2003-11-07 TNANI KONA - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

never go through, and yet it's on the County plan. So I'm questioning why it'll never be built if it's on the County plan because it's too expensive to do that, bridging of that drainage. That brings me to the idea of another collector further south which is great for the people who live south but has nothing to do with these particular subdivisions. Hienaloli, when it runs to the south, it connects, it becomes, it's the old railway right-of-way. There was a sugar mill up there many, many years ago. It cross -, it turns into dirt, it crosses a single lane railway bridge, it goes for dirt for a couple hundred yards more, and then it turns into a paved County road that services some very expensive subdivisions, Huallai Colony and some others that connect out to Huallai Road. So I think we're failing to look at Hienaloli in its more global sense. Whichever way you go, it's going to cost a lot of money to pave Hienaloli because of the drainage on the north side; there's another drainage where that railway bridge goes over on the south side. So my question is, since I abut the Kamehameha lands, I don't see any other place where a collector road could be discussed about except that Kamehameha piece of property which is an 88 or 80-some acre property that does go all the way down to the highway. It would be the easiest fix in terms of numbers of property dealers that you -, property owners that you would have to deal with plus everything south of that is already into Huallai Colony and Wehilani Estates, and they're private roads, private access roads. By the time you get past that, you're almost to Huallai Road. The Gomes brothers own a piece of property there, I believe, right on the corner of Hienaloli and Huallai. So those are some of my comments and then my questions about Hienaloli and where would this collector be? It's not on the County planning documents that I've ever seen. And to whom would it serve since it actually runs farther south rather than heading north which, as you mentioned, most people doing business are heading, they're heading north to this, to the Kailua center. Thanks. SPRINGER:Thank you. Mr. Yuen. YUEN:Just a couple of things. You are correct that the County has a long term plan that Hienaloli would be extended north and it would require bridging the drainageway. The point that I'm trying to make is that it's much too expensive a proposition for the development of either this particular subdivision or, in fact, the whole group of lots that are that have been rezoned on that border of the drainageway to the south that we're talking about. As far as the -, I think the idea behind a second collector is that it would serve potential development of that Bishop Estate property. GREGORY:Does that mean that the collector is in -, on the Bishop Estate property? YUEN:I don't have any details on that. 26