Laserfiche WebLink
map should be revised because the water really goes on somebody else's property, so we have <br />to let that other person comment on that. <br />Either way, we are recommending a condition that there would be no construction of single <br />family dwellings and related improvements or other substantial buildings or subdivision roads <br />within areas designated AE, and AE is an actual floodway where water is, where water can be <br />expected in high rain events and flood events. Where the shaded Zone X, Zone X is the area <br />that's outside of the flood area, but the shaded area could be on a fringe of flooding where you <br />might expect to see some water. And so either whether the map is revised or not, that would <br />be a condition. If the map is not revised, the result would be that a number of the lots that are <br />shown could not be built upon. <br />SPRINGER:And that's Condition O that the Director is referring our attention to. <br />Thanks, Chris. Commissioner Kubota. <br />KUBOTA:Yes. This morning, this is directed to Director Yuen. This morning I'm <br />in receipt of a transmittal from a Ruth Robinson, and she raises concerns about the <br />incremental rezoning type of zone changes that are being considered in this area as it affects <br />the entire, I guess, the whole area that we're talking about at this point, as it relates to traffic <br />congestion and safety. Have you -, would you like to respond to that, because I do have <br />concerns myself? <br />YUEN:It's a legitimate concern, but the law does permit them to bring this in, <br />this 15-acre increment. <br />KUBOTA:It brings to mind some years ago under a different administration when <br />we were talking about zone changes in the Anekona Knehoa Subdivision area. We attempted <br />to zone change the whole gamut of it, and it didn't fly, for some reason. Have we considered <br />looking at zone changes -? I know they have the right to incrementally do it, and 15 acres or <br />less you avoid the State Land Use Commission, and so I'm not faulting the owners, but I'm <br />just wondering if there is a better way that we can, we as responsible planners and <br />Commissioners, can look at the kinds of probable impact that these developments can have. <br />We keep talking about it, but you know, we keep adding more fuel to the fire, and I'm just <br />wondering if the Director can give us some direction on how we can look at these future <br />requests for rezoning, other than 15 acres, less than. <br />YUEN:You are absolutely right, it would be much better to look at things on a <br />broader, on a regional level and do planning on that basis. The system, as it exists now, and <br />has been practiced, is very much applicant driven. <br />KUBOTA:Right. <br />YUEN:And parcel by parcel driven. We -, in considering revisions to the State <br />land use law, this is -, we've sent in -, and just so you get an idea of the bigger picture. There <br />4 <br /> <br />