My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-10-22 THANNEKEN
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2010
>
2010-10-22 THANNEKEN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 11:15:03 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 11:15:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MOOERS: I think the Hannekens had a history of saving a lot of things, and I think that’s why they <br />got into trouble. And so they’re consciously making an effort, you know, not to do that. But they <br />do have the other at the landfill in Waimea too, the transfer station, of excess construction materials <br />and stuff. But I think the application is very clear as to any materials that they keep would stay <br />behind the berm and they would not use the area in front for storage. <br />I do want to point out one thing – it’s in your packet, but the letter of support from Ross Fulmer <br />who lives across the street. And Ross asked me if he should come today, and I told him, no, no <br />need, I haven’t heard any complaints, and I guess now I wish he had come. But I do want to call <br />your attention to the fact that Ross who lives just across down the curve a little ways -. I can show <br />you, right here, he lives right here in the Knehoa Subdivision. And his letter of support is included <br />in your package. And I live right there. <br />HOUSEL: I’d like to see if our Deputy Planning Director would like to comment on the proposed <br />changes that you suggested, Mr. Mooers, to Item No. 6. <br />MASUNAGA: I am in, I have no opposition to that because it would require a review by our staff, <br />relating to the types of trees and the landscape plan, and that is fine. Because sometimes, you <br />know, if you have it in a condition and then you go to order it and it’s not there, then you can’t <br />comply; so I understand how you would want that flexibility. <br />HOUSEL: Okay, so that language would be acceptable to you? <br />MASUNAGA: Yes, it is. <br />HOUSEL: Thank you. <br />COTTLE: Mr. Chairman, can I just clarify one point with the applicant? <br />HOUSEL: Sure. <br />COTTLE: On Pages 1 and 2 of the application, it says that the area south of the berm, which would <br />be visible, is to accommodate parking a trailer and implements associated with a back hoe; but <br />today I heard you say that a truck as well as the back hoe and the trailer would be parked. So, can <br />we just get some clarification on the record of what will actually be parked in that area? <br />MOOERS: I spoke in error. The truck will be above, so it’s just the trailer, the trailer to haul the <br />back hoe and the back hoe implements, which is if you go back to the photo of what the site looks <br />like today, that’s what’s there now. <br />COTTLE: Okay, so the -. <br />MOOERS: No truck. <br />COTTLE: Trailer and the back hoe -. <br />MOOERS: Back hoe -. <br />COTTLE: And the attachments -. <br />15 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.