My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-11-01 tnakamura
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-11-01 tnakamura
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 11:19:11 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 11:19:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
aggressive enough to move forward in doing something with their lot, and in this particular case <br />their subdivision, or this application for this property. <br />Now lack of the community development plan, this is the forum for which the community is <br />afforded the ability to speak for or against that; and our agenda is always publicized in the <br />newspaper so many days ahead. Im not so sure how many days ahead it is. But they know <br />about it, they have not come out and spoken against the application. So for me as a <br />Commissioner, lack of a community development plan and lack of any negative testimony from <br />the public for this application, and like I say it meets all the criteria which is before us for an <br />amendment, I find some difficulty in objecting to the application. <br />If the community, if they would like to have a community development plan, the forum is there <br />for them to do it. And because they havent done it, I dont think we should hold the applicant <br />hostage to it. He has met all the criteria. In fairness to him, I am willing to move forward with <br />his application and speaking against the motion. <br />GRAHAM:Any further comments from Commissioners? Well, I think we can pass it <br />on to Mr. Hayashi and we can take a vote then. The motion was to send an unfavorable <br />recommendation on the State Land Use Boundary Amendment. <br />HAYASHI:Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA:Aye. <br />HAYASHI:Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:Yes. <br />HAYASHI:Commissioner Galdones? <br />GALDONES:Nay. <br />HAYASHI:Commissioner Rho? <br />RHO:Nay. <br />HAYASHI:Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:Nay. <br />HAYASHI:Commissioner Salavea? <br />SALAVEA:No. <br />HAYASHI:Chair Graham? <br />GRAHAM:Aye. <br />HAYASHI:Mr. Chair, motion does not carry. The vote was three to four. <br />GRAHAM:Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:Yeah,IhaveaproceduralissueforIvan.Ibelieveinpriorcaseswehave <br />90days,right? <br />14EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.