Laserfiche WebLink
COTTLE: I’m sorry. Can I add one thing? <br />WATANABE: Yes, Maija. <br />COTTLE: You should also have a revised bill on yellow paper. And those were <br />changes made by the Director at the Windward meeting. Basically the changes are, there are two <br />changes: The first section, Section 2, was added and that is just another section of the Zoning <br />Code that we realized we also have to amend that to be consistent with the other sections of the <br />Code; and then one line was added in Section 3 (a), the last sentence where it says, “Where there <br />is an existing telecommunication tower, co-location of additional antenna or equipment will be <br />permitted provided the Director has issued plan approval for such use.” So this addition is just <br />allowing co-location on an existing tower so that the applicant won’t have to go back through <br />and get a Use Permit for that purpose. <br />WATANABE: Okay, very good. One second, Mr. Housel. Just I’ve been informed, for <br />the record we should note that Ms. Giffin is -. <br />GIFFIN:No longer recused. <br />WATANABE: Yeah, no longer recused. Well, I was going to use something more <br />positive, but that will work. Okay, Mr. Housel. <br />HOUSEL: I’ll wait for Maija; I had a question for Maija. Maija, the change in <br />Section 3 (a), “co-location of additional antennas and equipment,” does that mean on the same <br />tower or a separate tower? <br />COTTLE: On the same tower. <br />HOUSEL: Okay. <br />COTTLE: On an existing tower. <br />HOUSEL: Okay so, I want to be clear, if they are building another tower, would they <br />need a Use Permit? <br />COTTLE: They would. <br />HOUSEL: They would. <br />COTTLE: Yes. <br />HOUSEL: Okay, thank you. <br />WATANABE: Any further questions of staff? If not, I have one individual that’s signed <br />up to testify: Dante Mettler. Danette. Boy, I’m messing up everyone’s name. I’m sorry. May I <br />EXHIBIT B <br />2 <br /> <br />