Laserfiche WebLink
ALAMEDA: Follow-up? <br />YUEN: And we would look at that as basically okay while they were living <br />on the property. And to give an example of this similar kind of accommodation, if a <br />plumber has a van that has, you know, Al’s Plumbing on the sign, the plumbing company <br />is full of plumbing equipment, and the person takes it home and parks it at their home in <br />an RS zone, we do not cite people for that kind of usage. It’s a vehicle that they use at <br />work but they also, it’s also used as a personal vehicle that they may drive around in or <br />they may go to and from work. So we don’t look at that as a violation even in an RS <br />zone. So I don’t think we need to say anything specifically in the zoning conditions <br />about that kind of usage. But it needs to be, I think we do have an understanding here on <br />the record that the CN zoning does not authorize the use of the site as a baseyard for <br />buses. <br />Then on the other issue, on the issues, you know, we did have complaints, we did cite the <br />complaints and they did establish a baseyard in an ML zone for the buses as a result of <br />the complaints. I don’t look at that as a failure of our enforcement process. If there were <br />other violations then we, if we have other complaints we will follow-up on those and <br />investigate it and see if there was a violation. <br />And then the final thing I did want to mention though that there has been this discussion <br />of the, and this is a recurrent thing in the Waiakea House Lots area, a conflict between <br />commercial and residential uses. The General Plan does identify the area as Medium <br />Density Urban which opens the opportunity for commercial uses, that passed the County <br />Council. There’s also a course of action in the General Plan that talks about Kekuanaoa <br />Street being a site for a future commercial development; and that also passed the County <br />Council in 2005 as a specific course of action. <br />ALAMEDA: Mr. Lim, response? <br />LIM: I guess it’s finally, we’d like to give the Planning Commission the <br />applicant’s commitment that they understand fully the ramifications of any of those mini <br />busses coming onto the property. So we’re going to take additional steps to make sure <br />that that doesn’t happen. We’d ask for your support of this rezoning. I think <br />Mr. Watanabe has a question. <br />ALAMEDA: Okay. Sure, Mr. Watanabe, question for Mr. Lim or the Director? <br />WATANABE: Yeah, I have a question for Mr. Lim. Earlier I asked if you would <br />agree or the applicant would agree to limiting subdivision or resubdivision to two parcels. <br />And another thing has come up, maybe we can just change the zoning to CN-15 or <br />something like that which automatically states that, given the lot size. <br />LIM: We could agree to the first where there’d be no more than two lots <br />on the rezoned property. We couldn’t agree to the second cause that would require us to <br />reprocess the whole application. <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />24 <br /> <br />