My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-11-07 TRUTTER
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-11-07 TRUTTER
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 11:27:03 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 11:26:56 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MCCALL:Okay. Thank you. <br />SPRINGER:Mrs. Kubota? <br />KUBOTA:A last one. Number 12 of the SMA application, I guess, i <br />Condition No. 12, on page 16, Mr. Eadie. I shouldnÓt be asking this, I should be asking <br />Planning Director this, or maybe I should ask Norman. But heÓs going to refer it to you, I <br />guess, so IÓll ask you. I go back to this exclusive easement or lease, free of charge to <br />operate and maintain a golf course and golf safety zone and residents beach facility. My <br />question to you is why would the County do that? Six-three acres? Real property tax, I <br />mean, you know, and Mr. Eadie touched on it. He said they thought it was a better way, <br />but itÓs a convoluted way. Why is the County doing this because the mainess with, if the <br />County owns the land, donÓt you have an obligation to maintain it? <br />YUEN:No. <br />KUBOTA:What about the liability factors? <br />YUEN:The way the law, first of all, the way this is structured i <br />acres becomes public property. When itÓs public property, itÓs there forever. Sixty-three <br />acres would be encumbered by a lease or easement for the private operator to operate a <br />golf course. Golf courses are not necessarily forever. But as long as they want to operate <br />a golf course they can operate a golf course. But the government owns, the County or <br />another government entity -. It seems like it would be the County will own the land. As <br />far as the maintenance and liability responsibilities, if someone, maintenance and liability <br />go with the party that controls the property. So if the government, if they have an <br />exclusive easement over certain areas, they will be liable for those areas and theyÓll be <br />responsible to maintain those areas, theyÓll be responsible to maintain the golf course, <br />and they will be liable for any accidents that occur on the golf course. <br />KUBOTA:Exclusively? The County could be named as parties, so could they <br />not as landowners? <br />YUEN:The County can always be named as a party. To give you an <br />example, the State leases out property in the Kanoelehua Industrial area. If you trip in, <br />say, somebody doesnÓt maintain the parking lot, the lessee does not maintain the parking <br />lot, they have a puka in the parking lot, somebody trips and they break their leg. They <br />can sue both the State and lessee; but the lessee, not the State, is liable. Somebody can, <br />people can always name you in a suit but the person with the control of the property is <br />liable. And, in this case, the private operator will have exclusive control over the, over a <br />set area which includes the golf course and the golf safety zones; and this will all be <br />mapped out by metes and bounds. <br />As far as taxes, the taxation is the same because there is a provision in the County Tax <br />Code for a government property under lease or easement, and itÓs taxed to the person that <br />13 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.