Laserfiche WebLink
CHU: Could I add -? <br />WOODWARD: Yes, sir. If you’ll give us your name and address. I don’t believe you <br />have. <br />CHU: Newton Chu. <br />WOODWARD: Okay. <br />CHU: And I’m the partner in charge of our office over here. And I remember <br />when the client came in and met with Jennifer and stuff, and I sat down and met with them and, <br />you know, found out a little bit about the history and what was going on. It was very difficult for <br />us at that time when you have a, what we call a pro se, someone who had done everything on <br />their own but they maybe fumbled and bumbled their way into a mess and they come into your <br />office. And, BJ, I know you, you know what I’m talking about. It’s hard to undo the past and <br />sanitize or make it right. But what we saw in this project is that something that was a, we felt <br />was a little unique because when we first heard about it we really didn’t know what it was, either <br />a special treatment facility or whatever. And the more we talked with the State people, they <br />didn’t know either. So it’s kind of a hybrid. It’s something that’s not being done in the State. <br />But yet there were so many positive possibilities out of this to help the youth, not only on the <br />mainland but also on our community, that we decided that, well, we will get involved with this <br />and see if we can help them wind their way through the bureaucracy, both county and state. And <br />it turned out you guys are the first. I mean we are taking it through you guys first; and there are <br />other places that we’re going to have to go to make it work. <br />But I think if you look at the big picture of what a program like this offers to our young people in <br />our country, in our community -. In fact, part of our discussion this morning involves the <br />granddaughter of my minister who was a runaway just this past week and just found, who’s kind <br />of possibly a candidate for something like this so that she’s got soft issues that caused her to <br />runaway. This is a type of treatment that would be probably better for her than going back to <br />Hilo High. So we looked at the big picture when we evaluated the case and said, yeah, it’s a <br />mess, yeah, they fumbled and bumbled a little bit and they’ve done something that, you know, <br />maybe we should have spanked them a little harder. But we’ve got to start somewhere and we’re <br />starting here to make it right. And we have told them that we have to do things to make it right, <br />and they said they’re willing to do that; and hopefully we can keep it moving forward. It’s not, <br />you know, it’s not a contested case.Right? It’s not something that people are saying take, well, <br />there’s an isolated complaint which I’m sure you’re going to hear about from someone who lives <br />somewhere else. But there are issues that we will be addressing, tough issues, and, you know, <br />it’s my hope that we can move it forward because we do have a lot more hurdles after this <br />Planning Commission. We do have a lot more hurdles, we understand that. But that’s the <br />challenge. <br />LEITHEAD TODD: Commissioners, I wanted to, you know, just point out that it was partially <br />because of the history of this project and partially because it’s kind of unique that I had <br />recommended a five-year limit with -. Basically by then I would assume they would have gone <br />through Department of Health, there would be an opportunity to evaluate whether the building <br />19 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />