My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-12-02 TVURICH
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-12-02 TVURICH
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 4:03:26 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 4:03:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WATANABE:Yeah -. <br />SALAVEA:Of the -? Im sorry. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:Yeah. Im sorry, Allen. <br />SALAVEA:No -. <br />WATANABE:This would be the appropriate time to ask the parties questions, am I not <br />right? <br />ALAMEDA:Sure. <br />WATANABE:MyquestionwouldbetowardstheCounty,theDirector,the <br />recommendations refer to Rule No. 17 with regard to landscaping. Its my understanding that <br />its a little more comprehensive landscaping requirement than was previously set in the original <br />approval for the existing storage shelter. You know, as a follow up to that, I believe on page 24, <br />Item No. 6, I believe that the recommendation also requires that landscaping be completed on <br />both parcels, 120 and 91. I take it thats the existing plus the proposed and that certificate of <br />occupancy will not be provided unless this landscaping is complete. Am I correct in that? <br />ALAMEDA:Mr. Yuen? <br />YUEN:Yes, thats correct. Thats all correct. And the landscaping condition <br />along Kaloli Drive, it says what would be required to separate an RS, a single family, from a <br />limited industrial zone under Rule 17; and we have a copy of Rule 17 here. But thats actually, <br />within Rule 17, thats the most stringent landscaping. <br />WATANABE: Thank you. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Salavea. <br />SALAVEA:Follow up to that, Director Yuen, is, I guess Im asking your opinion just <br />for my own reference -. In the picture provided by Mr. Vurich, which is the current landscaping <br />of the commercial business now underway, does that meet Rule 17? <br />YUEN:The Rule 17 allows the use of existing woodlands as a buffer for <br />landscaping; and I believe along Kaloli its either in compliance or theres a small area thats not <br />in compliance where the building is visible. I cant vouch for the other phases of the building. I <br />know that I did look at this, I know I looked at the Kaloli frontage at one time and it was, most of <br />the screening is done by the existing ohia trees that are there and to the extent -. Along Kaloli it <br />would either comply, at the time that I looked at it, would either comply or be very close to <br />complying along Kaloli. I cant speak to the other faces of the building. <br />22EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.