My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-11-21 tplant
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-11-21 tplant
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 3:51:45 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 3:51:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
would stand to benefit by any waterline improvements, or trunk line, or reservoir system <br />in that area, to get together. <br />I think itÓs totally unfair to expect the Plant-Mason on a 6-lot subdivision to solve the <br />worldÓs problem in this particular subdivision. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Kubota? <br />KUBOTA:I have nothing more to say. ItÓs just that this red light went on. <br />GALDONES:Press the buttom. <br />KUBOTA:I did. Sorry. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Springer? <br />SPRINGER:Who owns Parcel 23? <br />FUKE:I think, I believe like all, itÓs a private road parcel that all of the <br />affected property owners in that area have like, what you call that, undivided or partial <br />interest in it, as well as like the north-south road. If you look at that map, the north-sound <br />road, and that north-south road continues all the way to Kaiwiki, Kaiwiki Road. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. <br />GALDONES:Norman, in this type of situation where the concern is being raised <br />by Mr. Cardoza, what has been the practice or the policy that the Department has <br />followed to address future problems or increase of density? I guess itÓs a rather unusual <br />situation because this is a private road. <br />HAYASHI:Well, in any rezoning application, we would look at the CountyÓs, <br />whether the proposed development would affect the roadway. We also need to take into <br />consideration what would the, you know, what the future potential for development, <br />additional development in that area would have to, would be relative to the infrastructure <br />in this particular, in this particular case the roadway. <br />I think, in this particular case, we looked at it from the standpoint that the Applicant, <br />basically, is asking for a reduction in density, or substantial reduction in density. <br />Therefore, we did not feel that roadway improvements needed to be made to the existing <br />roadway or existing infrastructure that services this, that would service this proposed <br />subdivision. <br />GALDONES:When it was approved in October of 2001, it was with 25 lots, and <br />the road at that time is what it is at this time, also? <br />11 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.