Laserfiche WebLink
GRAHAM:Right. And the grounds by which we might choose to exten <br />could they have to do with the content of the permit, or do you feel it should only have to <br />do with time-related grounds? <br />OÓTOOLE:Well, the reason for the request, the length of time requested, you <br />know, we can only go by the rule. I think that everything they bring up has to be related <br />to whatÓs wrong with a time extension. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. Mrs. Kubota? Did you have a question or comment? <br />KUBOTA:No. My question was precisely as Commissioner Graham asked. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. Commissioner McCall? <br />MCCALL:I have a question. It seems to me that we may be getting <br />catch-22 situation, though. Because if I understand it the Special Permit, IÓm not sure, is <br />the Special Permit revoked if they donÓt reach this thing by the time deadline or is it just <br />subject to revocation? I guess, this is to the Planning Director. <br />SPRINGER:Director Yuen? <br />YUEN:I think itÓs subject to being revoked. <br />OÓTOOLE:It says Ðthe Director shall initiate procedures to revoke the permit.Ñ <br />YUEN:We would need further proceedings, though to actually revok <br />OÓTOOLE:Right. <br />MCCALL:Could that be held in abeyance while the contested case goes on? <br />OÓTOOLE:Oh, yes. <br />YUEN:Yes. <br />KUBOTA:Madam Chair? <br />SPRINGER:Commissioner Kubota. <br />KUBOTA:In every other condition that IÓve noticed, there is a provision <br />stated where the authority lies with the Planning Director. And inadvertently as the, I <br />think it was Mr. Fuke who brought that point out, even if it is an error on our part <br />inadvertently we still have, we are bound by what is in the present conditions? We <br />cannot say it was supposed to have been there but we didnÓt do it? I mean, yes, no? <br />5 <br /> <br />