My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-10-27 tcr
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-10-27 tcr
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 11:17:14 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 11:17:11 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
RHO:I have a comment. <br />ALAMEDA:Sure. <br />RHO:Actually, its a question that I dont really want answered but I <br />wanted to put it on the record just to be on the record. Oneis I think some place in all <br />these documents it talks about Maiau Street and banning parking there, banning parking. <br />So, and then on Kamanu Street, Im not sure what the County, or our plans are, or the <br />Departments plans are for parking. So off-street parking on Kamanu Street and Maiau, I <br />think really needs to be looked at, off-street parking. Thanks. <br />ALAMEDA:So noted for the record. Any other comments? Commissioner <br />Galdones? <br />GALDONES:Thank you, Mr. Chair. I just want to understand the motion. The <br />motionisacceptingrecommendationoftheChair,oftheDirector,whichstatesthat69 <br />parking stalls, including 3 handicapped accessible stalls, are also proposed as required on <br />the Final Plan Approval. And that being said then the Figure 4, the 72 will be amended <br />to reflect what is in the recommendation. Do I understand the motion to say that? <br />WATANABE:Actually, were not stating any number of parking stalls. Because, <br />really, as the Director indicated, its more of an administrative matter. All were saying <br />is were forwarding a favorable recommendation to the County Council with regard to <br />the Change of Zoning, based on all the other conditions that are listed here. I guess what <br />were trying to say is we trust that, but were trying to back off from this discrepancy <br />between the 69 and 72 parking stalls. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Galdones? <br />GALDONES:Thank you. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:Its just an observation of this. It seems to me like the Final Plan <br />Approval states the minimum amount. The plan, as Figure 4 that were looking at shows <br />like a maximum amount that the lot would allow if all the stalls were built out. And, I <br />guess, seems like the owner would be remissed if he didnt build out as many parking <br />stalls as he could above the minimum. So, I know, thats how I resolved this discrepancy <br />between the amount stated in Final Plan Approval and the actual amount shown on the <br />drawing. <br />ALAMEDA:Good observation. Okay. Seeing no further comments or <br />questions, staff? <br />19EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.