My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-11-01 tfay_roblee
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-11-01 tfay_roblee
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 11:20:41 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 11:20:36 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GRAHAM:Is there anything further youd like to present at this time? You will get a <br />chance for like a closing presentation in a little bit. <br />ROBLEE:Okay, thank you. <br />GRAHAM:Okay. The next party would be the Intervenor, Ms. Lai; and, again, shes <br />not here. Mr. Torigoe, should I summarize the issues that I see that she brings up, should we just <br />sit and read them, or should we just move forward? <br />TORIGOE:Well, it being a contested case, I would suggest just pointing out to the <br />Commission, making sure they know where to look and allowing them to examine the evidence <br />that has been presented. And if they have perhaps questions that theyd like to address to the <br />parties that are here related to that, then that would be appropriate. I wouldnt want you to be <br />necessarily, you know, summarizing it for -. <br />GRAHAM:Okay. So we have, in that regard, we have from the Intervenor the <br />exhibitswhichwerelookingat;andinouroriginalmaterialthatwereceivedfromthePlanning <br />Department which I guess is also the Planning Departments exhibit today, we should have <br />correspondence from Ms. Lai. So, Mr. Torigoe, in regard to that, would it be appropriate for the <br />Commissioners to ask either the applicant or the County any questions regarding the content of <br />that material or just locating that material and understanding it? <br />TORIGOE:I think if, yeah, if you have questions that you would like to ask relating to <br />the factual matter thats in these exhibits, I think you can address it to the parties. <br />GRAHAM:Okay. Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:Just for the record with regard to the submissions from the Intervenor, Id <br />like the record to note that I have reviewed Exhibits 1 and 2, the two different letters, a letter <br />dated September 1, 2006 and October 18, 2006; and I will be considering those in making the <br />determination. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you. Other Commissioners? I might want to ask the County in <br />regard to this, let me get my paper in front of me right, just because I feel like this is an issue <br />thats sort of central to Ms. Lais concern. It seems to me a central concern is even though I <br />dont perceive that she foresees large impacts from this particular bed and breakfast, she does <br />foresee us sort of starting a pattern of approving bed and breakfasts in the area which she can <br />refer to as motel; and so shes concerned that this could sort of start a trend that would have <br />serious consequences for her property. So I guess I would like to hear the County respond as to <br />how that concern, about a possible future trend works into their considerations about whether we <br />should approve this application or not. <br />YUEN:First, I think that this application has to be judged on its merits. We have, <br />as a Department, weve consistently recommended approval of bed and breakfasts if there are no <br />unusual site circumstances that cause a problem. What I mean is that we would probably not <br />recommend approval of a bed and breakfast in Waipio Valley, for example. But weve <br />9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.