My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-11-24 TKOHALA LLC
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-11-24 TKOHALA LLC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 3:53:17 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 3:53:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WATANABE: Well, we’ve heard both sides, and I guess one thing we’re agreeing on is <br />that we can’t reach a complete agreement. I don’t think it’s going to hurt, although maybe it’s <br />not as necessary now as the Planning Director indicated, that we review this or the Leeward <br />Commission review this come August; that would be I think an aggressive time frame, but I <br />don’t suppose it’s going to hurt. <br />HOUSEL: Mr. Chair, I would suggest, as Mr. Lim stated that they expect to be able <br />to do something in six months, that we follow that time frame. And if necessary, you know, the <br />ball is in their court to come back with new facts. <br />WATANABE: He said, as I recall, six to eight months, so I don’t know if it’s -. And six <br />months might be quite aggressive even on his part, I think. <br />HOUSEL: Okay. <br />WATANABE: Mr. Woodward? <br />WOODWARD: Might I suggest a compromise? And that would be that the Planning <br />Director review progress in August, and if he feels it necessary at that point, to bring it to the <br />Commission. But if there’s nothing that has changed, I don’t see any reason that everybody <br />should be burdened with rehashing this. We really have to wait -. And they can’t do anything <br />with their property until they get the zoning situation cleared up. It’s either got to be a time <br />extension on their zoning or rezoning, and whether that happens by August is anybody’s guess. <br />WATANABE: I would tend to agree personally; on the other hand I’m just one body. As <br />st <br />I understand it, I will still be on the Leeward Planning Commission after April 1. But I just <br />assume, leave it up to the entire body of the Leeward Planning Commission to decide how they <br />want to handle this at that time. And it seems to me reasonable – possibly aggressive time frame <br />– but it’s reasonable to allow that body to review it because most of those people will be new <br />people. And they can decide what they want to do, rather than my making a ruling now that that <br />body may not agree with in the future. So I think it’s a fair way of handling the rather awkward <br />situation. <br />IWASHITA: Just to clarify in my mind, Mr. Chair, the ruling of the Chair is that this <br />contested case matter is continued, and if before August of 2009 the zoning is changed, then this <br />matter would be reset -. <br />WATANABE: Exactly. Earlier of final zoning or the August Leeward Commission <br />meeting -. <br />IWASHITA: And if the zoning has not been changed by August of 2009, then this <br />matter would be reset to be heard again and dealt with in -. <br />WATANABE: By the Leeward Planning Commission, right. <br />IWASHITA: August of 2009. <br />EXHIBIT A <br />18 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.