Laserfiche WebLink
GRAHAM:Is there anything further you€d like to present at this time? You will get a <br />chance for like a closing presentation in a little bit. <br />ROBLEE:Okay, thank you. <br />GRAHAM:Okay. The next party would be the Intervenor, Ms. Lai; and, again, she€s <br />not here. Mr. Torigoe, should I summarize the issues that I see that she brings up, should we just <br />sit and read them, or should we just move forward? <br />TORIGOE:Well, it being a contested case, I would suggest just pointing out to the <br />Commission, making sure they know where to look and allowing them to examine the evidence <br />that has been presented. And if they have perhaps questions that they€d like to address to the <br />parties that are here related to that, then that would be appropriate. I wouldn€t want you to be <br />necessarily, you know, summarizing it for -. <br />GRAHAM:Okay. So we have, in that regard, we have from the Intervenor the <br />exhibitswhichwe€relookingat;andinouroriginalmaterialthatwereceivedfromthePlanning <br />Department which I guess is also the Planning Department€s exhibit today, we should have <br />correspondence from Ms. Lai. So, Mr. Torigoe, in regard to that, would it be appropriate for the <br />Commissioners to ask either the applicant or the County any questions regarding the content of <br />that material or just locating that material and understanding it? <br />TORIGOE:I think if, yeah, if you have questions that you would like to ask relating to <br />the factual matter that€s in these exhibits, I think you can address it to the parties. <br />GRAHAM:Okay. Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:Just for the record with regard to the submissions from the Intervenor, I€d <br />like the record to note that I have reviewed Exhibits 1 and 2, the two different letters, a letter <br />dated September 1, 2006 and October 18, 2006; and I will be considering those in making the <br />determination. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you. Other Commissioners? I might want to ask the County in <br />regard to this, let me get my paper in front of me right, just because I feel like this is an issue <br />that€s sort of central to Ms. Lai€s concern. It seems to me a central concern is even though I <br />don€t perceive that she foresees large impacts from this particular bed and breakfast, she does <br />foresee us sort of starting a pattern of approving bed and breakfasts in the area which she can <br />refer to as motel; and so she€s concerned that this could sort of start a trend that would have <br />serious consequences for her property. So I guess I would like to hear the County respond as to <br />how that concern, about a possible future trend works into their considerations about whether we <br />should approve this application or not. <br />YUEN:First, I think that this application has to be judged on its merits. We have, <br />as a Department, we€ve consistently recommended approval of bed and breakfasts if there are no <br />unusual site circumstances that cause a problem. What I mean is that we would probably not <br />recommend approval of a bed and breakfast in Waipio Valley, for example. But we€ve <br />9 <br /> <br />