2008-11-06 TSONOMURA - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

WOODWARD: All right. I think it might be appropriate if somebody would like to move to defer both of these items. TORIGOE: Do we have a date? th COTTLE: We could hear this on the December 5 agenda, at the December meeting. We have one more month. WOODWARD: All right, okay. Let me ask the representative if that’s acceptable to him. NISHIMURA: Yes. WOODWARD: He says yes. Okay, do I hear a motion? BOWMAN: I move that we defer the State Land Use Boundary Amendment th application SLU 08-000020, Change of Zone application REZ 08-000081 to the December 5 meeting. ALAMEDA: Second. Discussion. DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman, one question. WOODWARD: Yes, sir. Mr. Domingo. DOMINGO: You know, in view of the fact that we had taken action on the State Land Use Boundary Amendment application and it was defeated, well, there was no majority vote on that, would it be proper then to consider discussion on that at the next Planning Commission meeting? WOODWARD: Discuss, I’m not sure what you’re asking. Discuss? DOMINGO: To consider it at the next Planning Commission meeting. th WOODWARD: That’s what the motion is, the December 5 meeting. DOMINGO: Yeah, but what implications would today’s action have on our intent to consider it at the next meeting because we’re saying we defer action on it until the next meeting. But in actuality we’re taking final decision on the State Land Use Boundary application today. And it’s -. TORIGOE: No. Actually in order to make your negative recommendation you would have to have five votes; and that did not happen. But the defeat of the motion to make a negative recommendation does not mean that, you know, you’re making a positive recommendation. You know, you would need to have five votes one way or the other. And so the defeat of today’s motion basically is a nonaction. DOMINGO: It’s a nonaction, okay. 22