Laserfiche WebLink
advanced. But, as planners, I think itÓd be wise to consider how resources that are <br />created for public benefit and re-creation could be developed in a way that the very, very <br />few monies that are available for that development could be spent well for the maximum <br />benefit of the public. <br />Specifically, IÓm talking about the beach at Maniniowali is relatively small. ItÓs also <br />seasonable, itÓs not there most winters for several months at a <br />Mahaiula, on the other hand, is large, itÓs permanent. There are much more opportunities <br />for public re-creation there. That said -. <br />Specifically about the plans that Mr. Leonard talked about a little bit earlier, the map <br />thatÓs on the far left on the wall is a double-fold map which you should have. It should <br />look like this with colored lines on it. <br />I realize that much of the commentary in the text that I gave you is not necessarily going <br />to be the decided by the Planning Commission. ItÓs things that deal with exclusive <br />easements on State land, the building of trails and footpaths over lands that are currently <br />undeveloped or unscarred. For instance, the utility corridor which will connect the <br />private subdivision and provide utility services to the comfort station is going to be a new <br />feature on that part of the landscape. The trail there does not currently exist. I think it <br />would be preferable to place the utility corridor on the existing road which will remain <br />there. Ultimately, put it along the foot of the aa lava flow, the trail thatÓs unmarked on <br />the right-hand side of your map as you look at the paper. <br />People have commented on the need for 24-hour public pedestrian access to the beach. I <br />cannot agree with that more. And I note that some of the conditions recommended for <br />approval of the application, No. 12, on page 9, states that the trail management and <br />restoration plan shall be submitted for review. <br />The mauka-makai trail, which I used for many, many years beginni <br />when Maniniowali was, I mean, when Queen Kaahumanu Highway was f <br />being preserved by the developer. That will function as a mauka-makai trail, although it <br />stops at the makai verge of the Queen Kaahumanu Highway. That particular trail, as it <br />stands today, will lead hikers to Kakapa; and Kakapa is the site of very sensitive <br />archaeological features. I believe it is possible, given the development plans of the <br />private landowner and this trail which is shown as a connector trail on the map, at the <br />foot of the aa flow -. ItÓs the same trail that Mr. Leonard referred earlier as not being <br />paved. I think that if that were chosen, for instance, as the utility corridor, it could or <br />couldnÓt be paved. I have no opinion about that -. But that portion of trail could very <br />easily be connected to the current mauka-mauka trail and serve as the suggested 24-hour <br />public access, pedestrian path from Queen Kaahumanu Highway down to the beach of <br />Maniniowali. <br />There are a couple other trails in the area and, again, I will try to be quick here. The <br />existing footpath that goes, supposedly leading from the expanded parking area down to <br />the shoreline also goes right through the middle of some archaeological sites. That is <br />15 <br /> <br />