My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-12-02 TVURICH
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-12-02 TVURICH
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 4:03:26 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 4:03:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WATANABE:Mr. Chairman? <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:I have a procedural question. Does it have to be an oral argument or could <br />it be just like part of public testimony? I take it that if youre going through oral argument then <br />were going round robin, each party will have an opportunity to rebut. And Im wondering if, <br />you know, the same thing could be accomplished in public testimony. <br />TORIGOE:Well, I think since there has been a formal request for an oral argument, <br />you ought to, you know, follow that procedure. But you can also ask other questions. And, in <br />fact, as part of the argument you get to ask questions. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay.Sowelldothat.Wellstartwiththeapplicant.Youcangoahead <br />and make your oral argument, and then we can ask questions at that time. And then we can <br />move on to the intervenor and see if there are any questions. They can make oral argument as <br />well. And then we can move on to the Department, kind of in that order. <br />EGER:Mr. Chairman, the intervenor, Im the intervenor. Im the intervenor. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Forgive me. I need to turn to my Corp. Counsel here for the <br />procedures on this. <br />TORIGOE:Generally speaking, under the rules, the applicant shall open and close <br />when theres a proceeding. Other parties shall be heard in such order as the presiding officer <br />directs. So normally its, you know, the procedure under the rules is to allow the applicant to <br />kind of set forth their argument or set the stage for that, and then the intervenor can come and <br />rebut that and present your argument as well. And then the Planning Director makes his position <br />known. And then again under the rules normally the Applicant closes. But there is discretion by <br />the presiding officer to amend that, and also the parties can agree by stipulation to change any of <br />these procedures. <br />ALAMEDA:So let me ask the applicant first then if you want to go ahead and <br />summarize your application, and then well go to the intervenor. <br />EGER:Okay, Ill be very -. Ive got a point of order. <br />ALAMEDA:Go ahead. Microphone, use the microphone, please. <br />TORIGOE:Mr. Eger, will you please the microphone, thank you. . <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you. <br />EGER:Im sorry, I thought this was picking up. I can hear it was not. My only <br />point of order was that I understood that Mr. Hayashi was going to give us a summary first; and I <br />dont know where Mr. Torigoe gets his authority for continued appearance by the applicant <br />because there was no request for the oral argument today; and thats what your agenda item <br />4EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.