My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-11-18 TIBBETSON
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-11-18 TIBBETSON
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 1:33:16 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 1:33:02 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
consider it and got back to him and did in fact sell it to him in 2003. Adeed was signed for the <br />property in March of 2003. Mr. Ibbetson communicated with the State Historic Preservation <br />Division. First he contacted an individual from the Hawaii Burial Council because he realized <br />there were graves on the site. They directed him to the State Historic Preservation Division. He <br />spoke to Keola Lindsey who came out to his property along with another woman from the State <br />Historic Preservation Division, Maryanne McGrath. They told him what he was doing was <br />acceptable in terms of where he was going to put his house. He acknowledged the existence of <br />the graves, which were there at the time he purchased the property. He said he would agree to <br />allow any descendants of the deceased to visit the graves to allow access to those graves, to <br />maintain them and visit them. And, actually had his second visit from the State Historic <br />Preservation Division several months later to see how he was doing with the construction. They <br />signed off on it, they approved it, which is why at the, with the application today for a bed and <br />breakfast they said that there was no, nothing that they. They had no opposition to the <br />application because they had already been out there at the time that he was doing his construction <br />andpriortothetimethathewasdoinghisconstructiontoviewthesiteandhadacknowledgedit <br />at that time. Mr. Ibbetson built his home. He did what he said he was going to do in terms of the <br />building permits. He didnt try to hide what he was doing from anybody. Matter of fact the <br />State Historic Preservation Division commended him and thanked him for contacting them <br />because they said a lot of people dont contact them before hand. He went ahead, proceeded, <br />built his home and subsequently came to the County asking them to approve the bed and <br />breakfast, which was at that point in time that Mr. Kaiawe came to him and objected to that <br />particular use. We dont believe that Mr. Ibbetson has done anything improper in what he has <br />done out there in the construction that he has done and the method hes used to build the <br />property. He has a home there. Hes the only one living in that home at the present time. If a <br />family were living there he could have any number of individuals living there as a family. To <br />ask this commission to allow him to open it up to 4 other individuals as a part of the bed and <br />breakfast we dont believe is going to have any noticeable impact upon any surrounding <br />properties or upon the gravesites themselves. And so, we would request that the commission <br />approve the application. Thats all. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you. Mr. Matsukawa. <br />MATSUKAWA:Thank you members of the commission. Ill also be brief. <br />ALAMEDA:Can you state your address? <br />MATSUKAWA:My name is Mike Matsukawa. My address 75-5751 Kuakini Highway, <br />Room 201, Kailua-Kona. I represent the intervenor Dean Kaiawe. <br />ALAMEDA:You may proceed. <br />MATSUKAWA:To expedite the hearing as I assured the commission we would last <br />meeting. I had Mr. Kaiawe prepare written testimony in advance and if the Chair allows it <br />during the time of evidence Id like leave to distribute the testimony, have the commission <br />members read it. Ive talked to Counsel about it they have no objections. I think that would save <br />time and keep the testimony focused. Basically, I dont think the parties have too much dispute <br />EXHIBIT B <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.