My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-11-07 TNANI KONA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-11-07 TNANI KONA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 11:26:52 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 11:26:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
condition of Hienaloli Road is substandard and that is one of the conditions of approval is that <br />that road would have to be improved, as well. <br />SPRINGER:Greg? <br />MOOERS:Oh, I'm sorry. Jeff asked if I would address the drainageway. Previous <br />rezoning, this RS-20 that was done for the Waltons, one of the conditions of approval required <br />that a drainage study be prepared and submitted to the Department of Public Works. <br />Mr. Jeffrey -, I don't know if it was Mr. or Dr. Jeffrey Casburn did a drainage study, and that <br />drainage study did show a realignment of the drainageway, and a letter has been submitted to <br />the Department of Public Works, also been submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers for a <br />letter of map revision that would amend this alignment. As Mr. Yuen pointed out, the <br />condition as written is pretty clear that there is no development allowed in the floodway, so if <br />for some reason the Army Corps did not approve the realignment, that would dramatically <br />reduce the number of lots that could be developed in this subdivision. <br />SPRINGER:Greg? Thank you. You referred us to one of the conditions that <br />addressed off-site improvements. I'm wondering if -, just to make sure that I'm on the right <br />page, if that's Condition I. <br />MOOERS:That is correct, I and J. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. Commissioners, do you have any questions or comments to <br />the Applicant at this time? Commissioner Graham. <br />GRAHAM:Greg, one thing that jumps to my attention is I believe the existing <br />subdivision, like Kona Heights or like RS-15s, and Jeff showed us the new ones that went in <br />just below, the RS-20s, so it feels like you're really representing a high density RS-10 that <br />doesn't really conform with the neighboring areas, and it feels to me as a Planning <br />Commission representative, like the neighbors are sort of a constituency who are already there, <br />so I'm concerned about the higher density and their concerns. <br />MOOERS:Well, to be honest, the density is there to try to increase the number of <br />facilities charges and water that will help pay for the water system. The higher density, and I <br />think you'll see this throughout this area, is that the increased number of lots is what will pay <br />the, for the roadways. The impact related fees, as you recall, the impact related fees which are <br />now $9,000 a unit would obviously be substantially higher in this case than if it were half the <br />density. <br />GRAHAM:Okay. Thank you. <br />DARROW:Could I make a -, interject for a moment? <br />SPRINGER:Sure. <br />8 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.