Laserfiche WebLink
ALAMEDA: Mr. Darrow? <br />DARROW: I believe there will be. I did speak with a representative from <br />Department of Public Works yesterday regarding access on Hinano Street and they said <br />they had no problem with two accesses on Hinano. Their main concern was Manono <br />Street. <br />ALAMEDA: Follow-up Commissioner Iwashita? No? <br />IWASHITA: No. <br />ALAMEDA: Any other questions? So clarification, again. Commissioner <br />Watanabe, I know you mentioned you had reservations on having two entrances with the <br />higher traffic. Is that -? <br />WATANABE: Yeah, that was in respect to Manono Street, and it echoed the <br />concerns of the Department of Public Works. I did note that Hinano Street already had <br />two accesses. <br />ALAMEDA: Okay. Mr. Darrow, you have a question? <br />DARROW: Just looking at the submitted site plan, the second submitted site <br />plan, it does show one access, but then again that could change. But it does show just <br />one access onto Hinano Street at this time. <br />ALAMEDA: Director? <br />YUEN: You know, I don’t have an issue with having two accesses on <br />Hinano Street. Manono Street is a major cross town street, and it would be better to limit <br />the number of access points on Manono Street. <br />ALAMEDA: Mr. Watanabe, would that change your motion? <br />WTANABE: No. <br />ALAMEDA: Okay. <br />WATANABE: No, the motion was -. <br />ALAMEDA: Okay, very good. Any discussion? Commissioner Iwashita. <br />IWASHTIA: Just for the record, I’d like to, if there’s no objections, incorporate <br />my comments from the prior proceeding into this record. <br />(SEE ATTACHMENT 1) <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />11 <br /> <br />