Laserfiche WebLink
Just a note — Federal law and FCC rules are so aligned with the <br /> industry that state and local governments are barred from taking <br /> action to block cell towers to protect the health of their citizens. These <br /> limits are based on known biological effects and are primarily related <br /> to tissue heating. The FCC maximum permissible exposure limits <br /> were issued in 1996 — thirty years ago and the cell phone industry has <br /> made considerable upgrades and frequency changes — so the <br /> standards should be upgraded and reported to the public. The <br /> Telecommunications Act of 1996 states you cannot deny a tower <br /> based on health concerns. <br /> The Palm Pkwy tower was installed around 2008 with very little homes <br /> in the area. Parcels were sold with the knowledge that the tower was <br /> already installed. There are currently only 2 homes in the 500 foot area <br /> of notification. <br /> Current cell tower on Palm was noted in the application as a 100 foot <br /> tower. It has been replaced with a 150 foot tower without input from <br /> the community as it was already in place. (page 3 application) <br /> Multiple errors are noted in the application. Some were caught by the <br /> planning dept and corrections were made. Others are still being made <br /> in the applicants paperwork to the property owners. <br /> 1- Placement of sign on wrong lot — <br /> 2- Page 12 — extending coverage on Daniel K Inouye Highway to <br /> cover Ranchos — wrong area <br /> 3- Page 14 — AT&T anchor tenant, but requested minimum 2 <br /> tenants <br /> 4- Photos were of 100 foot tower — had to be revised to 150 feet <br /> 5- Our packet to the owners on page 1 referenced a 180 foot <br /> tower... <br /> Plus many others errors <br />