My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-12-02 TWOOD
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-12-02 TWOOD
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 4:02:10 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 4:01:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DARROW:Im not exactly sure where that is. If there is enough room on the <br />outside of that chain link to be able to place the landscaping, if we could, if we could <br />defer that question to the applicant. <br />SIRACUSA:Ill wait for Mr. Wood with the idea that if theres no room for <br />landscaping on the outside I would want to suggest to him that he could paint that chain <br />link fence either matt black or matt dark green so it wouldnt be so intrusive visually. <br />I had a, possibly a correction to the revised recommendation; and that is on page 3, the <br />second paragraph. It begins with However. The very last part says The Planning <br />Commission supports an approval of the special permit with a limited life. And since <br />we havent voted on this yet I believe that that should either be Department or Director. <br />DARROW:Correct;andwellmakethat-. <br />SIRACUSA:Andcantherecordreflectthatwemaketheappropriatecorrection <br />there? <br />ALAMEDA:So noted. <br />SIRACUSA:So no one should think that this is a done deal already. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you, Commissioner Siracusa. Questions? Commissioner <br />Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:I have just one question for staff. And that will be, you know, with <br />the limited life and this proposed storage facility, would that mean that in the event the <br />five years expired or, lets say, some light industrial area became available, does that <br />mean the building has to be removed, the warehouse? <br />DARROW:It would be, depending on the use of the structure, I mean, it could <br />actually be used as an agricultural facility. But within that five-year period, usually the <br />conditions allow for an administrative time extension to be similar to the same period of <br />time originally granted. That is true for all conditions except for Condition No. 2. They <br />would have to come back to the Commission within the five years. At that time, if the <br />use is going to continue, theyre going to need another approval from the Planning <br />rd <br />Commission. And one of the stipulations of that approval is that this particular 33 <br />Avenue not only from, from Makuu Drive all the way to the last permitted special permit <br />rd <br />in this areaon 33 will have to be paved for them to be able to get a consideration for a <br />timeextension.Thatjustbythisbeingpavedisntinitselfautomaticapproval.Its <br />just -. They will not even be able to consider the time extension request without this <br />particularroadbeingimproved. <br />Butasfarastheuseofthestructure,iftheywereplanningoncontinuingitasabaseyard <br />then it would probably most likely need to be removed. <br />3EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.