My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-10-27 tcr
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-10-27 tcr
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 11:17:14 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 11:17:11 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DARROW:If we could add in the -. <br />WATANABE:Oh, excuse me, yeah, it would be inclusive, I did mean inclusive of <br />theD and E conditions which stipulate no direct access to Kamanu Street and a 10-foot <br />wide road widening setback. <br />SIRACUSA:And Ill second those as well. <br />ALAMEDA:And so noted. <br />DARROW:For clarification -. <br />ALAMEDA:Sure. <br />DARROW:Isthere,theminimum69parkingstalls,wouldthatbeadded,ora <br />new condition, or added to an existing condition? <br />ALAMEDA:Mr. Director? <br />YUEN:Im just, I dont understand why that condition is in there. Theres <br />a Zoning Code which states how many parking spaces youre supposed to have, and <br />weve discussed -. You know, I can see the Commissioners concern if we were rezoning <br />a project that has a, you know, a building under construction, no way they have parking <br />spaces, and there was no way to have enough parking spaces with the rezoning. I would <br />say, you know, I think weve gone through that. I think thats certainly a question that <br />comes up from the letter that we had from the architect. Now, but I think we have gone <br />through that; and we see that there is a way to have enough parking spaces. And this is a <br />zoning ordinance that if this building is destroyed in a hurricane and they want to rebuild <br />it, they have, you have the same zoning ordinance. <br />Now, under the Zoning Code as its written out, you could rebuild, they could decide, <br />well, were going to build warehouses in Kona and they decided to put the whole thing in <br />a warehouse, then they dont need 69 parking spaces anymore cause the whole thing is a <br />warehouse. But the Zoning Ordinance is going to say you have to have a minimum of 69 <br />parking spaces. So, but the Planning Commission will do the conditions on the zoning <br />ordinance. I also dont see the function, so I dont see the function of having a condition <br />that says you have to have a minimum of 69 spaces. <br />As far as this discrepancy between a map that you see as a figure attached to this and a <br />Plan Approval that says there are 69 spaces, I cant explain that discrepancy. But I have <br />to trust that, I have a guy whos the head of the Kona office who looked at the plan that <br />came in for Plan Approval, he counted the spaces, according to the contractor, they spent <br />several hours considering this issue, and he put down that theres 69 spaces in there. If <br />they had an earlier plan or different plan with 72 spaces, so much the better. But as we <br />discussed, you know, he went through this, says I got a signed Plan Approval that says <br />you got 69 spaces, you need 69 spaces, you got 69 spaces as this building is being built. <br />17EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.