ROLE:Assistant Planner SCOPE:Planning and development of a greenhouse/nursery operation near the birthing stones site(Kukaniloko)in Wahiawa central Oahu.The project included through putting native species for outplanting and eventual use for reforestation of the Lake Wilson site edge. The site is sloped and designed for various equipment circulation,green waste management,irrigation,a full range nursery operations,educational functions,public visitation and for-sales produce including aquaponic vegetables. PROJECT COST:N/A (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED County of Maui,Planning Department PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) South Maui Community Plan Update 2022 N/A Various Locations,HI (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE OCHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM b. ROLE:Planner SCOPE:Updated the South Maui Community Plan that included the regions from Maalaea,Kihei,Wailea,Makena,to Ahihi- Kinau/Kanaio. The updated plan provides a vision,a community plan map,goals,policies and actions to guide County officials and staff,property owners,developers,and residents on the appropriate growth and redevelopment patterns for South Maui for the next 20 years. PROJECT COST: $7,000,000(estimated) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Airports Division PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Ahukini Landfill Restoration,Phase II Ongoing N/A Lihue,HI (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑x CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE:Planner c• SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting is currently working with various agencies to develop a plan to deal with shearwater bird habitats in the project area;creating construction plans and specifications to stabilize a coastal slope containing landfill debris; and obtaining all necessary approvals and permits to allow such work.Project scope includes planning,environmental services, surveying,permitting,design and construction and post-construction support services.The scope also includes coordination with the State Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response(HEER)Office to address the mitigation and removal of debris that has fallen into the ocean. PROJECT COST: $8,600,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED NICELES Unipessoal, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Timor-Leste 2022-2023 N/A d. (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE:Environment/Planning Technical Adviser SCOPE:Conducted due diligence and reviewed environmental reports for the proposed project.Provided technical assistance &guidance related to the environmental and planning aspects of the project. PROJECT COST:N/A STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 7 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 1 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City and County of Honolulu,Department of Design and Construction PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(fapprcable) Honolulu Zoo Hawaiian Wetland Aviary Ongoing N/A Honolulu,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City and County of Honolulu,Department John Condrey (808)768-8468 of Design and Construction 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting is providing entitlement planning,landscape architecture,civil engineering services for the initial phase of a new Hawaii exhibit,which will feature a wetland aviary.The new exhibit starts at the main entrance arrival area and extends eastward to the Nene Goose Sanctuary.Once completed,the aviary will showcase animals in their habitat ranging from coastal wetlands to mountainous rain forests and further into dry forests and grasslands.The design intent is to expose guests to the wide range of native wetland(streams and ponds)and dry/ land habitats found in Hawaii.The scope of work for this project covers conceptual design and permitting,with follow-on design development and construction documents. PROJECT COST: $5,000,000 .. yy ... 4 AVISTRAr1RO yn N !RIPS VHELSINT SLOTHpi leH 1 PHASE 3(Future Concept) k Dry Finest 8 Grassland Aviary A 1 PHASE 7(Proposed Concept) -^ _ � ,i . �^ Coastal Wetlands Aviary \ F r r _r. _ - ', PHASE 2(Future Concept} pg ,,,,I. ,w. ;''f, y �,,, d .^Yf '` « . ;. Mountain Rain-forest Aviary v,. I'm �-100r,- r pl-..., \ h'' �- ?W TROPICAL A I. . V - FOREST fi-AMVHG4 PQNP LL` aBR Ltactuatei ^a 11111111H) -; r : i 71 � � Fn nl 51ib+dvIN-ke; / / / 1 % F.,,, 11 -. ,.- t,1,5 r i h •i .ir '-' - _ F \may - .- l • 1 I I " r_� `� ,x.'1.1 �' ,. ti ' ger' �� 1 r , , , . I ,_, t c 0 > ,li .t FIB" ,... ,ik,.. '��� ,On �' Ry,, 'i 1 r / ' ,4 ;M 'w ,, -61;:iii =1 1s '.ara ,,, a,,s r - ' -ltd, , ,reof e ... ,� �� � � 11111�� �y�ypE�rr11�I 1 ri ii!"'Mrw ,.. 1 :,:,,I h,' n iu .erp 1IR. ir'./d'• e' �E`��{{rxJ 1.F.�1 ' i.o,i.H) [t�a"Hr'�a end Y -- YrL?7,hnV 1I'y�pt�](�T//": .-rj_. nwne — r4' i� u z 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE �� Planner,Civil Engineer,Landscape a. `Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Architect STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 8 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 2 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City and County of Honolulu,Department of Design and Construction PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Kahawainui Stream Dredging Ongoing N/A Laie,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City and County of Honolulu,Department Kristie Ching (808)768-8800 of Design and Construction 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting is preparing construction plans and specifications for the maintenance dredging of the City- owned portion of Kahawainui Stream between the intersection with Laie Wai Stream to the mouth of the stream excluding the sand berm at the stream mouth.An environmental review consisting of a Draft and Final Environmental Assessment,with an anticipated Finding of No Significant Impact(FONSI),will be prepared in accordance to the Hawaii Revised Statutes Chapter 343. The review will include a biological survey,archaeological and cultural study,and other environmental reports to determine impacts of the project and mitigation measures.Preparation of permit applications for the dredging and obtaining permit approvals is included in the project scope along with engineering assistance during the bidding and construction. PROJECT COST: $2,000,000 i' ILLY , • k • 10I25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. af=Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner,Civil Engineer STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 9 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 3 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City and County of Honolulu,Department of Transportation Services PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Complete Streets Planning and Preliminary Design,Kaneohe,Kailua,and Pearl 2021 N/A City,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City and County of Honolulu,Department Daniel Alexander (808)768-6652 of Transportation Services 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting assessed implementation of complete streets concept designs in Kaneohe,Kailua,and Pearl City area as part of planned road rehabilitation projects in each area.The inter-disciplinary team was comprised of civil/ transportation engineers,physical/site planners,urban designers,arborists,and landscape architects. Initial tasks included evaluation of existing conditions through driving,walking and bicycling audits of each community;identifying the complete streets network based on land use and roadway configuration;and developing preliminary street cross-sections showing options for pedestrian walkways,bicycle lanes,shared pathways,and vehicular travel lanes.The project applied a context-sensitive solutions process,engaging stakeholders via outreach efforts,including community leader contact, social media outreach,bike tours,pop-up and sit-down sessions,distribution of project-specific collateral materials,and broadcast media coverage. Input from the community was combined with a multi-modal assessment of all transportation methods in each area and observations from the project team to prepare the complete streets proposals.Within each area unique conditions and parameters existed that called for specific solutions. Viable tools to develop complete streets were combined with sound urban design,physical planning and landscape architecture to arrive at best options.The results of the combined input were revealed at community meetings where concept plans were shown and additional feedback was provided. B+K worked with the team to bring its collective experience together and bring a sensible approach to addressing the evolution of the project areas'transportation networks,which was used to refine the street cross-sections and prepared concept plans for the proposed roadway improvements along with associated opinions of probable construction costs.B+K also assisted with the preparation of Exemption Declarations for the project pursuant to HRS Ch. 343. PROJECT COST: $4,000,000 / KANEOHE 0 46.164410 / KAILUA a / PEARL CITY ` ' COMPLETESTREETS COMPIETESTREETS COMPLETESTREETS wr..,.� h ---_,..:\_„ �� stnrw Mae e —awy,,„, �' Sad,Sninais oRH4- —...F.e �„ , -, b a t -i ' ,,more Infar '.. :'• a For ..glf Cy For more Information vts the website.htry:f/www.hanolulu.govhamplctastraNs m8lron visit the Vmbslle:ntlp 1/www honolv .Aav/ lurompleteslreels tl Email us oat year llqught5mrryde[es[reeisbhonolulu.gov • Email vs with yourlMughts-carnplatastrflalsOhoesalulu.gov Photo courtesy of Blue Zones 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE �� Planner,Civil Engineer,Landscape a. `Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Architect STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 10 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 4 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Kamehameha Schools PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(ifappIicable) Due Diligence Assessment and Test Fit Study for West Hawaii Land Acquisition (84-5236 Hawaii Belt Road) 2022 N/A Captain Cook,Hawaii 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Kamehameha Schools Laura Takahashi (808)534-8108 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting provided planning and consulting services for a due diligence assessment and test fit study of the property(for an early learning center)located at 84-5236 Mamalahoa Highway in Captain Cook,Hawaii. The scope of the due diligence assessment and test fit study included research and entitlements in phase 1;property condition assessment in phase 2;and a test fit study of the building and site in phase 3.The scope of work included an assessment of interior and exterior improvements as well as regulatory requirements,including pavement and parking areas;planting and irrigation systems;the general condition of the building architectural elements;plumbing fixtures;electrical fixtures and outlets;fire alarm system;general structural conditions; and the general condition of the air conditioning system;and the property's entitlements and zoning requirements.A due diligence assessment of the Early Learning Center Building at the Saint and Church and Model Schools(Kikiwelawela)in Kaneohe,Hawaii was also provided under this project. PROJECT COST:N/A X ,, • ii 1A w, Hexa i`i Island F .t { s , • — .._ 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE :Mowers Civil Engineer,Landscape a. `Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Architect STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 11 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 5 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City and County of Honolulu PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Department of Design and Construction 2022 Ala Moana Regional Park Master Plan and Environmental Impact Statement 2019(EIS) Ongoing Honolulu,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City and County of Honolulu,Department of Design and Construction Elaine Morisato (DDC) (808)768-8406 Biederman Redevelopment Ventures Benjamin Donsky (212)390-1122 (Prime consultant) 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting supported the City in developing portions of the Preferred Concept Master Plan for Ala Moana Regional Park(Ala Moana)and preparing its corresponding Environmental Impact Statement(EIS).The goal of the master plan was to provide a planning framework allowing Ala Moana to become a multi-faceted beach park and even greater asset to the community. The master plan evaluated the park's existing conditions and identified areas of improvement including landscape features,infrastructure,parking and pathways,and the park's iconic beach front.The 17 proposed improvement projects focused on addressing deferred maintenance to elevate the park's existing facilities and address coastal erosion issues while respecting and celebrating the established character.As part of the master planning process,the B+K Planning Group prepared and published a final EIS analyzing the proposed improvements established in the master plan. As part of the environmental review process,the B+K Planning group investigated the project's potential effects on the built and natural environments and provided mitigation measures to help minimize impacts pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statues,Chapter 343.This analysis included analyzing the need for beach nourishment and drainage canal improvements to address impacts from natural and climate change hazards like sea level rise.The EIS also analyzed the project's compliance with relevant federal,state,and county land uses regulations and policies. To develop the alternatives in the master plan and EIS,a strong community engagement and outreach program was conducted to better understand the multi-generational impact of Ala Moana on the community.Multiple public,in-person informational meetings were held between 2015 and 2018 and a project website titled"Our Ala Moana Park"was launched to garner community feedback.Incorporating input from over 30,000 visitor interactions at the website,feedback from the in-person community meetings and consultation responses from the EIS resulted in the design alternatives presented in the master plan and EIS. Additionally,during the community engagement process the master planning team was informed of more urgent actions needed at Ala Moana. This prompted the City to enact a 9-point plan to address these issues in parallel with the long-term master plan creating a holistic approach to improving the park long-term. PROJECT COST: $14,600,000 y A-2 Medium-density hl Ain nand Cilvd. Apartment District Kewalo basin ~ P-2 General Preservation District Arkulif9en Ala Moana Regional Park / '? i I • R S ffr PROJECT L t �`�cAwai!.,. Mixed 2, 4Boat Fiar6ar i'�• . BOUNDARYP. • Magic • , `° " • 'w+ Island I1 ++, e 'u� PnciJic Ocean1 Awa �! ) °v I Public Precincf.. (Waikl i Di.t t] 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Mowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner,Civil Engineer,Landscape Architect STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 12 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 6 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED County of Maui,Planning Department PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) South Maui Community Plan Update 2022 N/A Kihei-Makena,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER County of Maui,Planning Department Jennifer Maydan (808)270-8290 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting is updating the South Maui Community Plan that includes the regions from Maalaea,Kihei, Wailea,Makena,to Ahihi-Kinau/Kanaio. The updated plan will provide a vision,a community plan map,goals,policies and actions to guide County officials and staff,property owners,developers,and residents on the appropriate growth and redevelopment patterns for South Maui for the next 20 years. As a precursor to the community plan update,B+K has put together three resource papers that cover the topics of Sea-Level Rise and Climate Change,Housing,Population Growth,and Mobility.Each resource paper examines the current conditions in the area,key challenges for the future of the area and strategies to minimize adverse impacts. PROJECT COST:N/A .. .. • _ ..q. � P y.. ... -rte'•• �rr _. • /'r'• 5 A " - +;'34 " 4 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Li ,Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner,Civil Engineer STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 13 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 7 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Land and Natural Resources PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Kealakekua Bay Master Plan&Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) Ongoing(estimated N/A South Kona,HI completion 2023) 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER State of Hawaii,Department of Department of Land and Natural Martha Yent (808)587-0287 Resources 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting provided master plan,EIS,and management plan services for Kealakekua Bay State Historical Park. The state considers the park as one of the most historically significant places in Hawaii.The park spans 216 acres on land in three adjacent areas(Napoopoo,Pali Kapu 0 Keoua,and Kaawaloa),315 acres of waters of the adjacent Kealakekua Bay Marine Life Conservation District,and the Napoopoo pier.The primary project goal is to plan for a public park that preserves the area's cultural landscape and historic resources,preserves and protects the marine resources of Kealakekua Bay,promotes the scenic values and natural park setting,and accommodates outdoor recreation in a manner that does not impact or degrade natural and cultural resources.A draft master plan was developed before the ocean resources became the responsibility of the State Parks Division.The draft master plan is being updated to include analysis of marine issues and ocean recreational activities.The revised master plan will promote preservation and stewardship,offer guidance in the development of park interpretive concepts and programs,identify park facility needs,and recommend park management measures for the land and the sea.Community input and collaboration have been integral to the planning process and will continue to be considered in developing management measures. PROJECT COST:N/A(study) ;[ A1-•'IAIN t (7OK w i ~" ''',073;1"1"\?-v3 "- ► ^°",�. _" 1, 44.. . '" .., "-- . .:c ., � -_ - •. Nai�c'opo'o Roy - _-- > 3 -..., , �.' —.. ,,'N i.)2(] 0 f U ] ,,p6.ry - n� � ,te Perkygyp r_.'w Beach �+/ �p to x ,,i'�.4` R�•Ore Landing �; ttiQ'd !'" KaHauloa pld Go �� �,i'i✓ Manini Bay iP"or) Y❑aa ��. � Point io,1,,'eeuv"-,` cSn�enl� i 4 .C'✓ GU. dq captain Cook old T t Morliament `i" t :. Kealakekua Bay ---' KA'AWALOA Ally,:. , „= ,`, 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. r.(Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 14 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 8 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Airports Division PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION pfapp/icab/e) Ahukini Landfill Restoration,Phase II Ongoing N/A Lihue,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER State of Transportation,Airports Division Daryl Yokomizo (808)838-8825 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting is currently working with various agencies to develop a plan to deal with shearwater bird habitats in the project area;creating construction plans and specifications to stabilize a coastal slope containing landfill debris; and obtaining all necessary approvals and permits to allow such work.Project scope includes planning,environmental services, surveying,permitting,design and construction and post-construction support services.The scope also includes coordination with the State Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response(HEER)Office to address the mitigation and removal of debris that has fallen into the ocean. PROJECT COST: $8,600,000 • • • .c 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE �� Planner,Environmental Engineer, a. r`Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Landscape Architect STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 15 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 9 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Hawaiian Home Lands PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(ifappiicabie) North Kona Water Development,Environmental Assessments and Preliminary Engineering Report Ongoing N/A North Kona,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER State of Hawaii,Department of Hawaiian Andrew Choy (808)620-9559 Home Lands 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting is preparing Environmental Assessments(EAs)and a preliminary engineering report for potable water source development on two parcels in the Keauhou 2 Ahupuaa.The wells being developed are intended to support development of DHHL projects at Lai Opua Village and Kalaoa. A Hawaii Environmental Policy Act EA in accordance with Hawaii Revised Statutes(HRS)Chapter 343 and Title 11, Chapter 200 of the Department of Health Administrative Rules will be prepared for the one parcel with the U.S.Department of Agriculture(USDA)as the accepting agency. The other parcel will have an EA prepared pursuant to HRS Ch. 343 with DHHL accepting. A Preliminary Engineering Report(PER)meeting the requirements of the USDA Rural Utilities Service will also be prepared. A topographic survey for the PER will be coordinated and preliminary site layout and grading plans to confirm the area required for the site improvements will be prepared for the PER. The PER will also be processed for acceptance by the USDA Rural Utilities Service. A hydraulic study of the North Kona Water System and assistance in drafting the terms of the Water Development Agreement between DHHL,the landowners and the County Department of Water Supply will also be provided. PROJECT COST:N/A(Study) Illo '� \������ �)))11)))1�1)1»))11))1111)v ',")),3"), rl 4 .. _ S I' ( �y�[{gyp • F'•.. +" 407 lir' 4- aqui 1 - yp 4 •i p _4, � 'l IfY F 11 tr� ".......1..... ... .r-, i. [ n4 I ,' _...f...,'''k a +, . , ,-,, ,...,-, A � , ` � . tit,zlir If Li 1 i• . 1 „ , ,I; 1 _.A r y 41100. 4' I • I ,.. w.^MFS ... tits 4w 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3)ROLE Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner,Civil Engineer STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 16 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 10 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Greystar Development Services,LLC for University of Hawaii at Manoa PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) University of Hawaii at Manoa Multi-Family Housing,Environmental Assessment 2021 N/A Honolulu,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Greystar Development Services,LLC for Ethen Thacher(Greystar) (949)892-4973 University of Hawaii at Manoa 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting completed an Environmental Assessment for a Public Private Partnership(P3)project where the developer will design,build,and operate for profit the student housing multi-family building,day care center for UH students, and commercial operations such as a convenience store and/or eatery. PROJECT COST: $1,500,000 ® ;r. . A e a;. J •11 s X1 8 ' .� r R y i • I • 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. mo(Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner,Civil Engineer STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 17 G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS 28.EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F 26.NAMES OF KEY PERSONNEL 27.ROLE IN EXAMPLE PROJECT (Fill in"Example Projects Key"section below before completing table.Place X" (From Section E,Block 12) (From Section E,Block 13) under project key number for participation in same or similar role). 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge Jared Chang,AICP Planning Manager/Senior X Project Planner Ronald Sato,AICP Senior Project Manager/ Senior Planner Matthew Kodama,MBA Planning Project Manager X X X Carah Kadota,AICP Assistant Planning Project Manager Matthew Fernandez Assistant Planner X X 29.EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) City and County of Honolulu County of Maui 1 Department of Design and Construction 6 Planning Department Honolulu Zoo Hawaiian Wetland Aviary South Maui Community Plan Update City and County of Honolulu State of Hawaii 2 Department of Design and Construction Department of Land and Natural Resources Kahawainui Stream Dredging Kealakekua Bay Master Plan&Environmental Impact Statement City and County of Honolulu State of Hawaii s Department of Transportation Services 8 Department of Transportation,Airports Division, Complete Streets Planning and Preliminary Design, Ahukini Landfill Restoration,Phase II Kaneohe,Kailua,and Pearl Kamehameha Schools State of Hawaii 4 Due Diligence Assessment and Test Fit Study for West 9 Department of Hawaiian Home Lands Hawaii Land Acquisition(84-5236 Hawaii Belt Road) North Kona Water Development, City and County of Honolulu Department of Design and Construction(Biederman Greystar Development Services,LLC 5 Redevelopment Ventures-Prime Consultant 10 for University of Hawaii at Manoa Ala Moana Regional Park Master Plan and Environmental University of Hawaii at Manoa Multi-Family Housing Impact Statement STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 18 H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30.PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. COMPANY NAME: SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS BOWERS+KUBOTA CONSULTING,INC. 1. THE NAME OF THE FIRM OR PERSON, CONTACT 94-408 Akoki Street,Suite 201-A INFORMATION INCLUDING EMAIL ADDRESS,THE Waipahu,Hawaii 96797 PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS AND LOCATION Ph.(808)836-7787 OF ALL ITS OFFICES Fax.(808)834-4833 www.bowersandkubota.com Name of Firm Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. YEAR INCORPORATED: September 1980 Point of Contact Kathleen Chu,PE Principal PRINCIPALS: kchu@bowersandkubota.com (808) 836-7787 Brian Bowers,PE,CCM,President Principal Place of 94-408 Akoki Street, Suite 201-A, bbowers@bowersandkubota.com Business Waipahu,HI 96797 Dexter Kubota,PE,Vice President Location of all Offices Main Office (Waipahu) - Oahu dkubota@bowersandkubota.com Satellite Office (Kalihi) - Oahu Eric Iwamoto,PE,CCM,LEED AP,Principal Satellite Offices -Maui and Kauia eiwamoto@bowersandkubota.com Field Offices -Hawaii and Molokai Myong Choi,PE,LEED AP,Principal mchoi@bowersandkubota.com 2. THE AGE OF THE FIRM AND THE AVERAGE Mike Kamaka,PE,CCM,Principal NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES OVER THE PAST FIVE mkamaka@bowersandkubota.com YEARS. Hae-Dong Lee,AIA,NCIDQ,LEED AP,MBA Principal B+K has provided professional design services for the hlee@bowersandkubota.com last 43 years with the resources of the 8 principals and 260 professionals and administrative staff available to be Amy Matsushima,SHRM-SCP,Principal assigned to each project. Over the past 5 years,the average amatsushima@bowersandkubota.com number of employees has been 230 professionals. Kathleen Chu,PE,Principal 3. THE EDUCATION,TRAINING,AND kchu@bowersandkubota.com QUALIFICATIONS OF THE INDIVIDUAL,OR IF THE A FIRM,ITS KEY EMPLOYEES IN ACCORDANCE WITH HRS 103D-304 AND/OR THE PROFESSIONAL AND SCIENTIFIC OCCUPATION SERIES CONTAINED IN THE UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT'S QUALIFICATIONS STANDARDS HANDBOOK(HTTPS:WWW.OPM.GOV/ POLICY-DATA-OVERSIGHT/CLAS SIFICATION- QUALIFICATIONS/GENERAL-SCHEDULE- QUALIFICATION STANDARDS/#URL=GS-PROF) Dependent upon the magnitude,complexity and needs of the County of Hawaii,Planning Department,Planning Services may include the following: • Master Planning • Regional& Community Plans • Site Planning • Federal, State, and County Permit Processing • Land Use Studies • Community Outreach • Environmental Impact Statements&Assessments • Entitlement Processing • Facilities Planning • Public Meetings • Physical Planning STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 19 H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30.PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. The team presented exhibits a broad spectrum of professional experience for providing Planning Services.We also employ expertise in architectural,landscape architectural, and civil and electrical engineering, and provide a wealth of diverse technical experience to projects as required. B+K is committed to dedicating the required expertise and personnel until successful project completion. Ms.Kathleen Chu will serve as Principal-in-Charge of all general planning projects with the County of Hawaii,Planning Department. KEY PERSONNEL PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS ACTIVE PROFESSIONAL NO.OF YEARS OTHER CERTIFICATIONS/ KEY PERSONNEL PROJECT ROLE REGISTRATION EDUCATION EXPERIENCE TRAINING STATE DISCIPLINE Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge HI Civil 30 BS COMMUNITY PLANNING Planning Manager Jared Chang,AICP /Senior Project N/A 17 BA American Institute of Planner Certified Planners Senior Project Ronald Sato,AICP Manager/Senior N A 33 MA,BS American Institute of Planner Certified Planners Matthew Kodama,MBA Assistant Planning N/A 13 MBA,BBA Project Manager Carah Kadota,AICP Assistant Planning N/A 7 BEnvD American Institute of Project Manager Certified Planners Matthew Fernandez Assistant Planner N/A 3 BS/MS 1. A LIST OF RECENT PROJECT AND THE NAMES OF UP TO FIVE CLIENTS WHO MAY BE CONTACTED, INCLUDING AT LEAST TWO FOR WHOM SERVICES WERE RENDERED DURING THE PRECEDING YEAR: REFERENCES RECENT PROJECTS Jennifer Maydan,Planner Supervisor County of Maui,Planning Department South Maui Community Plan Update,Maui Telephone No. (808)270-8290 (Ongoing) Andrew Choy,Planner DHHL North Kona Water Development,Kona,HI State of Hawaii,Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (Ongoing) Telephone No. (808) 620-9559 Lori Walker,Integrated Assets Manager Office of Hawaiian Affairs Kukaniloko Green House and Nursery(Phase 1), Telephone No. (808)594-1835 Wahiawa,HI(Ongoing) Daniel Alexander,Project Manager City and County of Honolulu,Department of Transportation Complete Streets Planning and Preliminary Design, Services Pearl City,Kaneohe,Kailua,HI (2021) Telephone No. (808) 768-6652 Martha Yent,Interpretive Program Manager State of Hawaii Dept. of Land and Natural Resources, State Kealakekua Bay Master Plan&Environmental Parks Division Impact Assessment(EIS), South Kona,HI (Ongoing) Telephone No. (808) 587-0287 STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 20 H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30. PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. 2. ANY PROMOTIONAL OR DESCRIPTIVE LITERATURE WHICH THE INDIVIDUAL OR FIRM DESIRES TO SUBMIT. B+K is very familiar with the County of Hawaii's requirements based on past and current project experience. Select previous and ongoing projects on the island of Hawaii include: • DOT- Facility Planning and Land Acquisition, Hilo and Kahului Harbors, HI • Legacy Hilo Due Diligence, Hilo, HI • DHHL - North Kona Water Development, North Kona, HI • Hilton Waikoloa Village -various projects, Waikoloa, HI • Waikoloa Kings' Lands Docmentation Support, Waikoloa, HI • Auwaikeakau and Popoo Stream Jurisdictional Determination, Waikoloa, HI • DLNR- Kealakekua Bay Master Plan and Environmental Impact Statement, Kealakekua, HI • Kamehameha Schools- Due Diligence Assessment and Test Fit Study for West Hawaii Land Acquisition, Captain Cook, HI I.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. 31.SIGNATURE - t y 32.DATE June 30, 2023 33.NAME AND TITLE Kathleen Chu, PE Principal-in-Charge STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 21 1.SOLICITATION NUMBER(If any) ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS PL.4) Community Planning(Community/Regional Plans,General Plan,Climate Adaptation) PART II-GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS (If a firm has branch offices,complete for each specific branch office seeking work.) 2a.FIRM(OR BRANCH OFFICE)NAME 3.YEAR ESTABLISHED 4.DUNS NUMBER Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. 2008 03-929-9763 2b.STREET 5.OWNERSHIP a. 94-408 Akoki Street, Suite 201-A . TYPE Corporation 2c.CITY 2d.STATE 2e.ZIP CODE b.SMALL BUSINESS STATUS Waipahu HI 96797 6a.POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE 7.NAME OF FIRM(IF BLOCK 2A IS A BRANCH OFFICE) Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge 6b.TELEPHONE NUMBER 6c.E-MAIL ADDRESS 808 836-7787 kchu@bowersandkubota.com 8a.FORMER FIRM NAME(S)(IF ANY) 8b.YR.ESTABLISHED 8c.DUNS NUMBER KFC Airport,Inc. 1980 03-929-9763 9.EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE 10.PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE AND ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS c.No.of Employees c.Revenue a.Function b.Discipline a.Profile b.Experience Index Code (1)Firm (2)Branch Code Number(see below) 02 Administrative 41 A05 Airports;Navaids;Airport Lighting;Aircraft Fueling 5 06 Architects 20 A06 Airports;Terminals&Hangars;Freight 6 Handling 08 CADD Technician 7 C10 Commercial Building(low rise);Shopping Centers 4 12 Civil Engineers 26 C15 Construction Management 8 15 Construction Inspector 38 E02 Educational Facilities;Classrooms 4 16 Construction Managers 27 E03 Electrical Studies and Design 4 18 Cost Engineer/Estimator 2 E09 Environmental Impact Studies;... 5 21 Electrical Engineers 4 Ell Environmental Planning 4 23 Environmental Engineer 5 H07 Highways;Streets;Airfield Paving;Parking Lots 6 37 Interior Designer 1 H09 Hospitals&Medical Facilities 6 39 Landscape Architect 6 Hll Housing(Residential,Multi-Family;Apartments; 1 Condominiums) 47 Planner 6 L03 Landscape Architecture 4 48 Project Managers 66 P05 Planning(Community;Regional;...) 5 50 Risk Assessor 4 P06 Planning(Site,Installation and Project) 1 51 Safety/Occupational Health Engineer 1 R06 Rehabilitation (Buildings;Structures;Facilities) 3 52 Sanitary Engineer 1 SO4 Sewage Collection,Treatment&Disposal 4 53 Schedulers 2 S07 Solid Wastes;Incineration;Landfill 4 58 Technician/Analyst 3 S13 Storm Water Handling&Facilities 4 T02 Testing&Inspection Services 4 W02 Water Resources;Hydrology;Ground Water 4 Total 260 W03 Water Supply;Treatment and Distribution 4 11.ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM FOR LAST 3 YEARS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER (Insert revenue index number shown at right) a.Federal Work 7 1.Less than$100,000 6.$2 million to less than$5 million 2.$100,000 to less that$250,000 7.$5 million to less than$10 million b.Non-Federal Work 9 3.$250,000 to less than$500,000 8.$10 million to less than$25 million 4.$500,000 to less than$1 million 9.$25 million to less than$50 million c.Total Work 9 5.$1 million to less than$2 million 10.$50 million or greater 12.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. a.SIGNATURE b.DATE yit#A-Cd-3..,--- June 30,2023 c.NAME AND TITLE Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021) i APPENDIX A: AWARDS AND CLIENT EVALUATIONS Bowers + Kubota's Unique Qualifications and Commitment to Excellence are demonstrated by some of the numerous awards and recognition we have received. Zweig Group's , ai i Business Ma ' National Best Firms to Work For gazine s tt„ 2022:4th Place Multidiscipline 2009,2011-2 3rd Place Firm Size 200+ Employees 2008 2023 Recipient 3rd Place Internal Marketing Award013,2015,2022-21 3. 