My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-11-07 TSOTO
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-11-07 TSOTO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 11:27:24 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 11:27:23 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HAYASHI:There is an outstanding request, item that we need to deal with and <br />that is the Petition for Standing. At the last meeting, there was not enough votes to, I <br />believe, carry the, if I can find my notes here, to carry, to accept the Petition for Standing. <br />So I think, at this point, perhaps it would be proper for the Commission to deal with the <br />issue. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. I would ask for guidance from Counsel or th <br />Director, because this is a continue agenda item, do we need to <br />presentation again or may we move directly into hearing the contestants and why they <br />should be granted standing? <br />YUEN:Yes, we can move directly into that. And just for a little bit of <br />clarification for the Commission, we did not achieve five votes on either granting or <br />denying standing in the last instance. Corporation Counsel has essentially advised you <br />that you have the discretion to waive the fact that the Applicant did not notarize the <br />signature on the petition because itÓs not an essential part of the application. So itÓs <br />within your discretion to vote to approve the request for standing or to deny it. <br />SPRINGER:At this time, then, IÓd like to invite the ApplicantÓs representative <br />as well as the representative of those individuals or entity which has applied for standing. <br />Mr. Mooers, you have been sworn in. If the Intervenor and/or his representative are <br />ready, could you please raise your right hands? Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth <br />on this matter now before the Hawaii County Planning Commission? <br />TESTIFIERS:I do. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. Our Corporation Counsel is directing the Applicant <br />for standing in the contested case hearing to explain to us why they should be granted <br />standing. <br />KIM:Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. Robert Kim, attorney for <br />Association of Apartment Owners of Sea Village, Inc. IÓm substi <br />withdrawal and substitution which I submitted to the Commission for Ben Tsukazaki. <br />IÓm now attorney of record. At my right is the president of the association whoÓs present. <br />At the last hearing, according to the records, there was a Motion to Dismiss on the <br />grounds of no notary. My client had met all other conditions. The president of the <br />association, which is a corporation, was in Canada. There was no access to a notary, as <br />you must go to the nearest consulate; and, so, thatÓs the issue before you. As far as our <br />standing, if once the Commission deals with that, let me talk about standing. <br />The Sea Village Condominium Association and the condominium itse <br />to the project itself. They are next-door neighbors. The adverse impacts that they are <br />concerned about include, but are not limited to, viewplanes, noise, traffic, wastewater <br />treatment and its designed, cultural resources, recreational resources as this is an area <br />known as Tikis for surfers in Kona, public access, marine resources and beach protection. <br />I believe that all the elements, once the issue of the notary is resolved, are there for <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.