2006-12-01 tnakamura - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

area are already in orchards. I’ve seen citrus orchards and macadamia nut orchards that I can recall off the top of my head. A lot of people who live in that area also have nurseries where they grow orchids and other tropicals, container culture (in pots).As a matter of fact, one of them is named Watanabe, Marge and Yoshi Watanabe. And so I don’t think that looking at the soil quality alone is going to tell you whether or not you can engage in farming on a parcel. That’s number one. Last time we were talking about the State Land Use Urban District right next door. And I noticed that although it has been quite a while since it has received that designation, no one has applied to subdivide any of those parcels. They are still good sized large conforming parcels. And so I think that should tell us something about the desire of the community to keep a certain size. Also, Commissioner Watanabe last time had said that, well, maybe people haven’t done that, gone through that process to subdivide because the process is intimidating; and I would like to differ with that because I believe that we would not have such long meetings here every time if the process was intimidating. People are always applying. And in that case if people are already in the State Land Use Urban District, it shouldn’t be an intimidating process at all. It should be, you know, pretty much of a slam dunk. So I think that basically what you’ve got here is a very old, very stable community; and it is a very quiet community. You do not find gangs of roaming teenagers, you know, committing vandalism. You do not have a whole lot of police reports coming in on domestics and things like that. The minute you start opening this up to subdividing it into smaller parcels, and then more and more smaller parcels, that’s when you start creating change in the community. And change is stressful, and then all the other stuff starts happening. So I don’t feel that we should set the precedent. Mr. Nakamura has other options available to him. For example, he and his siblings could continue to hold the property, you know, each one having, I think it’s three of them, a one-third share. They could hold it as tenants in common, and then each one could still pass on their one- third share to their heirs. That’s one possibility. One of the siblings could buy out the other two, and then that sibling would have the land to pass on, the other two would have the money to pass on. Or all three could sell to a completely separate third party and divvy up the money between them. So I think Mr. Nakamura has quite a few options available in terms of passing on this inheritance to the next generation. But I do not think it is fair to impact the whole character of a community, of an entire community, just for the convenience of one family. So my concern is that we’re looking at the greatest good for the most number of people. And on that basis, I’m going to very strongly object to this application. ALAMEDA: Thank you, Commissioner Siracusa. Commissioner Watanabe? WATANABE: Well, I think we’ve heard testimony that the revised General Plan already includes that second subdivision as part of Low Density Urban. So when you’re speaking to the greater good, I would assume that the General Plan is addressing the greater good. In addition, you know, I find this quite interesting that on one hand we’re arguing that history has shown that there is no demand because no one has come in or only one application has come in for a rezoning; and yet we’re also arguing that we’re concerned that once we set the precedent there will be a flood of applications coming in and everything will change in this neighborhood. The two don’t coincide together. It doesn’t make sense. You know, if you don’t have demand, then EXHIBIT A 7