My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-11-02 TNEKOBA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-11-02 TNEKOBA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 11:21:57 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 11:21:53 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
they’ve had discussion with Mr. Joseph and Ms. McCrary starting back in mid-2006. I <br />think a lot of their issue initially was with the beeping noise that these big buses make <br />when they back up. So those supposedly disappeared. If they’re still hearing beeping <br />noises it’s the same beeping noises that my client heard, he heard, well, last night in fact, <br />and it’s coming from some place across the street. So it’s not from their property. So <br />that any, you know, any evidence of buses there recently is just coming by to pick up <br />something; and it’s not an indication that they’re going to conduct these operations on <br />site. <br />We tried to, I think that Mr. Joseph and Ms. McCrary at one time in mid-2006 provided <br />them with some small Podocarpus plants to plant along the boundaries of the property to <br />try to minimize the impacts and they indicated that those small plants died so they <br />purchased new Podocarpus plants. My clients stated they planted those and those are <br />now growing. We’re hoping that that’s going to, the Podocarpus are those relatively <br />quick growing thick bushes that grow quickly; and we’re hoping that that in conjunction <br />with the minimizing of the activities of the vehicles on the property will allow them to <br />live in harmony with their neighbors as much as possible. <br />ALAMEDA: Thank you. Commissioner Domingo, follow-up? <br />DOMINGO: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Well, you know, you addressed the <br />concerns that I had, and more so especially with regards to that which was contained in <br />the letter by the neighbors regarding the noise situation. I’m clear that that has been <br />addressed, hopefully. I don’t know if the noise issue could be inserted in the Zoning <br />Ordinance itself with regards to, you know, the noise taking place and the time. <br />LIM: We’re, you know, we’re in agreement proposed Condition C that <br />the Director has proposed that the landscaping between the properties for the purpose of <br />mitigating any adverse noise or visual impacts to the adjacent properties be implemented <br />in accordance with the Planning Department’s Rule No. 17 on landscaping. So we will <br />be checking to see what landscaping is presently out there; and if there’s more needed to <br />comply with the Rule, then we will implement that. <br />ALAMEDA: Commissioner Domingo? <br />DOMINGO: Thank you very much. <br />ALAMEDA: You’re welcome. Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE: I had a question actually for the Director. It seems the applicant is <br />asking to remove Condition D. And I guess my question would be are you satisfied with <br />that? I guess the only ingress and egress is all from Manono, no Kekuanaoa anyway, <br />yeah? And you already have two. So even if you remove that you’re not increasing the <br />amount of egress and egress? <br />ALAMEDA: Mr. Director. <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.