My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-10-22 TAINALOA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-10-22 TAINALOA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 11:14:21 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 11:14:12 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Hawaiian Acres side, where is that from the Countys perspective as to what the County <br />will take over, what are the issues there, whats likely to transpire in time, irrespective of <br />this particular application, so that we can look at whats being requested of this Applicant <br />in light of how we can foresee events to go as far as County-control of these roads on that <br />Puna emergency access road. <br />YUEN:I believe the statements in the record of Councilmember Safarik <br />are essentially correct. I skimmed those this morning. The County is planning to take <br />over the length of the Puna emergency access road. Its farther along on the Ainaloa side <br />than on the Hawaiian Acres side. And the net effect of that would be, itll be a County- <br />owned road and maintenance responsibility will fall to the County. It is unlikely that <br />there will be really substantial upgrade or improvement to the road anytime in the near <br />future. There are some budgeting for some upgrades and improvements. It would not be, <br />you know, theres no budgeting to improve it to what one would consider a County- <br />dedicablestandard,asnormallythekindofroadthattheCountywouldacceptasbeing <br />turned over from a private party to the County. <br />GRAHAM:And just a follow-up on that, since we are looking at the existing <br />condition which requires upgrade to County-dedicable standards of Ainaloa Boulevard, <br />having been on Ainaloa Boulevard, you know, six or twelve months ago, it looks like a <br />reasonable road. Could you give us some idea specifically what has to be done to make <br />that County-dedicable that would require the $6 million, or whatever of effort. <br />YUEN:I believe there is something in the record that generally describes <br />this, but as far as -. The road would have to be widened. It has a right-of-way -. I <br />believe the Ainaloa Boulevard would be classified as a collector street. The right-of-way <br />for a collector street would be 60 feet. The right-of-way itself is sufficient. The travel <br />lanes would be, the two travel lanes would be 12 feet wide in a dedicable road. I dont <br />believe the travel lanes are that wide. There would also have to be an improved shoulder <br />and improved, probably, a paved shoulder. Whether, and the further pavement of the <br />drainage swale would depend upon the grade of the road; and Im not sure whether it <br />would be necessary to pave the drainage swale or it could be left in gravel. There would <br />be, it would be a major increase, upgrade on the road. There are also some bumps, there <br />are small hills on the road. Im not sure what, how many of those would have to be fixed <br />or any of them would have to be fixed. I know that theyre not standard. Instead of <br />cutting through, when the road was done instead of cutting through the terrain and <br />making a relatively flat road, you go up these little bumps. And there may be sight <br />distance issues with some of these bumps that prevent you from having adequate sight <br />distance to see cars coming from the intersecting roads. That part Im speculating on, <br />you know, how much thats a concern. But those are the kinds of things that you look at <br />in accepting a County-dedicable road. Theres no question that it would be a substantial <br />improvement from what you have presently. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you for that. I think one reason that I was sort of bringing <br />that up is because where you have two relatively disparate positions -- lets say, the <br />Countys position of a dedicable road which is quite costly to the developer and the <br />28 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.