2007-11-02 TGHC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

changed to GHC Investments LLLP. So I’ll refer to the applicant by that name. The applicant in this case is requesting a change of zone from Single-Family Residential to Neighborhood Commercial 20,000 square feet for 22,500 square feet of land. It is identified on the submitted plot plan by a blue outline. Just for reference, at the bottom of the map we have Manono Street, on the top of the map we have Hinano Street. The applicants also own the properties surrounding this particular application. These properties were rezoned back in April of 2000 from Single Family Residential to Neighborhood Commercial 20,000 square feet. In that change of zone application they were required to consolidate these two properties, this property as well as this property here. The applicants are proposing this change of zone to be able to construct a two- phase development. The first phase will involve an approximate 20,000 square foot building, two stories. The first story will have small-scale retail uses. Second story will include office space. If all goes well, the second development would include a similar building with similar uses, but dependent on the demand at the time of construction of the second phase. For your information, we have had several correspondence submitted after this application was distributed. No. 1 we’ve had two comment letters, one from the th Department of Water Supply dated October 12, and one from the Department of Public th Works, and this is dated October 12 as well. Additionally, we’ve received several letters from the applicant. One of the letters or two of the letters had to do with the name change. The final and correct name change is GHC Family Limited Partnership, which is identified as GHC Investments LLLP. We also have a request from the applicants, and this is in the letter, I do not see a date, but it states that “After much consideration we would like to eliminate our proposal to consolidate all three properties under one TMK. In doing so this will allow us to better utilize spaces on all properties, thus allowing a separate entry on Manono Street versus only one if we were to consolidate all three.” As mentioned previously Ordinance 00 30 which was approved for this particular change of zone already requires the applicants to consolidate these two parcels. Additionally, referring to the Department of Water Supply’s comment letter, Condition No. 3 states that the applicant will be required to install a fire hydrant fronting the subject parcel. We are recommending that this requirement be added to Condition C; and this would be after the language that’s in place; and it would state that the applicant will be required to install a fire hydrant fronting the subject property. Again, at this time, the applicant will address their concerns regarding Condition B and Condition E regarding consolidation and access onto Manono Street. The Planning Director is recommending that the Planning Commission send a favorable recommendation to the Hawaii County Council for this application. Are there any questions? ALAMEDA: Questions? Commissioner Watanabe. EXHIBIT B 2