Laserfiche WebLink
this year. Our first notification letter was dated Oct. 26 with a Nov. 1st <br /> postmark and no information on the date of the Commission meeting which <br /> was subsequently set for Dec. 7th. Just a little over a month from the first <br /> notice. <br /> Our second notice regarding the date of the Commission meeting was <br /> dated Nov. 10th, less than a month before the meeting. <br /> With a notification time of months not weeks, this petition for standing <br /> would have been more thorough. We did not have adequate time to <br /> determine whether all of the affected residents received their notice or to <br /> verify all of the information in the application which is why we have a <br /> County Planning Dept. working on our behalf. We count on them to <br /> determine what meets the standards for tower construction, and what is in <br /> the best interests of the community. But with only 3 min each to present <br /> our case to the Commission, we are at a severe disadvantage compared to <br /> the time allotted to the applicant to present their information and make <br /> requested modifications. <br /> We are also aware that we cannot submit any additions to this petition <br /> once it is submitted 7 days prior to the Commission Meeting, though the <br /> applicant is given access to our document with time to prepare rebuttals for <br /> the Dec. 7th meeting. <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> We conclude with the recognition that we are a small group of residents opposing <br /> corporate financing and a large staff who have prepared their plan with extended <br /> time, care and expense. The odds are not in our favor and we ask that the <br /> Commission take into consideration all of the people who will be negatively <br /> affected by this project. <br /> We came here to find peace, beauty, and a rural healthy lifestyle. We will lose <br /> too much, along with a substantial financial loss to our property value, with the <br /> approval of the permit application. <br />