My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-11-01 tcouncil
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-11-01 tcouncil
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 11:20:36 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 11:20:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DARROW:Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA:No. <br />DARROW:And Mr. Chairman? <br />GRAHAM:Aye. <br />DARROW:The motion does not pass four to three. <br />WATANABE:Then I would move -. <br />GRAHAM:Excuse me a second. Go ahead, Commissioner Watanabe. <br />WATANABE:Ill make another motion and lets -. Ill move to continue this matter to <br />thenextPlanningCommissionmeeting. <br />SIRACUSA:Second. <br />GRAHAM:Okay,movedandseconded.Mr.Torigoe,doyouhaveanycommentson <br />how were proceeding here? <br />TORIGOE:I just wondered what would be, what is it that youre wanting to <br />accomplish by continuing? I guess to try and get a fuller board for one thing? <br />WATANABE:Im hoping, yeah, but, I mean -. Well, if were not clear procedurally there <br />is no way we can pass this other thing. Its going to come the same thing, four-three, right? <br />TORIGOE:Right. <br />WATANABE:So the only other thing we can do is say, no, we dont like this. But four <br />people actually, I assume like it, we just dont have five. So what else can we do? We can sit <br />here all day and we are still going to come out four-three, no matter what happens. <br />TORIGOE:Right. I was also going to ask is there anything, I guess, in discussion -? <br />WATANABE:Or if procedurally, Im sorry, but, or if procedurally because wed like to <br />present it on both sides, maybe we should have the Director discuss it now just for the record, <br />because the next Planning Commission meeting will be on the west side and at least we wont <br />then at the west side meeting be discussing something that was never discussed on the east side <br />because we couldnt get past procedures. I dont know -. <br />GRAHAM:One thing Im sensing in Mr. Torigoes comment is that rather than just <br />kind of come up again with maybe a bigger Commission, is there something that could be done <br />in the meantime that would remedy the concerns of the Commissioners who didnt vote for it; <br />and we havent heard from Commissioner Rho and I know he didnt support the motion. So do <br />13EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.