My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-11-21 tflorida
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-11-21 tflorida
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 3:52:24 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 3:52:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
tower site, so I was not involved in those license negotiations; and I wouldnÓt be able to <br />testify to that on personal knowledge. I would say that I have had discussions with <br />U.S. Cellular representatives, and I donÓt believe that they thi <br />of the lease. I know there were discussions about road and electricity, but I donÓt think <br />that they would agree with Mr. YamanakaÓs statements in his letter. <br />I think there have been further discussions about those kinds of improvements, but to my <br />knowledge, well, up to the point when U.S. Cellular owned the tower, there had not been <br />any definitive agreement on it. And I donÓt know whether there had been subsequent <br />discussions with AT&T Wireless, just because IÓm not privy to them. As an attorney for <br />lessees and landlords, a lot of times something as important as that should have been in <br />the license, if that were, in fact, the agreement of the parties. <br />GRAHAM:I see. And the way I interpret that is itÓs hard for you to be sure <br />what kind of verbal understanding might have been in place; but given the fact that itÓs <br />very important to this situation, if there were verbal understanding, you would expect it to <br />be in the license. <br />LEONG:If there had been an agreement, it would have been in the license. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you. <br />LEONG:Thank you. <br />GALDONES:Commissioners, any further questions? Hearing none, <br />Commissioners, what IÓd like to do at this time is to act upon the Petition for Standing in <br />a Contested Case Hearing, which was submitted by Mr. George H. R <br />purpose in doing that is so that those who have signed up to testify can decide whether <br />they will testify at this hearing or reserve their comments for the Contested Case Hearing, <br />if there is one thatÓs approved by the Commissioners. So if thereÓs no objection to the <br />process, Commissioners, you have before you a Petition that was submitted by <br />Mr. Robertson -. Norman, everything in order, the timeframe has been met and the fees <br />thatÓs necessary to go along with the Petition is in order? <br />HAYASHI:We did receive the Petition in the Kona office at 4:30 last week <br />Friday, 7 days prior to today. So I guess it was filed within a timely manner. As far as <br />the filing fee, we also received the filing fee for that. <br />GALDONES:Okay. Mr. Robertson, may I call upon you? Mr. Robertson, could <br />you use the microphone? Please raise your right hand? Do you swear or affirm to tell the <br />truth on this matter now before Hawaii County Planning Commission? <br />ROBERTSON:Yes, I do. <br />GALDONES:Could you please state your name and your residence address? <br />8 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.