My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-10-22 TAINALOA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-10-22 TAINALOA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 11:14:21 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 11:14:12 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
BRAZIER:Yes, it probably is. <br />LEITHEAD-TODD:Okay. I note that the questionnaire,while it mentions that Ainaloa <br />Development Corporation is proposing to contribute a million dollars, it has no mention <br />of what is being deleted -- the water tank, the bus stops, and the asphalt paver, or that the <br />earlier condition was full improvement to County dedicable standard. Was there <br />anything that went out to the community association that mentioned what the earlier <br />community benefits package was? <br />BRAZIER:To the best of my knowledge, when the project first began, I <br />believe it was in 95, I may be half a year or so, the, that all information was then mailed <br />out to the membership, at which time they did vote, as I understand it, to accept the <br />proposal that we are referring to. And this is, and then it was over the years extended to <br />allowfurtherpermittingovertheyearstillitranout,Ibelieve,inthebeginningofthis <br />year when it was decided that the items asked for in 95 were not practical and should be <br />looked at, namely, that the leading road on 130 into the Boulevard has been completed by <br />the State. Some of the other items were totally unrealistic. Basically, if the County does <br />take over the boulevard, most of the items requested back in 95 would become non-in, <br />basically moot. <br />LEITHEAD-TODD:I have no other questions. <br />GALDONES:Ms. Song, anything further? <br />SONG:We have no further evidence -. <br />NOMURA:Microphone -. <br />SONG:Excuse me. And we have no further evidence, but we would like <br />an opportunity to make argument. <br />GALDONES:Ms. Todd? <br />LEITHEAD-TODD:I have no other questions for Mr. Brazier. <br />BRAZIER:Thank you, sir. <br />GALDONES:Youre welcome, Mr. Brazier. Ms. Song, would you like to go <br />into your oral arguments at this time? <br />LEITHEAD-TODD:I thought Mr. Fuke was going to -. <br />SONG:No. <br />LEITHEAD-TODD:Okay. <br />20 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.