1st Place Trifecta Award for Winning all 3 Categories 2021: 1st Place Multidiscipline 2nd Place Firm Size 200+ Employees 3rd Place Internal Marketing Award i' iAllio Trifecta Award for Winning all 3 Categories 2020: 1st Place Firm Size 200+ Employees 1st Place Multidiscipline 2019: 1st Place 100-199 Employeesr....;.. 2nd Place Multidiscipline n , Pirr . .; 2018: 1st Place Architecture r, I Ifr 1st Place Civil Engineering 2nd Place Multidisciplinary 2017:2nd Place Civil Engineering ,• 4E11 3rd Place Multidisciplinary ,' ,� :•*» ,, "4 2016:2nd Place Civil Engineering Best *; 3rd Place Multidisciplinary i ,4,, Fit-alsoi 2015:2nd Place Civil Engineering + -, .�,..e. a. <; 1st Place Multidisciplinary t4.. .• , 2014: 1st Place Civil Engineering .: 1st Place Multidisciplinary ,s zT ENR „„ ENR Magazine's Top 100 TOP 1 00 Construction mmliilli Management-for-Fee Firms 2022:#30 National ` \4BoWE\OWER + J 2021:#48 National 2020:#44 National -'-- 2019:#39 National In 5 Inc.5000 Idi Fastest Growing. 44.1„ ,, Private Companies 2021:#4761 National ,. , 2018:#4805 National __. „ �� 1111111 AHA Fit-Friendly Worksite i' 2012: Platinum Achievement Recipient 2011,2013:Gold Achievement Award 2018,2021:Silver Achievement Award 2014:Worksite Innovation Award A iCEë h WkUM'4M Lfil:%CH Lir I`.i:IJXN,YIti4.Lgi 1.4 WYi. - 1141 7-7- _ Excellence Award •Wanaao Road/Keolu Drive IVII-11k-V Reconstructed Sewer •Bowers+Kubota Warehouse/ Office Space A •Keauhou Beach Hotel and Site Demolition(Honor Award-National) Honor Award 7 2019 Construction •Kaumualii Highway Lihue Mill Management Project Bridge Rice street Achievement Award ASCE •UH Information Technology Center Water/Wastewater/Utility: •Ewa Makai Middle School Construction value greater •Honouliuli WWTP-New Solids than$50M Handling Facility •Honoapiilani Highway Lahainaluna Road Outstanding Widening, Kaneohe-Kailua Wastewater Conveyance&Treatment • to Aholo Road y New Interisland Terminal Civil Engineering Facilities Project KK Tunnel Complex,HNL 7 Achievement Award •In-Vessel Bioconversion •Emergency Repairs of'lhi'ihilauakea Bridge Facility , •New Interisland Terminal Complex,HNL •South Ramp Microtunneling •Replacement of Kea'iwa Stream Bridge Project •Hawaiki Submarine Cable and Kapolei •Kaneohe-Kailua Watewater Landing Station(Grand Award and Best Conveyance&Treatment Large Project) Facilities Project K-K Tunnel •Keauhou Beach Hotel and Site Demolition (Grand Award and Best Large Project [Hawaii],Best Large Project[Region],Honor Award[National]) ARUM — i aye.€r n +e ufos..r , i Public Works Project of the Year ri 1E331 HAWAII SOCIETY OF h Range Improvements PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS •Ala Wai Golf Course Driving 1 CM Project of the Year i •Emergency Repairs oYlhi'ihi- , lauakea Bridge •Haleakala Highway Widening, Phase II J'}"►'4 A Hawaii Society of7 •Honouliuli WWTP,New Solids Professional Engineers Handling Facility y� � AWA� 2011 Project of the Year Award •Ewa Makai Middle School 1 •Manele Small Boat Harbor :, Kamehameha Avenue Roadway Ferry&ADA Improvements Improvements •In-Vessel Bioconversion Facility •Pa'au'au Stream Building Project General Design Project Management Merit Award Project of the Year University of Hawai'i-West •Manana Properties Develop- 11 O'ahu,New Administration& ment Allied Health Building •National Cemetery Stabili- zation CM National Project of the Year •Replacement of Kea'iwa Stream Bridge Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 Kahuku Ranch Cesspool Assessment and Remediation $220,610 Name of Project Contract Amount Scope of work: Civil Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5)Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team 1. Keeps you informed Lucas Aribon, Albert Rivera Comments:The B+K team has been able to meet or exceed 5 my needs over the last year and a half and continues to I Comments:Answered previously. perform at an outstanding level. 2. Quality of Project Manager 2. Addresses problems and offers workable Eric Tamashiro solutions Comments: Eric has provided excellent service and has consistently provided project deliverables on time,within 5 5 budget, and according to scope. In addition Eric and his Comments:Answered previously. team has responded to the many requests, ranging from assistance with contract scoping to post project support, so we are very happy with the services provided. 3. Treats you as an important team member 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions Comments: Eric is extremely conscientious and understands that the acquisitions we have been working on come from the 5 Comments: Eric listens to my opinions and more global 5 top levels of leadership at KS. He response time is excellent, concerns and incorporates them into his proposed solutions. even calling/emailing time sensitive information on Friday afternoon and even the weekend. 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs 5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments:As stated earlier,we have been operating on 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion time, on budget, and according to scope. 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality* Integrity * Teamwork Comments:Answered previously. 5 Comments: Eric is outcome focused and provides various 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule options on how to achieve the outcomes I am seeking. 5 Section 2—Technical Ability Comments:Answered previously. 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 3. Processes documents in a timely manner Comments:Again, Eric provides solutions that meet our 5 5 needs but are within the established regulations and Comments:Answered previously. boundaries. 2. General technical knowledge Section 5—Value Comments: I don't think I have presented an issue that we 5 have not been able to resolve,that's gotta count for a lot! 1. Adheres to project budget 5 3. Knowledge of the contract Comments:Answered previously. Comments: I work closely with Eric on crafting the contract 5 and SOW,which has been very successful to date. 2. Provides added value 5 4.Quality of response to documents Comments:Answered previously. Comments: Our turn around times on comments and 5 revisions has really impressed my bosses. Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 1. Please rate the overall performance Comments: I don't know enough about your margins to be Comments: Over the last 18 months, Eric has worked on commenting beyond,we have been satisfied with the 5 some of the most high profile acquisitions for KS and has 5 compensation relative to the deliverables and timeframes delivered consistently so it not hard to praise his work and they are provided. give him the ratings I have. 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 2. Would be your choice for future service Comments: I am a stickler for maintaining timelines and Eric 5 Comments: Eric(and B+K by extension)is growing a 5 have met all of my expectations as well as those of the reputation for delivering high quality products in short internal clients at KS. timeframes with the leadership at KS'FDSD. 7. Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: Comments: Eric has been keen to share insights on 5 regulatory requirements to avoid missteps as the project progresses. Mr.Allen Salavea Kamehameha Schools 11/22/2022 Name Agency/Department/Division Date Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 RH-03: Eng. Design Support for FY23 IWRR Name of Project Contract Amount Scope of work: Civil Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5) Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team Anthony Domingo, Jamie, Tang, James 1. Keeps you informed DeGuzman, Maria Bawag, Edgar Quinabo, 5 5 Joshua Gusman Comments: Comments: 2. Quality of Project Manager 2. Addresses problems and offers workable Mike Nishimura 5 solutions 5 Comments: Comments: 3. Treats you as an important team member 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions 5 Comments: Comments: 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs 5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments: 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality * Integrity * Teamwork Comments: 5 Comments: 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule 5 Section 2—Technical Ability Comments: 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work3. Processes documents in a timely manner 5 5 Comments: Comments: 2. General technical knowledge5 Section 5—Value Comments: 1. Adheres to project budget 5 3. Knowledge of the contract5 Comments: Comments: 2. Provides added value 5 4.Quality of response to documents Comments: 5 Comments: Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 1. Please rate the overall performance 5 Comments: Comments: 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 2. Would be your choice for future service 5 Comments: Comments: 7. Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: I realize all 5s does not offer constructive criticism,but I personally have N/A been extremely satisfied with the service we are receiving. Thorough, timely,yet not excessive communication is what I appreciate the most. Comments: Some scores regarding accuracy could have been docked,but all matters to date have been nondetrimental,which I believe is due to timely communication. Thank you and I look forward to our continued work together. Mr.Todd Ozaki County of Kauai, Department of Public Works 11/23/2022 Name Agency/Department/Division Date Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 PVT Landfill Owner Advisory Services $587,600 Name of Project Contract Amount Scope of work: Civil Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5) Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team 1. Keeps you informed Albert Rivera, Matt Takane 5 5 Comments:Quick to respond and detailed to enable Comments: appropriate answers/topos requested. 2. Quality of Project Manager 2. Addresses problems and offers workable Mike Nishimura solutions Comments:Mike is very responsive to any request 5 5 submitted. His directives are clear to subordinates that Comments: enable quality outcome. 3. Treats you as an important team member 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions 5 Comments: BK team has very inclusive of our needs. Comments: Listens attentively to needs and requests. 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs 5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments: No comment 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality * Integrity * Teamwork Comments: 5 Comments: Core values are met 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule 5 Section 2—Technical Ability Comments: 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 3. Processes documents in a timely manner Comments: Skill sets are very evident and reflected in the 5 5 end product Comments: Getting tired of commenting. 2. General technical knowledge Section 5—Value Comments:That is why we hired the company,formerly Belt- 5 Collins Hawaii. 1. Adheres to project budget 5 3. Knowledge of the contract5 Comments: Comments: 2. Provides added value 5 4.Quality of response to documents Comments: 5 Comments: Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 1. Please rate the overall performance 5 Comments: Comments: 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 2. Would be your choice for future service 5 Comments: Meets or exceeds scheduled requirements. Comments: 7. Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: 5 Comments: Evaluation is too long. Mr.Albert Shigemura PVT Land Company, Ltd. 11/29/2022 Name Agency/Department/Division Date Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 Building 9 Well #2 Repair, Kunia Tunnel $325,988 Name of Project Contract Amount Scope of work: Civil Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5) Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team 1. Keeps you informed Tracey-Anne Panlasigui, Brian Kawamoto 5 5 Comments: Comments: 2. Quality of Project Manager 2. Addresses problems and offers workable Cary Kondo 5 solutions 5 Comments: Comments: 3. Treats you as an important team member 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions 5 Comments: Comments: 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs 5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments: 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality * Integrity * Teamwork Comments: 5 Comments: 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule 5 Section 2—Technical Ability Comments: 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work3. Processes documents in a timely manner 5 5 Comments: Comments: 2. General technical knowledge5 Section 5—Value Comments: 1. Adheres to project budget 5 3. Knowledge of the contract5 Comments: Comments: 2. Provides added value 5 4.Quality of response to documents Comments: 5 Comments: Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 1. Please rate the overall performance 5 Comments: Comments: 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 2. Would be your choice for future service 5 Comments: Comments: 7. Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: 5 Comments: Ms. Su Yi Jacobs Government Services Company 11/29/2022 Name Agency/Department/Division Date Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 Moloaa Irrigation Cooperative Water Sys. Improvem. $100,000 Name of Project Contract Amount Scope of work: Civil Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5) Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team 1. Keeps you informed Kristen Yoshida Comments: Kristen was responsive,efficient and clearly 5 Comments:Always there when we needed them,prompt 5 went over and above to satisfy our needs. It was a responses and good proactive communications where pleasure working with her. necessary. 2. Quality of Project Manager 2. Addresses problems and offers workable Jay Stone solutions Comments: I have known Jay for many years,and he has 5 5 always exemplified professionalism,technical competence, Comments:Always worked towards a better solution for attention to detail,and has grown into a real leader and their client(us)and the affected water system. manager that any company would be proud to have. 3. Treats you as an important team member 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions Comments: 5 Comments: Maintained a good rapport with us during back 5 and forth comments. 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs 5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments: 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality * Integrity * Teamwork Comments: 5 Comments: Kristen and jay excelled in all of these 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule categories. GREA core values by the way. 5 Comments: Did their best to do this in spite of project delays Section 2—Technical Ability outside of their control. 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 3. Processes documents in a timely manner Comments: Kristen and Jay both maintained exemplary 5 5 professionalism during the ups and downs of this project, Comments: and never wavered from it. 2. General technical knowledge Section 5—Value Comments:They knew their stuff,came in with a good 5 approach and worked well with us on our technical 1. Adheres to project budget comments and suggestions. 5 3. Knowledge of the contract Comments: Comments: Kristen and Jay clearly read the contract and 5 understood its requirements and limitations. That was not 2. Provides added value always the case with about half of our other contracted consultants. i 5 Comments: I saw effort in this as the project progressed 4.Quality of response to documents through its different stages. Kristen and Jay were always 5 looking at things to add value to the project. Comments: always prompt and thorough i Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 1. Please rate the overall performance Comments: N/A Comments:A"10"for sure,hope we can do business again 5 with them. 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 2. Would be your choice for future service Comments: Did their best to stay on schedule to finish the 5 5 contract in spite of other factors beyond their control. Comments:Absolutely 7. Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: N/A Comments: Mr. Michael Miyahira State of Hawaii, Department of Health, Environmental 12/5/2022 Management Division,Safe Drinking Water Branch Name Agency/Department/Division Date Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 Keauhou Beach Hotel Demolition Project $2,599,745 Name of Project Contract Amount Civil Engineering, Landscape Archtiecture, Planning, Scope of work: Electrical Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5) Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team Calvin Ing, Albert Rivera, Edgar Quinabo, Brian Kawamoto, Bradley Tanimura, Lance Keliiaa, 1. Keeps you informed Christopher Billete, Kelsey Wai, Brian Itozaki, Nick Enomoto Comments:The entire team was very responsive. The project was very complicated,and the team was able to 5 5 flex when needed. I was also very satisfied with their ability and knowledge of the permitting and agency process. The team was able to address high-and low-level concerns Comments: Eric,Calvin and I talk often raised by the agencies. An example of this was a cover sheet included an"index/cheat sheet"for the plan reviewer so she could more efficiently navigate the large set of drawings. I believe this was much appreciated by the overwhelmed planning department. 2. Quality of Project Manager 2. Addresses problems and offers workable Eric Tamashiro solutions Comments: I have worked continuously with Eric for 10 Comments: None of the team shrunk from any problem. years!He is a measured and contemplative engineer. He reasonable solutions were brought up from multiple different is a good listener and clearly breakdowns issues so the 5 team members. Sometime the contractor,sometimes the 5 owner and the design team can discuss decisions with user,and design team. The important take away is that all focus and appropriate solutions. Eric communicates well were heard and felt comfortable sharing their ideas.At no with his team agencies that keep the conversations on time,was someone's reasonable contributions was point. He keeps the project moving and RFI/responses/ dismissed off hand. The team,as a whole,was open to revisions occurred timely. I also felt that our conversations critically thinking problems. concerning budget or overruns were transparent and fair. 3. Treats you as an important team member 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions Comments: I think it's fair to say that Eric and I have equal respect for each other. We both pretty much stay in our 5 Comments: Eric had very little choice in that matter. He 5 lanes and do our best to recognize each other's pain points managed well. as part of the process to make the project successful. 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments: I never noticed a point where this project had a 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion staff issue. 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality * Integrity * Teamwork Comments: no issues Comments: I typically don't give 5's or the highest marks 5 on these types of surveys,but I'm not sure we could have 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule completed this project without this team. They all provided their best,advocated for the project and worked together. 5 Comments: Our goals on schedule for this project was not in the hands of the design team for the most part. EXCEPT for meeting our demo completion schedule. This again was the Section 2—Technical Ability joint effort by the entire team. 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 3. Processes documents in a timely manner Comments: Our conversations or actions never veered to unethical practices. I believe that all who contributed on 5 Comments: I don't believe that we could have moved faster 5 this project,inclusive of subcontractors and KS cultural, for submitting drawings or responding. contractors etc... behaved professionally and ethically. 2. General technical knowledge Section 5—Value Comments:As I read or participated in meeting with 5 1. Adheres to project budget 5 agencies, I was impressed that the team was ready/knowledgeable/prepared to respond to all the comments. B+K was able to provide options or pivot or respond appropriately. 3. Knowledge of the contract Comments:All amendments to the contract were owner g driven. For this particular project, Comments:The contract scoped was amended multiple times. It was a good think that the proposal was well 5 defined. We did need to refer back to the amendments to 2. Provides added value double check line-item cost. Although,the project took us on many twists and turns,we were able to keep track of what was included,not included and track costs. Comments:The added value was the depth of experience 5 we could pull from.Cheryl Palesh and other leaders within the BCH and B+K team provided a concise view of a very 4.Quality of response to documents complicated project.The project never struggled for 5 competent expert review on a high level. I never encountered a situation where we didn't have a decisive path. Comments: No issues. reasonable turn around time Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 1. Please rate the overall performance Comments: Estimating some of these projects are hard as Comments: For complicated projects,this team was the the scope may shift. Having said that,the estimate or best. Considering the duration of the project and the proposal are very complete. Sometimes,the proposals are multiple changes in scope,I appreciated how and when more conservative than needed for every project. amendments were handled. As the owner PM,I However,one way we have navigating the unknown is to 4 appreciated not being inundated with multiple minor amend 5 phase the design contract. This way we can start ments. We were able to bundle the changes and forecast eliminating unknowns and not contracting for work where work so that invoicing/scope was clear and comprehensive. the scope is unclear and that significantly impacts design Also,during the covid lock down,the team also raised to the budget. Concurrently,B+K has assisted in wholistic occasion switching to MS TEAMs meeting was seamless. baseline cost on the conservative end to help with It's worthy to note that we had 100 OAC's and most of these budgeting. this way we can managed from both ends and were done virtually. hopefully exceed expectations. 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 2. Would be your choice for future service Comments: all documents are submitted on time. 5 Comments: B+K would be my preference especially for 5 large and/or complicated projects. 7. Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: N/A Comments: Mahalo nui for B+K's! Ms. Laura Takahashi Kamehameha Schools 11/23/2022 Name Agency/Department/Division Date i APPENDIX B: PROFESSIONAL LICENSES PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NOTICE THIS POCKET ID CARD IDENTIFIES YOU TO THE PUBLIC AS BEING CURRENTLY LICENSED AND SHOULD BE KEPT IN YOUR POSSESSION AT ALL TIMES. I License Number Expiration date Eli.' ''❑� CLASSES(ACTIVE): I I PE-12808 4130(2024 h• STATE OF-(OEM.CEPPFTTENT OF CO A(ERCE AND COM.SUAER AFFN RS _ 1,1111W1 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IOh El I I CLASS(ES):CE CIVIL lI KATHLEEN S B CHL 7140 MAKAA ST HONOLULU,HI 96825 !Ii / i SI,'. TURE OF LICENSEE _W W_—I J �• BOWERS + KUBOTA vI\ Construction Management•A/E Design•Planning•Project Management 94-408 Akoki Street,Suite 201-A Waipahu,Hawaii 96797 -' 13F.44 :_07 J fey '. COUNTY OF HAWAII �' � r i *�% -� PLANNING DEPARTMENT S�� ���Mii r+M.n. [7F iak4 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FISCAL YEAR 2023 - 2024 PL.5) COMMUNITY PLANNING Environmental Planning, Environmental Assessments, Environmental Impact Statements , 'f' June 30, 2023 May BOWERS + KUBOTA Aff BOWERS + KUBOTA Cranstrucfron Managerncc,t•.n!£design•Planning Project Manage neaar B+K No. 23.524 June 30, 2023 Mr. Zendo Kern, Planning Director Planning Department County of Hawaii 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3, Hilo, Hawai'i 96720 Subject: Professional Services During Fiscal Year 2023-2024 PL.5) Community Planning (Environmental Planning, Environmental Assessments, Environmental Impact Statements) Dear Mr. Kern: Bowers+Kubota Consulting(B+K)is pleased to submit our letter of interest and qualifications to provide professional services during the fiscal Year 2023-2024 for the above referenced category. We believe our staff with its extensive experience can provide the professional services required for your upcoming projects. Over the past 43 years, B+K has provided outstanding architectural/engineering design, program and project management, construction management, and planning services across the State of Hawaii while living our mission statement of Fulfilling Visions.Building Trust.Our extensive experience has resulted in successfully completing numerous projects for a variety of public agencies and private industry clients. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me by telephone at (808) 836-7787 or by email at kchu@bowersandkubota.com. Respectfully, BOWERS +KUBOTA CONSULTING, INC. 7 'tea, Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge 94-408 Akoki Street,Ste.201-A,Waipahu,HI 96797 . r 1808)835.7787 www.bowersandkubota.com 4... i STANDARD FORM 330 ARCHITECT- ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS PART I-CONTRACT SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS A. CONTRACT INFORMATION 1.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) Professional Services in Fiscal Year 2023 - 2024 2.PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 3.SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER PL.5)Community Planning (Environmental Planning, June 1,2023 Environmental Assessments,Environmental Impact Statements) B.ARCHITECT - ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT 4.NAME AND TITLE Kathleen Chu,PE,Principal-in-Charge 5.NAME OF FIRM :t Bowers+Kubota Consulting 6.TELEPHONE NUMBER 7.FAX NUMBER 8.E-MAIL ADDRESS (808) 836-7787 (808) 834-4833 kchu@bowersandkubota.com C. PROPOSED TEAM (COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR THE PRIME CONTRACTOR AND ALL KEY SUBCONTRACTORS.) (Check) 0 9.FIRM NAME 10.ADDRESS 11.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT w < a ~ z r ? O a (!)U PL.5)Community Planning Bowers+Kubota Consulting 94-408 Akoki Street, Suite 201- (Environmental Planning, a. X A Environmental Assessments, Waipahu,HI 96797 Environmental Impact ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE Statements) b. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE c. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE d. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE e. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE f. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE 9. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM ❑D (ATTACHED) AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 1 D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM a?.'(-? �.- ;\ . * _.) OF COUNTY OF HAWAII Planning Department PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE Kathleen Chu,PE PLANNING SENIOR MANAGER Jared Chang,AICP Ronald Sato,AICP Matthew Kodama,MBA Carah Kadota,AICP Matthew Fernandez AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 2 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge 31 1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) af= E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Jared Chang,AICP Planning Manager/Senior Project A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM Planner 17 <1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) M= E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Ronald Sato,AICP Senior Project Manager/Senior A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM Planner 33 <1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Waipahu,HI 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Master of Arts,Urban and Regional Planning Bachelor of Science,Political Science 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) American Institute of Certified Planners(Certificate No. 014538) American Planning Association,National and Hawaii Chapters Historic Hawaii Foundation,Board of Trustees(2010-2016) 11 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Harbors Division PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Pier 40 Improvements Honolulu Harbor Ongoing N/A Honolulu,HI (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑x CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM a ROLE: Senior Project Manager SCOPE: The State Department of Transportation,Harbors Division is proposing improvements to Piers 39 and 40 that's used by Young Brothers as an interisland terminal.The project would fill the harbor area between Piers 39 and 40 and demolish certain areas of these piers to offset fill and loss of U.S.waters.Inland areas would be raised 3 feet to address sea level rise and redevelopment of Young Brothers facilities.An EIS would be prepared along with addressing several federal requirements to support a U.S.COE Individual Permit for pier work. PROJECT COST:N/A (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Highways Division PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Transportation Corridor Assessment Route 11 Queen Kaahumanu/Kuakini Ongoing 2018 Highway,Kailua-Kona,HI (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE:Planner bSCOPE:B+K is performing a Corridor Assessment to find plausible solutions and options that will reduce congestion and enhance safety along Queen Kaahumanu Extension and Kuakini Highway.With the growth in population and increase in traffic,congestion on Route 11 between Henry Street and Kamehameha III Road has continued to grow and worsen over time. The approach to develop the concepts will be modeled after the Planning and Environmental Linkages(PEL)approach to help facilitate future NEPA or HEPA processes in the future.Future traffic operations will be evaluated and near-term and mid-term improvements that can be readily implemented to reduce congestion will be identified and evaluated against a pre-determined set of criteria. PROJECT COST: $301,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State DLNR,Division of Forestry&Wildlife PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Kawainui-Hamakua Marsh Master Plan;Final Environmental Impact 2020 N/A Statement,Kailua,HI (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE: Senior Project Manager c. SCOPE: The State DLNR,DOFAW updated their master plan for the 986-acre Kawainui-Hamakua Marsh Complex in partnership with DSP.The master plan supported wetland restoration,upland reforestation,created areas for native Hawaiian cultural practices,and supported public access and educational programs.Completed an EIS approved by the State Land Board and withstood a legal challenge. Work included extensive community outreach to address concerns and effective community- based planning. PROJECT COST: $53,300,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED The Wilhelm Group for State of Hawaii PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Department of Transportation,Harbors Division Ongoing N/A Hilo and Kahului Harbor Land Acquisition (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM d. ROLE: Senior Project Planner SCOPE: Assisting with the acquisition of privately held lands surrounding Hilo and Kahului Harbors and production of a Harbors Facilities Plan that will summarize the potential options that DOT-H may have in utilizing the acquired lands, assisting with the infrastructure due diligence,and preparing an Environmental Assessment for the harbors.Design vehicle maneuverability,harbor access points and major harbor use operations,forecasted harbor buildout and activities,and planned use and improvements to adjacent thoroughfares and streets were evaluated and agencies consulted with to formulate optimal use and development of the private lots to complement harbor improvements.PROJECT COST:N/A STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 5 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM Matthew Kodama,MBA Planning Project Manager 13 3 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) aim +Kubota Consulting,Waipahu,HI 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Master of Business Administration,Business Bachelor of Business Administration,Finance 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) American Planning Association Hawaii State Public Charter School Commission,Commissioner 2ELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED County of Maui,Planning Department PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) South Maui Community Plan Update 2022 N/A Various Locations,HI (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑x CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM a. ROLE:Assistant Planning Project Manager SCOPE:Updated the South Maui Community Plan that included the regions from Maalaea,Kihei,Wailea,Makena,to Ahihi- Kinau/Kanaio. The updated plan provides a vision,a community plan map,goals,policies and actions to guide County officials and staff,property owners,developers,and residents on the appropriate growth and redevelopment patterns for South Maui for the next 20 years. PROJECT COST: $7,000,000(estimated) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Land and Natural Resources PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Kealakekua Bay State Historical Park Master Plan and Environmental Impact Statement Ongoing N/A South Kona,HI (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑x CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM b ' ROLE:Assistant Planning Project Manager SCOPE:Providing support services for the EIS.The primary goal of the project is to plan for a public park that preserves the area's cultural landscape and historic resources,preserves and protects the marine resources of the Bay,promotes the scenic values and natural park setting,and accommodates outdoor recreation in a manner that doesn't impact or degrade the natural and cultural resources.Draft master plan was completed in 2013. PROJECT COST:N/A (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Accounting and General Services PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) ICSD Radio Facilities Site Assessments,Environmental Assessments and Round Top:Ongoing Facility Layouts,Oahu and Kauai Mauna Kapu:2014 N/A Various Locations,HI Mokuleia:2014 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE:Planning Senior Manager SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting is assisting ICSD in upgrades to six radio facilities on Oahu and four facilities on Kauai. The general scope of work at each facility includes conducting site evaluations,developing facility layouts and completing the associated preliminary engineering reports(PERs),followed by preparation of the environmental assessment(EA)and c, Conservation District Use permit(CDUP)and other permit applications as required for