Laserfiche WebLink
represents the area of this application. The yellow signifies Single Family Residential <br />zoning. The applicants in this case, Jinsoo and Ran Hui Iida, are requesting a change of <br />zone from Single Family Residential 10,000 square feet to Neighborhood Commercial <br />20,000 square feet for 23,559 square feet of land. Referring to the applicant’s plot plan <br />that is submitted, we have the parcel identified with a, outlined with a blue line. We have <br />Kilauea running on the right side of the map. Entrance is on the south side of the <br />property identified with brown. <br />The applicants are requesting this change of zone to be able to locate their beauty salon <br />identified as Lani’s Beauty Salon within an existing dwelling identified in red. They’re <br />proposing to have four chairs as well as a waxing room within this one-bedroom one-bath <br />dwelling. Additionally on the property there is another dwelling. The applicants at this <br />time are trying to correct a problem with the permitting to be able to permit this as a <br />second dwelling on the property.They’re in the process at this time. There has been a <br />letter to that effect submitted to the Commission. The proposed layout is identified. <br />Entrance from Kilauea, a single location with parking in this general location, again, with <br />the salon identified in red. At this time the applicants are proposing to utilize the second <br />dwelling for dwelling purposes; but in the future, if approved, they may use this for office <br />space. <br />Since this application, well, let me speak to this application. This is a unique situation in <br />the sense that usually when we look at these applications in reference to the General Plan <br />LUPAG Map we look at it from a broadbrush perspective. These lines usually are not, <br />you know, exact. But in certain circumstances we do look at these lines as being, you <br />know, more exact in nature. And the instances that we will look at that is when these run <br />along an identified road or if those particular, that particular area was changed by metes <br />and bounds. In this particular application, the General Plan between Medium Density <br />Urban and Single Family, or Low Density Urban is identified with the separation through <br />Kilauea Street. And so at this point even though in the application it states that the <br />General Plan has identified it as Medium Density the Planning Director interprets it as <br />Low Density Urban based on that separation from Kilauea Street. <br />The Planning Director, mainly based on this particular issue but others spoken to in the <br />application, is recommending an unfavorable recommendation be sent by the Planning <br />Commission to the Hawaii County Council. Since this application was sent to the <br />Planning Commission, we have received several correspondence to bring to your <br />attention. One is a comment letter dated October 25, 2007 from the Department of Public <br />Works. Additionally, we’ve received a comment letter from Department of Water <br />Supply dated October 19, 2007. And, again, we’ve received a letter from the applicants <br />in reference to the second dwelling; and, additionally, this morning, there has been <br />another correspondence from the applicants that has been passed out to the Planning <br />Commission. Are there any questions? <br />ALAMEDA: Seeing none, will the applicants or representative please come <br />forward. Please raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth now <br />before the Hawaii County Planning Commission? <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />2 <br /> <br />