2005-12-02 TVURICH - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ALAMEDA:Every applicant right now theres going to be time crunch. So we have a time problem for every application before us. So Im trying to, my role is to make sure that we proceed in a judicially and expeditious manner. So -. EGER:Im willing to be perfectly cooperative with that goal. Ive been a commissioners or board member here. But I brought a picture since youve taken one from him. This shows that corner where you cant see around. It shows the, from Kaloli -. ALAMEDA:Mr. Eger -. EGER:Since weve got one coming in, heres another one. ALAMEDA:Let me backtrack a little bit. I dont want to go too ahead of ourselves. In regardtotherequestthatyoubroughtforwardaboutMs.Leithead-Todd,Iwantedtoask,again, Mr. Torigoe, how should we proceed with that? TORIGOE:Well, I think you need to deal with it in some fashion. I think you can probably do it, you can attempt to do it fairly quickly at this point since Mr. Eger is going through his exceptions and this comes up as one of the exceptions. Mr. Eger could take a break from his oral argument and allow the parties to state their positions regarding the request for recusal or disqualifications; and then, Mr. Chairman, you make a decision on that. Okay. EGER:I would happily agree to that. ALAMEDA:Mr. Eger, can we look at that issue at this time? EGER:Yes. ALAMEDA:Could I ask the parties your thoughts on that? Could I ask the applicant first and then the Department? MR. VURICH:Stating the, Im sorry, stating the use -. ALAMEDA:The recusal of Ms. Leithead-Todd. MR. VURICH:Oh, I dont think thats fair. I think she was very, she stated as best as I can tell the situation and I dont think thats fair for -. ALAMEDA:Thank you. The Department or -? EGER:Mr. Chairman, I misspoke, its in 5 and 7, but the request for recusal is in 7. ALAMEDA:Okay, so noted. TORIGOE:Actually Mr. Eger should be given a chance to state the reasons why -. 17EXHIBIT B