design and implementation of the planned upgrades.The PERs and EAs are completed for the Mauna Kapu and Mokuleia sites on Oahu.At Mauna Kapu, B+K coordinated with the private land owner;the U.S.Army and Coast Guard,which lease and have facilities at the site, respectively;and the DLNR relative to trails through the site.The station improvements included underground electric,cable television,telephone,and communication conduits to service the existing buildings.B+K also provided the civil engineering design for the project.At Mokuleia,which is the site of the Pahole Rare Plant Facility project,reconditioning of a former Nike missile facility platforms and electrical services upgrades were included in the PER,with archaeological,cultural,flora, fauna,and hazardous materials assessments completed for the EA.Field visits and site planning have started for the Red Hill site with ongoing coordination between the U.S. Army and DAGS on the site requirements. At Roundtop,an EA and CDUP is being prepared for the replacement of the radio antennas.Activities at the other Oahu sites and for the Kauai sites are being scheduled. PROJECT COST:N/A (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Hawaiian Home Lands PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) North Kona Water Development Ongoing N/A Kona,HI (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM d ' ROLE:Assistant Planning Project Manager SCOPE:Preparing Environmental Assessments(EAs)and a preliminary engineering report for potable water source development on two parcels in the Keauhou 2 Ahupuaa.The wells being developed are intended to support development of DHHL projects at Lai Opua Village and Kalaoa. PROJECT COST:N/A STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 6 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM Carah Kadota,AICP Assistant Planning Project Manager 7 <1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) M=Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Waipahu,HI 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Bachelor of Environmental Design 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) American Institute of Certified Planners(Certificate No. 34599) American Planning Association,Hawaii Chapter 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City and County of Honolulu,Department of Design and Construction PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Kahawainui Stream Dredging 2023 N/A Laie,HI a. (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑x CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE:Planner SCOPE:Processing permit applications with approvals including DA permit,401WQC,NPDES permit for construction stormwater discharges,stream channel alteration,HRS Ch. 6E with SHPD. PROJECT COST: $2,000,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Highways PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Vulnerable Road User Safety Assessment(VRUSA) Statewide HI Ongoing N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE:Planner bSCOPE: Working with the HDOT to develop the State's first Vulnerable Road User Safety Assessment(VRUSA). A VRUSA is an assessment of the safety performance of a State with respect to vulnerable road users and the plan for the State to improve the safety of vulnerable road users.Addressing the safety of vulnerable road users through a collaborative and comprehensive approach allows people that walk,bike,and roll full and safe access to our transportation system.The assessment will include the Safe System Approach,which aims to improve safety culture,increase collaboration across all stakeholders,and refocus transportation system design and operation on anticipating human mistakes and lessening impact forces to reduce crash severity and save lives. PROJECT COST: 575,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Highways PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Route 50(Kaumualii Highway)Feasibility Study,Hanapepe to Kekaha, Ongoing N/A Kekaha,Kauai,HI (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE:Planner c• SCOPE: Conduct a Feasibility Study to explore conceptual details,constraints,and prospective timelines for different resiliency improvement alternatives based on probable future scenarios of concern for Route 50,Kaumualii Highway,from Hanapepe to Kekaha.The objectives of the Feasibility Study are to explore resiliency realities,criticalities,and challenges for the Route 50 study area. The scope of work will include coastal modeling of tidal flood frequency analysis and high-resolution sea level rise and wave inundation modeling.The modeling will be conducted for a variety of future sea level rise scenarios combined with different wave events to help estimate the frequency of occurrence of flooding at selected intervals in the future. PROJECT COST: $675,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Harbors Division PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Consulting Engineer's Report for FY2017-2019, State of Hawaii, 2021 N/A Statewide,HI d. (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE:Planner SCOPE:Preparation of a Consulting Engineer's Report that examined the operations of all commercial harbors and associated improvements within fiscal year 2017-2019. PROJECT COST: $50,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Harbors Division PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Department of Transportation,Harbors Division Pier 40 Improvements Honolulu Harbor Honolulu,HI Ongoing N/A e. (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE:Planner SCOPE:Planning work involves site planning and coordination with DOT,HAR and Young Brothers on improvements and relocation of their operations during construction.An Environmental Impact Statement is also being prepared along with obtaining an Individual Permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers that will involve compliance with several federal regulations(Section 7,Section 106,etc.).PROJECT COST:N/A STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 7 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM Matthew P.Fernandez Assistant Planner 3 <1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) rs= F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 1 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Land and Natural Resources PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Kealakekua Bay Master Plan&Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) Ongoing(estimated N/A South Kona,HI completion 2023) 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER State of Hawaii,Department of Department of Land and Natural Martha Yent (808)587-0287 Resources 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting provided master plan,EIS,and management plan services for Kealakekua Bay State Historical Park. The state considers the park as one of the most historically significant places in Hawaii.The park spans 216 acres on land in three adjacent areas(Napoopoo,Pali Kapu 0 Keoua,and Kaawaloa),315 acres of waters of the adjacent Kealakekua Bay Marine Life Conservation District,and the Napoopoo pier.The primary project goal is to plan for a public park that preserves the area's cultural landscape and historic resources,preserves and protects the marine resources of Kealakekua Bay,promotes the scenic values and natural park setting,and accommodates outdoor recreation in a manner that does not impact or degrade natural and cultural resources.A draft master plan was developed before the ocean resources became the responsibility of the State Parks Division.The draft master plan is being updated to include analysis of marine issues and ocean recreational activities.The revised master plan will promote preservation and stewardship,offer guidance in the development of park interpretive concepts and programs,identify park facility needs,and recommend park management measures for the land and the sea.Community input and collaboration have been integral to the planning process and will continue to be considered in developing management measures. PROJECT COST:N/A(Study) V. AP1AIN t OOK ,y i s."'hA�'X+a1. a p� `r"` - ^ytl; * _` - - y - ,, ,^... a - S r x •,,-NAP ,,,„1,„,,, R - .. `� . y y dart \t' v _ Na po npo'ca } ,. J F'ul,hor,[fd�a� o BPacft �r` spate k'3rk ' ��oti �Q�L) .- �c 4' qn Landing raw g a4 etc' e4- - { s ,r -��� titz4 c� '—Kahaulo �.. nF ,� sr fi Bay Mani'[sail r-..,-.^.4�©,-aG `a:�./ Pont ���ovFid �tP n'Ld l Ke n1d C''''' rpm 1 Captain Cook �%� Monurnerrt kpalakekrra Ray �~ ... ''-----.'" ""` KA'AWALOA x ,•• .,* O,�ca[t��ad {v " N3ht rif.1 racacr 4. - 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. r..`Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 9 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 2 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(ifapplicable) Waimanalo Infill Housing 2019 N/A Waimanalo,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Albert Palmer (808)587-0500 Corporation 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting provided planning services for the layout of single-family affordable housing lots on three remnant parcels in Waimanalo Village.An alternative concept for the largest parcel to have a community center and kupuna housing and personal gardening plots was also developed. A Chapter 11-200.1 Hawaii Administrative Rules(HAR)Environmental Assessment(EA)was then prepared for the project,with a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment(ESA);fauna and flora studies and an archaeological/cultural practice literature review were also conducted.The draft EA was completed,but not submitted for publication based on issuance of the updated Chapter 11-200.1 HAR which exempt affordable housing projects. PROJECT COST:N/A 1n: f* • 4-1-034:119 I ' 4-1-034:092 L - ! I — ' 1. r �! - gr . ir II II 111 g IIill _ f Is A �.q 10 i nlpil�f 1pt'+n ,. 1 a gm 4-1-012:155 .a'' q "' 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. rip(Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner,Civil Engineer STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 10 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 3 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(ifapplicable) State of Hawaii,Department of Accounting and General Services ICSD Radio Facilities Site Assessments,Environmental Assessments and Facility Round Top-Ongoing Layouts,Oahu and Kauai Mauna Kapu-2014 N/A Various Locations,HI Mokuleia-2014 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER State of Hawaii,Department of David DePonte (808)586-0492 Accounting and General Services 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting is assisting ICSD in upgrades to six radio facilities on Oahu and four facilities on Kauai. The general scope of work at each facility includes conducting site evaluations,developing facility layouts and completing the associated preliminary engineering reports(PERS),followed by preparation of the environmental assessment(EA)and Conservation District Use permit(CDUP)and other permit applications as required for design and implementation of the planned upgrades.The PERs and EAs are completed for the Mauna Kapu and Mokuleia sites on Oahu. At Mauna Kapu,B+K coordinated with the private land owner; the U.S. Army and Coast Guard,which lease and have facilities at the site,respectively;and the DLNR relative to trails through the site.The station improvements included underground electric,cable television,telephone,and communication conduits to service the existing buildings.B+K also provided the civil engineering design for the project. At Mokuleia,which is the site of the Pahole Rare Plant Facility project,reconditioning of a former Nike missile facility platforms and electrical services upgrades were included in the PER,with archaeological,cultural,flora,fauna,and hazardous materials assessments completed for the EA.Field visits and site planning have started for the Red Hill site with ongoing coordination between the U.S.Army and DAGS on the site requirements.At Roundtop,an EA and CDUP is being prepared for the replacement of the radio antennas.Activities at the other Oahu sites and for the Kaua'i sites are being scheduled. PROJECT COST:N/A n e + + {J T.—Project Site • . . f t7 a 4, a Mama 144:411 aa anal, A 'rte 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE 411 a. mo`Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner,Civil Engineer STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 11 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 4 Complete one Section Ffor each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Office of Hawaiian Affairs PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(fappicab/e) Kukaniloko Greenhouse Ongoing N/A Wahiawa,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER State of Hawaii,Office of Hawaiian Lori Walker (808)594-1835 Affairs 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting assisted OHA in planning and development of a greenhouse/nursery operation near the birthing stones site(Kukaniloko)in Wahiawa. The project is considered the first phase(23 acres)of many incremental improvements, infrastructure and facilities,to implement a long-range vision and master plan for a larger 511-acre landholding. The program for phase 1 includes through-putting native species for outplanting and eventual reforestation of the Lake Wilson site edges on the property.The site is sloped and designed for various equipment circulation,green waste management,irrigation,a full range nursery operation with green houses<20,000 SF,educational functions,public visitation and for-sales produce including aquaponic vegetables.The project will also address requirements for potable/irrigation water,power,communications,solar,sewerage,security, drainage,water catchment for irrigation,demonstration out-planting/agriculture plots,and stakeholder input. PROJECT COST:N/A TO WHITMORE VILLAGE AG-1—1 t SIGNALIZTED INTERSECTION TRADEVVINDS L �AMFFI —__ _ Art rieid.ws `2 1 ANFS)� s ■ ■ Y 1-Vfit'aY°1 .YIrri 71 r:` `^_ -__! ■ O ,, N,� J to x �' ` ■ w `„ , \ %4 %50 %2 \ll ' ` THOT _ Lk Ork J BRIDGE • KOkANOLO y'' - 1\ •!, (WAHIAWA) C MIXEI��`�; 11 ■ IFOREST. ` fl II ■ U / '940 r u (/1 psi \`)' 41 : jt / /q...4N,)/. 1 W % ' I11 1 ill T ,II rl\\%4 Il N. iew ' ,\,. \ �l • �._ j,\� f,I. �s oN 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. ra(Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner,Landscape Architect,Civil Engineer STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 12 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 5 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Hawaiian Home Lands PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION pfapp/icab/e) North Kona Water Development,Environmental Assessments and Preliminary Engineering Report Ongoing N/A North Kona,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER State of Hawaii,Department of Hawaiian Andrew Choy (808)620-9559 Home Lands 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting is preparing Environmental Assessments(EAs)and a preliminary engineering report for potable water source development on two parcels in the Keauhou 2 Ahupuaa. The wells being developed are intended to support development of DHHL projects at Lai Opua Village and Kalaoa.A Hawaii Environmental Policy Act EA in accordance with Hawaii Revised Statutes(HRS)Chapter 343 and Title 11, Chapter 200 of the Department of Health Administrative Rules will be prepared for the one parcel with the U.S.Department of Agriculture(USDA)as the accepting agency.The other parcel will have an EA prepared pursuant to HRS Ch. 343 with DHHL accepting. A Preliminary Engineering Report(PER)meeting the requirements of the USDA Rural Utilities Service will also be prepared.A topographic survey for the PER will be coordinated and preliminary site layout and grading plans to confirm the area required for the site improvements will be prepared for the PER. The PER will also be processed for acceptance by the USDA Rural Utilities Service.A hydraulic study of the North Kona Water System and assistance in drafting the terms of the Water Development Agreement between DHHL,the landowners and the County Department of Water Supply will also be provided. PROJECT COST:N/A(Study) +r :���' Yr ' y f •A TaiL -mom , ,hli! . •'-". .. r - r .: _I i 't 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. MBowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner,Civil Engineer STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 13 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 6 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Greystar Development Services,LLC for University of Hawaii at Manoa PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(ifapp/icab/e) University of Hawaii at Manoa Multi-Family Housing,Environmental Assessment 2021 N/A Honolulu,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Greystar Development Services,LLC for Ethen Thacher(Greystar) (949)892-4973 University of Hawaii at Manoa 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting completed an Environmental Assessment for a Public Private Partnership(P3)project where the developer will design,build,and operate for profit the student housing multi-family building,day care center for UH students, and commercial operations such as a convenience store and/or eatery. PROJECT COST: $1,500,000 It � • �r1,pd. v . A !' 41 a � kotN. q of y .•l r •y d a y .ry 1 f ¢ • ,ftp' ACy! W v ,, • " n �A n 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. �(Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner,Civil Engineer STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 14 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section Ffor each project.) 7 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City and County of Honolulu PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(ifapplicable) Department of Design and Construction 2022 Ala Moana Regional Park Master Plan and Environmental Impact Statement 2019(EIS) N/A Honolulu,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City and County of Honolulu,Department Elaine Morisato (DDC) (808)768-8406 of Design and Construction Biederman Redevelopment Ventures Benjamin DonskyBiederman (Prime Consultant) (Biederman) (212)390-1122 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting supported the City in developing portions of the Preferred Concept Master Plan for Ala Moana Regional Park(Ala Moana)and preparing its corresponding Environmental Impact Statement(EIS).The goal of the master plan was to provide a planning framework allowing Ala Moana to become a multi-faceted beach park and even greater asset to the community. The master plan evaluated the park's existing conditions and identified areas of improvement including landscape features,infrastructure,parking and pathways,and the park's iconic beach front.The 17 proposed improvement projects focused on addressing deferred maintenance to elevate the park's existing facilities and address coastal erosion issues while respecting and celebrating the established character.As part of the master planning process,the B+K Planning Group prepared and published a final EIS analyzing the proposed improvements established in the master plan. As part of the environmental review process,the B+K Planning group investigated the project's potential effects on the built and natural environments and provided mitigation measures to help minimize impacts pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statues,Chapter 343.This analysis included analyzing the need for beach nourishment and drainage canal improvements to address impacts from natural and climate change hazards like sea level rise.The EIS also analyzed the project's compliance with relevant federal,state,and county land uses regulations and policies. To develop the alternatives in the master plan and EIS,a strong community engagement and outreach program was conducted to better understand the multi-generational impact of Ala Moana on the community.Multiple public,in-person informational meetings were held between 2015 and 2018 and a project website titled"Our Ala Moana Park"was launched to garner community feedback.Incorporating input from over 30,000 visitor interactions at the website,feedback from the in-person community meetings and consultation responses from the EIS resulted in the design alternatives presented in the master plan and EIS. Additionally,during the community engagement process the master planning team was informed of more urgent actions needed at Ala Moana. This prompted the City to enact a 9-point plan to address these issues in parallel with the long-term master plan creating a holistic approach to improving the park long-term. PROJECT COST: $14,600,000 A•2 hiledeurnl density^ qla A4roana Blvd Apartment" Y .....r,-•—— ....'..+i.,.—__..... District Kewin .� �„— �.R Basin f J„/,/�. P-2 General Preservation District cc '' p���^ap.. ApartR] Ala Moana Regional Park �� `9 ,,PN-r.-1 9 t j' +Reso :�jr x '4 ,mix CT �' ,a 144Vai 'r iM4 �a ` I '°, .043,4[Har(d BOUNDARY , ,,r.. 'ii rinyic + i Island P E �h 1 Pacific Ocean f ) .� I Public Precinct ...� {Waikiki,Specia!District) 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1) FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner,Civil Engineer STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 15 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 8 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City and County of Honolulu,Department of Design and Construction PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(ifapplicable) Kahawainui Stream Dredging Ongoing N/A Laie,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City and County of Honolulu,Department Kristie Ching (808)768-8800 of Design and Construction 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting is preparing construction plans and specifications for the maintenance dredging of the City- owned portion of Kahawainui Stream between the intersection with Laie Wai Stream to the mouth of the stream excluding the sand berm at the stream mouth.An environmental review consisting of a Draft and Final Environmental Assessment,with an anticipated Finding of No Significant Impact(FONSI),will be prepared in accordance to the Hawaii Revised Statutes Chapter 343. The review will include a biological survey,archaeological and cultural study,and other environmental reports to determine impacts of the project and mitigation measures.Preparation of permit applications for the dredging and obtaining permit approvals is included in the project scope along with engineering assistance during the bidding and construction. PROJECT COST: $2,000,000 Nei k4[*OW JIM 161411,11 IL- 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. c(Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner,Civil Engineer STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 16 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 9 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED The Wilhelm Group(TWG)for State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION Ofapp/icab/e) Harbors Division SDOT-Facility Planning and Land Acquisition Ongoing N/A Hilo and Kahului Harbors,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Harbors Division Rod Nagao(TWG) (808)586-0492 The Wilhelm Group(Prime Consultant) 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting is assisting with the acquisition of privately held lands surrounding Hilo and Kahului Harbors and production of a Harbors Facilities Plan that will summarize the potential options that DOT-H may have in utilizing the acquired lands,assisting with the infrastructure due diligence,and preparing an Environmental Assessment for the harbors.Design vehicle maneuverability,harbor access points and major harbor use operations,forecasted harbor buildout and activities,and planned use and improvements to adjacent thoroughfares and streets were evaluated and agencies consulted with to formulate optimal use and development of the private lots to complement harbor improvements. PROJECT COST:N/A �► . ,+ xa J Hilo Harbor Kahului Harbor 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. ga(Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 17 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. l0 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED County of Maui,Department of Public Works PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION pfapp/icab/e) Waiale Road Extension Project Ongoing N/A Waikapu,Maui,Hawaii 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER County of Maui,Department of Public Nolly Yagin (808)270-7745 Works 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Providing the County of Maui cradle to grave services,from planning through construction,on the Waiale Road Extension project.The roadway improvements will include a single span bridge over Waikapu Stream,roundabout intersections,two through lanes, shoulder bikeways,pedestrian sidewalks,a shared-use path,and two parallel grassy swales,which will serve as a permanent stormwater best management practice(BMP). The project team conduct agency and public coordination,both to seek input and provide information relating to the environmental and design related tasks.The environmental documentation for the improvement project will be prepared as a joint NEPA/HRS 343 environmental assessment. The construction bid documents will include construction plans,specifications,engineer's estimate,and permits PROJECT COST: $3,800,000 A W PO.,TO. WO RIO MOM M ROI-a-1M SWC.PRONE IMR OF7x5J 4.y^ MAMA w fro:x vaelsl aC�s1 , Fy a ww si Iu6_tl' hwlFk-ryk;;° "+ �. GBCS-G SWf S9n9ER 1pR.l UAf RMI�k[ StlutER WS,Eti . J' IV ' 0.1 ,-1 !, @HMK f-SART,l4R • � 5' W R3W ♦ va xrx ipn 0 a--MS1 j I• -0'A _ ., __I. lWa[4;1x5! s. :ii +f1[iFN:! s,eI. � 001 -, s,as LA =awl .-5.7.•_ Vii- • s-2 oz-,- ,y _.-.,-,p. ANS©USE pm .... WC.SEM" Fpm, CMI[V 5[CIw 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. so‘Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner,Environmental Assessment STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 18 G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS 28.EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F 26.NAMES OF KEY PERSONNEL 27.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT (Fill in"Example Projects Key"section be/ow before completing tab/e. (from Section E,Block 12) (from Section E,Block 13) Place'X"under project key number for participation in same or similar role.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge X X Jared Chang,AICP Planning Manager/Senior X X X X Project Planner Ronald Sato,AICP Senior Project Manager/ X X Senior Planner Matthew Kodama,MBA Planning Project Manager X X X X X Carah Kadota,AICP Assistant Planning Project X X X Manager Matthew Fernandez Assistant Planner X 29.EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(from Section F) NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(from Section F) State of Hawaii Greystar Development Services,LLC 1 Department of Land and Natural Resources 6 for University of Hawaii at Manoa Kealakekua Bay Master Plan&Environmental Impact University of Hawaii at Manoa Multi-Family Housing State Statement of Hawaii City and County of Honolulu 2 Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation 7 Department of Design and Construction Waimanalo Infill Housing Ala Moana Regional Park Master Plan and Environmental Impact Statement State of Hawaii,Department of Accounting and General City and County of Honolulu Services 3 8 Department of Design and Construction ICSD Radio Facilities Site Assessments,Environmental Kahawainui Stream Dredging Assessments and Facility Layouts, Oahu and Kauai State of Hawaii State of Hawaii 4 Office of Hawaiian Affairs 9 Department of Transportation,Harbors Division Kukaniloko Greenhouse Private Land Acquisition surrounding Hilo and Kahului Harbors Master Plan and EA State of Hawaii 5 Department of Hawaiian Home Lands to County of Maui,Department of Public Works North Kona Water Development Waiale Road Extension Project STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 19 H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30.PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. COMPANY NAME: SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS BOWERS+KUBOTA CONSULTING,INC. 1. THE NAME OF THE FIRM OR PERSON, CONTACT 94-408 Akoki Street,Suite 201-A INFORMATION INCLUDING EMAIL ADDRESS,THE Waipahu,Hawaii 96797 PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS AND LOCATION OF Ph.(808)836-7787 ALL ITS OFFICES Fax.(808)834-4833 www.bowersandkubota.com Name of Firm: Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. YEAR INCORPORATED: Point of Contact: Kathleen Chu,PE September 1980 Principal kchu@bowersandkubota.com PRINCIPALS: (808) 836-7787 Brian Bowers,PE,CCM,President Principal Place of 94-408 Akoki Street, Suite 201-A, bbowers@bowersandkubota.com Business: Waipahu,HI 96797 Dexter Kubota,PE,Vice President Location of all Main Office (Waipahu) - Oahu dkubota@bowersandkubota.com Offices: Satellite Office (Kalihi) - Oahu Eric Iwamoto,PE,CCM,LEED AP,Principal Satellite Offices -Maui and Kauia eiwamoto@bowersandkubota.com Field Offices -Hawaii and Molokai Myong Choi,PE,LEED AP,Principal mchoi@bowersandkubota.com 2. THE AGE OF THE FIRM AND THE AVERAGE NUMBER Mike Kamaka,PE,CCM,Principal OF EMPLOYEES OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS. mkamaka@bowersandkubota.com B+K has provided professional design services for the last Hae-Dong Lee,AIA,NCIDQ,LEED AP,MBA Principal 43 years with the resources of the 8 principals and 260 hlee@bowersandkubota.com professionals and administrative staff available to be assigned to each project. Over the past 5 years,the average number of Amy Matsushima,SHRM-SCP,Principal employees has been 230 professionals. amatsushima@bowersandkubota.com Kathleen Chu,PE,Principal 3. THE EDUCATION,TRAINING,AND QUALIFICATIONS kchu@bowersandkubota.com OF THE INDIVIDUAL,OR IF THE A FIRM,ITS KEY EMPLOYEES IN ACCORDANCE WITH HRS 103D- 304 AND/OR THE PROFESSIONAL AND SCIENTIFIC OCCUPATION SERIES CONTAINED IN THE UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT'S QUALIFICATIONS STANDARDS HANDBOOK (HTTPS:WW W.OPM.GOV/POLICY-DATA-OVERSIGHT/ CLASSIFICATION-QUALIFICATIONS/GENERAL- SCHEDULE-QUALIFICATION STANDARDS/#URL=GS- PROF) Dependent upon the magnitude,complexity and needs of the County of Hawaii,Planning Department,Planning Services may include the following: • Master Planning • Regional& Community Plans • Site Planning • Federal, State, and County Permit Processing • Land Use Studies • Community Outreach • Environmental Impact Statements&Assessments • Entitlement Processing • Facilities Planning • Public Meetings • Physical Planning STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 20 H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30.PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. The team presented exhibits a broad spectrum of professional experience for providing Planning Services.We also employ expertise in architectural,landscape architectural, and civil and electrical engineering, and provide a wealth of diverse technical experience to projects as required. B+K is committed to dedicating the required expertise and personnel until successful project completion. Ms.Kathleen Chu will serve as Principal-in-Charge of all general planning projects with the County of Hawaii,Planning Department. KEY PERSONNEL PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS ACTIVE PROFESSIONAL KEY PERSONNEL PROJECT ROLE REGISTRATION NO.OF YEARS EDUCATION OTHER CERTIFICATIONS EXPERIENCE /TRAINING STATE DISCIPLINE Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge HI Civil 30 BS COMMUNITY PLANNING Planning Manager Jared Chang,AICP /Senior Project N/A 17 BA American Institute Planner of Certified Planners Senior Project Ronald Sato,AICP Manager/Senior N A 33 MA,BS American Institute Planner of Certified Planners Matthew Kodama, Assistant Planning N/A 13 MBA,BBA MBA Project Manager Carah Kadota,AICP Assistant Planning N/A 7 BEnvD American Institute Project Manager of Certified Planners Matthew Fernandez Assistant Planner N/A 3 BS/MS 1. A LIST OF RECENT PROJECT AND THE NAMES OF UP TO FIVE CLIENTS WHO MAY BE CONTACTED, INCLUDING AT LEAST TWO FOR WHOM SERVICES WERE RENDERED DURING THE PRECEDING YEAR: REFERENCES RECENT PROJECTS Ms. Lori Walker,Integrated Assets Manager Kukaniloko Green House and Nursery (Phase 1), Office of Hawaiian Affairs Telephone No. (808) 594-1835 Wahiawa, HI(ongoing) Mr. Andrew Choy,Planner DHHL North Kona Water Development, Kona, State of Hawaii, Department of Hawaiian Home Lands Telephone No. (808) 620-9559 HI (ongoing) Mr. Albert Palmer, Housing Development Specialist Waimanalo Infill Affordable Housing, Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation Waimanalo, HI (2020) Telephone No. (808) 587-0500 Mr. David DePonte, Building Engineer ICSD Radio Facilities Site Assessments, State of Hawaii, Department of Accounting and General Environmental Assessments and Facility Services Telephone No. (808) 586-0492 Layouts, Oahu and Kauai (ongoing) Ms. Martha Yent, Interpretive Program Manager State of Hawaii Dept. of Land and Natural Resources, Kealakekua Bay Master Plan&Environmental State Parks Division Impact Assessment(EIS), South Kona,HI (Ongoing) Telephone No. (808) 587-0287 STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 21 H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30. PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. 2. ANY PROMOTIONAL OR DESCRIPTIVE LITERATURE WHICH THE INDIVIDUAL OR FIRM DESIRES TO SUBMIT. B+K is very familiar with the County of Hawaii's requirements based on past and current project experience. Select previous and ongoing projects on the island of Hawaii include: • DOT- Facility Planning and Land Acquisition, Hilo and Kahului Harbors, HI • Legacy Hilo Due Diligence, Hilo, HI • DHHL - North Kona Water Development, North Kona, HI • Hilton Waikoloa Village -various projects, Waikoloa, HI • Waikoloa Kings' Lands Docmentation Support, Waikoloa, HI • Auwaikeakau and Popoo Stream Jurisdictional Determination, Waikoloa, HI • DLNR- Kealakekua Bay Master Plan and Environmental Impact Statement, Kealakekua, HI • Kamehameha Schools- Due Diligence Assessment and Test Fit Study for West Hawaii Land Acquisition, Captain Cook, HI I.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. 31.SIGNATURE 32.DATE June 30, 2023 33.NAME AND TITLE Kathleen Chu, PE Principal-in-Charge STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 22 1.SOLICITATION NUMBER(If any) PL.5)Community Planning(Environmental ARCHITECT ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS Planning,Environmental Assessments, Environmental Impact Statements) PART II-GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS (If a firm has branch offices,complete for each specific branch office seeking work.) 2a.FIRM(OR BRANCH OFFICE)NAME 3.YEAR ESTABLISHED 4.DUNS NUMBER Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. 