My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-11-02 TNEKOBA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-11-02 TNEKOBA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 11:21:57 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 11:21:53 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ALAMEDA: Are there any other questions for Mr. Lim? Also for the public and <br />for the testifiers, and the applicants, we only get to make a recommendation at this level, <br />and then it goes up. You know, cause we have a bunch of personalities here, but then it <br />goes up to the County Council and they have a bunch of personalities, too. So it’s going <br />to be a process, okay? So just so you know. No further questions, then I can ask <br />Mr. Lim if, can Mr. Lim stay there? Yeah? <br />YUEN: Yeah. <br />ALAMEDA: Okay. Then we’ll go ahead and close the hearing. <br />WATANABE: I move to close the hearing, public hearing. <br />WOODWARD: Second. <br />ALAMEDA: All right, those in favor say aye? <br />COMMISSIONERS: Aye. <br />ALAMEDA: So noted. All right, anybody care to entertain a motion? <br />Commissioner Watanabe. <br />WATANABE: I move to forward a favorable recommendation to the County <br />Council for Change of Zone Application REZ 07-000071 with the revised Condition D <br />which addresses either the consolidation of Parcels 25 and 26 or establishment of cross- <br />easements, as well as the limitation of resubdivision of those parcels into no more than <br />two lots, and also with the addition of Condition F which requires the improvements to <br />the frontage along Hinano Street, and the renumbering of the remaining conditions. <br />ALAMEDA: Is there a second? <br />DOMINGO: Second. <br />ALAMEDA: Motion made by Commissioner Watanabe and seconded by <br />Commissioner Domingo. Discussion? Commissioner Iwashita. <br />IWASHITA: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I speak in opposition to the motion. In that <br />regard, I’d like to actually cite the rationale that is quoted in a later matter we’re hearing, <br />but basically it’s this: <br />The proposed rezoning action for a Single-Family Residential to <br />Neighborhood Commercial is not consistent with the applicable goals, policies, <br />standards and courses of action of the General Plan for this area.In order to <br />consider an area for any type of zoning designation, the zoning amendment needs <br />to be consistent with the applicable goals, policies, standards and courses of <br />action of the General Plan. The current use of the property is consistent with the <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />26 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.