2003-11-21 tplant - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

before you is like a, is a reflection of what I did, which was to take out pertinent portions of the existing ordinance and then requesting that they be applied to the current ordinance. I would like to also, you know, for the record, indicate that in the event that this rezoning for one reason or another is not accepted, then the Applicant would have no other alternative but to proceed with the terms of the existing RS-15, which is really like not their choice. But if it comes to be, then, I guess, itÓs what theyÓll do. GALDONES:Commissioners, any questions of Mr. Fuke? Commissioner Kubota? KUBOTA:I lost you, Mr. Fuke, when you were going through the pro amendment changes. My understanding is, IÓm in receipt of a proposed amendment change or addition, by addition, actually, and one by deletion. I donÓt know where this came from but I have it in my hand. FUKE:ItÓs from me. KUBOTA:ThatÓs yours. So youÓre proposing that we delete Condition B in its entirety? FUKE:And then you would re-substitute -. KUBOTA:B, C, D? FUKE:Correct, yeah. KUBOTA:And then renumber the conditions following it? FUKE:Re-lettering it, Correct. KUBOTA:Yeah, okay. ThatÓs what you just said. FUKE:ThatÓs correct. KUBOTA:Okay. Is this, are these additions and deletions okay with the staff, the Planning Committee, Planning Department? HAYASHI:Yeah, I think, as far as the suggestion to delete Condition B, that would be okay with us. I think the ordinance that was referred, letÓs see, the Ordinance No. 96-152, the conditions imposed in that was over and beyond w normally been expected if this particular rezoning had gone through, or goes through. So we have no objections as far as deleting Condition B and restructuring the conditions as proposed by the Applicant. We had the opportunity to review those. 5