2008 03-929-9763 2b.STREET 5.OWNERSHIP 94-408 Akoki Street, Suite 201-A a.TYPE Corporation 2c.CITY 2d.STATE 2e.ZIP CODE b.SMALL BUSINESS STATUS Waipahu HI 96797 6a. POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE 7.NAME OF FIRM(IF BLOCK 2A IS A BRANCH OFFICE) Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge 6b.TELEPHONE NUMBER 6c.E-MAIL ADDRESS 808 836-7787 kchu@bowersandkubota.com 8a. FORMER FIRM NAME(S)(IF ANY) 8b.YR.ESTABLISHED 8c.DUNS NUMBER KFC Airport, Inc. 1980 03-929-9763 9.EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE 10.PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE AND ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS c.No.of Employees c.Revenue a.Function b.Discipline a.Profile b.Experience Index Code (1)Firm (2)Branch Code Number(see below) 02 Administrative 41 A05 Airports;Navaids;Airport Lighting;Aircraft Fueling 5 06 Architects 20 A06 Airports;Terminals&Hangars;Freight 6 Handling 08 CADD Technician 7 C10 Commercial Building(low rise);Shopping Centers 4 12 Civil Engineers 26 C15 Construction Management 8 15 Construction Inspector 38 E02 Educational Facilities;Classrooms 4 16 Construction Managers 27 E03 Electrical Studies and Design 4 18 Cost Engineer/Estimator 2 E09 Environmental Impact Studies;... 5 21 Electrical Engineers 4 Ell Environmental Planning 4 23 Environmental Engineer 5 H07 Highways;Streets;Airfield Paving;Parking Lots 6 37 Interior Designer 1 H09 Hospitals&Medical Facilities 6 39 Landscape Architect 6 Hll Housing(Residential,Multi-Family;Apartments; 1 Condominiums) 47 Planner 6 L03 Landscape Architecture 4 48 Project Managers 66 P05 Planning(Community;Regional;...) 5 50 Risk Assessor 4 P06 Planning(Site,Installation and Project) 1 51 Safety/Occupational Health Engineer 1 R06 Rehabilitation (Buildings;Structures;Facilities) 3 52 Sanitary Engineer 1 SO4 Sewage Collection,Treatment&Disposal 4 53 Schedulers 2 S07 Solid Wastes;Incineration;Landfill 4 58 Technician/Analyst 3 S13 Storm Water Handling&Facilities 4 T02 Testing&Inspection Services 4 W02 Water Resources;Hydrology;Ground Water 4 Total 260 W03 Water Supply;Treatment and Distribution 4 11.ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM FOR LAST 3 YEARS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER (Insert revenue index number shown at right) a.Federal Work 7 1.Less than$100,000 6.$2 million to less than$5 million 2.$100,000 to less that$250,000 7.$5 million to less than$10 million b.Non-Federal Work 9 3.$250,000 to less than$500,000 8.$10 million to less than$25 million 4.$500,000 to less than$1 million 9.$25 million to less than$50 million c.Total Work 9 5.$1 million to less than$2 million 10.$50 million or greater 12.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. a.SIGNATURE date b.DATE 'F""`' June 30,2023 c.NAME AND TITLE Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021) i APPENDIX A: AWARDS AND CLIENT EVALUATIONS Bowers + Kubota's Unique Qualifications and Commitment to Excellence are demonstrated by some of the numerous awards and recognition we have received. Zweig Group's , ai i Business Ma ' National Best Firms to Work For gazine s tt„ 2022:4th Place Multidiscipline 2009,2011-2 3rd Place Firm Size 200+ Employees 2008 2023 Recipient 3rd Place Internal Marketing Award013,2015,2022-21 3. 1st Place Trifecta Award for Winning all 3 Categories 2021: 1st Place Multidiscipline 2nd Place Firm Size 200+ Employees 3rd Place Internal Marketing Award i' iAllio Trifecta Award for Winning all 3 Categories 2020: 1st Place Firm Size 200+ Employees 1st Place Multidiscipline 2019: 1st Place 100-199 Employeesr....;.. 2nd Place Multidiscipline n , Pirr . .; 2018: 1st Place Architecture r, I Ifr 1st Place Civil Engineering 2nd Place Multidisciplinary 2017:2nd Place Civil Engineering ,• 4E11 3rd Place Multidisciplinary ,' ,� :•*» ,, "4 2016:2nd Place Civil Engineering Best *; 3rd Place Multidisciplinary i ,4,, Fit-alsoi 2015:2nd Place Civil Engineering + -, .�,..e. a. <; 1st Place Multidisciplinary t4.. .• , 2014: 1st Place Civil Engineering .: 1st Place Multidisciplinary ,s zT ENR „„ ENR Magazine's Top 100 TOP 1 00 Construction mmliilli Management-for-Fee Firms 2022:#30 National ` \4BoWE\OWER + J 2021:#48 National 2020:#44 National -'-- 2019:#39 National In 5 Inc.5000 Idi Fastest Growing. 44.1„ ,, Private Companies 2021:#4761 National ,. , 2018:#4805 National __. „ �� 1111111 AHA Fit-Friendly Worksite i' 2012: Platinum Achievement Recipient 2011,2013:Gold Achievement Award 2018,2021:Silver Achievement Award 2014:Worksite Innovation Award A iCEë h WkUM'4M Lfil:%CH Lir I`.i:IJXN,YIti4.Lgi 1.4 WYi. - 1141 7-7- _ Excellence Award •Wanaao Road/Keolu Drive IVII-11k-V Reconstructed Sewer •Bowers+Kubota Warehouse/ Office Space A •Keauhou Beach Hotel and Site Demolition(Honor Award-National) Honor Award 7 2019 Construction •Kaumualii Highway Lihue Mill Management Project Bridge Rice street Achievement Award ASCE •UH Information Technology Center Water/Wastewater/Utility: •Ewa Makai Middle School Construction value greater •Honouliuli WWTP-New Solids than$50M Handling Facility •Honoapiilani Highway Lahainaluna Road Outstanding Widening, Kaneohe-Kailua Wastewater Conveyance&Treatment • to Aholo Road y New Interisland Terminal Civil Engineering Facilities Project KK Tunnel Complex,HNL 7 Achievement Award •In-Vessel Bioconversion •Emergency Repairs of'lhi'ihilauakea Bridge Facility , •New Interisland Terminal Complex,HNL •South Ramp Microtunneling •Replacement of Kea'iwa Stream Bridge Project •Hawaiki Submarine Cable and Kapolei •Kaneohe-Kailua Watewater Landing Station(Grand Award and Best Conveyance&Treatment Large Project) Facilities Project K-K Tunnel •Keauhou Beach Hotel and Site Demolition (Grand Award and Best Large Project [Hawaii],Best Large Project[Region],Honor Award[National]) ARUM — i aye.€r n +e ufos..r , i Public Works Project of the Year ri 1E331 HAWAII SOCIETY OF h Range Improvements PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS •Ala Wai Golf Course Driving 1 CM Project of the Year i •Emergency Repairs oYlhi'ihi- , lauakea Bridge •Haleakala Highway Widening, Phase II J'}"►'4 A Hawaii Society of7 •Honouliuli WWTP,New Solids Professional Engineers Handling Facility y� � AWA� 2011 Project of the Year Award •Ewa Makai Middle School 1 •Manele Small Boat Harbor :, Kamehameha Avenue Roadway Ferry&ADA Improvements Improvements •In-Vessel Bioconversion Facility •Pa'au'au Stream Building Project General Design Project Management Merit Award Project of the Year University of Hawai'i-West •Manana Properties Develop- 11 O'ahu,New Administration& ment Allied Health Building •National Cemetery Stabili- zation CM National Project of the Year •Replacement of Kea'iwa Stream Bridge Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 Kahuku Ranch Cesspool Assessment and Remediation $220,610 Name of Project Contract Amount Scope of work: Civil Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5)Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team 1. Keeps you informed Lucas Aribon, Albert Rivera Comments:The B+K team has been able to meet or exceed 5 my needs over the last year and a half and continues to I Comments:Answered previously. perform at an outstanding level. 2. Quality of Project Manager 2. Addresses problems and offers workable Eric Tamashiro solutions Comments: Eric has provided excellent service and has consistently provided project deliverables on time,within 5 5 budget, and according to scope. In addition Eric and his Comments:Answered previously. team has responded to the many requests, ranging from assistance with contract scoping to post project support, so we are very happy with the services provided. 3. Treats you as an important team member 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions Comments: Eric is extremely conscientious and understands that the acquisitions we have been working on come from the 5 Comments: Eric listens to my opinions and more global 5 top levels of leadership at KS. He response time is excellent, concerns and incorporates them into his proposed solutions. even calling/emailing time sensitive information on Friday afternoon and even the weekend. 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs 5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments:As stated earlier,we have been operating on 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion time, on budget, and according to scope. 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality* Integrity * Teamwork Comments:Answered previously. 5 Comments: Eric is outcome focused and provides various 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule options on how to achieve the outcomes I am seeking. 5 Section 2—Technical Ability Comments:Answered previously. 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 3. Processes documents in a timely manner Comments:Again, Eric provides solutions that meet our 5 5 needs but are within the established regulations and Comments:Answered previously. boundaries. 2. General technical knowledge Section 5—Value Comments: I don't think I have presented an issue that we 5 have not been able to resolve,that's gotta count for a lot! 1. Adheres to project budget 5 3. Knowledge of the contract Comments:Answered previously. Comments: I work closely with Eric on crafting the contract 5 and SOW,which has been very successful to date. 2. Provides added value 5 4.Quality of response to documents Comments:Answered previously. Comments: Our turn around times on comments and 5 revisions has really impressed my bosses. Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 1. Please rate the overall performance Comments: I don't know enough about your margins to be Comments: Over the last 18 months, Eric has worked on commenting beyond,we have been satisfied with the 5 some of the most high profile acquisitions for KS and has 5 compensation relative to the deliverables and timeframes delivered consistently so it not hard to praise his work and they are provided. give him the ratings I have. 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 2. Would be your choice for future service Comments: I am a stickler for maintaining timelines and Eric 5 Comments: Eric(and B+K by extension)is growing a 5 have met all of my expectations as well as those of the reputation for delivering high quality products in short internal clients at KS. timeframes with the leadership at KS'FDSD. 7. Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: Comments: Eric has been keen to share insights on 5 regulatory requirements to avoid missteps as the project progresses. Mr.Allen Salavea Kamehameha Schools 11/22/2022 Name Agency/Department/Division Date Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 RH-03: Eng. Design Support for FY23 IWRR $414,740 Name of Project Contract Amount Scope of work: Civil Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5)Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team Anthony Domingo, Jamie, Tang, James DeGuzman, Maria Bawag, Edgar Quinabo, 5 1. Keeps you informed 5 Joshua Gusman Comments: Comments: 2. Quality of Project Manager 2. Addresses problems and offers workable Mike Nishimura 5 solutions 5 Comments: Comments: 3. Treats you as an important team member 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions 5 Comments: Comments: 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs 5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments: 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality* Integrity* Teamwork 5 Comments: Comments: 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule 5 Section 2—Technical Ability Comments: 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 5 3. Processes documents in a timely manner 5 Comments: Comments: 2. General technical knowledge5 Section 5—Value Comments: 1. Adheres to project budget 5 3. Knowledge of the contract5 Comments: Comments: 2. Provides added value 5 4.Quality of response to documents Comments: 5 Comments: Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 1. Please rate the overall performance 5 Comments: Comments: 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 2. Would be your choice for future service 5 Comments: Comments: 7.Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: I realize all 5s does not offer constructive criticism, but I personally have N/A been extremely satisfied with the service we are receiving. Thorough, timely,yet not excessive communication is what I appreciate the most. Comments: Some scores regarding accuracy could have been docked, but all matters to date have been nondetrimental,which I believe is due to timely communication. Thank you and I look forward to our continued work together. Mr.Todd Ozaki County of Kauai, Department of Public Works 11/23/2022 Name Agency/Department/Division Date Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 PVT Landfill Owner Advisory Services $587,600 Name of Project Contract Amount Scope of work: Civil Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5)Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team r— 1. Keeps you informed Albert Rivera, Matt Takane 5 Comments:Quick to respond and detailed to enable Comments: appropriate answers/topos requested. 2. Quality of Project Manager 2.Addresses problems and offers workable Mike Nishimura solutions Comments: Mike is very responsive to any request 5 5 submitted. His directives are clear to subordinates that Comments: enable quality outcome. 3. Treats you as an important team member 5 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions 5 Comments: BK team has very inclusive of our needs. Comments: Listens attentively to needs and requests. 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs 5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments: No comment 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality* Integrity* Teamwork 5 Comments: Comments: Core values are met 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule 5 Section 2—Technical Ability Comments: 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 3. Processes documents in a timely manner Comments: Skill sets are very evident and reflected in the 5 5 end product Comments:Getting tired of commenting. 2. General technical knowledge Section 5—Value Comments:That is why we hired the company,formerly Belt- 5 Collins Hawaii. 1. Adheres to project budget 5 3. Knowledge of the contract Comments: 5 Comments: 2. Provides added value 5 4.Quality of response to documents Comments: 5 Comments: Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 5 1. Please rate the overall performance 5 Comments: Comments: 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 5 2. Would be your choice for future service 5 Comments: Meets or exceeds scheduled requirements. Comments: 7.Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: 5 Comments: Evaluation is too long. .................................................................... Mr.Albert Shigemura PVT Land Company, Ltd. 11/29/2022 Name Agency/Department/Division Date Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 Building 9 Well#2 Repair, Kunia Tunnel $325,988 Name of Project Contract Amount Scope of work: Civil Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5)Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team 1. Keeps you informed Tracey-Anne Panlasigui, Brian Kawamoto 5 Comments: Comments: 2. Quality of Project Manager 2. Addresses problems and offers workable Cary Kondo 5 solutions 5 Comments: Comments: 3. Treats you as an important team member 5 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions 5 Comments: Comments: 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs 5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments: 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality* Integrity * Teamwork Comments: 5 Comments: 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule 5 Section 2—Technical Ability Comments: 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 5 3. Processes documents in a timely manner 5 Comments: Comments: 2. General technical knowledge 5 Section 5—Value Comments: 1. Adheres to project budget 5 3. Knowledge of the contract 5 Comments: Comments: 2. Provides added value 5 4.Quality of response to documents Comments: 5 Comments: Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 5 1. Please rate the overall performance 5 Comments: Comments: 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 5 2. Would be your choice for future service 5 Comments: Comments: 7. Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: 5 Comments: Ms. Su Yi Jacobs Government Services Company 11/29/2022 Name Agency/Department/Division Date Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 Moloaa Irrigation Cooperative Water Sys. Improvem. $100,000 Name of Project Contract Amount Scope of work: Civil Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5)Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team Kristen Yoshida 1. Keeps you informed Comments: Kristen was responsive, efficient and clearly 5 Comments:Always there when we needed them, prompt went over and above to satisfy our needs. It was a responses and good proactive communications where pleasure working with her. necessary. 2. Quality of Project Manager 2.Addresses problems and offers workable Jay Stone solutions Comments: I have known Jay for many years, and he has 5 5 always exemplified professionalism,technical competence, Comments:Always worked towards a better solution for attention to detail, and has grown into a real leader and their client(us)and the affected water system. manager that any company would be proud to have. 3. Treats you as an important team member 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions Comments: 5 Comments: Maintained a good rapport with us during back 5 and forth comments. 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs 5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments: 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality* Integrity * Teamwork Comments: 5 Comments: Kristen and jay excelled in all of these 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule categories. GREA core values by the way. 5 Comments: Did their best to do this in spite of project delays Section 2—Technical Ability outside of their control. 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 3. Processes documents in a timely manner Comments: Kristen and Jay both maintained exemplary 5 5 professionalism during the ups and downs of this project, Comments: and never wavered from it. 2. General technical knowledge Section 5—Value Comments:They knew their stuff,came in with a good 5 approach and worked well with us on our technical 1. Adheres to project budget comments and suggestions. 5 3. Knowledge of the contract Comments: Comments: Kristen and Jay clearly read the contract and 5 understood its requirements and limitations. That was not 2. Provides added value always the case with about half of our other contracted consultants. 5 Comments: I saw effort in this as the project progressed 4.Quality of response to documents through its different stages. Kristen and Jay were always 5 I looking at things to add value to the project. Comments:always prompt and thorough Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 1. Please rate the overall performance Comments: N/A Comments:A"10"for sure, hope we can do business again 5 with them. 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 2. Would be your choice for future service Comments: Did their best to stay on schedule to finish the 5 5 contract in spite of other factors beyond their control. Comments:Absolutely 7.Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: N/A Comments: Mr. Michael Miyahira State of Hawaii, Department of Health, Environmental 12/5/2022 Management Division,Safe Drinking Water Branch Name Agency/Department/Division Date Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 Keauhou Beach Hotel Demolition Project Name of Project Contract Amount Civil Engineering, Landscape Archtiecture, Planning, Scope of work: Electrical Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5)Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team Calvin Ing, Albert Rivera, Edgar Quinabo, Brian Kawamoto, Bradley Tanimura, Lance Keliiaa, 1. Keeps you informed Christopher Billete, Kelsey Wai, Brian Itozaki, Nick Enomoto Comments:The entire team was very responsive. The project was very complicated,and the team was able to 5 5 flex when needed. I was also very satisfied with their ability and knowledge of the permitting and agency process. The team was able to address high-and low-level concerns Comments: Eric,Calvin and I talk often raised by the agencies. An example of this was a cover sheet included an"index/cheat sheet"for the plan reviewer so she could more efficiently navigate the large set of drawings. I believe this was much appreciated by the overwhelmed planning department. 2. Quality of Project Manager 2. Addresses problems and offers workable Eric Tamashiro solutions Comments: I have worked continuously with Eric for 10 Comments: None of the team shrunk from any problem. years!He is a measured and contemplative engineer. He reasonable solutions were brought up from multiple different is a good listener and clearly breakdowns issues so the 5 team members. Sometime the contractor,sometimes the 5 owner and the design team can discuss decisions with user,and design team. The important take away is that all focus and appropriate solutions. Eric communicates well were heard and felt comfortable sharing their ideas.At no with his team agencies that keep the conversations on time,was someone's reasonable contributions was point. He keeps the project moving and RFI/responses/ dismissed off hand. The team,as a whole,was open to revisions occurred timely. I also felt that our conversations critically thinking problems. concerning budget or overruns were transparent and fair. 3. Treats you as an important team member 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions Comments: I think it's fair to say that Eric and I have equal respect for each other. We both pretty much stay in our 5 Comments: Eric had very little choice in that matter. He 5 lanes and do our best to recognize each other's pain points managed well. as 'art of the .rocess to make the project successful. 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments: I never noticed a point where this project had a 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion staff issue. 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality* Integrity * Teamwork Comments: no issues Comments: I typically don't give 5's or the highest marks 5 on these types of surveys, but I'm not sure we could have 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule completed this project without this team. They all provided their best,advocated for the project and worked together. Comments: Our goals on schedule for this project was not in 5 the hands of the design team for the most part. EXCEPT for meeting our demo completion schedule. This again was the Section 2—Technical Ability joint effort by the entire team. 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 3. Processes documents in a timely manner Comments: Our conversations or actions never veered to unethical practices. I believe that all who contributed on 5 Comments: I don't believe that we could have moved faster 5 this project, inclusive of subcontractors and KS cultural, for submitting drawings or responding. contractors etc... behaved professionally and ethically. 2. General technical knowledge Section 5—Value Comments:As I read or participated in meeting with 5 agencies, I was impressed that the team was 1. Adheres to project budget 5 ready/knowledgeable/prepared to respond to all the comments. B+K was able to provide options or pivot or respond appropriately. 3. Knowledge of the contract Comments:All amendments to the contract were owner driven. For this particular project, Comments:The contract scoped was amended multiple times. It was a good think that the proposal was well 5 defined. We did need to refer back to the amendments to 2. Provides added value double check line-item cost. Although,the project took us on many twists and turns,we were able to keep track of what was included, not included and track costs. Comments: The added value was the depth of experience 5 we could pull from.Cheryl Palesh and other leaders within the BCH and B+K team provided a concise view of a very 4.Quality of response to documents complicated project.The project never struggled for 5 competent expert review on a high level. I never encountered a situation where we didn't have a decisive path. Comments: No issues. reasonable turn around time i Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 1. Please rate the overall performance Comments: Estimating some of these projects are hard as Comments: For complicated projects,this team was the the scope may shift. Having said that,the estimate or best. Considering the duration of the project and the proposal are very complete. Sometimes,the proposals are multiple changes in scope, I appreciated how and when more conservative than needed for every project. amendments were handled. As the owner PM, I However,one way we have navigating the unknown is to 4 appreciated not being inundated with multiple minor amend 5 phase the design contract. This way we can start ments. We were able to bundle the changes and forecast eliminating unknowns and not contracting for work where work so that invoicing/scope was clear and comprehensive. the scope is unclear and that significantly impacts design Also,during the covid lock down,the team also raised to the budget. Concurrently, B+K has assisted in wholistic occasion switching to MS TEAMs meeting was seamless. baseline cost on the conservative end to help with It's worthy to note that we had 100 OAC's and most of these budgeting. this way we can managed from both ends and were done virtually. hopefully exceed expectations. 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 2. Would be your choice for future service Comments:all documents are submitted on time. 5 Comments: B+K would be my preference especially for 5 large and/or complicated projects. 7.Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: N/A Comments: Mahalo nui for B+K's! Ms. Laura Takahashi Kamehameha Schools 11/23/2022 Name Agency/Department/Division Date i APPENDIX B: PROFESSIONAL LICENSES PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NOTICE THIS POCKET ID CARD IDENTIFIES YOU TO THE PUBLIC AS BEING CURRENTLY LICENSED AND SHOULD BE KEPT IN YOUR POSSESSION AT ALL TIMES. I License Number Expiration date Eli.' ''❑� CLASSES(ACTIVE): I I PE-12808 4130(2024 h• STATE OF-(OEM.CEPPFTTENT OF CO A(ERCE AND COM.SUAER AFFN RS _ 1,1111W1 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IOh El I I CLASS(ES):CE CIVIL lI KATHLEEN S B CHL 7140 MAKAA ST HONOLULU,HI 96825 !Ii / i SI,'. TURE OF LICENSEE _W W_—I J �• BOWERS + KUBOTA vI\ Construction Management•A/E Design•Planning•Project Management 94-408 Akoki Street,Suite 201-A Waipahu,Hawaii 96797 ':C Ae4 . kyr. ��, ' COUNTY OF HAWAII - ` "''-� '`> PLANNING DEPARTMENT or ikr.'. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FISCAL YEAR 2023 - 2024 PL.7) COMMUNITY PLANNING Public Access Planning M yxy f�. f �<a N w�4 +c°" June 30, 2023 BOWERS + KUBOTA Aff BOWERS + KUBOTA Construction Management•A/E Design•Planning•Project Management B+K No. 23.524 June 30, 2023 Mr. Zendo Kern, Planning Director Planning Department County of Hawaii 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3, Hilo, Hawai'i 96720 Subject: Professional Services During Fiscal Year 2023-2024 PL.7) Community Planning (Public Access Planning) Dear Mr. Kern: Bowers+Kubota Consulting(B+K)is pleased to submit our letter of interest and qualifications to provide professional services during the fiscal Year 2023-2024 for the above referenced category. We believe our staff with its extensive experience can provide the professional services required for your upcoming projects. Over the past 43 years, B+K has provided outstanding architectural/engineering design, program and project management, construction management, and planning services across the State of Hawaii while living our mission statement of Fulfilling Visions.Building Trust.Our extensive experience has resulted in successfully completing numerous projects for a variety of public agencies and private industry clients. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me by telephone at (808) 836-7787 or by email at kchu@bowersandkubota.com. Respectfully, BOWERS +KUBOTA CONSULTING, INC. f - Kathleen Chu, PE Principal-in-Charge 94-408 Akoki Street,Ste.201-A,Waipahu,HI 96797 h (808)8367787 www.bowersandkubata.com i STANDARD FORM 330 ARCHITECT- ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS PART I-CONTRACT SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS A. CONTRACT INFORMATION 1.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) Professional Services in Fiscal Year 2023 - 2024 2.PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 3.SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER June 1,2023 PL.7) Community Planning (Public Access Planning) B.ARCHITECT - ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT 4.NAME AND TITLE Kathleen Chu,PE,Principal-in-Charge 5.NAME OF FIRM :,:t Bowers+Kubota Consulting 6.TELEPHONE NUMBER 7.FAX NUMBER 8.E-MAIL ADDRESS (808) 836-7787 (808) 834-4833 kchu@bowersandkubota.com C. PROPOSED TEAM (COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR THE PRIME CONTRACTOR AND ALL KEY SUBCONTRACTORS.) (Check) 0 9. FIRM NAME 10.ADDRESS 11.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT w < 2 a m z E ? O a (!)U a. X Bowers+Kubota Consulting 94-408 -408 Akoki Street, Suite 201- PL.7) Community Planning Waipahu,HI 96797 (Public Access Planning) ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE b. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE c. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE d. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE e. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE f. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE 9. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM D (ATTACHED) AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 1 D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM a7-'-9! • ► '�'. . I. OF COUNTY OF HAWAII Planning Department PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE Kathleen Chu,PE PLANNING SENIOR MANAGER Jared Chang,AICP PLANNERS Ronald Sato,AICP Matthew Kodama,MBA Carah Kadota,AICP Matthew Fernandez AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 2 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM 31 1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) af=Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Waipahu,HI 16.EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (State and Discipline) Bachelor of Science,Civil Engineering HI,Professional Engineer/Civil [#12808 (exp. 4/30/2024)] CA,Professional Engineer/Civil [#54022 (exp.12/31/2023)] 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Hawaii Council of Engineering Societies, Current Treasurer American Council of Engineering Companies of Hawaii American Society of Civil Engineers,Transportation Chair Engineering Sector Partnership, Chamber of Commerce,Women in STEM Lead 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED County of Maui,Department of Public Works PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Waiale Road Extension Project Ongoing N/A Waikapu,Maui,Hawaii (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑x CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE: Project Manager a. SCOPE: Project manager providing the County of Maui cradle to grave services,from planning through construction,on the Waiale Road Extension project.The roadway improvements will include a single span bridge over Waikapu Stream, roundabout intersections,two through lanes,shoulder bikeways,pedestrian sidewalks,a shared-use path,and two parallel grassy swales,which will serve as a permanent stormwater best management practice (BMP).The project team conduct agency and public coordination,both to seek input and provide information relating to the environmental and design related tasks. The environmental documentation for the improvement project will be prepared as a joint NEPA/HRS 343 environmental assessment.The construction bid documents will include construction plans,specifications,engineer's estimate,and permits PROJECT COST: $3,800,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Highways Route 50 (Kaumualii Highway) Feasibility Study-Hanapepe to Kekaha Ongoing N/A Kekaha,Kauai,HI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM b ROLE:Project Manager SCOPE: Conduct a Feasibility Study to explore conceptual details,constraints,and prospective timelines for different resiliency improvement alternatives based on probable future scenarios of concern for Route 50, Kaumualii Highway,from Hanapepe to Kekaha.The objectives of the Feasibility Study are to explore resiliency realities,criticalities,and challenges for the Route 50 study area. The scope of work will include coastal modeling of tidal flood frequency analysis and high-resolution sea level rise and wave inundation modeling.The modeling will be conducted for a variety of future sea level rise scenarios combined with different wave events to help estimate the frequency of occurrence of flooding at selected intervals in the future. PROJECT COST: $675,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Highways PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Vulnerable Road User Safety Assessment (VRUSA) Statewide,HI Ongoing Ongoing (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑x CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE:Project Manager c. SCOPE:Working with the HDOT to develop the State's first Vulnerable Road User Safety Assessment(VRUSA).A VRUSA is an assessment of the safety performance of a State with respect to vulnerable road users and the plan for the State to improve the safety of vulnerable road users.Addressing the safety of vulnerable road users through a collaborative and comprehensive approach allows people that walk,bike,and roll full and safe access to our transportation system.The assessment will include the Safe System Approach,which aims to improve safety culture,increase collaboration across all stakeholders,and refocus transportation system design and operation on anticipating human mistakes and lessening impact forces to reduce crash severity and save lives. PROJECT COST: $575,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Hawaii Community Foundation PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Affordable and Workforce Housing Regional Plans 2023 N/A Island of Maui, Hawaii (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE: Project Manager d SCOPE: B+K is creating three regional plans for the Central, South and West Maui regions.These plans highlight the need for affordable housing and infrastructure that would support those projects as part of the House Maui Initiative.The House Maui Initiative supports the planning and delivery of much needed affordable and workforce housing while building on the County of Maui's community-based planning process. As part of the effort,the B+K team explored where regional infrastructure can support and serve as a catalyst for affordable and workforce housing projects.Last year,the B+K team helped the County get additional funding for the Waiale Road Extension project,as a recipient of$25 M through the RAISE grant.Through a public private partnership with the neighboring developer,200 additional affordable homes will be built. PROJECT COST: $52,453 STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 3 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Jared Chang,AICP Planning Manager/Senior Project A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM Planner 17 <1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) an(Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Waipahu, HI 16.EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Bachelor of Arts,Public Administration 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) American Institute of Certified Planners(Certificate No. 028907) American Council of Engineering Companies, Senior Executive Institute, Class 26 Graduate (2002) American Planning Association,Hawaii Chapter Secretary (2017-present) 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City&County of Honolulu,Department of Planning and Permitting PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) North Shore Sustainable Communities Plan Update 2022 N/A Various Locations,HI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM a. ROLE: Senior Planner/Meeting Facilitator SCOPE: The plan will establish the vision,policies,and land use patterns for the North Shore Planning District through 2040 and beyond.It will be developed using an inclusive process that combines research and data collection with community input. The plan will analyze and address new and emerging policy issues including climate change and sea level rise,as well as economic and tourism implications from COVID-19.Estimated construction cost is not applicable.PROJECT COST:N/A (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED County of Maui,Department of Public Works PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Waiale Road Extension Waikapu,HI Ongoing N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑x CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE: Project Planner b. SCOPE: Providing cradle to grave services,from planning through construction,on the Waiale Road Extension project.The roadway improvements will include a single span bridge over Waikapu Stream,roundabout intersections,two through lanes, shoulder bikeways,pedestrian sidewalks,a shared-use path,and two parallel grassy swales,which will serve as a permanent stormwater best management practice (BMP).The project team will conduct agency and public coordination,both to seek input and provide information relating to the environmental and design related tasks.The environmental documentation for the improvement project will be prepared as a joint NEPA/HRS 343 environmental assessment.The construction bid documents will include construction plans, specifications,engineer's estimate,and permits.PROJECT COST: $3,800,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED The Wilhelm Group for State of Hawaii, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Department of Transportation,Harbors Division Ongoing N/A Hilo and Kahului Harbor Land Acquisition (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE: Project Planner c. SCOPE: Assisting with the acquisition of privately held lands surrounding Hilo and Kahului Harbors and production of a Harbors Facilities Plan that will summarize the potential options that DOT-H may have in utilizing the acquired lands, assisting with the infrastructure due diligence,and preparing an Environmental Assessment for the harbors.Design vehicle maneuverability,harbor access points and major harbor use operations,forecasted harbor buildout and activities,and planned use and improvements to adjacent thoroughfares and streets were evaluated and agencies consulted with to formulate optimal use and development of the private lots to complement harbor improvements.PROJECT COST: N/A (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Hawaii Community Foundation PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Affordable and Workforce Housing Regional Plans 2023 N/A Various Locations,HI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM d. ROLE: Senior Planning Manager SCOPE: B+K was tasked with creating three regional plans for the Central, South and West Maui regions.These plans highlighted the need for affordable housing and highlighted housing projects and infrastructure that would support those projects as part of the House Maui Initiative.The House Maui Initiative supports the planning and delivery of much needed affordable and workforce housing while building on the County of Maui's community-based planning process.PROJECT COST:N/A (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Hawaiian Home Lands PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) North Kona Water Development Ongoing N/A Kona,HI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM e. ROLE: Project Manager SCOPE: Preparing Environmental Assessments (EAs) and a preliminary engineering report for potable water source development on two parcels in the Keauhou 2 Ahupuaa.The wells being developed are intended to support development of DHHL projects at Lai Opua Village and Kalaoa. PROJECT COST: N/A STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 4 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Ronald Sato,AICP Senior Project Manager/Senior A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM Planner 33 <1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) =Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Waipahu,HI 16.EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Master of Arts,Urban and Regional Planning Bachelor of Science,Political Science 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) American Institute of Certified Planners(Certificate No. 014538) Historic Hawaii Foundation, Board of Trustees (2010-2016) American Planning Association,National and Hawaii Chapters 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1, LE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Harbors Division PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Pier 40 Improvements Honolulu Harbor Ongoing N/A Honolulu,HI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑x CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM a ROLE: Senior Project Manager SCOPE: The State Department of Transportation,Harbors Division is proposing improvements to Piers 39 and 40 that's used by Young Brothers as an interisland terminal.The project would fill the harbor area between Piers 39 and 40 and demolish certain areas of these piers to offset fill and loss of U.S.waters.Inland areas would be raised 3 feet to address sea level rise and redevelopment of Young Brothers facilities.An EIS would be prepared along with addressing several federal requirements to support a U.S.COE Individual Permit for pier work. PROJECT COST: N/A (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Highways Division PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Transportation Corridor Assessment Route 11 Queen Kaahumanu/Kuakini Ongoing 2018 Highway, Kailua-Kona,HI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE: Planner bSCOPE:B+K is performing a Corridor Assessment to find plausible solutions and options that will reduce congestion and enhance safety along Queen Kaahumanu Extension and Kuakini Highway.With the growth in population and increase in traffic,congestion on Route 11 between Henry Street and Kamehameha III Road has continued to grow and worsen over time. The approach to develop the concepts will be modeled after the Planning and Environmental Linkages (PEL) approach to help facilitate future NEPA or HEPA processes in the future.Future traffic operations will be evaluated and near-term and mid-term improvements that can be readily implemented to reduce congestion will be identified and evaluated against a pre-determined set of criteria. PROJECT COST: $301,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State DLNR,Division of Forestry&Wildlife PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Kawainui-Hamakua Marsh Master Plan; Final Environmental Impact 2020 N/A Statement, Kailua,HI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE: Senior Project Manager c. SCOPE: The State DLNR,DOFAW updated their master plan for the 986-acre Kawainui-Hamakua Marsh Complex in partnership with DSP.The master plan supported wetland restoration,upland reforestation,created areas for native Hawaiian cultural practices,and supported public access and educational programs. Completed an EIS approved by the State Land Board and withstood a legal challenge. Work included extensive community outreach to address concerns and effective community- based planning. PROJECT COST: $53,300,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Hawaii Community Foundation PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Affordable and Workforce Housing Regional Plans 2023 N/A Various Locations,HI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM d. ROLE: Senior Project Manager SCOPE: B+K was tasked with creating three regional plans for the Central, South and West Maui regions.These plans highlighted the need for affordable housing and highlighted housing projects and infrastructure that would support those projects as part of the House Maui Initiative.The House Maui Initiative supports the planning and delivery of much needed affordable and workforce housing while building on the County of Maui's community-based planning process. PROJECT COST: N/A STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 5 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM Matthew Kodama,MBA Planning Project Manager 13 3 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) af= E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM Carah Kadota,AICP Assistant Planning Project Manager 7 <1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) v= E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Matthew P.Fernandez Assistant Planner A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM 3 <1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) af= F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 1 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City and County of Honolulu,Department of Design and Construction PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION ofappllcable) Honolulu Zoo Hawaiian Wetland Aviary Ongoing N/A Honolulu, HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City and County of Honolulu,Department John Condrey (808) 768-8468 of Design and Construction 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE: Bowers+Kubota Consulting is providing entitlement planning, landscape architecture,civil engineering services for the initial phase of a new Hawaii exhibit,which will feature a wetland aviary.The new exhibit starts at the main entrance arrival area and extends eastward to the Nene Goose Sanctuary. Once completed,the aviary will showcase animals in their habitat ranging from coastal wetlands to mountainous rain forests and further into dry forests and grasslands. The design intent is to expose guests to the wide range of native wetland (streams and ponds) and dryland habitats found in Hawaii.The scope of work for this project covers conceptual design and permitting,with follow-on design development and construction documents. PROJECT COST:F. $5,000,000 ,ham .,!" ,,0 jo ���..� N. '4 41I TRAtI$ 0,yn" $I 't SLoxR cxRieH r PHASE 3(Future Concept) % 1 Dry Forest&Grassland Aviary A Mu �y % a.,i % ,,- i I y PHASE 7(Proposed Concept) '��^ Coastal Wetlands Aviary y F I -Y. _ - , PHASE 2(Future Concept} pg ,,,,I. ,r- :;',i'- 'S� d " "" Mountain Rain-Forest Aviary '� , rTM " I 1:41, ,:I ?W TROPP,.AL �� rV FOREST ', fL,6MING4 PPRP 16- AVI - ARY 9 .,, rx,srnrlr,u,n, . _rte, , j ,11°P. , r ,.. \J, l qiq ,/ N , , /I .� nl 51ib+dv \\`�y .—....10m.ue 0 !C�@�f Q1 �A Fe. "vi / R$ ! n i � i , In V + p` 1I , _.. I 4 , Al 41--- '' ,''''' I T.T.P. f '73# 1-- -1-1 -1-- • • - ,P-01.1b."), i- 1 { may 1: p..T, „IE ,- ., �..,.f., 1Yr ���� f' i ,,,iixe" i� °.id's � � Q114-,..: :.i ,Z� y �I I, ('i 1. i; ad '"ha I a G iii!_ ''• ' ,%i "f . �. - - ,i �' r_ E1.�, til)3741'4' yV_ K fi' II,.r..Iw,ii L"H.•� eeJnt u�,J ., .. 1 J{l.V . j=i^'`]_ nwne tt'ia ^ea.4.rSf u 1 z 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE ��` Planner, Civil Engineer,Landscape a. Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Architect STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 9 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 2 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City and County of Honolulu,Department of Design and Construction PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Kahawainui Stream Dredging Ongoing N/A Laie,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City and County of Honolulu,Department Kristie Ching (808) 768-8800 of Design and Construction 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting is preparing construction plans and specifications for the maintenance dredging of the City- owned portion of Kahawainui Stream between the intersection with Laie Wai Stream to the mouth of the stream excluding the sand berm at the stream mouth.An environmental review consisting of a Draft and Final Environmental Assessment,with an anticipated Finding of No Significant Impact(FONSI),will be prepared in accordance to the Hawaii Revised Statutes Chapter 343. The review will include a biological survey,archaeological and cultural study,and other environmental reports to determine impacts of the project and mitigation measures.Preparation of permit applications for the dredging and obtaining permit approvals is included in the project scope along with engineering assistance during the bidding and construction. PROJECT COST: $2,000,000 ti '4 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner, Civil Engineer STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 10 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 3 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City and County of Honolulu,Department of Transportation Services PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Complete Streets Planning and Preliminary Design,Kaneohe, Kailua,and Pearl 2021 N/A City,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City and County of Honolulu,Department Daniel Alexander of Transportation Services (808) 768 6652 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE: Bowers+Kubota Consulting assessed implementation of complete streets concept designs in Kaneohe, Kailua,and Pearl City area as part of planned road rehabilitation projects in each area.The inter-disciplinary team was comprised of civil/ transportation engineers,physical/site planners,urban designers,arborists,and landscape architects. Initial tasks included evaluation of existing conditions through driving,walking and bicycling audits of each community; identifying the complete streets network based on land use and roadway configuration;and developing preliminary street cross-sections showing options for pedestrian walkways,bicycle lanes,shared pathways,and vehicular travel lanes.The project applied a context-sensitive solutions process,engaging stakeholders via outreach efforts,including community leader contact, social media outreach,bike tours,pop-up and sit-down sessions,distribution of project-specific collateral materials,and broadcast media coverage. Input from the community was combined with a multi-modal assessment of all transportation methods in each area and observations from the project team to prepare the complete streets proposals.Within each area unique conditions and parameters existed that called for specific solutions. Viable tools to develop complete streets were combined with sound urban design,physical planning and landscape architecture to arrive at best options.The results of the combined input were revealed at community meetings where concept plans were shown and additional feedback was provided. B+K worked with the team to bring its collective experience together and bring a sensible approach to addressing the evolution of the project areas'transportation networks,which was used to refine the street cross-sections and prepared concept plans for the proposed roadway improvements along with associated opinions of probable construction costs. B+K also assisted with the preparation of Exemption Declarations for the project pursuant to HRS Ch. 343. PROJECT COST: $4,000,000 _ �y. v s Afrifdakt/ KANEOHE �� / KAILUA / PEARL CITY COMP LETESTREETS COMPLETESTREETS COMPLETESTREETS Lwow A, Shawn mem _ _ i - , a NrlYifr J+�M�kw b M. 0 I i .. 4 ,„. 7,,. \ ,. .. , '; ...... . ,,,„,,.. .‘„,.„. rfS\ [, For more IMorroston etre the webslle.ht1p://www.ranolulu.govicampletastreets For more inlornatron mst the website:nttp.//www.rwnolulu.govicomplelestreeta Email vs with your thoughts-campletasireelsOhonalulu.gov ErnaI us with your lMPgh[5_comple[NReelsehonolulu goy Photo courtesy of Blue Zones 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. =Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner, Civil Engineer,Landscape Architect STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 11 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 4 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Kamehameha Schools PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(ifapplicable) Due Diligence Assessment and Test Fit Study for West Hawaii Land Acquisition (84-5236 Hawaii Belt Road) 2022 N/A Captain Cook,Hawaii 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Kamehameha Schools Laura Takahashi (808)534-8108 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting provided planning and consulting services for a due diligence assessment and test fit study of the property(for an early learning center)located at 84-5236 Mamalahoa Highway in Captain Cook,Hawaii. The scope of the due diligence assessment and test fit study included research and entitlements in phase 1;property condition assessment in phase 2;and a test fit study of the building and site in phase 3.The scope of work included an assessment of interior and exterior improvements as well as regulatory requirements, including pavement and parking areas; planting and irrigation systems; the general condition of the building architectural elements;plumbing fixtures;electrical fixtures and outlets;fire alarm system;general structural conditions; and the general condition of the air conditioning system; and the property's entitlements and zoning requirements.A due diligence assessment of the Early Learning Center Building at the Saint and Church and Model Schools(Kikiwelawela)in Kaneohe,Hawaii was also provided under this project. PROJECT COST: N/A % _w x .K it1A Hexa i`i Island .t { s , - il' , a - - ,t .. ..-- - -s , ti 7 -anorraa aa-- 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. �QBowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner, Civil Engineer,Landscape Architect STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 12 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 5 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City and County of Honolulu PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Department of Design and Construction 2022 Ala Moana Regional Park Master Plan and Environmental Impact Statement 2019 (EIS) Ongoing Honolulu, HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City and County of Honolulu,Department of Design and Construction Elaine Morisato (DDC) (808) 768-8406 Biederman Redevelopment Ventures Benjamin Donsky (212)390-1122 (Prime consultant) 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting supported the City in developing portions of the Preferred Concept Master Plan for Ala Moana Regional Park(Ala Moana)and preparing its corresponding Environmental Impact Statement(EIS).The goal of the master plan was to provide a planning framework allowing Ala Moana to become a multi-faceted beach park and even greater asset to the community. The master plan evaluated the park's existing conditions and identified areas of improvement including landscape features,infrastructure,parking and pathways,and the park's iconic beach front.The 17 proposed improvement projects focused on addressing deferred maintenance to elevate the park's existing facilities and address coastal erosion issues while respecting and celebrating the established character.As part of the master planning process,the B+K Planning Group prepared and published a final EIS analyzing the proposed improvements established in the master plan. As part of the environmental review process,the B+K Planning group investigated the project's potential effects on the built and natural environments and provided mitigation measures to help minimize impacts pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statues,Chapter 343.This analysis included analyzing the need for beach nourishment and drainage canal improvements to address impacts from natural and climate change hazards like sea level rise.The EIS also analyzed the project's compliance with relevant federal,state,and county land uses regulations and policies. To develop the alternatives in the master plan and EIS,a strong community engagement and outreach program was conducted to better understand the multi-generational impact of Ala Moana on the community.Multiple public,in-person informational meetings were held between 2015 and 2018 and a project website titled"Our Ala Moana Park"was launched to garner community feedback.Incorporating input from over 30,000 visitor interactions at the website,feedback from the in-person community meetings and consultation responses from the EIS resulted in the design alternatives presented in the master plan and EIS. Additionally,during the community engagement process the master planning team was informed of more urgent actions needed at Ala Moana. This prompted the City to enact a 9-point plan to address these issues in parallel with the long-term master plan creating a holistic approach to improving the park long-term. PROJECT COST: $14,600,000 -i- A-2 Medium-density hl Ala nnna Ciivd. Apartment ��_�......'•—+ + District �� Kewalo i E3asin ~ P-2 General Preservation District f.rr 4. Ap.ut rten _ Ala Moana Regional Park 1f.1. ?, • gip*cin.i1 i I ty Res rt `I PROJECT t ;� YAldwal� mixed 4 l' Use ,, .,Boat HAAT 1' ,,, '� BOUNDARY I a v, a f• � lir ar v ., i Magic I ':'.5',N.::` Y 'r.1w I Island I ",,, a 'uy r �` r PnciJic Ocean 1 Awa ) °v -,r I Public Precinct;: N.• I (Waikl I Di.t ti 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Mt‘/ +Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner, Civil Engineer,Landscape Architect STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 13 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 6 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED County of Maui,Planning Department PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) South Maui Community Plan Update 2022 N/A Kihei-Makena,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER County of Maui,Planning Department Jennifer Maydan (808) 270-8290 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting is updating the South Maui Community Plan that includes the regions from Maalaea,Kihei, Wailea,Makena,to Ahihi-Kinau/Kanaio. The updated plan will provide a vision,a community plan map,goals,policies and actions to guide County officials and staff,property owners,developers,and residents on the appropriate growth and redevelopment patterns for South Maui for the next 20 years. As a precursor to the community plan update,B+K has put together three resource papers that cover the topics of Sea-Level Rise and Climate Change,Housing,Population Growth,and Mobility.Each resource paper examines the current conditions in the area,key challenges for the future of the area and strategies to minimize adverse impacts. PROJECT COST: N/A • ..q. � P y.. ... -rte'•• �rr _. - x y A ,;per.^ aw ` a;ate ° i� - �$ 7..w ' 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Lit. Bowers+Kubota Consulting, Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner, Civil Engineer STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 14 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 7 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Land and Natural Resources PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION Ofappllcable) Kealakekua Bay Master Plan&Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) Ongoing (estimated N/A South Kona, HI completion 2023) 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER State of Hawaii, Department of Department of Land and Natural Martha Yent (808) 587-0287 Resources 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE: Bowers+Kubota Consulting provided master plan,EIS,and management plan services for Kealakekua Bay State Historical Park. The state considers the park as one of the most historically significant places in Hawaii.The park spans 216 acres on land in three adjacent areas(Napoopoo,Pali Kapu 0 Keoua,and Kaawaloa),315 acres of waters of the adjacent Kealakekua Bay Marine Life Conservation District,and the Napoopoo pier.The primary project goal is to plan for a public park that preserves the area's cultural landscape and historic resources,preserves and protects the marine resources of Kealakekua Bay,promotes the scenic values and natural park setting,and accommodates outdoor recreation in a manner that does not impact or degrade natural and cultural resources.A draft master plan was developed before the ocean resources became the responsibility of the State Parks Division.The draft master plan is being updated to include analysis of marine issues and ocean recreational activities.The revised master plan will promote preservation and stewardship,offer guidance in the development of park interpretive concepts and programs,identify park facility needs,and recommend park management measures for the land and the sea.Community input and collaboration have been integral to the planning process and will continue to be considered in developing management measures. PROJECT COST: N/A (study) A 4•I A I N COOK w r d`K " ^y „„..44,4„ ,t....� .•, r 4. �c ::c - - •.. Nai�c'apo'o Ro�ci �"` �> -111tvi •Odd a, , N"�i •` ,o+ LOC Perky �p'rc�?F7Q' Beach to aCe aw � �Q Landing x '•. • ntiRd ! KaHauioa Bay Manini �p oPdo�oaa O e[ :yam Point nmen CU• [aptainc:aok pfd 7 Monument «✓ F Kealakekua Bay KA'AWALOA ,rte' • s • 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a Bowers+Kubota Consulting, Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 15 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 8 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Airports Division PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Ahukini Landfill Restoration,Phase II Ongoing N/A Lihue,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER State of Transportation,Airports Division Daryl Yokomizo (808)838-8825 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE: Bowers+Kubota Consulting is currently working with various agencies to develop a plan to deal with shearwater bird habitats in the project area;creating construction plans and specifications to stabilize a coastal slope containing landfill debris; and obtaining all necessary approvals and permits to allow such work.Project scope includes planning,environmental services, surveying,permitting,design and construction and post-construction support services.The scope also includes coordination with the State Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response(HEER)Office to address the mitigation and removal of debris that has fallen into the ocean. PROJECT COST: $8,600,000 ., • - f • K • 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE �� Planner,Environmental Engineer, a. r`Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Landscape Architect STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 16 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 9 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Hawaiian Home Lands PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) North Kona Water Development,Environmental Assessments and Preliminary Engineering Report Ongoing N/A North Kona,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER State of Hawaii, Department of Hawaiian Andrew Choy (808) 620-9559 Home Lands 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE: Bowers+Kubota Consulting is preparing Environmental Assessments (EAs) and a preliminary engineering report for potable water source development on two parcels in the Keauhou 2 Ahupuaa.The wells being developed are intended to support development of DHHL projects at Lai Opua Village and Kalaoa. A Hawaii Environmental Policy Act EA in accordance with Hawaii Revised Statutes(HRS)Chapter 343 and Title 11, Chapter 200 of the Department of Health Administrative Rules will be prepared for the one parcel with the U.S.Department of Agriculture(USDA)as the accepting agency. The other parcel will have an EA prepared pursuant to HRS Ch. 343 with DHHL accepting. A Preliminary Engineering Report(PER)meeting the requirements of the USDA Rural Utilities Service will also be prepared. A topographic survey for the PER will be coordinated and preliminary site layout and grading plans to confirm the area required for the site improvements will be prepared for the PER. The PER will also be processed for acceptance by the USDA Rural Utilities Service. A hydraulic study of the North Kona Water System and assistance in drafting the terms of the Water Development Agreement between DHHL,the landowners and the County Department of Water Supply will also be provided. PROJECT COST: N/A (Study) Illo girl/ � \���� 1\)y1�1�1��)1�1)l�l�)���11»lllly� rl ,"),w>»� }}}}?}}}}?}}}fY1)} MIIIU�RVIE;� � ,. T a r. E F .v - s .' t#i1 . I i 1 ' '7.' :i, ri, —7 ir , , oil -mom. r _ w s ' 9 , �I 41". .. I , n• " " 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3)ROLE Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner, Civil Engineer STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 17 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 10 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Greystar Development Services,LLC for University of Hawaii at Manoa PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) University of Hawaii at Manoa Multi-Family Housing,Environmental Assessment 2021 N/A Honolulu,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Greystar Development Services,LLC for Ethen Thacher (Greystar) (949)892-4973 University of Hawaii at Manoa 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting completed an Environmental Assessment for a Public Private Partnership(P3)project where the developer will design,build,and operate for profit the student housing multi-family building,day care center for UH students, and commercial operations such as a convenience store and/or eatery. PROJECT COST: $1,500,000 lir • . ih drr 111111111111111 • yl. l • tii• IM J • • _ V 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Bowers+Kubota Consulting, Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner, Civil Engineer STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 18 G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS 28.EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F 26.NAMES OF KEY PERSONNEL 27.ROLE IN EXAMPLE PROJECT (Fill in"Example Projects Key"section below before completing table.Place'X" (From Section E,Block 12) (From Section E,Block 13) under project key number for participation in same or similar role). 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge Jared Chang,AICP Planning Manager/Senior X Project Planner Ronald Sato,AICP Senior Project Manager/ Senior Planner Matthew Kodama,MBA Planning Project Manager X X X Carah Kadota,AICP Assistant Planning Project Manager Matthew Fernandez Assistant Planner X X 29.EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) City and County of Honolulu County of Maui 1 Department of Design and Construction 6 Planning Department Honolulu Zoo Hawaiian Wetland Aviary South Maui Community Plan Update City and County of Honolulu State of Hawaii 2 Department of Design and Construction Department of Land and Natural Resources Kahawainui Stream Dredging Kealakekua Bay Master Plan&Environmental Impact Statement City and County of Honolulu Department of Transportation Services State of Hawaii s Complete Streets Planning and Preliminary Design, 8 Department of Transportation,Airports Division, Kaneohe, Kailua,and Pearl Ahukini Landfill Restoration,Phase II Kamehameha Schools State of Hawaii 4 Due Diligence Assessment and Test Fit Study for West 9 Department of Hawaiian Home Lands Hawaii Land Acquisition (84-5236 Hawaii Belt Road) North Kona Water Development, City and County of Honolulu Department of Design and Construction (Biederman Greystar Development Services,LLC 5 Redevelopment Ventures-Prime Consultant 10 for University of Hawaii at Manoa Ala Moana Regional Park Master Plan and Environmental University of Hawaii at Manoa Multi-Family Housing Impact Statement STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 19 H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30.PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. COMPANY NAME: SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS BOWERS+KUBOTA CONSULTING,INC. 1. THE NAME OF THE FIRM OR PERSON, CONTACT 94-408 Akoki Street,Suite 201-A INFORMATION INCLUDING EMAIL ADDRESS, THE Waipahu,Hawaii 96797 PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS AND LOCATION Ph.(808) 836-7787 OF ALL ITS OFFICES Fax. (808) 834-4833 www.bowersandkubota.com Name of Firm Bowers+ Kubota Consulting, Inc. YEAR INCORPORATED: September 1980 Point of Contact Kathleen Chu, PE Principal PRINCIPALS• kchu@bowersandkubota.com (808) 836-7787 Brian Bowers,PE, CCM,President Principal Place of 94-408 Akoki Street, Suite 201-A, bbowers@bowersandkubota.com Business Waipahu, HI 96797 Dexter Kubota,PE,Vice President Location of all Offices Main Office (Waipahu) - Oahu dkubota@bowersandkubota.com Satellite Office (Kalihi) - Oahu Eric Iwamoto,PE, CCM,LEED AP,Principal Satellite Offices -Maui and Kauia eiwamoto@bowersandkubota.com Field Offices -Hawaii and Molokai Myong Choi,PE,LEED AP,Principal mchoi@bowersandkubota.com 2. THE AGE OF THE FIRM AND THE AVERAGE Mike Kamaka,PE, CCM,Principal NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES OVER THE PAST FIVE mkamaka@bowersandkubota.com YEARS. Hae-Dong Lee,AIA,NCIDQ,LEED AP,MBA Principal B+K has provided professional design services for the hlee@bowersandkubota.com last 43 years with the resources of the 8 principals and 260 professionals and administrative staff available to be Amy Matsushima, SHRM-SCP,Principal assigned to each project. Over the past 5 years, the average amatsushima@bowersandkubota.com number of employees has been 230 professionals. Kathleen Chu,PE,Principal 3. THE EDUCATION, TRAINING, AND kchu@bowersandkubota.com QUALIFICATIONS OF THE INDIVIDUAL, OR IF THE A FIRM, ITS KEY EMPLOYEES IN ACCORDANCE WITH HRS 103D-304 AND/OR THE PROFESSIONAL AND SCIENTIFIC OCCUPATION SERIES CONTAINED IN THE UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT'S QUALIFICATIONS STANDARDS HANDBOOK (HTTPS:WWW.OPM.GOV/ POLICY-DATA-OVERSIGHT/CLASSIFICATION- QUALIFICATIONS/GENERAL-SCHEDULE- QUALIFICATION STANDARDS/#URL=GS-PROF) Dependent upon the magnitude, complexity and needs of the County of Hawaii, Planning Department, Planning Services may include the following: • Master Planning • Regional & Community Plans • Site Planning • Federal, State, and County Permit Processing • Land Use Studies • Community Outreach • Environmental Impact Statements &Assessments • Entitlement Processing • Facilities Planning • Public Meetings • Physical Planning STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 20 H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30.PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. The team presented exhibits a broad spectrum of professional experience for providing Planning Services.We also employ expertise in architectural, landscape architectural, and civil and electrical engineering, and provide a wealth of diverse technical experience to projects as required. B+K is committed to dedicating the required expertise and personnel until successful project completion. Ms. Kathleen Chu will serve as Principal-in-Charge of all general planning projects with the County of Hawaii, Planning Department. KEY PERSONNEL PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS ACTIVE PROFESSIONAL NO.OF YEARS OTHER CERTIFICATIONS/ KEY PERSONNEL PROJECT ROLE REGISTRATION EDUCATION EXPERIENCE TRAINING STATE DISCIPLINE Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge HI Civil 30 BS COMMUNITY PLANNING Planning Manager Jared Chang,AICP /Senior Project N/A 17 BA American Institute of Planner Certified Planners Senior Project Ronald Sato,AICP Manager/Senior N/A 33 MA,BS American Institute of Planner Certified Planners Matthew Kodama,MBA Assistant Planning N/A 13 MBA,BBA Project Manager Carah Kadota,AICP Assistant Planning N/A 7 BEnvD American Institute of Project Manager Certified Planners Matthew Fernandez Assistant Planner N/A 3 BS/MS 1. A LIST OF RECENT PROJECT AND THE NAMES OF UP TO FIVE CLIENTS WHO MAY BE CONTACTED, INCLUDING AT LEAST TWO FOR WHOM SERVICES WERE RENDERED DURING THE PRECEDING YEAR: REFERENCES RECENT PROJECTS Jennifer Maydan, Planner Supervisor South Maui Community Plan Update. Maui County of Maui, Planning Department Telephone No. (808) 270-8290 (Ongoing) Andrew Choy, Planner DHHL North Kona Water Development, Kona, HI State of Hawaii, Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (Ongoing) Telephone No. (808) 620-9559 Lori Walker, Integrated Assets Manager Kukaniloko Green House and Nursery (Phase 1), Office of Hawaiian Affairs Telephone No. (808) 594-1835 Wahiawa, HI (Ongoing) Daniel Alexander, Project Manager City and County of Honolulu, Department of Transportation Complete Streets Planning and Preliminary Design, Services Pearl City, Kaneohe, Kailua, HI (2021) Telephone No. (808) 768-6652 Martha Yent, Interpretive Program Manager State of Hawaii Dept. of Land and Natural Resources, State Kealakekua Bay Master Plan & Environmental Parks Division Impact Assessment (EIS), South Kona, HI (Ongoing) Telephone No. (808) 587-0287 STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 21 H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30.PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. 2. ANY PROMOTIONAL OR DESCRIPTIVE LITERATURE WHICH THE INDIVIDUAL OR FIRM DESIRES TO SUBMIT. B+K is very familiar with the County of Hawaii's requirements based on past and current project experience. Select previous and ongoing projects on the island of Hawaii include: • DOT- Facility Planning and Land Acquisition, Hilo and Kahului Harbors, HI • Legacy Hilo Due Diligence, Hilo, HI • DHHL - North Kona Water Development, North Kona, HI • Hilton Waikoloa Village -various projects, Waikoloa, HI • Waikoloa Kings' Lands Docmentation Support, Waikoloa, HI • Auwaikeakau and Popoo Stream Jurisdictional Determination, Waikoloa, HI • DLNR- Kealakekua Bay Master Plan and Environmental Impact Statement, Kealakekua, HI • Kamehameha Schools- Due Diligence Assessment and Test Fit Study for West Hawaii Land Acquisition, Captain Cook, HI I.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. 31.SIGNATURE 1 �T2 _ 32.DATE June 30, 2023 33.NAME AND TITLE Kathleen Chu, PE Principal-in-Charge STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 22 1.SOLICITATION NUMBER(If any) ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS PL.7) Community Planning(Public Access Planning) PART II-GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS (If a firm has branch offices,complete for each specific branch office seeking work.) 2a.FIRM(OR BRANCH OFFICE)NAME 3.YEAR ESTABLISHED 4.DUNS NUMBER Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. 2008 03-929-9763 2b.STREET 5.OWNERSHIP a. 94-408 Akoki Street, Suite 201-A . TYPE Corporation 2c.CITY 2d.STATE 2e.ZIP CODE b.SMALL BUSINESS STATUS Waipahu HI 96797 6a.POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE 7.NAME OF FIRM(IF BLOCK 2A ISA BRANCH OFFICE) Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge 6b.TELEPHONE NUMBER 6c.E-MAIL ADDRESS 808 836-7787 kchu@bowersandkubota.com 8a.FORMER FIRM NAME(S)(IF ANY) 8b.YR.ESTABLISHED 8c.DUNS NUMBER KFC Airport,Inc. 1980 03-929-9763 9.EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE 10.PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE AND ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS c.No.of Employees c.Revenue a.Function b.Discipline a.Profile b.Experience Index Code (1) Firm (2) Branch Code Number(see below) 02 Administrative 41 A05 Airports;Navaids;Airport Lighting;Aircraft Fueling 5 06 Architects 20 A06 Airports;Terminals&Hangars;Freight 6 Handling 08 CADD Technician 7 C10 Commercial Building(low rise);Shopping Centers 4 12 Civil Engineers 26 C15 Construction Management 8 15 Construction Inspector 38 E02 Educational Facilities;Classrooms 4 16 Construction Managers 27 E03 Electrical Studies and Design 4 18 Cost Engineer/Estimator 2 E09 Environmental Impact Studies;... 5 21 Electrical Engineers 4 Ell Environmental Planning 4 23 Environmental Engineer 5 H07 Highways;Streets;Airfield Paving;Parking Lots 6 37 Interior Designer 1 H09 Hospitals&Medical Facilities 6 39 Landscape Architect 6 Hll Housing(Residential,Multi-Family;Apartments; 1 Condominiums) 47 Planner 6 L03 Landscape Architecture 4 48 Project Managers 66 P05 Planning(Community;Regional;...) 5 50 Risk Assessor 4 P06 Planning(Site,Installation and Project) 1 51 Safety/Occupational Health Engineer 1 R06 Rehabilitation (Buildings;Structures;Facilities) 3 52 Sanitary Engineer 1 SO4 Sewage Collection,Treatment&Disposal 4 53 Schedulers 2 S07 Solid Wastes;Incineration;Landfill 4 58 Technician/Analyst 3 S13 Storm Water Handling&Facilities 4 T02 Testing&Inspection Services 4 W02 Water Resources;Hydrology;Ground Water 4 Total 260 W03 Water Supply;Treatment and Distribution 4 11.ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM FOR LAST 3 YEARS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER (Insert revenue index number shown at right) a.Federal Work 7 1.Less than$100,000 6.$2 million to less than$5 million 2.$100,000 to less that$250,000 7.$5 million to less than$10 million b.Non-Federal Work 9 3.$250,000 to less than$500,000 8.$10 million to less than$25 million 4.$500,000 to less than$1 million 9.$25 million to less than$50 million c.Total Work 9 5.$1 million to less than$2 million 10.$50 million or greater 12.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. a.SIGNATURE (fac#A-Cd-3.,--- b.DATE June 30,2023 c.NAME AND TITLE Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021) i APPENDIX A: AWARDS AND CLIENT EVALUATIONS Bowers + Kubota's Unique Qualifications and Commitment to Excellence are demonstrated by some of the numerous awards and recognition we have received. Zweig Group's , ai i Business Ma ' National Best Firms to Work For gazine s tt„ 2022:4th Place Multidiscipline 2009,2011-2 3rd Place Firm Size 200+ Employees 2008 2023 Recipient 3rd Place Internal Marketing Award013,2015,2022-21 3. 1st Place Trifecta Award for Winning all 3 Categories 2021: 1st Place Multidiscipline 2nd Place Firm Size 200+ Employees 3rd Place Internal Marketing Award i' iAllio Trifecta Award for Winning all 3 Categories 2020: 1st Place Firm Size 200+ Employees 1st Place Multidiscipline 2019: 1st Place 100-199 Employeesr....;.. 2nd Place Multidiscipline n , Pirr . .; 2018: 1st Place Architecture r, I Ifr 1st Place Civil Engineering 2nd Place Multidisciplinary 2017:2nd Place Civil Engineering ,• 4E11 3rd Place Multidisciplinary ,' ,� :•*» ,, "4 2016:2nd Place Civil Engineering Best *; 3rd Place Multidisciplinary i ,4,, Fit-alsoi 2015:2nd Place Civil Engineering + -, .�,..e. a. <; 1st Place Multidisciplinary t4.. .• , 2014: 1st Place Civil Engineering .: 1st Place Multidisciplinary ,s zT ENR „„ ENR Magazine's Top 100 TOP 1 00 Construction mmliilli Management-for-Fee Firms 2022:#30 National ` \4BoWE\OWER + J 2021:#48 National 2020:#44 National -'-- 2019:#39 National In 5 Inc.5000 Idi Fastest Growing. 44.1„ ,, Private Companies 2021:#4761 National ,. , 2018:#4805 National __. „ �� 1111111 AHA Fit-Friendly Worksite i' 2012: Platinum Achievement Recipient 2011,2013:Gold Achievement Award 2018,2021:Silver Achievement Award 2014:Worksite Innovation Award A iCEë h WkUM'4M Lfil:%CH Lir I`.i:IJXN,YIti4.Lgi 1.4 WYi. - 1141 7-7- _ Excellence Award •Wanaao Road/Keolu Drive IVII-11k-V Reconstructed Sewer •Bowers+Kubota Warehouse/ Office Space A •Keauhou Beach Hotel and Site Demolition(Honor Award-National) Honor Award 7 2019 Construction •Kaumualii Highway Lihue Mill Management Project Bridge Rice street Achievement Award ASCE •UH Information Technology Center Water/Wastewater/Utility: •Ewa Makai Middle School Construction value greater •Honouliuli WWTP-New Solids than$50M Handling Facility •Honoapiilani Highway Lahainaluna Road Outstanding Widening, Kaneohe-Kailua Wastewater Conveyance&Treatment • to Aholo Road y New Interisland Terminal Civil Engineering Facilities Project KK Tunnel Complex,HNL 7 Achievement Award •In-Vessel Bioconversion •Emergency Repairs of'lhi'ihilauakea Bridge Facility , •New Interisland Terminal Complex,HNL •South Ramp Microtunneling •Replacement of Kea'iwa Stream Bridge Project •Hawaiki Submarine Cable and Kapolei •Kaneohe-Kailua Watewater Landing Station(Grand Award and Best Conveyance&Treatment Large Project) Facilities Project K-K Tunnel •Keauhou Beach Hotel and Site Demolition (Grand Award and Best Large Project [Hawaii],Best Large Project[Region],Honor Award[National]) ARUM — i aye.€r n +e ufos..r , i Public Works Project of the Year ri 1E331 HAWAII SOCIETY OF h Range Improvements PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS •Ala Wai Golf Course Driving 1 CM Project of the Year i •Emergency Repairs oYlhi'ihi- , lauakea Bridge •Haleakala Highway Widening, Phase II J'}"►'4 A Hawaii Society of7 •Honouliuli WWTP,New Solids Professional Engineers Handling Facility y� � AWA� 2011 Project of the Year Award •Ewa Makai Middle School 1 •Manele Small Boat Harbor :, Kamehameha Avenue Roadway Ferry&ADA Improvements Improvements •In-Vessel Bioconversion Facility •Pa'au'au Stream Building Project General Design Project Management Merit Award Project of the Year University of Hawai'i-West •Manana Properties Develop- 11 O'ahu,New Administration& ment Allied Health Building •National Cemetery Stabili- zation CM National Project of the Year •Replacement of Kea'iwa Stream Bridge Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 Kahuku Ranch Cesspool Assessment and Remediation $220,610 Name of Project Contract Amount Scope of work: Civil Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5)Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team 1. Keeps you informed Lucas Aribon, Albert Rivera Comments:The B+K team has been able to meet or exceed 5 my needs over the last year and a half and continues to I Comments:Answered previously. perform at an outstanding level. 2. Quality of Project Manager 2. Addresses problems and offers workable Eric Tamashiro solutions Comments: Eric has provided excellent service and has consistently provided project deliverables on time,within 5 5 budget, and according to scope. In addition Eric and his Comments:Answered previously. team has responded to the many requests, ranging from assistance with contract scoping to post project support, so we are very happy with the services provided. 3. Treats you as an important team member 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions Comments: Eric is extremely conscientious and understands that the acquisitions we have been working on come from the 5 Comments: Eric listens to my opinions and more global 5 top levels of leadership at KS. He response time is excellent, concerns and incorporates them into his proposed solutions. even calling/emailing time sensitive information on Friday afternoon and even the weekend. 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs 5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments:As stated earlier,we have been operating on 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion time, on budget, and according to scope. 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality* Integrity * Teamwork Comments:Answered previously. 5 Comments: Eric is outcome focused and provides various 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule options on how to achieve the outcomes I am seeking. 5 Section 2—Technical Ability Comments:Answered previously. 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 3. Processes documents in a timely manner Comments:Again, Eric provides solutions that meet our 5 5 needs but are within the established regulations and Comments:Answered previously. boundaries. 2. General technical knowledge Section 5—Value Comments: I don't think I have presented an issue that we 5 have not been able to resolve,that's gotta count for a lot! 1. Adheres to project budget 5 3. Knowledge of the contract Comments:Answered previously. Comments: I work closely with Eric on crafting the contract 5 and SOW,which has been very successful to date. 2. Provides added value 5 4.Quality of response to documents Comments:Answered previously. Comments: Our turn around times on comments and 5 revisions has really impressed my bosses. Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 1. Please rate the overall performance Comments: I don't know enough about your margins to be Comments: Over the last 18 months, Eric has worked on commenting beyond,we have been satisfied with the 5 some of the most high profile acquisitions for KS and has 5 compensation relative to the deliverables and timeframes delivered consistently so it not hard to praise his work and they are provided. give him the ratings I have. 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 2. Would be your choice for future service Comments: I am a stickler for maintaining timelines and Eric 5 Comments: Eric(and B+K by extension)is growing a 5 have met all of my expectations as well as those of the reputation for delivering high quality products in short internal clients at KS. timeframes with the leadership at KS'FDSD. 7. Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: Comments: Eric has been keen to share insights on 5 regulatory requirements to avoid missteps as the project progresses. Mr.Allen Salavea Kamehameha Schools 11/22/2022 Name Agency/Department/Division Date Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 RH-03: Eng. Design Support for FY23 IWRR $414,740 Name of Project Contract Amount Scope of work: Civil Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5)Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team Anthony Domingo, Jamie, Tang, James DeGuzman, Maria Bawag, Edgar Quinabo, 5 1. Keeps you informed 5 Joshua Gusman Comments: Comments: 2. Quality of Project Manager 2. Addresses problems and offers workable Mike Nishimura 5 solutions 5 Comments: Comments: 3. Treats you as an important team member 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions 5 Comments: Comments: 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs 5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments: 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality* Integrity* Teamwork 5 Comments: Comments: 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule 5 Section 2—Technical Ability Comments: 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 5 3. Processes documents in a timely manner 5 Comments: Comments: 2. General technical knowledge5 Section 5—Value Comments: 1. Adheres to project budget 5 3. Knowledge of the contract5 Comments: Comments: 2. Provides added value 5 4.Quality of response to documents Comments: 5 Comments: Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 1. Please rate the overall performance 5 Comments: Comments: 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 2. Would be your choice for future service 5 Comments: Comments: 7.Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: I realize all 5s does not offer constructive criticism, but I personally have N/A been extremely satisfied with the service we are receiving. Thorough, timely,yet not excessive communication is what I appreciate the most. Comments: Some scores regarding accuracy could have been docked, but all matters to date have been nondetrimental,which I believe is due to timely communication. Thank you and I look forward to our continued work together. Mr.Todd Ozaki County of Kauai, Department of Public Works 11/23/2022 Name Agency/Department/Division Date Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 PVT Landfill Owner Advisory Services $587,600 Name of Project Contract Amount Scope of work: Civil Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5)Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team r— 1. Keeps you informed Albert Rivera, Matt Takane 5 Comments:Quick to respond and detailed to enable Comments: appropriate answers/topos requested. 2. Quality of Project Manager 2.Addresses problems and offers workable Mike Nishimura solutions Comments: Mike is very responsive to any request 5 5 submitted. His directives are clear to subordinates that Comments: enable quality outcome. 3. Treats you as an important team member 5 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions 5 Comments: BK team has very inclusive of our needs. Comments: Listens attentively to needs and requests. 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs 5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments: No comment 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality* Integrity* Teamwork 5 Comments: Comments: Core values are met 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule 5 Section 2—Technical Ability Comments: 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 3. Processes documents in a timely manner Comments: Skill sets are very evident and reflected in the 5 5 end product Comments:Getting tired of commenting. 2. General technical knowledge Section 5—Value Comments:That is why we hired the company,formerly Belt- 5 Collins Hawaii. 1. Adheres to project budget 5 3. Knowledge of the contract Comments: 5 Comments: 2. Provides added value 5 4.Quality of response to documents Comments: 5 Comments: Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 5 1. Please rate the overall performance 5 Comments: Comments: 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 5 2. Would be your choice for future service 5 Comments: Meets or exceeds scheduled requirements. Comments: 7.Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: 5 Comments: Evaluation is too long. .................................................................... Mr.Albert Shigemura PVT Land Company, Ltd. 11/29/2022 Name Agency/Department/Division Date Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 Building 9 Well#2 Repair, Kunia Tunnel $325,988 Name of Project Contract Amount Scope of work: Civil Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5)Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team 1. Keeps you informed Tracey-Anne Panlasigui, Brian Kawamoto 5 Comments: Comments: 2. Quality of Project Manager 2. Addresses problems and offers workable Cary Kondo 5 solutions 5 Comments: Comments: 3. Treats you as an important team member 5 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions 5 Comments: Comments: 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs 5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments: 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality* Integrity * Teamwork Comments: 5 Comments: 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule 5 Section 2—Technical Ability Comments: 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 5 3. Processes documents in a timely manner 5 Comments: Comments: 2. General technical knowledge 5 Section 5—Value Comments: 1. Adheres to project budget 5 3. Knowledge of the contract 5 Comments: Comments: 2. Provides added value 5 4.Quality of response to documents Comments: 5 Comments: Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 5 1. Please rate the overall performance 5 Comments: Comments: 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 5 2. Would be your choice for future service 5 Comments: Comments: 7. Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: 5 Comments: Ms. Su Yi Jacobs Government Services Company 11/29/2022 Name Agency/Department/Division Date Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 Moloaa Irrigation Cooperative Water Sys. Improvem. $100,000 Name of Project Contract Amount Scope of work: Civil Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5)Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team Kristen Yoshida 1. Keeps you informed Comments: Kristen was responsive, efficient and clearly 5 Comments:Always there when we needed them, prompt went over and above to satisfy our needs. It was a responses and good proactive communications where pleasure working with her. necessary. 2. Quality of Project Manager 2.Addresses problems and offers workable Jay Stone solutions Comments: I have known Jay for many years, and he has 5 5 always exemplified professionalism,technical competence, Comments:Always worked towards a better solution for attention to detail, and has grown into a real leader and their client(us)and the affected water system. manager that any company would be proud to have. 3. Treats you as an important team member 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions Comments: 5 Comments: Maintained a good rapport with us during back 5 and forth comments. 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs 5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments: 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality* Integrity * Teamwork Comments: 5 Comments: Kristen and jay excelled in all of these 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule categories. GREA core values by the way. 5 Comments: Did their best to do this in spite of project delays Section 2—Technical Ability outside of their control. 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 3. Processes documents in a timely manner Comments: Kristen and Jay both maintained exemplary 5 5 professionalism during the ups and downs of this project, Comments: and never wavered from it. 2. General technical knowledge Section 5—Value Comments:They knew their stuff,came in with a good 5 approach and worked well with us on our technical 1. Adheres to project budget comments and suggestions. 5 3. Knowledge of the contract Comments: Comments: Kristen and Jay clearly read the contract and 5 understood its requirements and limitations. That was not 2. Provides added value always the case with about half of our other contracted consultants. 5 Comments: I saw effort in this as the project progressed 4.Quality of response to documents through its different stages. Kristen and Jay were always 5 I looking at things to add value to the project. Comments:always prompt and thorough Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 1. Please rate the overall performance Comments: N/A Comments:A"10"for sure, hope we can do business again 5 with them. 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 2. Would be your choice for future service Comments: Did their best to stay on schedule to finish the 5 5 contract in spite of other factors beyond their control. Comments:Absolutely 7.Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: N/A Comments: Mr. Michael Miyahira State of Hawaii, Department of Health, Environmental 12/5/2022 Management Division,Safe Drinking Water Branch Name Agency/Department/Division Date Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 Keauhou Beach Hotel Demolition Project Name of Project Contract Amount Civil Engineering, Landscape Archtiecture, Planning, Scope of work: Electrical Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5)Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team Calvin Ing, Albert Rivera, Edgar Quinabo, Brian Kawamoto, Bradley Tanimura, Lance Keliiaa, 1. Keeps you informed Christopher Billete, Kelsey Wai, Brian Itozaki, Nick Enomoto Comments:The entire team was very responsive. The project was very complicated,and the team was able to 5 5 flex when needed. I was also very satisfied with their ability and knowledge of the permitting and agency process. The team was able to address high-and low-level concerns Comments: Eric,Calvin and I talk often raised by the agencies. An example of this was a cover sheet included an"index/cheat sheet"for the plan reviewer so she could more efficiently navigate the large set of drawings. I believe this was much appreciated by the overwhelmed planning department. 2. Quality of Project Manager 2. Addresses problems and offers workable Eric Tamashiro solutions Comments: I have worked continuously with Eric for 10 Comments: None of the team shrunk from any problem. years!He is a measured and contemplative engineer. He reasonable solutions were brought up from multiple different is a good listener and clearly breakdowns issues so the 5 team members. Sometime the contractor,sometimes the 5 owner and the design team can discuss decisions with user,and design team. The important take away is that all focus and appropriate solutions. Eric communicates well were heard and felt comfortable sharing their ideas.At no with his team agencies that keep the conversations on time,was someone's reasonable contributions was point. He keeps the project moving and RFI/responses/ dismissed off hand. The team,as a whole,was open to revisions occurred timely. I also felt that our conversations critically thinking problems. concerning budget or overruns were transparent and fair. 3. Treats you as an important team member 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions Comments: I think it's fair to say that Eric and I have equal respect for each other. We both pretty much stay in our 5 Comments: Eric had very little choice in that matter. He 5 lanes and do our best to recognize each other's pain points managed well. as 'art of the .rocess to make the project successful. 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments: I never noticed a point where this project had a 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion staff issue. 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality* Integrity * Teamwork Comments: no issues Comments: I typically don't give 5's or the highest marks 5 on these types of surveys, but I'm not sure we could have 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule completed this project without this team. They all provided their best,advocated for the project and worked together. Comments: Our goals on schedule for this project was not in 5 the hands of the design team for the most part. EXCEPT for meeting our demo completion schedule. This again was the Section 2—Technical Ability joint effort by the entire team. 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 3. Processes documents in a timely manner Comments: Our conversations or actions never veered to unethical practices. I believe that all who contributed on 5 Comments: I don't believe that we could have moved faster 5 this project, inclusive of subcontractors and KS cultural, for submitting drawings or responding. contractors etc... behaved professionally and ethically. 2. General technical knowledge Section 5—Value Comments:As I read or participated in meeting with 5 agencies, I was impressed that the team was 1. Adheres to project budget 5 ready/knowledgeable/prepared to respond to all the comments. B+K was able to provide options or pivot or respond appropriately. 3. Knowledge of the contract Comments:All amendments to the contract were owner driven. For this particular project, Comments:The contract scoped was amended multiple times. It was a good think that the proposal was well 5 defined. We did need to refer back to the amendments to 2. Provides added value double check line-item cost. Although,the project took us on many twists and turns,we were able to keep track of what was included, not included and track costs. Comments: The added value was the depth of experience 5 we could pull from.Cheryl Palesh and other leaders within the BCH and B+K team provided a concise view of a very 4.Quality of response to documents complicated project.The project never struggled for 5 competent expert review on a high level. I never encountered a situation where we didn't have a decisive path. Comments: No issues. reasonable turn around time i Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 1. Please rate the overall performance Comments: Estimating some of these projects are hard as Comments: For complicated projects,this team was the the scope may shift. Having said that,the estimate or best. Considering the duration of the project and the proposal are very complete. Sometimes,the proposals are multiple changes in scope, I appreciated how and when more conservative than needed for every project. amendments were handled. As the owner PM, I However,one way we have navigating the unknown is to 4 appreciated not being inundated with multiple minor amend 5 phase the design contract. This way we can start ments. We were able to bundle the changes and forecast eliminating unknowns and not contracting for work where work so that invoicing/scope was clear and comprehensive. the scope is unclear and that significantly impacts design Also,during the covid lock down,the team also raised to the budget. Concurrently, B+K has assisted in wholistic occasion switching to MS TEAMs meeting was seamless. baseline cost on the conservative end to help with It's worthy to note that we had 100 OAC's and most of these budgeting. this way we can managed from both ends and were done virtually. hopefully exceed expectations. 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 2. Would be your choice for future service Comments:all documents are submitted on time. 5 Comments: B+K would be my preference especially for 5 large and/or complicated projects. 7.Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: N/A Comments: Mahalo nui for B+K's! Ms. Laura Takahashi Kamehameha Schools 11/23/2022 Name Agency/Department/Division Date i APPENDIX B: PROFESSIONAL LICENSES PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NOTICE THIS POCKET ID CARD IDENTIFIES YOU TO THE PUBLIC AS BEING CURRENTLY LICENSED AND SHOULD BE KEPT IN YOUR POSSESSION AT ALL TIMES. I License Number Expiration date Eli.' ''❑� CLASSES(ACTIVE): I I PE-12808 4130(2024 h• STATE OF-(OEM.CEPPFTTENT OF CO A(ERCE AND COM.SUAER AFFN RS _ 1,1111W1 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IOh El I I CLASS(ES):CE CIVIL lI KATHLEEN S B CHL 7140 MAKAA ST HONOLULU,HI 96825 !Ii / i SI,'. TURE OF LICENSEE _W W_—I J �• BOWERS + KUBOTA vI\ Construction Management•A/E Design•Planning•Project Management 94-408 Akoki Street,Suite 201-A Waipahu,Hawaii 96797 .0v4( (`-' '.. , , kyr. ok\ T COUNTY OF HAWAII "''_� '`> PLANNING DEPARTMENT or '. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FISCAL YEAR 2023 - 2024 PL.8) COMMUNITY PLANNING Writer, Grant Writer yxy f�. f �<a N w�4 +c°" June 30, 2023 Illim BOWERS + KUBOTA Aff BOWERS + KUBOTA Construction Management•A/E Design•Planning•Project Management B+K No. 23.524 June 30, 2023 Mr. Zendo Kern, Planning Director Planning Department County of Hawaii 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3, Hilo, Hawai'i 96720 Subject: Professional Services During Fiscal Year 2023-2024 PL.8) Community Planning (Writer, Grant Writer) Dear Mr. Kern: Bowers+Kubota Consulting(B+K)is pleased to submit our letter of interest and qualifications to provide professional services during the fiscal Year 2023-2024 for the above referenced category. We believe our staff with its extensive experience can provide the professional services required for your upcoming projects. Over the past 43 years, B+K has provided outstanding architectural/engineering design, program and project management, construction management, and planning services across the State of Hawaii while living our mission statement of Fulfilling Visions.Building Trust.Our extensive experience has resulted in successfully completing numerous projects for a variety of public agencies and private industry clients. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me by telephone at (808) 836-7787 or by email at kchu@bowersandkubota.com. Respectfully, BOWERS +KUBOTA CONSULTING, INC. f - Kathleen Chu, PE Principal-in-Charge 94-408 Akoki Street,Ste.201-A,Waipahu,HI 96797 h (808)8367787 www.bowersandkubata.com i STANDARD FORM 330 ARCHITECT- ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS PART I-CONTRACT SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS A. CONTRACT INFORMATION 1.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) Professional Services in Fiscal Year 2023 - 2024 2.PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 3.SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER June 1,2023 PL.8) Community Planning (Writer, Grant Writer) B.ARCHITECT - ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT 4.NAME AND TITLE Kathleen Chu,PE,Principal-in-Charge 5.NAME OF FIRM :,:t Bowers+Kubota Consulting 6.TELEPHONE NUMBER 7.FAX NUMBER 8.E-MAIL ADDRESS (808) 836-7787 (808) 834-4833 kchu@bowersandkubota.com C. PROPOSED TEAM (COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR THE PRIME CONTRACTOR AND ALL KEY SUBCONTRACTORS.) (Check) 0 9. FIRM NAME 10.ADDRESS 11.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT w < 2 a m z E ? O a v U 94-408 Akoki Street, Suite 201- x. X Bowers+Kubota Consulting APL.8)Community Planning Waipahu,HI 96797 (Writer, Grant Writer) ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE b. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE c. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE d. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE e. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE f. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE 9. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM ❑D (ATTACHED) AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 1 D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM a7-'-9! • ► '�'. . I. OF COUNTY OF HAWAII Planning Department PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE Kathleen Chu,PE PLANNING SENIOR MANAGER Jared Chang,AICP PLANNERS Ronald Sato,AICP Matthew Kodama,MBA Carah Kadota,AICP Matthew Fernandez AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 2 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM 31 1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) af=Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Waipahu,HI 16.EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (State and Discipline) Bachelor of Science,Civil Engineering HI,Professional Engineer/Civil [#12808 (exp. 4/30/2024)] CA,Professional Engineer/Civil [#54022 (exp.12/31/2023)] 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Hawaii Council of Engineering Societies, Current Treasurer American Council of Engineering Companies of Hawaii American Society of Civil Engineers,Transportation Chair Engineering Sector Partnership, Chamber of Commerce,Women in STEM Lead 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED County of Maui,Department of Public Works PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Waiale Road Extension Project Ongoing N/A Waikapu,Maui,Hawaii (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑x CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE: Project Manager a. SCOPE: Project manager providing the County of Maui cradle to grave services,from planning through construction,on the Waiale Road Extension project.The roadway improvements will include a single span bridge over Waikapu Stream, roundabout intersections,two through lanes,shoulder bikeways,pedestrian sidewalks,a shared-use path,and two parallel grassy swales,which will serve as a permanent stormwater best management practice (BMP).The project team conduct agency and public coordination,both to seek input and provide information relating to the environmental and design related tasks. The environmental documentation for the improvement project will be prepared as a joint NEPA/HRS 343 environmental assessment.The construction bid documents will include construction plans,specifications,engineer's estimate,and permits PROJECT COST: $3,800,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Highways Route 50 (Kaumualii Highway) Feasibility Study-Hanapepe to Kekaha Ongoing N/A Kekaha,Kauai,HI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM b ROLE:Project Manager SCOPE: Conduct a Feasibility Study to explore conceptual details,constraints,and prospective timelines for different resiliency improvement alternatives based on probable future scenarios of concern for Route 50, Kaumualii Highway,from Hanapepe to Kekaha.The objectives of the Feasibility Study are to explore resiliency realities,criticalities,and challenges for the Route 50 study area. The scope of work will include coastal modeling of tidal flood frequency analysis and high-resolution sea level rise and wave inundation modeling.The modeling will be conducted for a variety of future sea level rise scenarios combined with different wave events to help estimate the frequency of occurrence of flooding at selected intervals in the future. PROJECT COST: $675,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Highways PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Vulnerable Road User Safety Assessment (VRUSA) Statewide,HI Ongoing Ongoing (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑x CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE:Project Manager c. SCOPE:Working with the HDOT to develop the State's first Vulnerable Road User Safety Assessment(VRUSA).A VRUSA is an assessment of the safety performance of a State with respect to vulnerable road users and the plan for the State to improve the safety of vulnerable road users.Addressing the safety of vulnerable road users through a collaborative and comprehensive approach allows people that walk,bike,and roll full and safe access to our transportation system.The assessment will include the Safe System Approach,which aims to improve safety culture,increase collaboration across all stakeholders,and refocus transportation system design and operation on anticipating human mistakes and lessening impact forces to reduce crash severity and save lives. PROJECT COST: $575,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Hawaii Community Foundation PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Affordable and Workforce Housing Regional Plans 2023 N/A Island of Maui, Hawaii (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE: Project Manager d SCOPE: B+K is creating three regional plans for the Central, South and West Maui regions.These plans highlight the need for affordable housing and infrastructure that would support those projects as part of the House Maui Initiative.The House Maui Initiative supports the planning and delivery of much needed affordable and workforce housing while building on the County of Maui's community-based planning process. As part of the effort,the B+K team explored where regional infrastructure can support and serve as a catalyst for affordable and workforce housing projects.Last year,the B+K team helped the County get additional funding for the Waiale Road Extension project,as a recipient of$25 M through the RAISE grant.Through a public private partnership with the neighboring developer,200 additional affordable homes will be built. PROJECT COST: $52,453 STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 3 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Jared Chang,AICP Planning Manager/Senior Project A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM Planner 17 <1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) an(Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Waipahu, HI 16.EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Bachelor of Arts,Public Administration 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) American Institute of Certified Planners(Certificate No. 028907) American Council of Engineering Companies, Senior Executive Institute, Class 26 Graduate (2002) American Planning Association,Hawaii Chapter Secretary (2017-present) 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City&County of Honolulu,Department of Planning and Permitting PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) North Shore Sustainable Communities Plan Update 2022 N/A Various Locations,HI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM a. ROLE: Senior Planner/Meeting Facilitator SCOPE: The plan will establish the vision,policies,and land use patterns for the North Shore Planning District through 2040 and beyond.It will be developed using an inclusive process that combines research and data collection with community input. The plan will analyze and address new and emerging policy issues including climate change and sea level rise,as well as economic and tourism implications from COVID-19.Estimated construction cost is not applicable.PROJECT COST:N/A (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED County of Maui,Department of Public Works PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Waiale Road Extension Waikapu,HI Ongoing N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑x CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE: Project Planner b. SCOPE: Providing cradle to grave services,from planning through construction,on the Waiale Road Extension project.The roadway improvements will include a single span bridge over Waikapu Stream,roundabout intersections,two through lanes, shoulder bikeways,pedestrian sidewalks,a shared-use path,and two parallel grassy swales,which will serve as a permanent stormwater best management practice (BMP).The project team will conduct agency and public coordination,both to seek input and provide information relating to the environmental and design related tasks.The environmental documentation for the improvement project will be prepared as a joint NEPA/HRS 343 environmental assessment.The construction bid documents will include construction plans, specifications,engineer's estimate,and permits.PROJECT COST: $3,800,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED The Wilhelm Group for State of Hawaii, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Department of Transportation,Harbors Division Ongoing N/A Hilo and Kahului Harbor Land Acquisition (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE: Project Planner c. SCOPE: Assisting with the acquisition of privately held lands surrounding Hilo and Kahului Harbors and production of a Harbors Facilities Plan that will summarize the potential options that DOT-H may have in utilizing the acquired lands, assisting with the infrastructure due diligence,and preparing an Environmental Assessment for the harbors.Design vehicle maneuverability,harbor access points and major harbor use operations,forecasted harbor buildout and activities,and planned use and improvements to adjacent thoroughfares and streets were evaluated and agencies consulted with to formulate optimal use and development of the private lots to complement harbor improvements.PROJECT COST: N/A (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Hawaii Community Foundation PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Affordable and Workforce Housing Regional Plans 2023 N/A Various Locations,HI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM d. ROLE: Senior Planning Manager SCOPE: B+K was tasked with creating three regional plans for the Central, South and West Maui regions.These plans highlighted the need for affordable housing and highlighted housing projects and infrastructure that would support those projects as part of the House Maui Initiative.The House Maui Initiative supports the planning and delivery of much needed affordable and workforce housing while building on the County of Maui's community-based planning process.PROJECT COST:N/A (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Hawaiian Home Lands PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) North Kona Water Development Ongoing N/A Kona,HI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM e. ROLE: Project Manager SCOPE: Preparing Environmental Assessments (EAs) and a preliminary engineering report for potable water source development on two parcels in the Keauhou 2 Ahupuaa.The wells being developed are intended to support development of DHHL projects at Lai Opua Village and Kalaoa. PROJECT COST: N/A STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 4 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Ronald Sato,AICP Senior Project Manager/Senior A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM Planner 33 <1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) =Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Waipahu,HI 16.EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Master of Arts,Urban and Regional Planning Bachelor of Science,Political Science 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) American Institute of Certified Planners(Certificate No. 014538) Historic Hawaii Foundation, Board of Trustees (2010-2016) American Planning Association,National and Hawaii Chapters 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1, LE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Harbors Division PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Pier 40 Improvements Honolulu Harbor Ongoing N/A Honolulu,HI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑x CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM a ROLE: Senior Project Manager SCOPE: The State Department of Transportation,Harbors Division is proposing improvements to Piers 39 and 40 that's used by Young Brothers as an interisland terminal.The project would fill the harbor area between Piers 39 and 40 and demolish certain areas of these piers to offset fill and loss of U.S.waters.Inland areas would be raised 3 feet to address sea level rise and redevelopment of Young Brothers facilities.An EIS would be prepared along with addressing several federal requirements to support a U.S.COE Individual Permit for pier work. PROJECT COST: N/A (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Highways Division PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Transportation Corridor Assessment Route 11 Queen Kaahumanu/Kuakini Ongoing 2018 Highway, Kailua-Kona,HI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE: Planner bSCOPE:B+K is performing a Corridor Assessment to find plausible solutions and options that will reduce congestion and enhance safety along Queen Kaahumanu Extension and Kuakini Highway.With the growth in population and increase in traffic,congestion on Route 11 between Henry Street and Kamehameha III Road has continued to grow and worsen over time. The approach to develop the concepts will be modeled after the Planning and Environmental Linkages (PEL) approach to help facilitate future NEPA or HEPA processes in the future.Future traffic operations will be evaluated and near-term and mid-term improvements that can be readily implemented to reduce congestion will be identified and evaluated against a pre-determined set of criteria. PROJECT COST: $301,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State DLNR,Division of Forestry&Wildlife PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Kawainui-Hamakua Marsh Master Plan; Final Environmental Impact 2020 N/A Statement, Kailua,HI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM ROLE: Senior Project Manager c. SCOPE: The State DLNR,DOFAW updated their master plan for the 986-acre Kawainui-Hamakua Marsh Complex in partnership with DSP.The master plan supported wetland restoration,upland reforestation,created areas for native Hawaiian cultural practices,and supported public access and educational programs. Completed an EIS approved by the State Land Board and withstood a legal challenge. Work included extensive community outreach to address concerns and effective community- based planning. PROJECT COST: $53,300,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Hawaii Community Foundation PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Affordable and Workforce Housing Regional Plans 2023 N/A Various Locations,HI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 CHECK IF PROJECT PERFORMED WITH CURRENT FIRM d. ROLE: Senior Project Manager SCOPE: B+K was tasked with creating three regional plans for the Central, South and West Maui regions.These plans highlighted the need for affordable housing and highlighted housing projects and infrastructure that would support those projects as part of the House Maui Initiative.The House Maui Initiative supports the planning and delivery of much needed affordable and workforce housing while building on the County of Maui's community-based planning process. PROJECT COST: N/A STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 5 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM Matthew Kodama,MBA Planning Project Manager 13 3 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) af= E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM Carah Kadota,AICP Assistant Planning Project Manager 7 <1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) v= E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Matthew P.Fernandez Assistant Planner A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM 3 <1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) af= F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 1 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City and County of Honolulu,Department of Design and Construction PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION ofappllcable) Honolulu Zoo Hawaiian Wetland Aviary Ongoing N/A Honolulu, HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City and County of Honolulu,Department John Condrey (808) 768-8468 of Design and Construction 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE: Bowers+Kubota Consulting is providing entitlement planning, landscape architecture,civil engineering services for the initial phase of a new Hawaii exhibit,which will feature a wetland aviary.The new exhibit starts at the main entrance arrival area and extends eastward to the Nene Goose Sanctuary. Once completed,the aviary will showcase animals in their habitat ranging from coastal wetlands to mountainous rain forests and further into dry forests and grasslands. The design intent is to expose guests to the wide range of native wetland (streams and ponds) and dryland habitats found in Hawaii.The scope of work for this project covers conceptual design and permitting,with follow-on design development and construction documents. PROJECT COST:F. $5,000,000 ,ham .,!" ,,0 jo ���..� N. '4 41I TRAtI$ 0,yn" $I 't SLoxR cxRieH r PHASE 3(Future Concept) % 1 Dry Forest&Grassland Aviary A Mu �y % a.,i % ,,- i I y PHASE 7(Proposed Concept) '��^ Coastal Wetlands Aviary y F I -Y. _ - , PHASE 2(Future Concept} pg ,,,,I. ,r- :;',i'- 'S� d " "" Mountain Rain-Forest Aviary '� , rTM " I 1:41, ,:I ?W TROPP,.AL �� rV FOREST ', fL,6MING4 PPRP 16- AVI - ARY 9 .,, rx,srnrlr,u,n, . _rte, , j ,11°P. , r ,.. \J, l qiq ,/ N , , /I .� nl 51ib+dv \\`�y .—....10m.ue 0 !C�@�f Q1 �A Fe. "vi / R$ ! n i � i , In V + p` 1I , _.. I 4 , Al 41--- '' ,''''' I T.T.P. f '73# 1-- -1-1 -1-- • • - ,P-01.1b."), i- 1 { may 1: p..T, „IE ,- ., �..,.f., 1Yr ���� f' i ,,,iixe" i� °.id's � � Q114-,..: :.i ,Z� y �I I, ('i 1. i; ad '"ha I a G iii!_ ''• ' ,%i "f . �. - - ,i �' r_ E1.�, til)3741'4' yV_ K fi' II,.r..Iw,ii L"H.•� eeJnt u�,J ., .. 1 J{l.V . j=i^'`]_ nwne tt'ia ^ea.4.rSf u 1 z 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE ��` Planner, Civil Engineer,Landscape a. Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Architect STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 9 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 2 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City and County of Honolulu,Department of Design and Construction PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Kahawainui Stream Dredging Ongoing N/A Laie,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City and County of Honolulu,Department Kristie Ching (808) 768-8800 of Design and Construction 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting is preparing construction plans and specifications for the maintenance dredging of the City- owned portion of Kahawainui Stream between the intersection with Laie Wai Stream to the mouth of the stream excluding the sand berm at the stream mouth.An environmental review consisting of a Draft and Final Environmental Assessment,with an anticipated Finding of No Significant Impact(FONSI),will be prepared in accordance to the Hawaii Revised Statutes Chapter 343. The review will include a biological survey,archaeological and cultural study,and other environmental reports to determine impacts of the project and mitigation measures.Preparation of permit applications for the dredging and obtaining permit approvals is included in the project scope along with engineering assistance during the bidding and construction. PROJECT COST: $2,000,000 ti '4 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner, Civil Engineer STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 10 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 3 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City and County of Honolulu,Department of Transportation Services PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Complete Streets Planning and Preliminary Design,Kaneohe, Kailua,and Pearl 2021 N/A City,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City and County of Honolulu,Department Daniel Alexander of Transportation Services (808) 768 6652 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE: Bowers+Kubota Consulting assessed implementation of complete streets concept designs in Kaneohe, Kailua,and Pearl City area as part of planned road rehabilitation projects in each area.The inter-disciplinary team was comprised of civil/ transportation engineers,physical/site planners,urban designers,arborists,and landscape architects. Initial tasks included evaluation of existing conditions through driving,walking and bicycling audits of each community; identifying the complete streets network based on land use and roadway configuration;and developing preliminary street cross-sections showing options for pedestrian walkways,bicycle lanes,shared pathways,and vehicular travel lanes.The project applied a context-sensitive solutions process,engaging stakeholders via outreach efforts,including community leader contact, social media outreach,bike tours,pop-up and sit-down sessions,distribution of project-specific collateral materials,and broadcast media coverage. Input from the community was combined with a multi-modal assessment of all transportation methods in each area and observations from the project team to prepare the complete streets proposals.Within each area unique conditions and parameters existed that called for specific solutions. Viable tools to develop complete streets were combined with sound urban design,physical planning and landscape architecture to arrive at best options.The results of the combined input were revealed at community meetings where concept plans were shown and additional feedback was provided. B+K worked with the team to bring its collective experience together and bring a sensible approach to addressing the evolution of the project areas'transportation networks,which was used to refine the street cross-sections and prepared concept plans for the proposed roadway improvements along with associated opinions of probable construction costs. B+K also assisted with the preparation of Exemption Declarations for the project pursuant to HRS Ch. 343. PROJECT COST: $4,000,000 _ �y. v s Afrifdakt/ KANEOHE �� / KAILUA / PEARL CITY COMP LETESTREETS COMPLETESTREETS COMPLETESTREETS Lwow A, Shawn mem _ _ i - , a NrlYifr J+�M�kw b M. 0 I i .. 4 ,„. 7,,. \ ,. .. , '; ...... . ,,,„,,.. .‘„,.„. rfS\ [, For more IMorroston etre the webslle.ht1p://www.ranolulu.govicampletastreets For more inlornatron mst the website:nttp.//www.rwnolulu.govicomplelestreeta Email vs with your thoughts-campletasireelsOhonalulu.gov ErnaI us with your lMPgh[5_comple[NReelsehonolulu goy Photo courtesy of Blue Zones 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. =Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner, Civil Engineer,Landscape Architect STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 11 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 4 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Kamehameha Schools PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(ifapplicable) Due Diligence Assessment and Test Fit Study for West Hawaii Land Acquisition (84-5236 Hawaii Belt Road) 2022 N/A Captain Cook,Hawaii 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Kamehameha Schools Laura Takahashi (808)534-8108 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting provided planning and consulting services for a due diligence assessment and test fit study of the property(for an early learning center)located at 84-5236 Mamalahoa Highway in Captain Cook,Hawaii. The scope of the due diligence assessment and test fit study included research and entitlements in phase 1;property condition assessment in phase 2;and a test fit study of the building and site in phase 3.The scope of work included an assessment of interior and exterior improvements as well as regulatory requirements, including pavement and parking areas; planting and irrigation systems; the general condition of the building architectural elements;plumbing fixtures;electrical fixtures and outlets;fire alarm system;general structural conditions; and the general condition of the air conditioning system; and the property's entitlements and zoning requirements.A due diligence assessment of the Early Learning Center Building at the Saint and Church and Model Schools(Kikiwelawela)in Kaneohe,Hawaii was also provided under this project. PROJECT COST: N/A % _w x .K it1A Hexa i`i Island .t { s , - il' , a - - ,t .. ..-- - -s , ti 7 -anorraa aa-- 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. �QBowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner, Civil Engineer,Landscape Architect STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 12 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 5 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City and County of Honolulu PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Department of Design and Construction 2022 Ala Moana Regional Park Master Plan and Environmental Impact Statement 2019 (EIS) Ongoing Honolulu, HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City and County of Honolulu,Department of Design and Construction Elaine Morisato (DDC) (808) 768-8406 Biederman Redevelopment Ventures Benjamin Donsky (212)390-1122 (Prime consultant) 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting supported the City in developing portions of the Preferred Concept Master Plan for Ala Moana Regional Park(Ala Moana)and preparing its corresponding Environmental Impact Statement(EIS).The goal of the master plan was to provide a planning framework allowing Ala Moana to become a multi-faceted beach park and even greater asset to the community. The master plan evaluated the park's existing conditions and identified areas of improvement including landscape features,infrastructure,parking and pathways,and the park's iconic beach front.The 17 proposed improvement projects focused on addressing deferred maintenance to elevate the park's existing facilities and address coastal erosion issues while respecting and celebrating the established character.As part of the master planning process,the B+K Planning Group prepared and published a final EIS analyzing the proposed improvements established in the master plan. As part of the environmental review process,the B+K Planning group investigated the project's potential effects on the built and natural environments and provided mitigation measures to help minimize impacts pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statues,Chapter 343.This analysis included analyzing the need for beach nourishment and drainage canal improvements to address impacts from natural and climate change hazards like sea level rise.The EIS also analyzed the project's compliance with relevant federal,state,and county land uses regulations and policies. To develop the alternatives in the master plan and EIS,a strong community engagement and outreach program was conducted to better understand the multi-generational impact of Ala Moana on the community.Multiple public,in-person informational meetings were held between 2015 and 2018 and a project website titled"Our Ala Moana Park"was launched to garner community feedback.Incorporating input from over 30,000 visitor interactions at the website,feedback from the in-person community meetings and consultation responses from the EIS resulted in the design alternatives presented in the master plan and EIS. Additionally,during the community engagement process the master planning team was informed of more urgent actions needed at Ala Moana. This prompted the City to enact a 9-point plan to address these issues in parallel with the long-term master plan creating a holistic approach to improving the park long-term. PROJECT COST: $14,600,000 -i- A-2 Medium-density hl Ala nnna Ciivd. Apartment ��_�......'•—+ + District �� Kewalo i E3asin ~ P-2 General Preservation District f.rr 4. Ap.ut rten _ Ala Moana Regional Park 1f.1. ?, • gip*cin.i1 i I ty Res rt `I PROJECT t ;� YAldwal� mixed 4 l' Use ,, .,Boat HAAT 1' ,,, '� BOUNDARY I a v, a f• � lir ar v ., i Magic I ':'.5',N.::` Y 'r.1w I Island I ",,, a 'uy r �` r PnciJic Ocean 1 Awa ) °v -,r I Public Precinct;: N.• I (Waikl I Di.t ti 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Mt‘/ +Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner, Civil Engineer,Landscape Architect STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 13 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 6 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED County of Maui,Planning Department PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) South Maui Community Plan Update 2022 N/A Kihei-Makena,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER County of Maui,Planning Department Jennifer Maydan (808) 270-8290 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting is updating the South Maui Community Plan that includes the regions from Maalaea,Kihei, Wailea,Makena,to Ahihi-Kinau/Kanaio. The updated plan will provide a vision,a community plan map,goals,policies and actions to guide County officials and staff,property owners,developers,and residents on the appropriate growth and redevelopment patterns for South Maui for the next 20 years. As a precursor to the community plan update,B+K has put together three resource papers that cover the topics of Sea-Level Rise and Climate Change,Housing,Population Growth,and Mobility.Each resource paper examines the current conditions in the area,key challenges for the future of the area and strategies to minimize adverse impacts. PROJECT COST: N/A • ..q. � P y.. ... -rte'•• �rr _. - x y A ,;per.^ aw ` a;ate ° i� - �$ 7..w ' 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Lit. Bowers+Kubota Consulting, Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner, Civil Engineer STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 14 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 7 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Land and Natural Resources PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION Ofappllcable) Kealakekua Bay Master Plan&Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) Ongoing (estimated N/A South Kona, HI completion 2023) 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER State of Hawaii, Department of Department of Land and Natural Martha Yent (808) 587-0287 Resources 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE: Bowers+Kubota Consulting provided master plan,EIS,and management plan services for Kealakekua Bay State Historical Park. The state considers the park as one of the most historically significant places in Hawaii.The park spans 216 acres on land in three adjacent areas(Napoopoo,Pali Kapu 0 Keoua,and Kaawaloa),315 acres of waters of the adjacent Kealakekua Bay Marine Life Conservation District,and the Napoopoo pier.The primary project goal is to plan for a public park that preserves the area's cultural landscape and historic resources,preserves and protects the marine resources of Kealakekua Bay,promotes the scenic values and natural park setting,and accommodates outdoor recreation in a manner that does not impact or degrade natural and cultural resources.A draft master plan was developed before the ocean resources became the responsibility of the State Parks Division.The draft master plan is being updated to include analysis of marine issues and ocean recreational activities.The revised master plan will promote preservation and stewardship,offer guidance in the development of park interpretive concepts and programs,identify park facility needs,and recommend park management measures for the land and the sea.Community input and collaboration have been integral to the planning process and will continue to be considered in developing management measures. PROJECT COST: N/A (study) A 4•I A I N COOK w r d`K " ^y „„..44,4„ ,t....� .•, r 4. �c ::c - - •.. Nai�c'apo'o Ro�ci �"` �> -111tvi •Odd a, , N"�i •` ,o+ LOC Perky �p'rc�?F7Q' Beach to aCe aw � �Q Landing x '•. • ntiRd ! KaHauioa Bay Manini �p oPdo�oaa O e[ :yam Point nmen CU• [aptainc:aok pfd 7 Monument «✓ F Kealakekua Bay KA'AWALOA ,rte' • s • 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a Bowers+Kubota Consulting, Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 15 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 8 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation,Airports Division PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Ahukini Landfill Restoration,Phase II Ongoing N/A Lihue,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER State of Transportation,Airports Division Daryl Yokomizo (808)838-8825 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE: Bowers+Kubota Consulting is currently working with various agencies to develop a plan to deal with shearwater bird habitats in the project area;creating construction plans and specifications to stabilize a coastal slope containing landfill debris; and obtaining all necessary approvals and permits to allow such work.Project scope includes planning,environmental services, surveying,permitting,design and construction and post-construction support services.The scope also includes coordination with the State Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response(HEER)Office to address the mitigation and removal of debris that has fallen into the ocean. PROJECT COST: $8,600,000 ., • - f • K • 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE �� Planner,Environmental Engineer, a. r`Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Landscape Architect STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 16 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 9 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED State of Hawaii,Department of Hawaiian Home Lands PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) North Kona Water Development,Environmental Assessments and Preliminary Engineering Report Ongoing N/A North Kona,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER State of Hawaii, Department of Hawaiian Andrew Choy (808) 620-9559 Home Lands 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE: Bowers+Kubota Consulting is preparing Environmental Assessments (EAs) and a preliminary engineering report for potable water source development on two parcels in the Keauhou 2 Ahupuaa.The wells being developed are intended to support development of DHHL projects at Lai Opua Village and Kalaoa. A Hawaii Environmental Policy Act EA in accordance with Hawaii Revised Statutes(HRS)Chapter 343 and Title 11, Chapter 200 of the Department of Health Administrative Rules will be prepared for the one parcel with the U.S.Department of Agriculture(USDA)as the accepting agency. The other parcel will have an EA prepared pursuant to HRS Ch. 343 with DHHL accepting. A Preliminary Engineering Report(PER)meeting the requirements of the USDA Rural Utilities Service will also be prepared. A topographic survey for the PER will be coordinated and preliminary site layout and grading plans to confirm the area required for the site improvements will be prepared for the PER. The PER will also be processed for acceptance by the USDA Rural Utilities Service. A hydraulic study of the North Kona Water System and assistance in drafting the terms of the Water Development Agreement between DHHL,the landowners and the County Department of Water Supply will also be provided. PROJECT COST: N/A (Study) Illo girl/ � \���� 1\)y1�1�1��)1�1)l�l�)���11»lllly� rl ,"),w>»� }}}}?}}}}?}}}fY1)} MIIIU�RVIE;� � ,. T a r. E F .v - s .' t#i1 . I i 1 ' '7.' :i, ri, —7 ir , , oil -mom. r _ w s ' 9 , �I 41". .. I , n• " " 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3)ROLE Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner, Civil Engineer STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 17 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 10 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Greystar Development Services,LLC for University of Hawaii at Manoa PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) University of Hawaii at Manoa Multi-Family Housing,Environmental Assessment 2021 N/A Honolulu,HI 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Greystar Development Services,LLC for Ethen Thacher (Greystar) (949)892-4973 University of Hawaii at Manoa 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) SCOPE:Bowers+Kubota Consulting completed an Environmental Assessment for a Public Private Partnership(P3)project where the developer will design,build,and operate for profit the student housing multi-family building,day care center for UH students, and commercial operations such as a convenience store and/or eatery. PROJECT COST: $1,500,000 lir • . ih drr 111111111111111 • yl. l • tii• IM J • • _ V 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Bowers+Kubota Consulting, Inc. Waipahu,HI Planner, Civil Engineer STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 18 G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS 28.EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F 26.NAMES OF KEY PERSONNEL 27.ROLE IN EXAMPLE PROJECT (Fill in"Example Projects Key"section below before completing table.Place'X" (From Section E,Block 12) (From Section E,Block 13) under project key number for participation in same or similar role). 