Laserfiche WebLink
WATANABE: I agree, I agree. I believe Sallie Wolz-McCullough is here as a <br />representative for Christopher McCullough. <br />IWASHITA: Well, I guess my concern is that the discussion thus far has talked about <br />both McCulloughs as being applicants to be intervenors when in fact the application is only <br />signed by Christopher McCullough. <br />WATANABE: Right. I needed to clarify that, too, because she can testify but, you know, <br />the granting of standing is something separate, right? <br />IWASHITA: Well, I guess my concern is that all the representations and from what the <br />testifier has said up to now, you know, he’s thinking both of them have applied; only one has <br />applied. I just wanted to make it clear. <br />BLANCATO: Yeah, Sallie Wolz is Christopher McCullough’s sister-in-law. And she is <br />the owner of the property; she is on the property as co-owner along with Christopher <br />McCullough. <br />IWASHITA: That’s fine. I just wanted to clarify the contested case procedure and <br />applying to be an intervenor is very specific. And you can be an owner and if you don’t apply, <br />you’re not going to be recognized as an intervenor, right? So my point simply is that only <br />Christopher McCullough signed the request for, you know -. And I’m sorry, Sallie is not, you <br />did not sign it, so you are not an applicant to be an intervenor; that’s the way it’s set up. I just <br />wanted to make that clear on the record. <br />BLANCATO: But the reason that happened was because we only had a week to file a <br />contested case and Christopher McCullough was the only one that was actually in Kona that day <br />and could do it, because there was only a week to act on this. <br />WATANABE: Well, as long as it’s clear for the record, okay? <br />BLANCATO: I’m sorry. Okay. <br />WATANABE: Okay. <br />IWASHITA: Well -. <br />DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman? <br />WATANABE: Yes? <br />DOMINGO: I’m glad that Mr. Torigoe has made that clear with the speaker, and that he <br />understands the implications of this matter with regards to not being notified in a timely manner, <br />because prior notification is important. In fact, any procedure regarding any issue is important, if <br />and when this goes to litigation or whatever. So having made that clear by Mr. Torigoe, I think, <br />EXHIBIT D <br />11 <br /> <br />