My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-12-02 THOAWE
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-12-02 THOAWE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 4:00:20 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 4:00:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
here and its four to one in favor of the application, that still is a negative <br />recommendation. If after that vote, if you take a vote like that, just for example, and Im <br />not saying that thats whats going to happen, if you take a vote like that today, the <br />Applicant can either say, we will take it up to the Council with that vote and that <br />recommendation because the time has run out, or they could elect to stay here at the <br />Planning Commission and ask for a revote when there are more Commissioners. That <br />would be up to them. <br />SPRINGER:Question? <br />FUJIKAWA:Springer. <br />SPRINGER:Is the converse then true if the motion were to forward an <br />unfavorable recommendation to the County Council and that fails to pass, would that, <br />whatwouldthatbe? <br />YUEN:Thatwouldbe,itdbeanunfavorablerecommendation,todayit <br />would be, because of there only being five Commissioners here. But if you had a motion <br />to have an unfavorable recommendation and say four people voted in favor of that, I <br />think as a matter of formality, we would still ask for the second motion for the favorable. <br />And, but if the vote was then one to four on that one, then thats an unfavorable, its an <br />unfavorable recommendation. Anything less than five is an unfavorable <br />recommendation. But to give the Council a full picture, we tell them what the vote was <br />so that they understand. If it was done by less than a full Planning Commission, they can <br />look at that, and they can, its available as information to them. <br />FUJIKAWA:Do you understand? <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Chair, I understand that I will be making no motion on this <br />agenda item. <br />FUJIKAWA:Any questions, Commissioners, with any of the Applicants <br />representative, testifier or the Director? If not, Commissioners, what do you want to do? <br />You have something to say, Pam? <br />HARLOW:Yes, thank you, Chairman Fujikawa. Wed like to respond to <br />Mr. Clausnitzers allegations, if thats possible? <br />FUJIKAWA:You may go ahead. <br />PACK:Well, I think that I would leave most of the response to Pam but I <br />would just like to say that I am livid. I am totally furious. His quote, intent to defraud, <br />his attorney made a similar allegation in the letter. He did not buy the property from us, <br />so there was no obligation from us to disclose anything to Mr. Clausnitzer. However, we <br />got a copy of the disclosure which he signed which said that we may well be applying for <br />14 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.