My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-11-07 TCLIFTO
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-11-07 TCLIFTO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 11:27:17 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 11:27:15 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SPRINGER:Moved by Commissioner Kubota and seconded by Commissioner Smith <br />to approve this Special Management Area, the application for a Special Management Area Use <br />Permit, SMA 03-005. And, Commissioners, youÓre then working off of the ApplicantÓs <br />proposed findings? <br />KUBOTA:For a lack of any other, yes. <br />SPRINGER:This is a discussion period that weÓre in now. Director Yuen, do you have <br />any guidance for us, given this motion before us now? <br />YUEN:The Commission does have to make findings and have conditions. <br />Because we service, although my recommendation was for a deferra <br />Commission and looking ahead to the possibility that the Commission would want to take a vote <br />on the merits, we do have a set of findings and conditions that we prepared. TheyÓre essentially <br />the same as Mr. FukeÓs, except that the findings, the discussion and the findings are, tone down <br />some of the positive things he says about his project. TheyÓre in neutral language, thatÓs not <br />important. Then the conditions are essentially the same except that his incorporate, the <br />conditions are the same, I think, except that his incorporate 400 and that we have the 200. And, <br />again, this is not our recommendation. But if the Commission wants to take a vote on essentially <br />what the Applicant has proposed, we would suggest that the Commission use this set of findings <br />and conditions, except that the Commission should, and the mover, should make it specific <br />whether they are moving for 200 or 400 on the number of rooms. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. Commissioner Kubota? <br />KUBOTA:Yes, IÓd like to speak to my motion. The zoning has to be approved by the <br />Council yet. If the Council sees in its wisdom to limit that hotel occupancy, then they will <br />change it there. And, so, the conceptual plans call for, I think, two hotels, two or three hotels. <br />And if the Council wishes to lop it off, well, they will do so; and our SMA will have to follow <br />suit. Until then it has no value or, yes, it has no value at this time. And the Applicants are <br />willing to take that chance and come back in for an amendment if necessary, so I would stick to <br />my original motion of following -. If theyÓre essentially the same as Mr. Yuen said, I would <br />stick with the ApplicantÓs proposal. <br />SPRINGER:Commissioners, any further discussion or comment on this matter? <br />OÓTOOLE:To clarify, then, youÓre taking Mr. FukeÓs findings and his suggested <br />conditions? <br />KUBOTA:On the condition that Mr. Yuen said theyÓre essentially the same except <br />for Condition E, 400 versus 200. <br />OÓTOOLE:And then I think Mr. Fuke said to, he would agree to include Condition K <br />from the Change of Zone. <br />FUKE:ThatÓs correct. <br />16 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.