My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-11-01 tcouncil
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-11-01 tcouncil
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 11:20:36 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 11:20:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IWASHITA:Well, the problem is notice. Because under 16.2 which were supposed to <br />be following, you know, were suppose to have public hearings, you know, which this is being <br />construed to be one of the public hearings; and notice is supposed to be given of what were <br />considering. And if in fact were considering more than what, if the notice given is that were <br />considering more than what were supposed to be considering, then arguably again that is <br />defective notice. And I suppose that can be remedied by, we can try to remedy that. But I dont <br />see again, well, again, I just see these problems; and, you know, I would like them rectified. <br />Well, frankly, Im really uncomfortable with going forward and, you know, to me, ideally the <br />best solution is, you know, lets start allover again, get it right, and so there would be no <br />questions. And I dont, you know, were talking about amending the General Plan. This is a <br />matter of great substance and policy for the County and for the future of the County. And so I <br />dont see a great rush to get this back to the Council and that we can, you know, start the process <br />over again; and that would be my preference. <br />GRAHAM:Okay. So I think weve got all the issues on the table; and probably we <br />shouldtakeanactionherejusttomovethismeetingalongastowhereweregoing.Somaybe <br />Ill do that in just a minute, but well first hear from Commissioner Watanabe. <br />WATANABE:Okay. I earlier suggested maybe we should just a voice call. But to push, <br />to press the issue, Ill move that we accept that we are procedurally clear to move forward and <br />discuss this revised recommendation on the Ordinance 05-25, so that would be my motion. <br />GRAHAM:Is there a second? <br />GALDONES:I second. <br />GRAHAM:Second by Commissioner Galdones. Mr. Torigoe, do you have any <br />comments on this motion as to whether it properly reflects what were trying to do? <br />TORIGOE:No, I dont think so. Its pretty straightforward, I think. <br />GRAHAM:Okay. <br />SIRACUSA:Could you repeat the motion, please. I had trouble hearing you. <br />WATANABE:Im moving that we accept the fact that we are procedurally clear to move <br />forward and discuss the proposed revisions to Ordinance No. 05-25. <br />GRAHAM:Is that clear now, Commissioner -? <br />SIRACUSA:Yes. <br />GRAHAM:Thanks, good. Do we have any discussion on this motion by <br />Commissioner Watanabe? Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:I just wanted to reiterate for the record on this motion that really, you <br />know, what were talking about in terms of what this body does is probably one of the most <br />10EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.