Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Horiuchi lived in that house my whole life. And, you know, he came to my family and said, <br />I know how you feel about this, but we want money. You want to buy us out?‚ And we said <br />No.‚ We couldn€t afford it. The whole neighborhood couldn€t afford to buy it together. We <br />tried. Okay, so when it comes to a situation, I mean, when you go and you buy a property and <br />they do a title search, they tell you, single family residential. You take your chances when you <br />buy something and then you want to go and try and change the zoning after the fact. It€s not like <br />they didn€t know. <br />And as far as the houses inhabited, there was a party there three weeks ago, the house in the <br />back, for whatever it€s worth. <br />So I don€t know -. Do you understand what I€m trying to say? <br />SALAVEA:Yes, yes, yeah. <br />BLACK:Okay. <br />SALAVEA:Thank you. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Salavea? <br />SALAVEA:No. I yield. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Commissioner Springer, you had your hand up. Go ahead. <br />SPRINGER:Yeah. I€m wondering if the Planning Director might respond to some of <br />the concerns that the testifier had brought up. When we previously heard this application, there <br />was no public testimony. But the testifier today has brought up the issues of viewplanes, noise, <br />nuisance, traffic burden at the intersection, loading of the intersection; and the question raised <br />about the community development planning schedule. How should we take into consideration, <br />or do you have any suggestions for us when the value of community plans is recognized, it has <br />been espoused by the administration but might not be happening in a timely fashion for citizens <br />such as the testifier today? <br />YUEN:Well, there€s a -. You went through a list of things. The first project <br />that€s being complained about was the office building which had been zoned in either the late <br />eighties or early the nineties, it was never developed and came to the Planning Commission, and <br />ultimately to the Council for a time extension of existing zoning. We did recommend the time <br />extension. It wasn€t a question of a new zoning. And the difficulty with the protecting the <br />viewplane of an individual from their, say they have a back window of their house, over a piece <br />of what had been a vacant property. I€m not sure what the zoning of that had -. It was probably <br />a residential zone before it became a commercial zone. And we€re talking about the other office <br />building. <br />BLACK:It was RS-10. <br />10EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />