My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-10-21 TKKVDG
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-10-21 TKKVDG
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 11:05:33 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 11:05:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GRAHAM:Could I infer that on the prior one we had north of here where the <br />gentleman wanted to let his swimming pool extend into the shoreline setback area as neighboring <br />properties did that if he had come up with a balancing activity like he had a public access right <br />next to his house therethat if hed have said well Ill make some improvement work on the <br />public access next to the house along with this then the Planning Department would have taken <br />perhaps a different stand? <br />YUEN:A possibility. <br />GALDONES:Further questions or anycomments? Seeing none. Commissioners the <br />Director is recommending approval and staff has made an amendment to the background report <br />andalsoto the recommendation. Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:Imovethatweapprovetheapplicationforshorelinesetbackvariance <br />application number 05-001 based on the Directors recommendations inclusive of the <br />amendments. <br />MCCALL:Second. <br />GALDONES:It has been moved by Commissioner Watanabe seconded by <br />Commissioner McCall that Kailua-Kona Village Development Group Shoreline Setback <br />Variance Application number 05-001 be approved by the Planning Commission and as amended <br />stated by presentation of Staff. Any discussions? Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:I have to say I have to vote in opposition. And part of that a large part of <br />that is the precedence issue. I dont think we want to go down the road where shoreline setback <br />variances are being granted because other activities are being proposed by the applicant, which <br />leaves the Planning Director or the Planning Commission to feel that the net public interest is <br />being served. I think that the public interest needs to be served by the specific shoreline setback <br />variance project for which were granting the application. And it feels to me like its going in <br />the wrong direction to follow that approach. <br />GALDONES:Further discussion? Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA:I just wanted to say that I have a lot of trouble with shoreline setback <br />variances and I will not be voting to approve this one. <br />GALDONES:Seeing no further discussions. <br />LIM:Mr. Chairman I think in light of the opposition I think Id like to see if we <br />can work something out further with the Department in terms of what we can do to address those <br />concerns. You know we think that a part of it is I think the example given by the Director is <br />maybe not quite appropriate for this situation. I guess youre familiar with the Kona Inn <br />Shopping Village and it has a, I think youve got some photos there of the, excuse me of the <br />lawn area fronting the project. And we had the option of building onto the existing building and <br />EXHIBIT E <br />6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.