My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-11-21 tplant
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-11-21 tplant
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 3:51:45 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 3:51:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FUKE:No, thereÓs just one. <br />YUEN:ItÓs just one lot on the -. So the four-lot subdivision previously <br />would, included the other properties? <br />FUKE:It was a part of the consolidation/resubdivision -. <br />YUEN:Right, okay. <br />FUKE:Which resulted in this, as well as other lots, yeah. <br />YUEN:Right, right, right. The Commission could, you know, looking <br />ahead at where this is going, clearly, I can tell you without having been up there, that if <br />youÓre talking about realigning a curve on a road, thatÓs an extremely expensive <br />proposition. And the Applicant, if that were a condition of their approval, would <br />probably figure out something else to do with the property, righ <br />FUKE:Yes. Largely because as you see the tax map key, Mr. Yuen, <br />you know, the existing right-of-way is already set. <br />YUEN:Yes. <br />FUKE:You know, so to be able to kind of make appropriate correct <br />then you would have to condemn property or, you know, I think thatÓs going to be a very <br />difficult proposition to handle. <br />YUEN:Yeah. An alternative, if the Commission wanted to move ahe <br />today, I think an alternative would be to have a condition about having adequate sight <br />distance and turning radius at the intersection, which is a safety, a major safety <br />consideration. The road itself to add, you know, itÓs going to be a big project. ItÓs either <br />going to be donÓt do anything or, and let, deny the rezoning,or leave it as it is and let the <br />rezoning go forward, as far as the curve that theyÓre talking about. <br />CARDOZA:What about the water issue? <br />FUJIKAWA:Mr. Chairman? <br />GALDONES:Mr. Fujikawa? <br />YUEN:And let me just say one thing about the water. There was a <br />requirement for water system improvements if they did a 25-lot subdivision. I think that <br />this application has been tailored so that it can fit within what is available in the <br />Department of Water Supply currently. There are some things that youÓre going to have <br />to do, but basically they do not need major improvements. And, I think, that is their <br />choice. If they come in with an application that fits with, you can do a development that <br />fits within the number of, theyÓre applying for six lots and the Department of Water <br />19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.