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge Jared Chang,AICP Planning Manager/Senior X Project Planner Ronald Sato,AICP Senior Project Manager/ Senior Planner Matthew Kodama,MBA Planning Project Manager X X X Carah Kadota,AICP Assistant Planning Project Manager Matthew Fernandez Assistant Planner X X 29.EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) City and County of Honolulu County of Maui 1 Department of Design and Construction 6 Planning Department Honolulu Zoo Hawaiian Wetland Aviary South Maui Community Plan Update City and County of Honolulu State of Hawaii 2 Department of Design and Construction Department of Land and Natural Resources Kahawainui Stream Dredging Kealakekua Bay Master Plan&Environmental Impact Statement City and County of Honolulu Department of Transportation Services State of Hawaii s Complete Streets Planning and Preliminary Design, 8 Department of Transportation,Airports Division, Kaneohe, Kailua,and Pearl Ahukini Landfill Restoration,Phase II Kamehameha Schools State of Hawaii 4 Due Diligence Assessment and Test Fit Study for West 9 Department of Hawaiian Home Lands Hawaii Land Acquisition (84-5236 Hawaii Belt Road) North Kona Water Development, City and County of Honolulu Department of Design and Construction (Biederman Greystar Development Services,LLC 5 Redevelopment Ventures-Prime Consultant 10 for University of Hawaii at Manoa Ala Moana Regional Park Master Plan and Environmental University of Hawaii at Manoa Multi-Family Housing Impact Statement STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 19 H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30.PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. COMPANY NAME: SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS BOWERS+KUBOTA CONSULTING,INC. 1. THE NAME OF THE FIRM OR PERSON, CONTACT 94-408 Akoki Street,Suite 201-A INFORMATION INCLUDING EMAIL ADDRESS, THE Waipahu,Hawaii 96797 PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS AND LOCATION Ph.(808) 836-7787 OF ALL ITS OFFICES Fax. (808) 834-4833 www.bowersandkubota.com Name of Firm Bowers+ Kubota Consulting, Inc. YEAR INCORPORATED: September 1980 Point of Contact Kathleen Chu, PE Principal PRINCIPALS• kchu@bowersandkubota.com (808) 836-7787 Brian Bowers,PE, CCM,President Principal Place of 94-408 Akoki Street, Suite 201-A, bbowers@bowersandkubota.com Business Waipahu, HI 96797 Dexter Kubota,PE,Vice President Location of all Offices Main Office (Waipahu) - Oahu dkubota@bowersandkubota.com Satellite Office (Kalihi) - Oahu Eric Iwamoto,PE, CCM,LEED AP,Principal Satellite Offices -Maui and Kauia eiwamoto@bowersandkubota.com Field Offices -Hawaii and Molokai Myong Choi,PE,LEED AP,Principal mchoi@bowersandkubota.com 2. THE AGE OF THE FIRM AND THE AVERAGE Mike Kamaka,PE, CCM,Principal NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES OVER THE PAST FIVE mkamaka@bowersandkubota.com YEARS. Hae-Dong Lee,AIA,NCIDQ,LEED AP,MBA Principal B+K has provided professional design services for the hlee@bowersandkubota.com last 43 years with the resources of the 8 principals and 260 professionals and administrative staff available to be Amy Matsushima, SHRM-SCP,Principal assigned to each project. Over the past 5 years, the average amatsushima@bowersandkubota.com number of employees has been 230 professionals. Kathleen Chu,PE,Principal 3. THE EDUCATION, TRAINING, AND kchu@bowersandkubota.com QUALIFICATIONS OF THE INDIVIDUAL, OR IF THE A FIRM, ITS KEY EMPLOYEES IN ACCORDANCE WITH HRS 103D-304 AND/OR THE PROFESSIONAL AND SCIENTIFIC OCCUPATION SERIES CONTAINED IN THE UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT'S QUALIFICATIONS STANDARDS HANDBOOK (HTTPS:WWW.OPM.GOV/ POLICY-DATA-OVERSIGHT/CLASSIFICATION- QUALIFICATIONS/GENERAL-SCHEDULE- QUALIFICATION STANDARDS/#URL=GS-PROF) Dependent upon the magnitude, complexity and needs of the County of Hawaii, Planning Department, Planning Services may include the following: • Master Planning • Regional & Community Plans • Site Planning • Federal, State, and County Permit Processing • Land Use Studies • Community Outreach • Environmental Impact Statements &Assessments • Entitlement Processing • Facilities Planning • Public Meetings • Physical Planning STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 20 H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30.PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. The team presented exhibits a broad spectrum of professional experience for providing Planning Services.We also employ expertise in architectural, landscape architectural, and civil and electrical engineering, and provide a wealth of diverse technical experience to projects as required. B+K is committed to dedicating the required expertise and personnel until successful project completion. Ms. Kathleen Chu will serve as Principal-in-Charge of all general planning projects with the County of Hawaii, Planning Department. KEY PERSONNEL PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS ACTIVE PROFESSIONAL NO.OF YEARS OTHER CERTIFICATIONS/ KEY PERSONNEL PROJECT ROLE REGISTRATION EDUCATION EXPERIENCE TRAINING STATE DISCIPLINE Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge HI Civil 30 BS COMMUNITY PLANNING Planning Manager Jared Chang,AICP /Senior Project N/A 17 BA American Institute of Planner Certified Planners Senior Project Ronald Sato,AICP Manager/Senior N/A 33 MA,BS American Institute of Planner Certified Planners Matthew Kodama,MBA Assistant Planning N/A 13 MBA,BBA Project Manager Carah Kadota,AICP Assistant Planning N/A 7 BEnvD American Institute of Project Manager Certified Planners Matthew Fernandez Assistant Planner N/A 3 BS/MS 1. A LIST OF RECENT PROJECT AND THE NAMES OF UP TO FIVE CLIENTS WHO MAY BE CONTACTED, INCLUDING AT LEAST TWO FOR WHOM SERVICES WERE RENDERED DURING THE PRECEDING YEAR: REFERENCES RECENT PROJECTS Jennifer Maydan, Planner Supervisor South Maui Community Plan Update. Maui County of Maui, Planning Department Telephone No. (808) 270-8290 (Ongoing) Andrew Choy, Planner DHHL North Kona Water Development, Kona, HI State of Hawaii, Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (Ongoing) Telephone No. (808) 620-9559 Lori Walker, Integrated Assets Manager Kukaniloko Green House and Nursery (Phase 1), Office of Hawaiian Affairs Telephone No. (808) 594-1835 Wahiawa, HI (Ongoing) Daniel Alexander, Project Manager City and County of Honolulu, Department of Transportation Complete Streets Planning and Preliminary Design, Services Pearl City, Kaneohe, Kailua, HI (2021) Telephone No. (808) 768-6652 Martha Yent, Interpretive Program Manager State of Hawaii Dept. of Land and Natural Resources, State Kealakekua Bay Master Plan & Environmental Parks Division Impact Assessment (EIS), South Kona, HI (Ongoing) Telephone No. (808) 587-0287 STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 21 H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30.PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. 2. ANY PROMOTIONAL OR DESCRIPTIVE LITERATURE WHICH THE INDIVIDUAL OR FIRM DESIRES TO SUBMIT. B+K is very familiar with the County of Hawaii's requirements based on past and current project experience. Select previous and ongoing projects on the island of Hawaii include: • DOT- Facility Planning and Land Acquisition, Hilo and Kahului Harbors, HI • Legacy Hilo Due Diligence, Hilo, HI • DHHL - North Kona Water Development, North Kona, HI • Hilton Waikoloa Village -various projects, Waikoloa, HI • Waikoloa Kings' Lands Docmentation Support, Waikoloa, HI • Auwaikeakau and Popoo Stream Jurisdictional Determination, Waikoloa, HI • DLNR- Kealakekua Bay Master Plan and Environmental Impact Statement, Kealakekua, HI • Kamehameha Schools- Due Diligence Assessment and Test Fit Study for West Hawaii Land Acquisition, Captain Cook, HI I.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. 31.SIGNATURE 1 �T2 _ 32.DATE June 30, 2023 33.NAME AND TITLE Kathleen Chu, PE Principal-in-Charge STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021)Page 22 1, SOLICITATION NUMBER(If any) ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS PL.8) Community Planning(Writer,Grant Writer) PART II—GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS (If a firm has branch offices,complete for each specific branch office seeking work.) 2a.FIRM(OR BRANCH OFFICE)NAME 3.YEAR ESTABLISHED 4.DUNS NUMBER Bowers+Kubota Consulting,Inc. 2008 03-929-9763 2b.STREET 5.OWNERSHIP a. 94-408 Akoki Street, Suite 201-A . TYPE Corporation 2c.CITY 2d.STATE 2e.ZIP CODE b.SMALL BUSINESS STATUS Waipahu HI 96797 6a.POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE 7.NAME OF FIRM(IF BLOCK 2A ISA BRANCH OFFICE) Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge 6b.TELEPHONE NUMBER 6c.E-MAIL ADDRESS 808 836-7787 kchu@bowersandkubota.com 8a.FORMER FIRM NAME(S)(IF ANY) 8b.YR.ESTABLISHED 8c.DUNS NUMBER KFC Airport,Inc. 1980 03-929-9763 9.EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE 10.PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE AND ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS c.No.of Employees c.Revenue a.Function b.Discipline a.Profile b.Experience Index Code (1) Firm (2) Branch Code Number(see below) 02 Administrative 41 A05 Airports;Navaids;Airport Lighting;Aircraft Fueling 5 06 Architects 20 A06 Airports;Terminals&Hangars;Freight 6 Handling 08 CADD Technician 7 C10 Commercial Building(low rise);Shopping Centers 4 12 Civil Engineers 26 C15 Construction Management 8 15 Construction Inspector 38 E02 Educational Facilities;Classrooms 4 16 Construction Managers 27 E03 Electrical Studies and Design 4 18 Cost Engineer/Estimator 2 E09 Environmental Impact Studies;... 5 21 Electrical Engineers 4 Ell Environmental Planning 4 23 Environmental Engineer 5 H07 Highways;Streets;Airfield Paving;Parking Lots 6 37 Interior Designer 1 H09 Hospitals&Medical Facilities 6 39 Landscape Architect 6 Hll Housing(Residential,Multi-Family;Apartments; 1 Condominiums) 47 Planner 6 L03 Landscape Architecture 4 48 Project Managers 66 P05 Planning(Community;Regional;...) 5 50 Risk Assessor 4 P06 Planning(Site,Installation and Project) 1 51 Safety/Occupational Health Engineer 1 R06 Rehabilitation (Buildings;Structures;Facilities) 3 52 Sanitary Engineer 1 SO4 Sewage Collection,Treatment&Disposal 4 53 Schedulers 2 S07 Solid Wastes;Incineration;Landfill 4 58 Technician/Analyst 3 S13 Storm Water Handling&Facilities 4 T02 Testing&Inspection Services 4 W02 Water Resources;Hydrology;Ground Water 4 Total 260 W03 Water Supply;Treatment and Distribution 4 11.ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM FOR LAST 3 YEARS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER (Insert revenue index number shown at right) a.Federal Work 7 1.Less than$100,000 6.$2 million to less than$5 million 2.$100,000 to less that$250,000 7.$5 million to less than$10 million b.Non-Federal Work 9 3.$250,000 to less than$500,000 8.$10 million to less than$25 million 4.$500,000 to less than$1 million 9.$25 million to less than$50 million c.Total Work 9 5.$1 million to less than$2 million 10.$50 million or greater 12.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. a.SIGNATURE (fac#A—Cd-3.,--- b.DATE June 30,2023 c.NAME AND TITLE Kathleen Chu,PE Principal-in-Charge STANDARD FORM 330(7/2021) i APPENDIX A: AWARDS AND CLIENT EVALUATIONS Bowers + Kubota's Unique Qualifications and Commitment to Excellence are demonstrated by some of the numerous awards and recognition we have received. Zweig Group's , ai i Business Ma ' National Best Firms to Work For gazine s tt„ 2022:4th Place Multidiscipline 2009,2011-2 3rd Place Firm Size 200+ Employees 2008 2023 Recipient 3rd Place Internal Marketing Award013,2015,2022-21 3. 1st Place Trifecta Award for Winning all 3 Categories 2021: 1st Place Multidiscipline 2nd Place Firm Size 200+ Employees 3rd Place Internal Marketing Award i' iAllio Trifecta Award for Winning all 3 Categories 2020: 1st Place Firm Size 200+ Employees 1st Place Multidiscipline 2019: 1st Place 100-199 Employeesr....;.. 2nd Place Multidiscipline n , Pirr . .; 2018: 1st Place Architecture r, I Ifr 1st Place Civil Engineering 2nd Place Multidisciplinary 2017:2nd Place Civil Engineering ,• 4E11 3rd Place Multidisciplinary ,' ,� :•*» ,, "4 2016:2nd Place Civil Engineering Best *; 3rd Place Multidisciplinary i ,4,, Fit-alsoi 2015:2nd Place Civil Engineering + -, .�,..e. a. <; 1st Place Multidisciplinary t4.. .• , 2014: 1st Place Civil Engineering .: 1st Place Multidisciplinary ,s zT ENR „„ ENR Magazine's Top 100 TOP 1 00 Construction mmliilli Management-for-Fee Firms 2022:#30 National ` \4BoWE\OWER + J 2021:#48 National 2020:#44 National -'-- 2019:#39 National In 5 Inc.5000 Idi Fastest Growing. 44.1„ ,, Private Companies 2021:#4761 National ,. , 2018:#4805 National __. „ �� 1111111 AHA Fit-Friendly Worksite i' 2012: Platinum Achievement Recipient 2011,2013:Gold Achievement Award 2018,2021:Silver Achievement Award 2014:Worksite Innovation Award A iCEë h WkUM'4M Lfil:%CH Lir I`.i:IJXN,YIti4.Lgi 1.4 WYi. - 1141 7-7- _ Excellence Award •Wanaao Road/Keolu Drive IVII-11k-V Reconstructed Sewer •Bowers+Kubota Warehouse/ Office Space A •Keauhou Beach Hotel and Site Demolition(Honor Award-National) Honor Award 7 2019 Construction •Kaumualii Highway Lihue Mill Management Project Bridge Rice street Achievement Award ASCE •UH Information Technology Center Water/Wastewater/Utility: •Ewa Makai Middle School Construction value greater •Honouliuli WWTP-New Solids than$50M Handling Facility •Honoapiilani Highway Lahainaluna Road Outstanding Widening, Kaneohe-Kailua Wastewater Conveyance&Treatment • to Aholo Road y New Interisland Terminal Civil Engineering Facilities Project KK Tunnel Complex,HNL 7 Achievement Award •In-Vessel Bioconversion •Emergency Repairs of'lhi'ihilauakea Bridge Facility , •New Interisland Terminal Complex,HNL •South Ramp Microtunneling •Replacement of Kea'iwa Stream Bridge Project •Hawaiki Submarine Cable and Kapolei •Kaneohe-Kailua Watewater Landing Station(Grand Award and Best Conveyance&Treatment Large Project) Facilities Project K-K Tunnel •Keauhou Beach Hotel and Site Demolition (Grand Award and Best Large Project [Hawaii],Best Large Project[Region],Honor Award[National]) ARUM — i aye.€r n +e ufos..r , i Public Works Project of the Year ri 1E331 HAWAII SOCIETY OF h Range Improvements PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS •Ala Wai Golf Course Driving 1 CM Project of the Year i •Emergency Repairs oYlhi'ihi- , lauakea Bridge •Haleakala Highway Widening, Phase II J'}"►'4 A Hawaii Society of7 •Honouliuli WWTP,New Solids Professional Engineers Handling Facility y� � AWA� 2011 Project of the Year Award •Ewa Makai Middle School 1 •Manele Small Boat Harbor :, Kamehameha Avenue Roadway Ferry&ADA Improvements Improvements •In-Vessel Bioconversion Facility •Pa'au'au Stream Building Project General Design Project Management Merit Award Project of the Year University of Hawai'i-West •Manana Properties Develop- 11 O'ahu,New Administration& ment Allied Health Building •National Cemetery Stabili- zation CM National Project of the Year •Replacement of Kea'iwa Stream Bridge Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 Kahuku Ranch Cesspool Assessment and Remediation $220,610 Name of Project Contract Amount Scope of work: Civil Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5)Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team 1. Keeps you informed Lucas Aribon, Albert Rivera Comments:The B+K team has been able to meet or exceed 5 my needs over the last year and a half and continues to I Comments:Answered previously. perform at an outstanding level. 2. Quality of Project Manager 2. Addresses problems and offers workable Eric Tamashiro solutions Comments: Eric has provided excellent service and has consistently provided project deliverables on time,within 5 5 budget, and according to scope. In addition Eric and his Comments:Answered previously. team has responded to the many requests, ranging from assistance with contract scoping to post project support, so we are very happy with the services provided. 3. Treats you as an important team member 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions Comments: Eric is extremely conscientious and understands that the acquisitions we have been working on come from the 5 Comments: Eric listens to my opinions and more global 5 top levels of leadership at KS. He response time is excellent, concerns and incorporates them into his proposed solutions. even calling/emailing time sensitive information on Friday afternoon and even the weekend. 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs 5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments:As stated earlier,we have been operating on 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion time, on budget, and according to scope. 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality* Integrity * Teamwork Comments:Answered previously. 5 Comments: Eric is outcome focused and provides various 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule options on how to achieve the outcomes I am seeking. 5 Section 2—Technical Ability Comments:Answered previously. 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 3. Processes documents in a timely manner Comments:Again, Eric provides solutions that meet our 5 5 needs but are within the established regulations and Comments:Answered previously. boundaries. 2. General technical knowledge Section 5—Value Comments: I don't think I have presented an issue that we 5 have not been able to resolve,that's gotta count for a lot! 1. Adheres to project budget 5 3. Knowledge of the contract Comments:Answered previously. Comments: I work closely with Eric on crafting the contract 5 and SOW,which has been very successful to date. 2. Provides added value 5 4.Quality of response to documents Comments:Answered previously. Comments: Our turn around times on comments and 5 revisions has really impressed my bosses. Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 1. Please rate the overall performance Comments: I don't know enough about your margins to be Comments: Over the last 18 months, Eric has worked on commenting beyond,we have been satisfied with the 5 some of the most high profile acquisitions for KS and has 5 compensation relative to the deliverables and timeframes delivered consistently so it not hard to praise his work and they are provided. give him the ratings I have. 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 2. Would be your choice for future service Comments: I am a stickler for maintaining timelines and Eric 5 Comments: Eric(and B+K by extension)is growing a 5 have met all of my expectations as well as those of the reputation for delivering high quality products in short internal clients at KS. timeframes with the leadership at KS'FDSD. 7. Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: Comments: Eric has been keen to share insights on 5 regulatory requirements to avoid missteps as the project progresses. Mr.Allen Salavea Kamehameha Schools 11/22/2022 Name Agency/Department/Division Date Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 RH-03: Eng. Design Support for FY23 IWRR $414,740 Name of Project Contract Amount Scope of work: Civil Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5)Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team Anthony Domingo, Jamie, Tang, James DeGuzman, Maria Bawag, Edgar Quinabo, 5 1. Keeps you informed 5 Joshua Gusman Comments: Comments: 2. Quality of Project Manager 2. Addresses problems and offers workable Mike Nishimura 5 solutions 5 Comments: Comments: 3. Treats you as an important team member 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions 5 Comments: Comments: 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs 5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments: 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality* Integrity* Teamwork 5 Comments: Comments: 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule 5 Section 2—Technical Ability Comments: 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 5 3. Processes documents in a timely manner 5 Comments: Comments: 2. General technical knowledge5 Section 5—Value Comments: 1. Adheres to project budget 5 3. Knowledge of the contract5 Comments: Comments: 2. Provides added value 5 4.Quality of response to documents Comments: 5 Comments: Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 1. Please rate the overall performance 5 Comments: Comments: 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 2. Would be your choice for future service 5 Comments: Comments: 7.Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: I realize all 5s does not offer constructive criticism, but I personally have N/A been extremely satisfied with the service we are receiving. Thorough, timely,yet not excessive communication is what I appreciate the most. Comments: Some scores regarding accuracy could have been docked, but all matters to date have been nondetrimental,which I believe is due to timely communication. Thank you and I look forward to our continued work together. Mr.Todd Ozaki County of Kauai, Department of Public Works 11/23/2022 Name Agency/Department/Division Date Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 PVT Landfill Owner Advisory Services $587,600 Name of Project Contract Amount Scope of work: Civil Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5)Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team r— 1. Keeps you informed Albert Rivera, Matt Takane 5 Comments:Quick to respond and detailed to enable Comments: appropriate answers/topos requested. 2. Quality of Project Manager 2.Addresses problems and offers workable Mike Nishimura solutions Comments: Mike is very responsive to any request 5 5 submitted. His directives are clear to subordinates that Comments: enable quality outcome. 3. Treats you as an important team member 5 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions 5 Comments: BK team has very inclusive of our needs. Comments: Listens attentively to needs and requests. 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs 5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments: No comment 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality* Integrity* Teamwork 5 Comments: Comments: Core values are met 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule 5 Section 2—Technical Ability Comments: 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 3. Processes documents in a timely manner Comments: Skill sets are very evident and reflected in the 5 5 end product Comments:Getting tired of commenting. 2. General technical knowledge Section 5—Value Comments:That is why we hired the company,formerly Belt- 5 Collins Hawaii. 1. Adheres to project budget 5 3. Knowledge of the contract Comments: 5 Comments: 2. Provides added value 5 4.Quality of response to documents Comments: 5 Comments: Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 5 1. Please rate the overall performance 5 Comments: Comments: 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 5 2. Would be your choice for future service 5 Comments: Meets or exceeds scheduled requirements. Comments: 7.Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: 5 Comments: Evaluation is too long. .................................................................... Mr.Albert Shigemura PVT Land Company, Ltd. 11/29/2022 Name Agency/Department/Division Date Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 Building 9 Well#2 Repair, Kunia Tunnel $325,988 Name of Project Contract Amount Scope of work: Civil Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5)Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team 1. Keeps you informed Tracey-Anne Panlasigui, Brian Kawamoto 5 Comments: Comments: 2. Quality of Project Manager 2. Addresses problems and offers workable Cary Kondo 5 solutions 5 Comments: Comments: 3. Treats you as an important team member 5 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions 5 Comments: Comments: 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs 5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments: 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality* Integrity * Teamwork Comments: 5 Comments: 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule 5 Section 2—Technical Ability Comments: 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 5 3. Processes documents in a timely manner 5 Comments: Comments: 2. General technical knowledge 5 Section 5—Value Comments: 1. Adheres to project budget 5 3. Knowledge of the contract 5 Comments: Comments: 2. Provides added value 5 4.Quality of response to documents Comments: 5 Comments: Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 5 1. Please rate the overall performance 5 Comments: Comments: 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 5 2. Would be your choice for future service 5 Comments: Comments: 7. Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: 5 Comments: Ms. Su Yi Jacobs Government Services Company 11/29/2022 Name Agency/Department/Division Date Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 Moloaa Irrigation Cooperative Water Sys. Improvem. $100,000 Name of Project Contract Amount Scope of work: Civil Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5)Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team Kristen Yoshida 1. Keeps you informed Comments: Kristen was responsive, efficient and clearly 5 Comments:Always there when we needed them, prompt went over and above to satisfy our needs. It was a responses and good proactive communications where pleasure working with her. necessary. 2. Quality of Project Manager 2.Addresses problems and offers workable Jay Stone solutions Comments: I have known Jay for many years, and he has 5 5 always exemplified professionalism,technical competence, Comments:Always worked towards a better solution for attention to detail, and has grown into a real leader and their client(us)and the affected water system. manager that any company would be proud to have. 3. Treats you as an important team member 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions Comments: 5 Comments: Maintained a good rapport with us during back 5 and forth comments. 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs 5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments: 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality* Integrity * Teamwork Comments: 5 Comments: Kristen and jay excelled in all of these 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule categories. GREA core values by the way. 5 Comments: Did their best to do this in spite of project delays Section 2—Technical Ability outside of their control. 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 3. Processes documents in a timely manner Comments: Kristen and Jay both maintained exemplary 5 5 professionalism during the ups and downs of this project, Comments: and never wavered from it. 2. General technical knowledge Section 5—Value Comments:They knew their stuff,came in with a good 5 approach and worked well with us on our technical 1. Adheres to project budget comments and suggestions. 5 3. Knowledge of the contract Comments: Comments: Kristen and Jay clearly read the contract and 5 understood its requirements and limitations. That was not 2. Provides added value always the case with about half of our other contracted consultants. 5 Comments: I saw effort in this as the project progressed 4.Quality of response to documents through its different stages. Kristen and Jay were always 5 I looking at things to add value to the project. Comments:always prompt and thorough Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 1. Please rate the overall performance Comments: N/A Comments:A"10"for sure, hope we can do business again 5 with them. 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 2. Would be your choice for future service Comments: Did their best to stay on schedule to finish the 5 5 contract in spite of other factors beyond their control. Comments:Absolutely 7.Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: N/A Comments: Mr. Michael Miyahira State of Hawaii, Department of Health, Environmental 12/5/2022 Management Division,Safe Drinking Water Branch Name Agency/Department/Division Date Bowers + Kubota Evaluation Form 2022 Keauhou Beach Hotel Demolition Project Name of Project Contract Amount Civil Engineering, Landscape Archtiecture, Planning, Scope of work: Electrical Engineering Please indicate how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in each section by writing in the appropriate numerical response: (N/A) Not Applicable (1) Very Dissatisfied (2) Dissatisfied (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) Satisfied (5)Very Satisfied Section 1 —Staff Score Section 3—Communication Score 1. Quality of consultant team Calvin Ing, Albert Rivera, Edgar Quinabo, Brian Kawamoto, Bradley Tanimura, Lance Keliiaa, 1. Keeps you informed Christopher Billete, Kelsey Wai, Brian Itozaki, Nick Enomoto Comments:The entire team was very responsive. The project was very complicated,and the team was able to 5 5 flex when needed. I was also very satisfied with their ability and knowledge of the permitting and agency process. The team was able to address high-and low-level concerns Comments: Eric,Calvin and I talk often raised by the agencies. An example of this was a cover sheet included an"index/cheat sheet"for the plan reviewer so she could more efficiently navigate the large set of drawings. I believe this was much appreciated by the overwhelmed planning department. 2. Quality of Project Manager 2. Addresses problems and offers workable Eric Tamashiro solutions Comments: I have worked continuously with Eric for 10 Comments: None of the team shrunk from any problem. years!He is a measured and contemplative engineer. He reasonable solutions were brought up from multiple different is a good listener and clearly breakdowns issues so the 5 team members. Sometime the contractor,sometimes the 5 owner and the design team can discuss decisions with user,and design team. The important take away is that all focus and appropriate solutions. Eric communicates well were heard and felt comfortable sharing their ideas.At no with his team agencies that keep the conversations on time,was someone's reasonable contributions was point. He keeps the project moving and RFI/responses/ dismissed off hand. The team,as a whole,was open to revisions occurred timely. I also felt that our conversations critically thinking problems. concerning budget or overruns were transparent and fair. 3. Treats you as an important team member 3. Seeks/incorporates your suggestions Comments: I think it's fair to say that Eric and I have equal respect for each other. We both pretty much stay in our 5 Comments: Eric had very little choice in that matter. He 5 lanes and do our best to recognize each other's pain points managed well. as 'art of the .rocess to make the project successful. 4. Team is sufficiently staffed to meet your needs5 Section 4—Timeliness Comments: I never noticed a point where this project had a 1. Responds to your request in a timely fashion staff issue. 5. Lives the B+K Core Values 5 Superior Quality* Integrity * Teamwork Comments: no issues Comments: I typically don't give 5's or the highest marks 5 on these types of surveys, but I'm not sure we could have 2. Reaches interim project goals on schedule completed this project without this team. They all provided their best,advocated for the project and worked together. Comments: Our goals on schedule for this project was not in 5 the hands of the design team for the most part. EXCEPT for meeting our demo completion schedule. This again was the Section 2—Technical Ability joint effort by the entire team. 1. Professional/ethical approach to the work 3. Processes documents in a timely manner Comments: Our conversations or actions never veered to unethical practices. I believe that all who contributed on 5 Comments: I don't believe that we could have moved faster 5 this project, inclusive of subcontractors and KS cultural, for submitting drawings or responding. contractors etc... behaved professionally and ethically. 2. General technical knowledge Section 5—Value Comments:As I read or participated in meeting with 5 agencies, I was impressed that the team was 1. Adheres to project budget 5 ready/knowledgeable/prepared to respond to all the comments. B+K was able to provide options or pivot or respond appropriately. 3. Knowledge of the contract Comments:All amendments to the contract were owner driven. For this particular project, Comments:The contract scoped was amended multiple times. It was a good think that the proposal was well 5 defined. We did need to refer back to the amendments to 2. Provides added value double check line-item cost. Although,the project took us on many twists and turns,we were able to keep track of what was included, not included and track costs. Comments: The added value was the depth of experience 5 we could pull from.Cheryl Palesh and other leaders within the BCH and B+K team provided a concise view of a very 4.Quality of response to documents complicated project.The project never struggled for 5 competent expert review on a high level. I never encountered a situation where we didn't have a decisive path. Comments: No issues. reasonable turn around time i Section 6—Overall 5. Knowledge and accuracy of estimating 1. Please rate the overall performance Comments: Estimating some of these projects are hard as Comments: For complicated projects,this team was the the scope may shift. Having said that,the estimate or best. Considering the duration of the project and the proposal are very complete. Sometimes,the proposals are multiple changes in scope, I appreciated how and when more conservative than needed for every project. amendments were handled. As the owner PM, I However,one way we have navigating the unknown is to 4 appreciated not being inundated with multiple minor amend 5 phase the design contract. This way we can start ments. We were able to bundle the changes and forecast eliminating unknowns and not contracting for work where work so that invoicing/scope was clear and comprehensive. the scope is unclear and that significantly impacts design Also,during the covid lock down,the team also raised to the budget. Concurrently, B+K has assisted in wholistic occasion switching to MS TEAMs meeting was seamless. baseline cost on the conservative end to help with It's worthy to note that we had 100 OAC's and most of these budgeting. this way we can managed from both ends and were done virtually. hopefully exceed expectations. 6. Knowledge and accuracy of schedules 2. Would be your choice for future service Comments:all documents are submitted on time. 5 Comments: B+K would be my preference especially for 5 large and/or complicated projects. 7.Ability to avoid or mitigate claims Additional Comments: N/A Comments: Mahalo nui for B+K's! Ms. Laura Takahashi Kamehameha Schools 11/23/2022 Name Agency/Department/Division Date i APPENDIX B: PROFESSIONAL LICENSES PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NOTICE THIS POCKET ID CARD IDENTIFIES YOU TO THE PUBLIC AS BEING CURRENTLY LICENSED AND SHOULD BE KEPT IN YOUR POSSESSION AT ALL TIMES. I License Number Expiration date Eli.' ''❑� CLASSES(ACTIVE): I I PE-12808 4130(2024 h• STATE OF-(OEM.CEPPFTTENT OF CO A(ERCE AND COM.SUAER AFFN RS _ 1,1111W1 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IOh El I I CLASS(ES):CE CIVIL lI KATHLEEN S B CHL 7140 MAKAA ST HONOLULU,HI 96825 !Ii / i SI,'. TURE OF LICENSEE _W W_—I J �• BOWERS + KUBOTA vI\ Construction Management•A/E Design•Planning•Project Management 94-408 Akoki Street,Suite 201-A Waipahu,Hawaii 96797